Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

What is a Mixte?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

What is a Mixte?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-09 | 08:56 PM
  #1  
that_guy_zach's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 785
Likes: 5
From: omicron persei 8
What is a Mixte?

Does a Mixte have to have the split top tube, or is the name based on the "Style" of frame.

Raleigh




Schwinn


that_guy_zach is offline  
Reply
Old 12-17-09 | 09:38 PM
  #2  
Forum Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 22,906
Likes: 10,333
From: Kalamazoo
Depends on who you ask. Sheldon said that a "true" mixte has the two top tubes running from the head tube, past the seat tube, and run all the way to the drop outs.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_m.html#mixte

That Schwinn is often called a "Faux Mixte". Doesn't make it a bad bike, just a different interpretation of the Mixte style.
cb400bill is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 05:11 AM
  #3  
randyjawa's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 12,564
Likes: 2,739
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

This is an opinion and in my mind the Mixte must have the double top tube to be called a Mixte. Anything else isn't.
randyjawa is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 06:12 AM
  #4  
PDXaero's Avatar
French threaded
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 4
From: Portland, OR.

Bikes: many

A quick hunt through old threads will show that the general concensus defines the mixte by having the third set of rear stays as both the above examples do. In addition to the two stated styles motobecane using a splitting top tube that in mid span went from a single large diameter tube two two smaller stay before adjoining the seattube.
I won't even try to explain the trevor flying gate.
PDXaero is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 07:56 AM
  #5  
Grand Bois's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,392
Likes: 40
From: Pinole, CA, USA
Originally Posted by cb400bill
Depends on who you ask. Sheldon said that a "true" mixte has the two top tubes running from the head tube, past the seat tube, and run all the way to the drop outs.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_m.html#mixte

That Schwinn is often called a "Faux Mixte". Doesn't make it a bad bike, just a different interpretation of the Mixte style.
Sheldon is saying that a mixte always has 3 stays and may or may not have a double top tube. That's the way I read it.
Grand Bois is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 10:00 AM
  #6  
Road Fan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8



Always a popular discussion.

Do you really need to know? This will just come down again to argument over opinions.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 10:33 AM
  #7  
GV27's Avatar
Light Makes Right
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: Green Mountain, Colorado

Bikes: Gianni Motta Criterium, Dean Hardtail

I was just thinking back to the discussion a couple months back about compact geometry. People kept crowing about "smaller triangles" being orders of magnitude stiffer. So here's my question. When you have roadies constantly in search of ultimate stiffness and carbon construction bringing the weight of a bike down well under UCI regs - why are modern race bikes not all mixtes? Not only are the triangles WAY smaller than even a compact frame, there's an extra one......
GV27 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 12:12 PM
  #8  
Road Fan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by GV27
I was just thinking back to the discussion a couple months back about compact geometry. People kept crowing about "smaller triangles" being orders of magnitude stiffer. So here's my question. When you have roadies constantly in search of ultimate stiffness and carbon construction bringing the weight of a bike down well under UCI regs - why are modern race bikes not all mixtes? Not only are the triangles WAY smaller than even a compact frame, there's an extra one......
Because standard mixtes, with the twin tubes are not stiffer, and really are not even as stiff as a diamond frame. The top tube on a diamond frame, together wth teh down tube, resists the bb twisting with pedal force. The stiffness is proportional to the fourth power of diameter. Each twin tube is about half the diameter of a top tube and hence 1/16 the stiffness. Two of them are 1/8 the stiffness. But you still don't get even that reduced contribution to stiffness because the twin tubes are not TIGged or lugged to the seat post, they're just located with some little links. The "modern" mixte like the Schwinn that was shown has a standard diameter tube attached to the seat tube with either TIG or lugs. That gives you back the stiffness relative to the diamond. And, that dropped down tube gives the front "triangle" a shape that is very similar to MBs and compact road frames. So teh "modern" mixte should be about as good as a compact frame, but the true mixte should not.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 12:55 PM
  #9  
PDXaero's Avatar
French threaded
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 4
From: Portland, OR.

Bikes: many


Sorry, I had to.
PDXaero is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 01:07 PM
  #10  
Bionicycle's Avatar
No I'm Not a Pirate!
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 694
Likes: 1
From: The middle of somewhere in Indiana
Originally Posted by Road Fan
Because standard mixtes, with the twin tubes are not stiffer, and really are not even as stiff as a diamond frame. The top tube on a diamond frame, together wth teh down tube, resists the bb twisting with pedal force. The stiffness is proportional to the fourth power of diameter. Each twin tube is about half the diameter of a top tube and hence 1/16 the stiffness. Two of them are 1/8 the stiffness. But you still don't get even that reduced contribution to stiffness because the twin tubes are not TIGged or lugged to the seat post, they're just located with some little links. The "modern" mixte like the Schwinn that was shown has a standard diameter tube attached to the seat tube with either TIG or lugs. That gives you back the stiffness relative to the diamond. And, that dropped down tube gives the front "triangle" a shape that is very similar to MBs and compact road frames. So teh "modern" mixte should be about as good as a compact frame, but the true mixte should not.
This same debate comes into play whenever a thread mentions the stiffness of the classic Mixte frame (twin top tubes). I’m intelligent enough to understand the theories of torsion load and stiffness of tubing in relation to thickness and diameter, but what I don’t like about comparing diamond frame and Mixte frames, is the theory applies best only if the two frames are constructed exactly alike; and they are not.

It doesn’t take into account that Mixte frames are not only braced between the top tubes, but also braced to the seat tube, but most importantly the top tubes go all the way to the drop outs, where they are tied together by the rear axle.

But to try and infer that Mixte frames are significantly weaker and inherently overly flexible is in my opinion a fallacy. My own riding experience tells me that the Mixte frame I’m riding is no more, or less flexible than the dozens of diamond frames I’ve ridden in my life. Actually the stiffest frame I’ve ridden in some time was a U-frame aluminum bike, with oblong tubing. There was no discernable flex in that frame at all. I wonder why all the new super bikes haven’t adopted that style frame?
Bionicycle is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 01:07 PM
  #11  
Maddox's Avatar
Ride heavy metal.
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 2
From: Teenage Wasteland, USA

Bikes: '74 Raleigh LTD-3, '76 Motobecane Grand Jubile, '83 Fuji TSIII (customized commuter), '10 Mercier Kilo WT (fixed obsession), '83 Bianchi Alloro, '92 Bridgestone MB-1 (project), '83 Specialized Expedition (project), '79 Peugeot UO-8 (sold)

Originally Posted by PDXaero

Sorry, I had to.
Whoa...Haven't seen that one before. Very cool.
Maddox is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 01:57 PM
  #12  
TwoShort's Avatar
Retro-Direct Fan
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, Colorado
Originally Posted by GV27
I was just thinking back to the discussion a couple months back about compact geometry. People kept crowing about "smaller triangles" being orders of magnitude stiffer. So here's my question. When you have roadies constantly in search of ultimate stiffness and carbon construction bringing the weight of a bike down well under UCI regs - why are modern race bikes not all mixtes? Not only are the triangles WAY smaller than even a compact frame, there's an extra one......
Well, for one thing, weight isn't the only UCI reg... My (very limited) knowledge of the rest of them doesn't provide a clear reason you couldn't do a mixte, but significant departures from what all the other bikes look like generally run afoul of something...

The extra triangle only provides more stiffness to the seat tube, which is irrelevant. And the two-continuous-tubes is really an advantage specific to steel, so moving carbon frame shapes nearer to mixte geometry is really just moving the top tube/seat tube/seat stay junction lower, which some frame builders both advocate and do.

Is there a reason not to go all the way down to a straight mixte-like line, and if so is that reason technical or regulatory? Beats me.
TwoShort is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 06:02 PM
  #13  
that_guy_zach's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 785
Likes: 5
From: omicron persei 8
Thanks guys, I was not trying to start a debate or anything. I have just been buying every one of them I see for sale so I wanted to know a little more about them.
that_guy_zach is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 06:56 PM
  #14  
Bianchigirll's Avatar
Bianchi Goddess
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 28,888
Likes: 4,133
From: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In

Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.

IMHO a Mixtie should have the twin "toptubes" that become stays

PDXaero just what is that?
__________________
One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"

Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
Bianchigirll is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-09 | 09:02 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,944
Likes: 853
From: Wilmette, IL
Baines Flying Gate
https://sports.webshots.com/photo/208...55521085SDqfvf
big chainring is offline  
Reply
Old 12-19-09 | 04:56 AM
  #16  
Veloria's Avatar
Lug Princess
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 910
Likes: 5
From: Easthaven Isle, ME
Originally Posted by that_guy_zach
Thanks guys, I was not trying to start a debate or anything. I have just been buying every one of them I see for sale so I wanted to know a little more about them.
Why are you buying every one of them you see for sale?

If you are looking for "sexy bikes" to resell, than regardless of definition the ones with twin lateral stays have the most caché at the moment.
Veloria is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgvg
Classic & Vintage
5
10-16-18 09:11 AM
polymorphself
Classic & Vintage
20
06-02-18 10:36 AM
dweenk
Classic & Vintage
33
07-12-15 01:40 PM
calstar
Classic & Vintage
1
06-10-12 12:00 PM
macman58
Classic & Vintage
19
05-08-10 07:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.