wheelbuilding question
#1
car dodger
Thread Starter
wheelbuilding question
I'm building up a set of wheels w/ 70s campy high flange track hubs - the rear hub has threading on one side only, so will I need to dish? Or no dish like a flip flop hub?
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#2
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,326 Times
in
837 Posts
I believe you should build it undished, but this is very easy for you to determine this empirically. As you lace up the spokes, eyeball the rim to be centered relative to the two ends of the axle. For initial alignment, I sight down through the rim's valve hole to see if the hub's snap-on oil hole cover (if present) lies directly in front of the far side of the rim. Set the complete, untensioned wheel in the frame backwards and forwards, and fine-tune the spoke lengths so that the rim sits centered on the frame in both orientations. Now bring the spokes up to proper tension, and you are good to go.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#3
car dodger
Thread Starter
Thanks! The hubs have no oil port hole but I will work something out -
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,768
Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Flip the wheel in the stand as you true and center the rim between the lock nuts. I believe a track wheel does have some dish.
#5
car dodger
Thread Starter
I'm not sure of my front chainline measurement yet, but it's an old track frame. Don't know if the BB I have for it is sized for track or gears.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#6
Decrepit Member
Chainline diagram from Campagnolo catalog 16:
#7
car dodger
Thread Starter
What does the "B" dimension "sprocket width" define? On the diagram, it looks like it's from the inside of the dropout to the outside of the hub barrel? Sheldon says to measure from dropout to center of cog -
"Measure the distance from the inside of the rear fork end (or the outside of the axle locknut) to the middle of the sprocket".
"Measure the distance from the inside of the rear fork end (or the outside of the axle locknut) to the middle of the sprocket".
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#9
Decrepit Member
That's what it looks like to me, too. It could be that Saint Sheldon's definition is just different from Campagnolo's.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 91
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just ordered parts to build a wheel with old Campy high flange record track hubs, the same as yours most likely. It does need a dish on the rear hub. It's not much though.
For me, I am doing a 4cross on a 36 hole hub with DT Swiss RR1.1 rims. I needed 295mm spokes for one side and 297 mm spokes for the other.
Hope this helps
For me, I am doing a 4cross on a 36 hole hub with DT Swiss RR1.1 rims. I needed 295mm spokes for one side and 297 mm spokes for the other.
Hope this helps
#11
car dodger
Thread Starter
Thanks, I was going to do 3 cross w/ the same DT Swiss rims. My spoke lengths figured to be 284 and 286 I think.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#13
Decrepit Member
The ERD can vary quite a bit between rims even if they're both 700C rims.
#14
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,584
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times
in
788 Posts
and just to sidetrack the thread a little: I've always had to subtract at least 1mm (sometimes more) from the numbers the spoke calculators provide. I usually try 2 or 3 calculators to see how they compare with the same dimensions input and then take the shortest spoke numbers but buy even shorter; they all seem to ere on the plus side in my experience (YRMV).
#15
Decrepit Member
and just to sidetrack the thread a little: I've always had to subtract at least 1mm (sometimes more) from the numbers the spoke calculators provide. I usually try 2 or 3 calculators to see how they compare with the same dimensions input and then take the shortest spoke numbers but buy even shorter; they all seem to ere on the plus side in my experience (YRMV).
#16
Disraeli Gears
Spocalc and Sutherland's agree that Record track high-flange hubs should be dished 44 mm from wheel center to left flange, 31 mm from wheel center to right flange. Sutherland's says that left locknut to left flange is 16 mm, right locknut to right flange is 29 mm, for 120 mm dropout spacing.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 1,383
Bikes: Cinelli Supercoursa 69, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Mondonico Diamond Extra 05, Coors Light Greg Lemond (built by Scapin) 88, Scapin MTB, Stumpjumper 83, Specialized Stumpjumper M4, Lemond Poprad 2001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
see if you can borrow a dishing tool and check the wheel just as you would a standard wheel. I have my 1963 track bike with several sets of wheels and all rear wheels ARE dished to center the wheel in the frame. You will need to verify your chain line to make sure the BB/axel and cranks are matched to the bike. Chain line is critical on a track bike as there is nothing to take up chain slack like the DR on a regular bike. If your chain line is wrong on a track bike you will wear out chains, cogs, and chain rings rapidly.
#18
car dodger
Thread Starter
apparently the search feature here doesn't work for topic titles...
anyway, I started building the wheels last night, so far so good.
However, I noticed the rear axle of the campy track hub is slightly longer on the drive side.
When placed in the rear dropouts of my track frame, the drive side axle nut engages fully when tightened, but the non-drive side axle nut has some threads exposed when tight. Why would the axle be offset like that?
anyway, I started building the wheels last night, so far so good.
However, I noticed the rear axle of the campy track hub is slightly longer on the drive side.
When placed in the rear dropouts of my track frame, the drive side axle nut engages fully when tightened, but the non-drive side axle nut has some threads exposed when tight. Why would the axle be offset like that?
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,768
Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
apparently the search feature here doesn't work for topic titles...
anyway, I started building the wheels last night, so far so good.
However, I noticed the rear axle of the campy track hub is slightly longer on the drive side.
When placed in the rear dropouts of my track frame, the drive side axle nut engages fully when tightened, but the non-drive side axle nut has some threads exposed when tight. Why would the axle be offset like that?
anyway, I started building the wheels last night, so far so good.
However, I noticed the rear axle of the campy track hub is slightly longer on the drive side.
When placed in the rear dropouts of my track frame, the drive side axle nut engages fully when tightened, but the non-drive side axle nut has some threads exposed when tight. Why would the axle be offset like that?
Adjust the cones so the extra axle is equal on both sides. Operator error...
#20
car dodger
Thread Starter
I thought there would be a way to equalize it but I wasn't sure. The front hub axle is fine, just checked.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#21
Who cares, just ride it!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 989
Bikes: 1992ish Davidson Impulse, 1981 Apollo Gran Sport SS, 2006 Salsa Las Cruces, 2010 Soma Double Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
and just to sidetrack the thread a little: I've always had to subtract at least 1mm (sometimes more) from the numbers the spoke calculators provide. I usually try 2 or 3 calculators to see how they compare with the same dimensions input and then take the shortest spoke numbers but buy even shorter; they all seem to ere on the plus side in my experience (YRMV).