Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Is this fork bent?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Is this fork bent?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-10, 02:16 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Andrew F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Is this fork bent?



I'm thinking about make an hour drive to see it, but the more I look the more bent (ever so slightly) it looks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
3m43o93p55U55P45X1 .jpg (6.9 KB, 161 views)
Andrew F is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:20 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
bobbycorno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,454
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
At first glance, I was sure that it is. But then I put a straightedge up to the photo, and I'm not so sure. Call it a definite maybe.

SP
Bend, OR
bobbycorno is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:21 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Oldpeddaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Maidstone, Kent, England
Posts: 2,637

Bikes: 1970 Holdsworth Mistral, Vitus 979, Colnago Primavera, Corratec Hydracarbon, Massi MegaTeam, 1935 Claud Butler Super Velo, Carrera Virtuoso, Viner, 1953 Claud Butler Silver Jubilee, 1954 Holdsworth Typhoon, 1966 Claud Butler Olympic Road, 1982 Claud

Liked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by bobbycorno
At first glance, I was sure that it is. But then I put a straightedge up to the photo, and I'm not so sure. Call it a definite maybe.

SP
Bend, OR
+1
Oldpeddaller is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:23 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Liked 107 Times in 80 Posts
It is bent the wheel is to close to the frame. Roger
rhenning is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:24 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Pars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 2,418

Bikes: '73 Raleigh RRA, 1986 Trek 500 commuter

Liked 17 Times in 12 Posts
I put a straight edge up to the photo and it does look bent to me compared to the head tube. Front wheel looks closer than normal to the down tube as well.
Pars is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:24 PM
  #6  
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,531

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
looks bent to me but i also am not 100% sure.
__________________
--Don't Panic.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:25 PM
  #7  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,602

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Liked 4,535 Times in 2,141 Posts
Bent. The forks have re-raked themselves at the bend, and it's bent a few inches below the crown as well. The tipoff is not the fork so much as the frame; note that the top tube is definitely slanting upwards.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:26 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
BigPolishJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southwest Michigan
Posts: 1,554

Bikes: Fuji Monterey, Schwinn Traveler, Fuji Special Road Racer, Gitane Interclub, Sun EZ-1, Schwinn Frontier, Puch Cavalier, Vista Cavalier, Armstrong, Raleigh Sports, Schwinn Stingray

Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
What's the frame size? I ask because all of my bikes are 64 or 68cm (tall frames) and they all look like they might have bent forks, but when I put a strait edge up to them they are strait. It's weird to me, but that's what it seems.
BigPolishJimmy is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:28 PM
  #9  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,602

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Liked 4,535 Times in 2,141 Posts
Originally Posted by BigPolishJimmy
What's the frame size? I ask because all of my bikes are 64 or 68cm (tall frames) and they all look like they might have bent forks, but when I put a strait edge up to them they are strait. It's weird to me, but that's what it seems.
I'll bet you it's a 56 or 57, ST C-T-T.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:31 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
BigPolishJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southwest Michigan
Posts: 1,554

Bikes: Fuji Monterey, Schwinn Traveler, Fuji Special Road Racer, Gitane Interclub, Sun EZ-1, Schwinn Frontier, Puch Cavalier, Vista Cavalier, Armstrong, Raleigh Sports, Schwinn Stingray

Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
+1 top tube slant
BigPolishJimmy is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:43 PM
  #11  
FBoD Member at Large
 
khatfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I think she's bent:

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
bentfork..jpg (69.1 KB, 84 views)
khatfull is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 02:55 PM
  #12  
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,555

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Liked 1,005 Times in 646 Posts
+100 Bent. Donor bike.
+1 56 +/- frame.
wrk101 is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 03:13 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Andrew F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Some how I knew the answer, needed to hear it. Still I'm sad. Its a Dawes Atlantis, 58cm asking $125 for the frame, $175 for the bike.

Thanks everyone, I feel better now....anyway a 60cm would have been a better fit....but still, set with 3+ inches of drop to bars, she would look mean.......no..no...no...it's bent...look away you fool........H...E....L...P........M....E....
Andrew F is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 03:19 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Pars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 2,418

Bikes: '73 Raleigh RRA, 1986 Trek 500 commuter

Liked 17 Times in 12 Posts
Could it just be the fork only that is bent? Or most likely top tube / head tube / down tube also? I guess what I'm asking is the fork the only problem or frame likely as well? Hard to tell from the pics.
Pars is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 03:37 PM
  #15  
thompsonpost
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I wouldn't mess with it. Boat anchor.
 
Old 08-10-10, 04:27 PM
  #16  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,602

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Liked 4,535 Times in 2,141 Posts
Top tube shows a noticeable bend. Seller is a crafty scam artist.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 05:45 PM
  #17  
Dropped
 
JunkYardBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northwestern NJ
Posts: 6,080
Liked 21 Times in 18 Posts
Here's another photo. Top tube sure looks compromised, but it could be optical distortion. Personally, I never make assessments based on poor, small sized photos unless there is obvious evidence of a crash. That's not to say the others are wrong...I simply don't have a very good eye for it.

JunkYardBike is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 05:54 PM
  #18  
thompsonpost
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
But the down tube should show some crinkle on the lower surface, as well.
 
Old 08-10-10, 05:56 PM
  #19  
Dropped
 
JunkYardBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northwestern NJ
Posts: 6,080
Liked 21 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by thompsonpost
But the down tube should show some crinkle on the lower surface, as well.
I agree...I think a crimp would be obvious. Not sure the down tube would bow, but something would be evident, no? So maybe the top tube bow is an optical distortion.

Kinda hard to argue with khatfull's forensics, though. And the tire does appear too close to the down tube, though sometimes a slightly turned wheel will make it appear closer than it is. Forks look lined up though...

Last edited by JunkYardBike; 08-10-10 at 05:59 PM.
JunkYardBike is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 06:12 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
afilado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 1,154

Bikes: '93 Bridgestone RB-1, '91 Specialized Allez Epic, '85 Raleigh Team Pro, '78 Andre Bertin, early '90s F. Moser Leader AX , '85 Centurion Equipe, '98 Litespeed Tuscany, '89 Klein Quantum, '80 Nishiki Superbe, '83 Peckham, '84 Fuji Opus III

Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
When in doubt, walk away.

J
afilado is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 08:43 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Andrew F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
khatfull


I think she's bent:


Thanks Khatfull I can now walk away with peace of mind, and for that matter for everyones observations, you guys are great!!!!!

Last edited by Andrew F; 08-10-10 at 08:47 PM.
Andrew F is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 08:48 PM
  #22  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,602

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Liked 4,535 Times in 2,141 Posts
Originally Posted by thompsonpost
But the down tube should show some crinkle on the lower surface, as well.
No. Front end collision damage can be anything from a sharp wrinkle to a gradual, virtually blemishless curve. This is an example of the latter; if that tube was curved from the fisheye lens effect in the enlarged photo, then the rest of the tubes would exhibit a similar curve. They aren't - the top tube is bent.

I've long desired to dig up one of these mild curve frames to see how well they'd do with the Park HTS-1.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 09:07 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
auchencrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 10,303
Likes: 0
Liked 44 Times in 34 Posts
See my Dawes below - It looks bent, but it isn't.

If I were in the market for that blue one, I'd drive an hour to see it and remove all doubt.

__________________
- Auchen
auchencrow is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 09:16 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
vincev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Crown Point,Indiana
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would ride and see in person.cameras put weird angles at times.
vincev is offline  
Old 08-10-10, 09:35 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Andrew F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Nope, your's confirms it in my mind, she looks straight. The spacing on the tire on the blue one, the top tube and the inconsistant rake of the forks. Truthfully, if it was a 60cm I'd make the drive, I wasn't in the market for another bike, it caught my eye and the addiction set in.
Andrew F is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.