Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Need some input on early MTB frames - new project in mind

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Need some input on early MTB frames - new project in mind

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-09 | 06:34 PM
  #26  
Bikedued's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,984
Likes: 145
Don't overlook Cannondale. My 88 feels feather light even with a steel fork and wire bead Mythos tires, very rigid too. Hell even the Brooks saddle didn't weigh it down much. For steel though, my 990
was the best MTB I ever owned. It was LIGHT, fire engine red lugged True temper, and Deore XT. I may be stupid for selling it, but it truly was more bike than I needed. The Red C'dale made the loss
bearable. I have a 22" Puch in red also, lugged and may get bull moosed.,,,,BD
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
Bikedued is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-09 | 10:25 PM
  #27  
treebound's Avatar
aka: Mike J.
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,405
Likes: 60
From: between Milwaukee and Sheboygan in Wisconsin

Bikes: 1995 Trek 520 is the current primary bike.

Got some numbers but no pics, all the weight talk got me motivated.

The Ross, not sure what model, with some ice and snow on it weighed in at about 35Lbs. A beast complete with bullmoose bars, but should make a fun urban road curb bumper.

Nishiki Bravo, sloping top tube, 14.5" frame, hi-ten steel, 31Lbs.

DiamondBack Outlook, hi-ten steel, 20" frame, minimal slope on the top tube, 32Lbs

GaryFisher Marlin, medium to minimal slope top tube, 16.75" frame, 25Lbs with a full rear rack mounted on it. Feels a lot lighter than it weighs. I really like this bike. Tubing is a cro-mo of some sort, too dark to read the text on the frame.

GT Outpost, 4130 steel, about an 18"-20" frame, 30Lbs.

I couldn't get to the Timberlin which is racked on back and fendered, probably in the 25-30Lb range naked.

Hope this helps some. If I decided to unload most of these I'd keep the Timberlin and the GF Marlin, the rest could go and probably slowly will come sunny weather.

Ps, I'd maybe use one of these in an offroad triathlon but probably not for a legitimate MTB race. But for a weekend brush or trail fun ride then sure if it wasn't too rocky.

Last edited by treebound; 12-23-09 at 10:28 PM.
treebound is offline  
Reply
Old 12-24-09 | 07:35 AM
  #28  
David325's Avatar
BMW Aficionado
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA

Bikes: '66 Raleigh RSW, '69 Humber Sports, '71 Raleigh Pro, '73 Raleigh Super Course, '74 Raleigh International, '75 + '77 Raleigh Competition, '87 Raleigh Edge, others

Most any old mountain bike that isn't total bottom of the line will take a serious beating. My suggestion though is to put on a suspension fork with lockout, because you'd really have a much better time with it off road and can lock it out for on road.
David325 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-24-09 | 08:51 AM
  #29  
Poguemahone's Avatar
Vello Kombi, baby
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,188
Likes: 16
From: Je suis ici

Bikes: 1973 Eisentraut; 1970s Richard Sachs; 1978 Alfio Bonnano; 1967 Peugeot PX10

As a beater and hauler, I have a Shogun Prarie Breaker III. Lugged steel, butted Tange tubing, vertical D/os. Looking at the bike, it's from a fairly early point in MTB design; it really looks like a 26" wheeled touring bike (more so since I've set it up with drops). Triple bottle cage mounts on the frame, that sort of thing. Works great as a hauler; I really haven't ridden it off road, as I a) put slicks on it and b) own a Surly Karate Monkey, which is set up for off road. But I like the Shogun a lot, and even though it was given to me for free I'd have a tough time getting rid of it; equipped with fender it is just too darn practical.
__________________
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"

Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
Poguemahone is offline  
Reply
Old 12-24-09 | 09:13 AM
  #30  
Grand Bois's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,392
Likes: 40
From: Pinole, CA, USA
Even with very lightweight wheels and without the Brooks, my Bridgestone MB2 weighs 26 pounds. I don't know how you'd get a steel-framed MTB much lighter than that.

Grand Bois is offline  
Reply
Old 12-24-09 | 10:33 AM
  #31  
jgedwa's Avatar
surly old man
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 44
From: Carlisle, PA

Bikes: IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.

Originally Posted by Dirtdrop
Even with very lightweight wheels and without the Brooks, my Bridgestone MB2 weighs 26 pounds. I don't know how you'd get a steel-framed MTB much lighter than that.
I do. But not all these solutions are what people might want:

-go with a single ring up front
-go single speed or even fixed
-I like good old MTB wheelsets, but modern ones can be much lighter
-small, light tires (this changes everything, often)
-even high-end bikes used to often have steel stems and/or bars. Change them out.
-cranks (this one takes a lot of money for not much improvement)

A rigid frame made of good tubing can certainly be set up to weigh a few pounds under 26, if that is your thing. I have a couple that come in way under that.

jim
__________________
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
jgedwa is offline  
Reply
Old 12-24-09 | 10:59 AM
  #32  
Grand Bois's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,392
Likes: 40
From: Pinole, CA, USA
Those are modern lightweight wheels and the tires are 1.3's. The front is a 28 spoker with an Ultegra hub. The bars are aluminum Ritchie/Nitto bullmoose. All of the large bolts on the bike are titanium. There are steel bikes with lighter frames like the MB-0 but they have a reputation for breaking. My digital bike scale is highly accurate. I'm finding that most bikes weigh more than claimed.
Grand Bois is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Classtime
Classic & Vintage
41
03-03-19 07:50 PM
bwilli88
General Cycling Discussion
12
01-15-14 01:45 PM
Maddox
Classic & Vintage
30
07-05-11 02:01 PM
ColonelJLloyd
Classic & Vintage
89
12-24-10 01:38 PM
DBL0ZER0
General Cycling Discussion
9
01-20-10 11:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.