Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

RD question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-10 | 05:55 PM
  #1  
woodenidol's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA

Bikes: Schwinn Madison, Schwinn Tempo

RD question

I ordered some 7 speed Sora shifters for the 1987 Schwinn Tempo. I will need to get a new 7 speed Freewheel and want to maximize my gearing as best I can with as little changes as possible.

This is my RD

Name: Shimano RD-1050, 105
Brand: Shimano
Primary Group: 105
Model: RD-1050
Years: 1987 - 1988
Country: Japan
Weight: 257 grams (avg)

From Velo base I have that as a 28 tooth max rear cog and 26 tooth max chainwrap. I would like to go up to a 14-28 Freewheel, which puts me one over on the wrap with my 52/39 chainrings.

Will the RD take that +1 tooth chainwrap from its spec? If not, would this be a good replacement? It would give me the option of going up to a mega range if I chose.

Tourney TX51 Rear Der.

Second question, will the FD work with the Sora shifters?

Thanks

Last edited by woodenidol; 03-28-10 at 06:05 PM.
woodenidol is offline  
Reply
Old 03-28-10 | 06:33 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
From Sheldon Brown:

"A note about capacity:
Manufacturers have to assume that their customers are clueless, and will expect the chain to have some tension on it even in the bad gears where the chain is using small chainrings with small rear sprockets. Thus, the rated chain-wrap capacity is very conservative. A competent cyclist who uses the gears properly can generally exceed this by several teeth with no problem.

Most derailers also specify a maximum size rear sprocket. This is often a pessimistic value, based on the largest sprocket that is normally provided as part of that group."

I think you will be fine in terms of the rear derailer taking up slack as long as you avoid the small-small gear combination. I am running 50-45-24 chainrings with a 14-28 freewheel (40T total) and a derailer rated for 33T capacity. This is no problem, I just have to avoid the 2 small cogs when I am in the 24 up front (chain starts rubbing on the middle chainring then anyways). The 105 will definitely be a nicer derailer than the alternative you present.
ktmh is offline  
Reply
Old 03-28-10 | 06:40 PM
  #3  
wrk101's Avatar
Thrifty Bill
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,641
Likes: 1,106
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

+1 The RD you have is much nicer than the one you are thinking of buying. It will probably work, and it is bought and paid for.
wrk101 is online now  
Reply
Old 03-28-10 | 07:06 PM
  #4  
woodenidol's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA

Bikes: Schwinn Madison, Schwinn Tempo

Thanks! Im thinking a 32 rear would be pushing my luck though?
woodenidol is offline  
Reply
Old 03-28-10 | 07:13 PM
  #5  
Banned.
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Likes: 1,462
32 would be pushing it. Take the inch, not the mile.

The 105 will handle it. Just watch your clearance from the rear spokes.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-10 | 05:59 AM
  #6  
top506's Avatar
Death fork? Naaaah!!
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,529
Likes: 945
From: The other Maine, north of RT 2

Bikes: Seriously downsizing.

Originally Posted by RobbieTunes
32 would be pushing it. Take the inch, not the mile.

The 105 will handle it. Just watch your clearance from the rear spokes.
Most likely you could get away with a 30t, though. I've run 13-30 freewheels with that RD with good results.
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.

(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
top506 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-10 | 07:07 AM
  #7  
EjustE's Avatar
sultan of schwinn
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,536
Likes: 17
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
The 1050 105 you have is better than the Tourney. If you are planning on running larger cogs (like a 32), I would highly recommend a Deore XT/LX or even an Exage 500LX (M500) c. early 90s as a replacement. They can handle the larger cogs (long cage) and you would have no issues with chain wrap. And they are 7sp index and the quality is equal or better than your 105.
EjustE is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CampioneDItalia
Classic & Vintage
12
11-12-17 01:44 PM
koko_t
Bicycle Mechanics
13
07-23-15 04:52 AM
stevegor
Bicycle Mechanics
11
10-27-10 11:56 PM
jackb
Bicycle Mechanics
23
09-24-10 03:33 PM
woodenidol
Classic & Vintage
0
03-28-10 05:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.