RD question
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Bikes: Schwinn Madison, Schwinn Tempo
RD question
I ordered some 7 speed Sora shifters for the 1987 Schwinn Tempo. I will need to get a new 7 speed Freewheel and want to maximize my gearing as best I can with as little changes as possible.
This is my RD
Name: Shimano RD-1050, 105
Brand: Shimano
Primary Group: 105
Model: RD-1050
Years: 1987 - 1988
Country: Japan
Weight: 257 grams (avg)
From Velo base I have that as a 28 tooth max rear cog and 26 tooth max chainwrap. I would like to go up to a 14-28 Freewheel, which puts me one over on the wrap with my 52/39 chainrings.
Will the RD take that +1 tooth chainwrap from its spec? If not, would this be a good replacement? It would give me the option of going up to a mega range if I chose.
Tourney TX51 Rear Der.
Second question, will the FD work with the Sora shifters?
Thanks
This is my RD
Name: Shimano RD-1050, 105
Brand: Shimano
Primary Group: 105
Model: RD-1050
Years: 1987 - 1988
Country: Japan
Weight: 257 grams (avg)
From Velo base I have that as a 28 tooth max rear cog and 26 tooth max chainwrap. I would like to go up to a 14-28 Freewheel, which puts me one over on the wrap with my 52/39 chainrings.
Will the RD take that +1 tooth chainwrap from its spec? If not, would this be a good replacement? It would give me the option of going up to a mega range if I chose.
Tourney TX51 Rear Der.
Second question, will the FD work with the Sora shifters?
Thanks
Last edited by woodenidol; 03-28-10 at 06:05 PM.
#2
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
From Sheldon Brown:
"A note about capacity:
Manufacturers have to assume that their customers are clueless, and will expect the chain to have some tension on it even in the bad gears where the chain is using small chainrings with small rear sprockets. Thus, the rated chain-wrap capacity is very conservative. A competent cyclist who uses the gears properly can generally exceed this by several teeth with no problem.
Most derailers also specify a maximum size rear sprocket. This is often a pessimistic value, based on the largest sprocket that is normally provided as part of that group."
I think you will be fine in terms of the rear derailer taking up slack as long as you avoid the small-small gear combination. I am running 50-45-24 chainrings with a 14-28 freewheel (40T total) and a derailer rated for 33T capacity. This is no problem, I just have to avoid the 2 small cogs when I am in the 24 up front (chain starts rubbing on the middle chainring then anyways). The 105 will definitely be a nicer derailer than the alternative you present.
"A note about capacity:
Manufacturers have to assume that their customers are clueless, and will expect the chain to have some tension on it even in the bad gears where the chain is using small chainrings with small rear sprockets. Thus, the rated chain-wrap capacity is very conservative. A competent cyclist who uses the gears properly can generally exceed this by several teeth with no problem.
Most derailers also specify a maximum size rear sprocket. This is often a pessimistic value, based on the largest sprocket that is normally provided as part of that group."
I think you will be fine in terms of the rear derailer taking up slack as long as you avoid the small-small gear combination. I am running 50-45-24 chainrings with a 14-28 freewheel (40T total) and a derailer rated for 33T capacity. This is no problem, I just have to avoid the 2 small cogs when I am in the 24 up front (chain starts rubbing on the middle chainring then anyways). The 105 will definitely be a nicer derailer than the alternative you present.
#3
Thrifty Bill

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,641
Likes: 1,106
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
+1 The RD you have is much nicer than the one you are thinking of buying. It will probably work, and it is bought and paid for.
#6
Death fork? Naaaah!!

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,529
Likes: 945
From: The other Maine, north of RT 2
Bikes: Seriously downsizing.
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
#7
The 1050 105 you have is better than the Tourney. If you are planning on running larger cogs (like a 32), I would highly recommend a Deore XT/LX or even an Exage 500LX (M500) c. early 90s as a replacement. They can handle the larger cogs (long cage) and you would have no issues with chain wrap. And they are 7sp index and the quality is equal or better than your 105.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CampioneDItalia
Classic & Vintage
12
11-12-17 01:44 PM






