![]() |
Originally Posted by mkeller234
(Post 13707891)
Here is a picture of the Brooks B17 Champion Special I had. I would be lying if I didn't admit the uneven sides bothered me a little bit. I would have used it, but I traded it for a Black B17 imperial... which is completely perfect looking.
Originally Posted by mkeller234
(Post 13707891)
The truth lies somewhere between the two arguments. Some of us are asking for too much, some of us aren't admitting that a brooks aesthetics are as important to us as their comfort. If Brooks weren't a beauty product, we wouldn't be posting pictures of them or even having this discussion.
|
Originally Posted by auchencrow
(Post 13708290)
Those who like a little "character" in their leather saddles are probably the same ones who can appreciate some "patina" in their paint, while others will have none of it: Tastes vary widely, simply because people are so different - which goes to show that we're like cows.
Patina is ultra-subjective but basically the result of use whereas the saddles we're talking about are brand new and the result of decisions taken in the factory as to what is an acceptable product to put onto the market. I think time will tell but I suspect that Brooks' present policy regarding what is acceptable (I don't think anyone is claiming that Brooks saddles have always had these imperfections) will change as the effects on their sales becomes felt. It basically depends on whether the 'I ride it, not look at it.' folks or the 'I ride it AND care what it looks like.' folks are more numerous. |
All those who look at the condition of their saddles whilst riding please step forward. All those who still can.............
|
Originally Posted by olly708
(Post 13713795)
All those who look at the condition of their saddles whilst riding please step forward. All those who still can.............
|
Originally Posted by voronin
(Post 13699617)
Brooks said it was okay, I do not agree!
What me do? |
Looks good to me. Doesn't look like anything that will affect it in the future. It's leather, so it's pretty tough. 11 billion cows can't be wrong. My Selle Anatamica didn't have any problems!
|
Originally Posted by mkeller234
(Post 13713807)
Sorry, but that argument does not cut it. No matter how much we deny it, looks count for something.
|
Originally Posted by olly708
(Post 13725745)
Guess so, you may have a point there. Cher's plastic surgeon would most definitely agree with you.
Yes, the B17 is the most basic, lowest rung of all Brooks saddles. However, isn't it fair to say that any Brooks product is not low-end? Therefore, I still have my own expectations of what one should look like. |
Originally Posted by 753proguy
(Post 13720534)
Next time, don't buy the bottom-of-the-line saddle perhaps? The basic B-17 is, well..., very basic.
|
I use Swifts and Swallows on some of my bicycles.
It's all about fit, comfort, and performance for me. The Swallow is black and looks fine, with no swirling or patterns. I also have three Swifts and each has some distinctive "patterns" in the leather. I can see them, but no one else has ever commented. I think of them as character lines, and couldn't care less. I recently received a Swift Select for a project and this one is even more distinctive. Again, not a deal breaker, but merely "flavor." This is a honey Swift, the day I was dialing in my Hollands. It was about a week old. http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2501/5...3e283e35_o.jpg |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.