Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Stem Length and Bike Safety

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Stem Length and Bike Safety

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-09, 03:13 PM
  #26  
Veteran, Pacifist
 
Wildwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328

Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?

Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,833 Times in 2,229 Posts
[QUOTE=big_heineken;10094464]I ride with a 60 mm stem on my 1994 Trek 1200. It came with a ridiculously long 120 mm stem. ... QUOTE]

All my bikes have a 12 or 13 cm stems and I don't think they are ridiculously long, although my bikes are larger than your Trek. I would hazard a guess that a very high percentage of road bikes are sold with stems varying from 10 - 12 cm.
Wildwood is offline  
Old 12-01-09, 03:38 PM
  #27  
Just keep pedalling!
 
big_heineken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 439

Bikes: 1987 Schwinn Circuit, 1987 Panasonic DX-4000, 1984 Peugeot PSV10, 1989 Centurion Prestige, 1973 Raleigh Sprite, 1987 Peugeot Canyon Express, ~1986 Raleigh Capri, 1994 Trek 850, 1984 Centurion Pro Tour 15, 2012 Gravity Zilla

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wildwood
Originally Posted by big_heineken
I ride with a 60 mm stem on my 1994 Trek 1200. It came with a ridiculously long 120 mm stem. ...
All my bikes have a 12 or 13 cm stems and I don't think they are ridiculously long, although my bikes are larger than your Trek. I would hazard a guess that a very high percentage of road bikes are sold with stems varying from 10 - 12 cm.
I've started this discussion before:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...per-long-stems
big_heineken is offline  
Old 12-01-09, 04:13 PM
  #28  
GO BIG RED
 
norwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hastings,NE
Posts: 678

Bikes: 1996 Bianchi Veloce 1993 Bridgestone MB-3 1992 Trek 700 1992 Trek 820

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by big_heineken
I ride with a 60 mm stem on my 1994 Trek 1200. It came with a ridiculously long 120 mm stem. I have no trouble with the 60 mm stem. The ride is responsive but not twitchy. My GF's bike, a 1984 Peugeot PSV-10, has a 100 mm stem and is much more twitchy than my Trek.

+1
I don't know how the theory of "short stem, twitchy steering" got started, but I've never found it to be true. My road bikes currently have stems of 100mm and 80mm ext. and handle very nice. I've had a stem as long as 130mm on my Bianchi however and found the steering to be horrible. Like steering with a long 2x4 or a backwards boat tiller. Twitchy has way more to do with geometry than stem length.

P.S. Good luck to the Longhorns Sat.
norwood is offline  
Old 12-01-09, 04:35 PM
  #29  
headtube.
 
zzyzx_xyzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 803
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I believe that people have compared different length stems on the same bike and found that shorter stems feel twitchier. I think they are confusing the effect of a shorter stem which gets you to sit up higher, thus putting less weight on the bars, and thus having more propensity to pull back on them (which is less stable than pushing forward on the bars, as long as your handgrips are in front of the steer tube) with the effect of stem length itself. If they were to compare two different frames, one having longer stem AND a shorter top tube to match (so that riding position is the same) they would not find much difference.

For example, my "twitchiest" bike has a 140mm stem! That's because it's one of those old low end frames where they made every model with a 54cm top tube, and even with that stem it's not really enough reach.

That all means that people don't like to ride a setup that doesn't fit THEM with the right amount of reach for their body and they feel it reflected in the handling. So get the stem that makes YOU fit on the bike.
zzyzx_xyzzy is offline  
Old 12-01-09, 06:43 PM
  #30  
RFC
Senior Member
 
RFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466

Bikes: many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
This is starting to look like a Bike Fit Anxiety Support Group, so I can't help myself. My apologies.

I ride bikes with stem lengths from 90 to 130 based on the size and configuration of the bike. I do not sense more or less twitchiness attributable to stem length. IMHO, what one might call twitchiness is more likely a result of headtube angle and/or tire width and pressure.

BTW, the 24" front wheel on my Schwinn Prologue TT is very twitchy.
RFC is offline  
Old 12-02-09, 11:06 AM
  #31  
New account: KlunkerBiker
 
Speed2XS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Post Falls, ID
Posts: 141

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cpsqlrwn
the fact that the increased height of the stem relative to the saddle will also cause the bars to feel closer, and the 70 may do the trick.
This was my thought. Hopefully it does the trick.
Speed2XS is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.