Does my top tube have the bends?
#1
Makeshift
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 618
Bikes: 2002 Bianchi Vigorelli, 2002 S-works CX, 1973 Raleigh Super Course conversion, 1979 Raleigh Competition, 1973 Raleigh Professional Track, 1980 Austro Daimler Inter-10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Does my top tube have the bends?
I was just prepping my Raleigh Competition conversion to sell and noticed something I'd never really inspected closely before: touch up paint/primer under the top tube at the head lug joint.
This got me thinking bad things, mostly about the previous owner of the frame who neglected to mention anything when I bought it a few years ago, but also about the potential for front end damage.
Honestly, I can't tell. Some of the signs are there--paint damage mostly--but every once in a while when looking obsessively at the frame I think I see a bend or kink. Then, in a fit of positive thinking it goes away.
I just need some objective eyes on this thing.
Whaddaya think?:
This got me thinking bad things, mostly about the previous owner of the frame who neglected to mention anything when I bought it a few years ago, but also about the potential for front end damage.
Honestly, I can't tell. Some of the signs are there--paint damage mostly--but every once in a while when looking obsessively at the frame I think I see a bend or kink. Then, in a fit of positive thinking it goes away.
I just need some objective eyes on this thing.
Whaddaya think?:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 5,045
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Photos tend to create bends where they don't exist - I have a feeling that's one reason I got my Trek 170 on ebay so inexpensively. But I think the paint damage is a bad sign.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
10 Posts
Relax your not selling a carbon fiber bicycle. It's likely structurally sound. If it doesn't ride with poor handling I wouldn't worry about it. It might have been crashed, it might have been poorly prepared at the factory. Some faults in tubing are likely to occur at some point.
Its not likely that anything will give without notice.
Its not likely that anything will give without notice.
#4
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,258
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
Looks bent to me. Set a straight edge on it. Looks like there may be a crack in the lug, too.
The fork looks bent in the one picture, but it's a weird angle.
Take it up to Matt and have the shop check it.
The fork looks bent in the one picture, but it's a weird angle.
Take it up to Matt and have the shop check it.
#5
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
I think you are OK on this one - the lower curve of the Prugnat lug is what is fooling your eye. Notice that the perceived bend will vanish if you shade the lower half of the top tube with your hand.
That's the first Prugnat-lugged Competition that I've seen. It looks gorgeous with those lugs - absolutely gorgeous. If you're convinced it's bent, I'm convinced that I'll take it off your hands
-Kurt
That's the first Prugnat-lugged Competition that I've seen. It looks gorgeous with those lugs - absolutely gorgeous. If you're convinced it's bent, I'm convinced that I'll take it off your hands
-Kurt
#6
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
Geez...its kind of tough to tell. I see what ofg's seeing in regards to the lug but its so hard to tell. an old school way of checking for cracks is to wipe the area for alcohol and watch it evaporate. alcohol will seep into a crack and take longer to evaporate.
Can you send a super hi-res image of the lug area without paint to my email? jim2527@hotmail.com
Can you send a super hi-res image of the lug area without paint to my email? jim2527@hotmail.com
#8
Makeshift
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 618
Bikes: 2002 Bianchi Vigorelli, 2002 S-works CX, 1973 Raleigh Super Course conversion, 1979 Raleigh Competition, 1973 Raleigh Professional Track, 1980 Austro Daimler Inter-10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lug's definitely not cracked. Here are a couple more undercarriage shots:
What you're likely seeing is a less-than-perfectly filed ridge in the lug.
It's so hard to know what the origins of the paint damage are because of the damned messy touch-ups.
The fork is straight as far as I can tell:
The fact that it's turning Kurt's eye gives me confidence. But I think I might take it down to Matt anyway.
Edit: thanks for the offer Jim. Let me see if I can get some shots with better lighting.
What you're likely seeing is a less-than-perfectly filed ridge in the lug.
It's so hard to know what the origins of the paint damage are because of the damned messy touch-ups.
The fork is straight as far as I can tell:
The fact that it's turning Kurt's eye gives me confidence. But I think I might take it down to Matt anyway.
Edit: thanks for the offer Jim. Let me see if I can get some shots with better lighting.
#9
Makeshift
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 618
Bikes: 2002 Bianchi Vigorelli, 2002 S-works CX, 1973 Raleigh Super Course conversion, 1979 Raleigh Competition, 1973 Raleigh Professional Track, 1980 Austro Daimler Inter-10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A couple more for Jim:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
25 Posts
My Carlton has a very subtle S curve in the top tube. I don't think it was wrecked. I think they forced it to match the angle of the lugs at the factory. I've read that a frame built under tension is likely to develop cracks, but the frame is 50 years old and it's okay so far.
#11
Building a better Strida
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: toronto, canada
Posts: 1,106
Bikes: bianchi brava 1988. fuji track 2007, 2006 Bianchi Pista, 1987 Miele and a strida knock off
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
why not take a straight-edge and hold it against the top tube as it approaches the headtube.
it should be flush against it, should u take that straight edge/level and hold it against the top tube at say the 3,6,9,12 o clock areas on the tube.
if you see any light passing between the top tube and straight edge, then there could be a bend. just make sure the straight edge is completely aligned to the top tube.
it should be flush against it, should u take that straight edge/level and hold it against the top tube at say the 3,6,9,12 o clock areas on the tube.
if you see any light passing between the top tube and straight edge, then there could be a bend. just make sure the straight edge is completely aligned to the top tube.
#12
Makeshift
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 618
Bikes: 2002 Bianchi Vigorelli, 2002 S-works CX, 1973 Raleigh Super Course conversion, 1979 Raleigh Competition, 1973 Raleigh Professional Track, 1980 Austro Daimler Inter-10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My Carlton has a very subtle S curve in the top tube. I don't think it was wrecked. I think they forced it to match the angle of the lugs at the factory. I've read that a frame built under tension is likely to develop cracks, but the frame is 50 years old and it's okay so far.
I'd love to have been an industrial strength fly on the wall back when the folks at Carlton were assembling these frames.
Seems like a lot of fish got through the QA net.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
14 Posts
I think the missing paint is from cable housing rub.
But why is it on the opposite side of where the cable should be routed?
My guess is someone has it set up with aero levers at some point so had to route it around the opposite side.
But why is it on the opposite side of where the cable should be routed?
My guess is someone has it set up with aero levers at some point so had to route it around the opposite side.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
25 Posts
Based on the overall fit and finish of the Raleigh, I'd say there's a good chance that this is what's going on with my Competition.
I'd love to have been an industrial strength fly on the wall back when the folks at Carlton were assembling these frames.
Seems like a lot of fish got through the QA net.
I'd love to have been an industrial strength fly on the wall back when the folks at Carlton were assembling these frames.
Seems like a lot of fish got through the QA net.
#15
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,598
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 867 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times
in
396 Posts
Hard to tell from photos, but could the "bent" look be caused by the conical shape of the lug?
#16
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
Looks like an optical illusion from here. Very true that if you shield your view of the lug, the perception of curvature vanishes.
#17
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times
in
2,518 Posts
retracted...
#18
Makeshift
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 618
Bikes: 2002 Bianchi Vigorelli, 2002 S-works CX, 1973 Raleigh Super Course conversion, 1979 Raleigh Competition, 1973 Raleigh Professional Track, 1980 Austro Daimler Inter-10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks guys--I'm back to thinking that it's probably fine. If there's any bend at all it's most likely the result of Raleigh's credo of "best practice=oy, wotevah" [bad Cockney accent].
Anyway, here's the bike in all its Brit path racer glory:
(Now I'm back on the fence about letting this one go--I always seem to be on the fence with it...maybe a sign.)
Anyway, here's the bike in all its Brit path racer glory:
(Now I'm back on the fence about letting this one go--I always seem to be on the fence with it...maybe a sign.)
#20
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
#21
Makeshift
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 618
Bikes: 2002 Bianchi Vigorelli, 2002 S-works CX, 1973 Raleigh Super Course conversion, 1979 Raleigh Competition, 1973 Raleigh Professional Track, 1980 Austro Daimler Inter-10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#22
Makeshift
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 618
Bikes: 2002 Bianchi Vigorelli, 2002 S-works CX, 1973 Raleigh Super Course conversion, 1979 Raleigh Competition, 1973 Raleigh Professional Track, 1980 Austro Daimler Inter-10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#24
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times
in
2,518 Posts
I'm not convinced it's not bent, but the lugs definitely contribute to that. If the top tube is bent like that, so is the down tube. I doubt even Raleigh would let a bike go that was visibly bent. My thought is that their processes wouldn't include a step that would require such a thing to happen. For some reason, it seems to be the DT that shows evidence of manufacturing malpractice.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sf
Posts: 539
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The top tube is bent and the down tube is deformed/angled where it enters the lug. Probably from an impact. They don't pre-crash them at the factory. It's odd that that fork doesn't clearly show crash damage.
Does the bike track straight and you can ride it with no hands?
Does the bike track straight and you can ride it with no hands?