Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

1983 Schwinn Continental?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

1983 Schwinn Continental?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-09 | 09:39 PM
  #1  
The Aram's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, Michigan
1983 Schwinn Continental?

I was driving down the road today on my way to a party when I notice a road bike parked next to a mailbox and a pile of closet doors, sporting a FREE! sign. I pull over immediately and run across the street hoping to find something worthwhile. I can tell it's a Schwinn because that's the only part of the decals that are instantly readable. I pop off the front wheel, wedge it in the backseat of my car, and go on my way.

Now, this is where it gets interesting. I just brought it into the garage and decided to figure out what it is. This is a TALL bike, black, non-original seat, non-original tires. Unfortunately, the model name decals on both sides are absolutely unreadable. All you can piece together is SCHWINN in the 80's font. The head badge (oval shape, not round) is gone. The serial number is FU*****, which seems to date it at 1983. There's also a sticker from the bike shop it was purchased at, which celebrates the 35th anniversary of the store in 1983. The only other decals that are readable are Continental emblazoned on both sides of the top of the frame. Were Continentals even made in 1983? I can't seem to find evidence that they were, and it seems like all the serial number databases end at 1982. I'm just assuming FU means 1983.

What do I have here? I'll post some pictures when it's not the middle of the night and I can get it out in the sunlight. The only problems seem to be some dust and cobwebs from sitting in a garage, the missing head badge, some rust, and a back wheel that's definitely out of round. At the very least, if the frame isn't too tall, it'll be good for parting out.
The Aram is offline  
Reply
Old 07-25-09 | 09:44 PM
  #2  
Forum Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 22,967
Likes: 10,441
From: Kalamazoo
Pics?
cb400bill is offline  
Reply
Old 07-25-09 | 10:13 PM
  #3  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

FU is June, 1983. I'd be interested in seeing pictures. Schwinn shipped the equipment used to make electroforged frames to Murray Ohio's plant near Nashville, TN, in late 1982/early 1983, and contracted with Murray to build Varsities in Tennessee at lower cost than in Chicago where the Schwinn plant had become unionized. The problem was that customers wouldn't pay a $20 - $25 premium (even with reduced production costs in Tennessee) over lugged bikes Schwinn was importing from Giant on Taiwan for a heavy electroforged Varsity, so the deal with Murray to build Varsities in Nashville was short lived. I don't recall seeing any electroforged adult "lightweight" bikes (Varsities, Continentals) in Schwinn catalogs after 1982.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 07-28-09 | 01:00 PM
  #4  
The Aram's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, Michigan
OK, took some photos yesterday. Anyone know what I have here?

Full set:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/2962889...7621750834421/



It seems to me the fork doesn't match. Also, I've got this hanging out on the frame, taped with hockey stick and duct tape, which obviously served some purpose at some point.



Anybody have any clue?
The Aram is offline  
Reply
Old 07-28-09 | 01:54 PM
  #5  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Well, that is a strange one. The "Continental" decal on the top tube is in the same font used for the model names on the bikes in the 1984 catalog. Now I'm really curious (and confused).
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 07-28-09 | 02:10 PM
  #6  
tolfan's Avatar
Novist senior member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 1
From: Amish Country

Bikes: have about 30 bikes right now

The chrome fork is original. It had star stickers on it at the begining of its life, one long one on each side. the thing hanging off the frame is a pump holder. there should be 2 of them and the pump goes inbetween, or 1 and a peg, or 1 and the pump had the fancy holder end on it. Yours looks just like one I have.
tolfan is offline  
Reply
Old 07-28-09 | 02:12 PM
  #7  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,299
Likes: 6,556
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

It looks like a Continental whose fork has been replaced.

What do you think you'd like to do with it?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Old 07-28-09 | 02:28 PM
  #8  
The Aram's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Thanks everyone. I didn't think Schwinn made Continentals in 1983, and the decals seemed to say something other than Continental (aside from the top tube). It's clear this bike was pretty heavily ridden and there were a lot of things replaced over the years (the cables are more contemporary Shimanos).

noglider, not really sure. I'm thinking I might flip it after I work it over a little bit. It's waaaaaay too tall for me. the top of the frame comes up around my waist. Even with the seat adjusted, I doubt I could even get on it. And I would have to replace the back wheel anyway, it's bent so far out of whack it won't move. It's a shame, because it seems like a great bike.
The Aram is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.