Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

B33 vs B66

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-09 | 12:50 PM
  #1  
SirMike1983's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sturmey Archer Hub
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 1,936
From: New England

Bikes: Old Schwinns and old Raleighs

B33 vs B66

Has anyone ridden a Brooks B33 saddle here? How does it compare in riding to the B66? I've been thinking about adding one to my Christmas list, but haven't ever seen a B33 in person. I ride in an upright position and with all my winter riding gear (heavy clothing, jacket etc) run about 160 lbs. Would a B33 be appropriate?
__________________
Classic American and British Roadsters, Utility Bikes, and Sporting Bikes (1935-1979): HERE
SirMike1983 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-09 | 01:07 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Likes: 10
A B-66. B-33 is more suitable for a Clydesdale or Athena rider. If you're 150 lbs like me, a B-66 is more than enough for seated suspension.
NormanF is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-09 | 01:18 PM
  #3  
cudak888's Avatar
www.theheadbadge.com
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,000
Likes: 5,484
From: Southern Florida

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

The B.66 should do you quite well.

While I have not had any experience with the B.33, I can say that the B.73 should be avoided; it has very little lateral rigidity, since the saddle and upper frame are suspended at all points by springs, and it has a distinct tendency to bounce.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-09 | 01:38 PM
  #4  
SirMike1983's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sturmey Archer Hub
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 1,936
From: New England

Bikes: Old Schwinns and old Raleighs

I see-- I'm in the 150-160 range, so perhaps I'll add a new B66 to my list instead. It's cheaper and more appropriate for period work up anyway. I set my bars a good 2-3 inches higher than the saddle and ride pretty upright.

As for the B-73-- it's the only saddle I see produced new with 3 coil springs. I suppose they were more common many years ago, but given how coil springs on saddles work it would seem you're right about that lateral motion issue.
__________________
Classic American and British Roadsters, Utility Bikes, and Sporting Bikes (1935-1979): HERE
SirMike1983 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-09 | 01:45 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Likes: 10
The B-73 is better suited for a roadster or a longtail cargo bike. Otherwise stick with the B-66.
NormanF is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-09 | 01:58 PM
  #6  
Sci-Fi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 2
Consider a Brooks B-135. Co-worker has one on his cruiser and finds it sized right and rides good w/o being bouncy. ~8" or 210 wide is pretty much the comfort zone for most upright riders...not too narrow or wide for men or women and could be used on a road bike.
Sci-Fi is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-09 | 02:04 PM
  #7  
SirMike1983's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sturmey Archer Hub
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 1,936
From: New England

Bikes: Old Schwinns and old Raleighs

Interesting-- the reason I ask is that on my current B66 (which I got some years back) the front vertical bolt is a bit loose. I'm not sure if that's supposed to happen or not. There seems to be no way to tighten it. My fear was that my riding position had caused too much weight on the saddle itself and damaged that front bolt. Is this a common thing or is it a problem with the saddle?

The saddle will have a traditional Raleigh type saddle bag attached. I'm not sure if the large double action springs on some of these prevent that.
__________________
Classic American and British Roadsters, Utility Bikes, and Sporting Bikes (1935-1979): HERE
SirMike1983 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-09 | 10:33 PM
  #8  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,314
Likes: 5,225
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by SirMike1983
Interesting-- the reason I ask is that on my current B66 (which I got some years back) the front vertical bolt is a bit loose. I'm not sure if that's supposed to happen or not. There seems to be no way to tighten it. My fear was that my riding position had caused too much weight on the saddle itself and damaged that front bolt. Is this a common thing or is it a problem with the saddle?

The saddle will have a traditional Raleigh type saddle bag attached. I'm not sure if the large double action springs on some of these prevent that.
Both my B66 saddles (1972 and 1983) have bag loops installed from the factory.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-09 | 11:55 PM
  #9  
sunburst's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 187
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Peugeot, Motobecane, Joannou, Kona, Specialized, Ironhorse, Royal Scot, Dahon

Be aware that the B66 has special clamp that only works with straight seatpost (unless you buy an adapter. The B67 is the same saddle, but is a 2-rail design that works with standard seatposts.
sunburst is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.