Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Superbe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-08 | 09:43 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Central, IL

Bikes: late 80's Trek 400; POS MTB

Superbe

I've been searching and can't find the cage lenght of the SunTour Superbe rear derailleur. Does anyone know? Thanks
Engineer101 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-08 | 09:57 PM
  #2  
Charles Wahl's Avatar
Disraeli Gears
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,349
Likes: 614
From: NYC
What do you mean by cage length, the distance between the axles of the jockey wheels? I have a mid-production Superbe RD (the one with the full skirt on outside of upper jockey wheel), and I could measure for you.
Charles Wahl is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-08 | 10:15 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Central, IL

Bikes: late 80's Trek 400; POS MTB

Actually, I got cage length and capacity mixed up. I need to know how much slack it can take up. I've heard 26 teeth, but I'm not sure about that because it was for the Superbe Pro and just one site.
Engineer101 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-08 | 10:35 PM
  #4  
juneeaa memba!
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Donating
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,631
Likes: 5
From: boogled up in...Idaho!

Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...

the oldest style was 26 teeth. I dunno about the newer versions, though. What vintage are you referring to?
luker is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-08 | 11:23 PM
  #5  
Charles Wahl's Avatar
Disraeli Gears
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,349
Likes: 614
From: NYC
According to Sutherland's:


The tooth counts are max. difference between chainrings/mas. difference ft + rr/max. sprocket teeth
Charles Wahl is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-08 | 11:38 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Central, IL

Bikes: late 80's Trek 400; POS MTB

Not really sure on the year.

Thanks Charles for the info.
I currently have a 52/39 or 52/40, don't remember right now, and a 13-22 freewheel. Do you guys think I can still use this derailleur until I get a 52/42 crank and not swap freewheels, or will it just not work right?
Engineer101 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-08 | 03:01 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 2
An engineer has to ask this question???

Let's see, 52T - 39T = 13T difference and 22T - 13T = 9T difference. Then we get 13T + 9T = 22T total difference. 22T < 26T, so it should work.
Mike Mills is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-08 | 07:39 AM
  #8  
Charles Wahl's Avatar
Disraeli Gears
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,349
Likes: 614
From: NYC
Actually, Mike, the last number is the actual number of teeth on the largest cog. That depends on the deralier mount offset from the axle centerline, too. It's the middle number that's combined difference between largest and smallest, front and rear.
Charles Wahl is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-08 | 10:19 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Central, IL

Bikes: late 80's Trek 400; POS MTB

If math was all I had to do, I won't have posted again. This is why:
I know that I'm getting the plain Superbe. I just don't know which one. Until I get a new chainring neither will technically work because of chainring difference and/or max total difference. I ask whether it can work for now because I've heard of people being able to adjust wheel position in the drop outs, derailleur orientation, etc. to get derailleurs to work out of their specs.
Engineer101 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-08 | 11:35 AM
  #10  
juneeaa memba!
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Donating
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,631
Likes: 5
From: boogled up in...Idaho!

Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...

sure. I have a nuovo record that runs a 28t largest rear cog, and so do a lot of people here. Ratings are conservative, first off, and the first actual problem that usually occurs is that the top derailleur pulley rattles against the largest rear cog. That clearance can be adjusted by repositioning the rear wheel, and in the case of the superbe rear, varying the b screw adjustment.

just gotta try it. um, bench testing, I believe. I am not sure that 26t will work with your setup, but I am certain that 32t will not.
luker is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-08 | 12:10 PM
  #11  
CV-6's Avatar
If I own it, I ride it
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,685
Likes: 820
From: Cardinal Country

Bikes: Lejeune(14), Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré(4), Springfield, Greg Lemond, Andre Bertin, Schwinn Paramount

Originally Posted by luker
sure. I have a nuovo record that runs a 28t largest rear cog, and so do a lot of people here. Ratings are conservative, first off, and the first actual problem that usually occurs is that the top derailleur pulley rattles against the largest rear cog. That clearance can be adjusted by repositioning the rear wheel, and in the case of the superbe rear, varying the b screw adjustment.

just gotta try it. um, bench testing, I believe. I am not sure that 26t will work with your setup, but I am certain that 32t will not.
In that vein, I have a Superbe that is running on a 26T cog with no problems. The cluster itself is a 13-26 ultra 7. This is on a bike with Campag vertical dropouts.
__________________
Please do not "like" my posts. This isn't Facebook.

Lynn Travers

Photos

CV-6 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-08 | 12:25 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Charles Wahl
Actually, Mike, the last number is the actual number of teeth on the largest cog. That depends on the deralier mount offset from the axle centerline, too. It's the middle number that's combined difference between largest and smallest, front and rear.
LOL! Classic blunder. It serves me right.



He stated he plans to use a 22T rear which is less than the max capacity of all those listed.

He plans to use a 23T minimum which is greater than the minimum for those listed.

He plans to have 22T difference which is less than or "close enough" to the capacities listed.

I believe it will likely work, as riding in the small-small (f-r) combination is rare. Most riding will be done in the middle and upper cogs. What's really important is the ability to get up onto that largest cog, which they will all do.

Last edited by Mike Mills; 12-14-08 at 12:30 PM.
Mike Mills is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-08 | 01:12 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Central, IL

Bikes: late 80's Trek 400; POS MTB

Thanks everyone. Now I just have to wait for the parts.

LOL! Classic blunder. It serves me right.
I did the same thing with the cage length vs. capacity at the top.
Engineer101 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.