![]() |
Late '80s Falcons
IDENTIFIED: It's an early 1980's Falcon.
I'm considering what appears to be a nice frameset with details strangely similar to the Raleigh Professional Mark V's. Thing is, it's $175 - a bit more then I usually plunk down for a frameset - definitely quite a bit for an unknown. That said, I do want to get an idea of what the thing actually is. I honestly don't think it's a Pro - details are simply wrong for it. That said, here are the details that stand out: -English threading -Lugs with window cutouts, could be Bocama Competition 83's or similar. -Flat, non-engraved seat stay caps -Short rear drops -Water bottle braze-ons, seat tube + downtube -Downtube shifter braze-ons -Top tube cable clips, beefy ones too -Under the BB cable routing -Appears to have NO BB cutout - one of the reasons I've dismissed "Raleigh Pro" as a possibility. I only have one photo of it: http://www.jaysmarine.com/myseryframe.jpg Any ideas? I haven't a clue - I was going to say Falcon, but the stay caps are too short by comparison. -Kurt |
Some mysteries are better left unsolved.
|
What ever it is I would rather have the Albert Eisentraut behind it.
Do you get a fork for $175 |
Originally Posted by GMS
(Post 10814742)
What ever it is I would rather have the Albert Eisentraut behind it.
Do you get a fork for $175 The Eisentraut is out of my budget, not my size, the fork is a ball of rust, and I don't like it - nor Eisentraut himself. -Kurt |
Whatever it is, under the paint, being British and (most likely) mass-produced, and without the fork, $175 is much too much.
|
Just took some photos + more data:
-Columbus DO's -27.2 seatpost -126mm spacing -BB marked BCM - definitely Bocama lugs. Felt light enough to be 531 - definitely lighter to the touch then some Tretubi or Cromor frames I've held. http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_1.jpg http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_2.jpg http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_3.jpg http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_4.jpg http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_5.jpg -Kurt |
Kurt,
I'm not "diggin" the paint scheme. I'd save the $$$ for that treasure that will certainly come your way. |
Originally Posted by pastorbobnlnh
(Post 10815961)
I'm not "diggin" the paint scheme. I'd save the $$$ for that treasure that will certainly come your way.
I've got enough SR to put this one together too. -Kurt |
What's with the two sets of stays having different terminal styles at the rear dropouts? That's kinda weird.
|
Originally Posted by Charles Wahl
(Post 10816219)
What's with the two sets of stays having different terminal styles at the rear dropouts? That's kinda weird.
http://www.jaysmarine.com/unkframe_1.jpg -Kurt |
|
Originally Posted by Charles Wahl
(Post 10816272)
Maybe it's a Serrato ;-)
-Kurt |
Kurt,
It is a Reynolds 531 Falcon frame and fork. I had one with the identical lugs and fork crown with the same flat plate stay caps. It seems like a reasonable price given that you will have to respray and buy decals. |
methinks that there is no way that this bike is a Raleigh Team Pro.
Sue me |
Originally Posted by bicyclebits
(Post 10817680)
It is a Reynolds 531 Falcon frame and fork. I had one with the identical lugs and fork crown with the same flat plate stay caps.
It seems like a reasonable price given that you will have to respray and buy decals. http://www.wooljersey.com/gallery/d/...1/DSC00065.JPG Perfect match. That said, I suspect that it is original paint. There's a mark in the paintwork that corresponds to the decals on the example above: http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_6.jpg Also dug up an old discussion about the former frame here on BF - supposedly, the slightly different stay caps were another experiment, along with the decals: http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=407253 -Kurt |
Originally Posted by EjustE
(Post 10817758)
methinks that there is no way that this bike is a Raleigh Team Pro.
Originally Posted by EjustE
(Post 10817758)
Sue me
-Kurt |
Could very easily been built by myself in the Coventry Eagle/ British Eagle/Barry Hoban (clements)Factory in Wales 80's. All lugs, drop outs are what we used. But i have to add that most frame builders at the time were using the same. if the seat tube is 27.2 and it was built in Wales its 531 tubing. I have a low profile in the attic with the exact same colours that i built and sprayed 85ish. ps they must of been short of short point seat tube lugs at the time as it is different to the head tubes lol
Originally Posted by cudak888
(Post 10815814)
Just took some photos + more data:
-Columbus DO's -27.2 seatpost -126mm spacing -BB marked BCM - definitely Bocama lugs. Felt light enough to be 531 - definitely lighter to the touch then some Tretubi or Cromor frames I've held. http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_1.jpg http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_2.jpg http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_3.jpg http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_4.jpg http://www.jaysmarine.com/mysteryframe_5.jpg -Kurt |
Originally Posted by boxie98
(Post 10859383)
Could very easily been built by myself in the Coventry Eagle/ British Eagle/Barry Hoban (clements)Factory in Wales 80's. All lugs, drop outs are what we used. But i have to add that most frame builders at the time were using the same. if the seat tube is 27.2 and it was built in Wales its 531 tubing. I have a low profile in the attic with the exact same colours that i built and sprayed 85ish. ps they must of been short of short point seat tube lugs at the time as it is different to the head tubes lol
Post is 27.2, and it feels like 531. I'm surprised the ST lug isn't part of the same set - both headlugs and seat lug are short-point. I notice the white/red example has a long point seat lug matched with the short-point headlugs - is this normal? Incidentally, what was the production run for these machines? What year were the seatstay caps changed to the cheaper version you allude to in the other thread? I notice you mentioned the decal set was a prototype - how long did those prototype decals run? It would seem as if this bike had the same style on the white/red (unless the production decals used the same shape/die cutout). -Kurt |
Kurt - is there a serial number visible?
Seems curious to have Reynolds tubing and Columbus dropouts. Were there markings on the steerer? |
Originally Posted by USAZorro
(Post 10859686)
Kurt - is there a serial number visible?
Seems curious to have Reynolds tubing and Columbus dropouts. Were there markings on the steerer? Steerer tube is completely blank. No dove markings, and it's not rifled either. -Kurt |
Doesn't sound like a Raleigh, though I do see the similarities. Sounds like you've already reached the same conclusions, and Falcon seems to be the leading candidate. I like the look of it.
|
Originally Posted by USAZorro
(Post 10859801)
Doesn't sound like a Raleigh, though I do see the similarities. Sounds like you've already reached the same conclusions, and Falcon seems to be the leading candidate. I like the look of it.
-Kurt |
Sorry to bump this up, but I found another '80s Falcon. They just seem to come out of the woodwork:
http://www.jaysmarine.com/clements_80s.jpg Unmarked rear drops. -Kurt |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.