Difference between a trek 500 and 520
05-28-09 | 03:29 PM
#1
Thread Starter
back in the saddle
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 634
Likes: 3
From: Central WI
Bikes: Raleigh Olympian, Trek 400, 500, 1500, 6700, Madone 6.9, Sekai 2400, Schwinn Passage, KOM, Super Letour, Nishiki Sport, Vision R45, Bike E, Volae Team
Difference between a trek 500 and 520
I have a 1983 trek 500 that I have been setting up for touring (triple, rack etc). I have looked at the vintage trek site and it appears the geomety is the same for the model 500 and 520. Am I missing something, or are the frames the same? Is there a reason the 520 frame sells for a premium?
05-28-09 | 03:50 PM
#2
The Improbable Bulk
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,379
Likes: 7
From: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Bikes: Many
Looking at 1984... the head tube angle is different, and as I would have suspected, the 520 has a longer chainstay length and wheelbase. This is the norm for a touring bike for heel clearance with panniers and stability when loaded.
The 520 also had some additional braze-ons. Perhaps differing by year, but I believe an additional set of bosses for a water bottle under the down tube, and a low rider mount on the fork. In addition it probably had double eyelets front and rear, and I don't know if your 500 has them.
The 500 is a sport bike, and will not be ideal for touring, but if you have no issue with heel strike, and get everything mounted that you need, then you should be fine. Especially so the more lightly loaded you tour.
The 520 also had some additional braze-ons. Perhaps differing by year, but I believe an additional set of bosses for a water bottle under the down tube, and a low rider mount on the fork. In addition it probably had double eyelets front and rear, and I don't know if your 500 has them.
The 500 is a sport bike, and will not be ideal for touring, but if you have no issue with heel strike, and get everything mounted that you need, then you should be fine. Especially so the more lightly loaded you tour.
05-28-09 | 03:53 PM
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Trek being what they were, models evolved as the years went on. The x20 complete bicycles were usually touring bikes: 520, 620, 720. In different years they shared frames with other 5xx, 6xx, or 7xx bikes. A 500 would usually be a sport bike or sport-tour bike, where the 520 is set up as a touring bike.
Early on Trek had two frame geometries, three materials, and dozens of build kits. As they went on the frames became more specialized.
Models changed a lot from year ot year, even in frame details like rake. Not all 500s would ride like all other 500s, over the years.
Road Fan
Early on Trek had two frame geometries, three materials, and dozens of build kits. As they went on the frames became more specialized.
Models changed a lot from year ot year, even in frame details like rake. Not all 500s would ride like all other 500s, over the years.
Road Fan
05-28-09 | 06:11 PM
#4
weapons-grade bolognium
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,607
Likes: 3,307
From: Across the street from Chicago
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Here's a pic taken in the North Woods of WI:
05-28-09 | 08:45 PM
#6
Thread Starter
back in the saddle
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 634
Likes: 3
From: Central WI
Bikes: Raleigh Olympian, Trek 400, 500, 1500, 6700, Madone 6.9, Sekai 2400, Schwinn Passage, KOM, Super Letour, Nishiki Sport, Vision R45, Bike E, Volae Team
Early on Trek had two frame geometries, three materials, and dozens of build kits. As they went on the frames became more specialized.
Models changed a lot from year to year, even in frame details like rake. Not all 500s would ride like all other 500s, over the years.
Road Fan
05-30-09 | 12:18 PM
#7
Reeks of aged cotton duck
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 5
From: Middle Georgia, USA
Bikes: 2008 Kogswell PR mkII, 1976 Raleigh Professional, 1996 Serotta Atlanta, 1984 Trek 520, 1979 Raleigh Comp GS
The 520 also had some additional braze-ons. Perhaps differing by year, but I believe an additional set of bosses for a water bottle under the down tube, and a low rider mount on the fork. In addition it probably had double eyelets front and rear, and I don't know if your 500 has them.
