Did Simplex SLJ 6600 RD come equipped for threaded dropout?
#1
Disraeli Gears
Thread Starter
Did Simplex SLJ 6600 RD come equipped for threaded dropout?
I have this Motobecane Team Champion frame with cracked rear dropout that I got re-welded.
Clearly, it's got a Campy-style threaded rear dropout. And yet the specs for the bike say that it had a Simplex SLJ 6600 rear derailer. Unfortunately, the frame came with no derailers. I'm just wondering if there was a version of the Simplex RD that came equipped to fit such a dropout.
I have plenty of nice derailers I could use (including an SLJ 6600 that's for a Simplex unthreaded dropout), but I'd like to build this bike more or less as a restoration -- therein lies the problem.
Clearly, it's got a Campy-style threaded rear dropout. And yet the specs for the bike say that it had a Simplex SLJ 6600 rear derailer. Unfortunately, the frame came with no derailers. I'm just wondering if there was a version of the Simplex RD that came equipped to fit such a dropout.
I have plenty of nice derailers I could use (including an SLJ 6600 that's for a Simplex unthreaded dropout), but I'd like to build this bike more or less as a restoration -- therein lies the problem.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
25 Posts
That's interesting. I was told that these derailers came from a Team Champion. The RD is set up for the old style Simplex hanger, but I think it mayl work on a Campy style hanger with just a change to a threaded top bolt. I think I have a threaded top bolt for it. I'll check it out tomorrow and get back to you. It's a drop parallelogram SLJ, but it bears little resemblance to a SLJ6600 Aerodynamic. I understand that it was made especially for the Team Champion.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
25 Posts
My derailer is set up to work on any derailer hanger, even Huret. It does not utilize the threads. It can't because the top pivot is sprung. Turning the top bolt just winds up the spring. You bolt it on from the back, as you would on an old Simplex hanger. The bolt is extra long to fit thicker hangers. I might be willing to trade mine for a 6600 Aerodynamic in good condition, but I'm not anxious to get rid of it. I like it alot.
I saw one in Kurt's display case the last time he posted pictures of it. Maybe he'll make you a better deal.
I saw one in Kurt's display case the last time he posted pictures of it. Maybe he'll make you a better deal.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
Charles, your Simplex hanger is of the hybrid style, it can accept either Campagnolo or simplex type derailleurs. I've attached a few pics and a link from my site that may help....
https://cyclespeugeot.com/Threading.html
https://cyclespeugeot.com/Threading.html
#7
Disraeli Gears
Thread Starter
Mine is an Aerodynamic, and in quite good condition, but not pristine -- has some rash in the usual place under the outer parallelogram plate by the top pivot, and a bit of chain rash on the jockey wheel plates too.
This RD fits a PX-10 with the standard Simplex unthreaded dropouts perfectly. I assume that the tab on the sprung top plate just outside the hanger meets the top-front of the hanger casting; that looks right anyway. The mounting bolt with shoulder won't fit through a Campy threaded dropout: the Simplex dropout has 8.9 mm clearance, while the inside of the threads on the Campy is only about 8.2. What's with all this “you can retap your Simplex dropout for a Campy-style derailer” stuff? Seems like you'd end up with practically nothing, thread-wise!
Maybe I can get the right sort of bolt (with low-profile head) and find or make a smaller collar for it.
I notice that because the Campy dropout hanger has a front profile that slopes backward (like the Simplex ones miamijim illustrates above), while the Simplex dropout on my PX-10 is basically vertical off the hanger, thus the derailer's spring action would be biased to be rotated somewhat more clockwise (looking from drive side) on a Campy dropout than on the PX-10 hanger. Would that make a difference to operation?
I'll try to post explanatory pictures later, but right now I have to go watch the end of the NYC Mayor's Cup kayak race (around the island).
This RD fits a PX-10 with the standard Simplex unthreaded dropouts perfectly. I assume that the tab on the sprung top plate just outside the hanger meets the top-front of the hanger casting; that looks right anyway. The mounting bolt with shoulder won't fit through a Campy threaded dropout: the Simplex dropout has 8.9 mm clearance, while the inside of the threads on the Campy is only about 8.2. What's with all this “you can retap your Simplex dropout for a Campy-style derailer” stuff? Seems like you'd end up with practically nothing, thread-wise!
Maybe I can get the right sort of bolt (with low-profile head) and find or make a smaller collar for it.
I notice that because the Campy dropout hanger has a front profile that slopes backward (like the Simplex ones miamijim illustrates above), while the Simplex dropout on my PX-10 is basically vertical off the hanger, thus the derailer's spring action would be biased to be rotated somewhat more clockwise (looking from drive side) on a Campy dropout than on the PX-10 hanger. Would that make a difference to operation?
I'll try to post explanatory pictures later, but right now I have to go watch the end of the NYC Mayor's Cup kayak race (around the island).
Last edited by Charles Wahl; 08-14-10 at 01:03 PM.
#8
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
Charles,
If your hanger is threaded it will accept a Cmapy stayle derailleur with no issues. I see no reason whi the Simplex bolt wouldnt fit into the threaded opening. The first pic I posted in post #6 clearly shows a simplex bolt from beind derailleur mounted to a Campy style threaded dropout.
If your hanger is threaded it will accept a Cmapy stayle derailleur with no issues. I see no reason whi the Simplex bolt wouldnt fit into the threaded opening. The first pic I posted in post #6 clearly shows a simplex bolt from beind derailleur mounted to a Campy style threaded dropout.
#10
Disraeli Gears
Thread Starter
OK, Jim -- it seems that you're correct. I tried the Simplex shouldered bolt in another Campy dropout on another frame, and it fits. The first one I tried must just be a bit narrower (the bolt fits the wrong way around, but not the right way). So I guess I'm good to go.
What about the question I asked above: is the location/angle of what you're calling the “notch for derailleur tang” critical? Or will a Simplex derailer fit on any bike with a braze-on hanger?
What about the question I asked above: is the location/angle of what you're calling the “notch for derailleur tang” critical? Or will a Simplex derailer fit on any bike with a braze-on hanger?
#12
Disraeli Gears
Thread Starter
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
25 Posts
Remove with a blow dryer. Install with a hot glue gun.
There are no derailers identical to yours without the Moto badge because that model was made especially for the Moto Team Champion.
I was going to offer to send Charles my front and rear Moto tags, but I can't find my bag of badges. It happens every time I clean up the shop. Last time it was a Mafac Competition bridge wire.
Last edited by Grand Bois; 08-15-10 at 11:46 AM.
#14
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
#16
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
I wouldn't understand why Simplex would go through the trouble to re-tool the 6600 just for Moto, and the Velobase SLJ 6000 seems to have all the upper arm casting differences present in the Moto RD.
-Kurt
#17
Disraeli Gears
Thread Starter
Here's the 6600 from Velobase
Mine looks exactly like that, except that it doesn't have the wide web between top pivot and left adjusting screw; instead mine looks like the one Grand Bois posted in #13 (but with the black/nylon heads on the pivots rather than chromed).
I don't see the difference between the rear derailers GB posted in #2 and #13, other than the badge. the cable clamp looks the same in #2 as in #13, but maybe I'm just not seeing enough of it.
Mine looks exactly like that, except that it doesn't have the wide web between top pivot and left adjusting screw; instead mine looks like the one Grand Bois posted in #13 (but with the black/nylon heads on the pivots rather than chromed).
I don't see the difference between the rear derailers GB posted in #2 and #13, other than the badge. the cable clamp looks the same in #2 as in #13, but maybe I'm just not seeing enough of it.
#18
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
1. Badge
2. Casting web
3. Recess in upper casting for "Aerodynamic"
4. Pivots
All the casting differences appear to be on the upper body.
Take care,
-Kurt
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
25 Posts
You don't see a difference because the two pictures because they are of the same derailer. The point was to show Kurt that he could just change badges if he wanted the same derailer without the Moto badge. You and Kurt could just swap badges. He'll have what he said he wants and you'll have almost the correct derailer with the correct badge. I'm sure that very few people will know the difference.
#20
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
You don't see a difference because the two pictures because they are of the same derailer. The point was to show Kurt that he could just change badges if he wanted the same derailer without the Moto badge. You and Kurt could just swap badges. He'll have what he said he wants and you'll have almost the correct derailer with the correct badge. I'm sure that very few people will know the difference.
-Kurt
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
Kurt,
Ignore the 'Moto' badges, they're just a marketing exercise. Simplex simply slapped Peugeot and Moto badges on them.
Jim
Ignore the 'Moto' badges, they're just a marketing exercise. Simplex simply slapped Peugeot and Moto badges on them.
Jim
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
If you mount the Simplex to a hanger that doesnt allow a realtively tight angle with the chainstay you may have an issue. Keep in mind that modern manufacturers recommend a slightly open angle which is adjusted with what Shimano refers to as the 'B' screw. Looking over current day Shimano tech docs it looks like they recommend the 'B' be adjusted so there's as small an angle as possible as long as the RD upper pulley doesnt touch the freewheel cogs.
#23
Disraeli Gears
Thread Starter
Thanks, Jim.
I don't really care that much about whether the RD has a Moto badge or not -- the FD I have for the bike has a Simplex badge too.
One more question: there's a guard on the inner jockey wheel plate that curves toward the jockey wheel. Does that belong on the bottom jockey wheel (as on GB's pics of 6600 and SX610) or on the upper one (as the plate is installed on my derailer)? It seems to me that the chain is more likely to want to wander off the upper jockey wheel; but I'm no derailer engineer.
I don't really care that much about whether the RD has a Moto badge or not -- the FD I have for the bike has a Simplex badge too.
One more question: there's a guard on the inner jockey wheel plate that curves toward the jockey wheel. Does that belong on the bottom jockey wheel (as on GB's pics of 6600 and SX610) or on the upper one (as the plate is installed on my derailer)? It seems to me that the chain is more likely to want to wander off the upper jockey wheel; but I'm no derailer engineer.
Last edited by Charles Wahl; 08-15-10 at 08:41 PM.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
25 Posts
Thanks, Jim.
I don't really care that much about whether the RD has a Moto badge or not -- the FD I have for the bike has a Simplex badge too.
One more question: there's a guard on the inner jockey wheel plate that curves toward the jockey wheel. Does that belong on the bottom jockey wheel (as on GB's pics of 6600 and SX610) or on the upper one (as the plate is installed on my derailer)? It seems to me that the chain is more likely to want to wander off the upper jockey wheel; but I'm no derailer engineer.
I don't really care that much about whether the RD has a Moto badge or not -- the FD I have for the bike has a Simplex badge too.
One more question: there's a guard on the inner jockey wheel plate that curves toward the jockey wheel. Does that belong on the bottom jockey wheel (as on GB's pics of 6600 and SX610) or on the upper one (as the plate is installed on my derailer)? It seems to me that the chain is more likely to want to wander off the upper jockey wheel; but I'm no derailer engineer.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
One more question: there's a guard on the inner jockey wheel plate that curves toward the jockey wheel. Does that belong on the bottom jockey wheel (as on GB's pics of 6600 and SX610) or on the upper one (as the plate is installed on my derailer)? It seems to me that the chain is more likely to want to wander off the upper jockey wheel; but I'm no derailer engineer.
The 'gaurd' belongs on the upper jockey wheel.