Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

wheelbuilding question

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

wheelbuilding question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-08, 07:00 AM
  #1  
car dodger
Thread Starter
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 61 Posts
wheelbuilding question

I'm building up a set of wheels w/ 70s campy high flange track hubs - the rear hub has threading on one side only, so will I need to dish? Or no dish like a flip flop hub?
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
norskagent is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 08:07 AM
  #2  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,326 Times in 837 Posts
I believe you should build it undished, but this is very easy for you to determine this empirically. As you lace up the spokes, eyeball the rim to be centered relative to the two ends of the axle. For initial alignment, I sight down through the rim's valve hole to see if the hub's snap-on oil hole cover (if present) lies directly in front of the far side of the rim. Set the complete, untensioned wheel in the frame backwards and forwards, and fine-tune the spoke lengths so that the rim sits centered on the frame in both orientations. Now bring the spokes up to proper tension, and you are good to go.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 08:15 AM
  #3  
car dodger
Thread Starter
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 61 Posts
Thanks! The hubs have no oil port hole but I will work something out -
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
norskagent is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 08:57 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,768

Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Flip the wheel in the stand as you true and center the rim between the lock nuts. I believe a track wheel does have some dish.
dbakl is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 09:13 AM
  #5  
car dodger
Thread Starter
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 61 Posts
I'm not sure of my front chainline measurement yet, but it's an old track frame. Don't know if the BB I have for it is sized for track or gears.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
norskagent is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 10:12 AM
  #6  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
Originally Posted by norskagent
I'm not sure of my front chainline measurement yet, but it's an old track frame. Don't know if the BB I have for it is sized for track or gears.
As dbakl notes, there will be dish.

Chainline diagram from Campagnolo catalog 16:

__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 12:42 PM
  #7  
car dodger
Thread Starter
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 61 Posts
What does the "B" dimension "sprocket width" define? On the diagram, it looks like it's from the inside of the dropout to the outside of the hub barrel? Sheldon says to measure from dropout to center of cog -

"Measure the distance from the inside of the rear fork end (or the outside of the axle locknut) to the middle of the sprocket".
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
norskagent is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 01:02 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,768

Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Looks like cog seat of hub to outside cone locknut to me.
dbakl is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 01:28 PM
  #9  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
Originally Posted by dbakl
Looks like cog seat of hub to outside cone locknut to me.
That's what it looks like to me, too. It could be that Saint Sheldon's definition is just different from Campagnolo's.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 03:26 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 91
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just ordered parts to build a wheel with old Campy high flange record track hubs, the same as yours most likely. It does need a dish on the rear hub. It's not much though.
For me, I am doing a 4cross on a 36 hole hub with DT Swiss RR1.1 rims. I needed 295mm spokes for one side and 297 mm spokes for the other.
Hope this helps
pax139 is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 03:48 PM
  #11  
car dodger
Thread Starter
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 61 Posts
Thanks, I was going to do 3 cross w/ the same DT Swiss rims. My spoke lengths figured to be 284 and 286 I think.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
norskagent is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 06:23 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,768

Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by norskagent
Thanks, I was going to do 3 cross w/ the same DT Swiss rims. My spoke lengths figured to be 284 and 286 I think.
Hmmm, I've always used 293 front and rear, for Camp high-flange 3x to 700c or sewup...

Maybe the tighter dish is requiring shorter spokes.
dbakl is offline  
Old 07-31-08, 07:05 PM
  #13  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
Originally Posted by dbakl
Hmmm, I've always used 293 front and rear, for Camp high-flange 3x to 700c or sewup...

Maybe the tighter dish is requiring shorter spokes.
The ERD can vary quite a bit between rims even if they're both 700C rims.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 08-01-08, 09:03 AM
  #14  
Stop reading my posts!
 
unworthy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,584
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times in 788 Posts
and just to sidetrack the thread a little: I've always had to subtract at least 1mm (sometimes more) from the numbers the spoke calculators provide. I usually try 2 or 3 calculators to see how they compare with the same dimensions input and then take the shortest spoke numbers but buy even shorter; they all seem to ere on the plus side in my experience (YRMV).
unworthy1 is offline  
Old 08-01-08, 09:15 AM
  #15  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
Originally Posted by unworthy1
and just to sidetrack the thread a little: I've always had to subtract at least 1mm (sometimes more) from the numbers the spoke calculators provide. I usually try 2 or 3 calculators to see how they compare with the same dimensions input and then take the shortest spoke numbers but buy even shorter; they all seem to ere on the plus side in my experience (YRMV).
I do that too. If a spoke is half a millimeter too long, you'll bottom out the nipple on the threads before achieving the desired tension. I always round down.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 08-03-08, 08:39 PM
  #16  
Disraeli Gears
 
Charles Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,093
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 369 Times in 214 Posts
Spocalc and Sutherland's agree that Record track high-flange hubs should be dished 44 mm from wheel center to left flange, 31 mm from wheel center to right flange. Sutherland's says that left locknut to left flange is 16 mm, right locknut to right flange is 29 mm, for 120 mm dropout spacing.
Charles Wahl is offline  
Old 08-03-08, 10:46 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Deanster04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 1,383

Bikes: Cinelli Supercoursa 69, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Mondonico Diamond Extra 05, Coors Light Greg Lemond (built by Scapin) 88, Scapin MTB, Stumpjumper 83, Specialized Stumpjumper M4, Lemond Poprad 2001

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
see if you can borrow a dishing tool and check the wheel just as you would a standard wheel. I have my 1963 track bike with several sets of wheels and all rear wheels ARE dished to center the wheel in the frame. You will need to verify your chain line to make sure the BB/axel and cranks are matched to the bike. Chain line is critical on a track bike as there is nothing to take up chain slack like the DR on a regular bike. If your chain line is wrong on a track bike you will wear out chains, cogs, and chain rings rapidly.
Deanster04 is offline  
Old 08-06-08, 06:58 AM
  #18  
car dodger
Thread Starter
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 61 Posts
apparently the search feature here doesn't work for topic titles...
anyway, I started building the wheels last night, so far so good.
However, I noticed the rear axle of the campy track hub is slightly longer on the drive side.
When placed in the rear dropouts of my track frame, the drive side axle nut engages fully when tightened, but the non-drive side axle nut has some threads exposed when tight. Why would the axle be offset like that?
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
norskagent is offline  
Old 08-06-08, 08:07 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,768

Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by norskagent
apparently the search feature here doesn't work for topic titles...
anyway, I started building the wheels last night, so far so good.
However, I noticed the rear axle of the campy track hub is slightly longer on the drive side.
When placed in the rear dropouts of my track frame, the drive side axle nut engages fully when tightened, but the non-drive side axle nut has some threads exposed when tight. Why would the axle be offset like that?

Adjust the cones so the extra axle is equal on both sides. Operator error...
dbakl is offline  
Old 08-06-08, 08:10 AM
  #20  
car dodger
Thread Starter
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 61 Posts
I thought there would be a way to equalize it but I wasn't sure. The front hub axle is fine, just checked.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
norskagent is offline  
Old 08-06-08, 10:31 AM
  #21  
Who cares, just ride it!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 989

Bikes: 1992ish Davidson Impulse, 1981 Apollo Gran Sport SS, 2006 Salsa Las Cruces, 2010 Soma Double Cross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by unworthy1
and just to sidetrack the thread a little: I've always had to subtract at least 1mm (sometimes more) from the numbers the spoke calculators provide. I usually try 2 or 3 calculators to see how they compare with the same dimensions input and then take the shortest spoke numbers but buy even shorter; they all seem to ere on the plus side in my experience (YRMV).
+1 on that! I've tried the DT Swiss calc. and a few others and they always seem to give imprecise lengths, typically at least 1 or 2mm too long. I use online calculators to get in the ball park, and then trial and error for the correct length.
Antipodes is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.