Superbe
#2
What do you mean by cage length, the distance between the axles of the jockey wheels? I have a mid-production Superbe RD (the one with the full skirt on outside of upper jockey wheel), and I could measure for you.
#3
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Central, IL
Bikes: late 80's Trek 400; POS MTB
Actually, I got cage length and capacity mixed up. I need to know how much slack it can take up. I've heard 26 teeth, but I'm not sure about that because it was for the Superbe Pro and just one site.
#6
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Central, IL
Bikes: late 80's Trek 400; POS MTB
Not really sure on the year.
Thanks Charles for the info.
I currently have a 52/39 or 52/40, don't remember right now, and a 13-22 freewheel. Do you guys think I can still use this derailleur until I get a 52/42 crank and not swap freewheels, or will it just not work right?
Thanks Charles for the info.
I currently have a 52/39 or 52/40, don't remember right now, and a 13-22 freewheel. Do you guys think I can still use this derailleur until I get a 52/42 crank and not swap freewheels, or will it just not work right?
#8
Actually, Mike, the last number is the actual number of teeth on the largest cog. That depends on the deralier mount offset from the axle centerline, too. It's the middle number that's combined difference between largest and smallest, front and rear.
#9
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Central, IL
Bikes: late 80's Trek 400; POS MTB
If math was all I had to do, I won't have posted again. This is why:
I know that I'm getting the plain Superbe. I just don't know which one. Until I get a new chainring neither will technically work because of chainring difference and/or max total difference. I ask whether it can work for now because I've heard of people being able to adjust wheel position in the drop outs, derailleur orientation, etc. to get derailleurs to work out of their specs.
I know that I'm getting the plain Superbe. I just don't know which one. Until I get a new chainring neither will technically work because of chainring difference and/or max total difference. I ask whether it can work for now because I've heard of people being able to adjust wheel position in the drop outs, derailleur orientation, etc. to get derailleurs to work out of their specs.
#10
juneeaa memba!


Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,631
Likes: 5
From: boogled up in...Idaho!
Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...
sure. I have a nuovo record that runs a 28t largest rear cog, and so do a lot of people here. Ratings are conservative, first off, and the first actual problem that usually occurs is that the top derailleur pulley rattles against the largest rear cog. That clearance can be adjusted by repositioning the rear wheel, and in the case of the superbe rear, varying the b screw adjustment.
just gotta try it. um, bench testing, I believe. I am not sure that 26t will work with your setup, but I am certain that 32t will not.
just gotta try it. um, bench testing, I believe. I am not sure that 26t will work with your setup, but I am certain that 32t will not.
#11
If I own it, I ride it


Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,685
Likes: 820
From: Cardinal Country
Bikes: Lejeune(14), Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré(4), Springfield, Greg Lemond, Andre Bertin, Schwinn Paramount
sure. I have a nuovo record that runs a 28t largest rear cog, and so do a lot of people here. Ratings are conservative, first off, and the first actual problem that usually occurs is that the top derailleur pulley rattles against the largest rear cog. That clearance can be adjusted by repositioning the rear wheel, and in the case of the superbe rear, varying the b screw adjustment.
just gotta try it. um, bench testing, I believe. I am not sure that 26t will work with your setup, but I am certain that 32t will not.
just gotta try it. um, bench testing, I believe. I am not sure that 26t will work with your setup, but I am certain that 32t will not.
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 2
He stated he plans to use a 22T rear which is less than the max capacity of all those listed.
He plans to use a 23T minimum which is greater than the minimum for those listed.
He plans to have 22T difference which is less than or "close enough" to the capacities listed.
I believe it will likely work, as riding in the small-small (f-r) combination is rare. Most riding will be done in the middle and upper cogs. What's really important is the ability to get up onto that largest cog, which they will all do.
Last edited by Mike Mills; 12-14-08 at 12:30 PM.
#13
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Central, IL
Bikes: late 80's Trek 400; POS MTB
Thanks everyone. Now I just have to wait for the parts.
I did the same thing with the cage length vs. capacity at the top.
LOL! Classic blunder. It serves me right.







