Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Relaxed Riding Position?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Relaxed Riding Position?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-04 | 09:19 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Cushing, Oklahoma

Bikes: 1969 Peugeot U08, unknown MTB circa 1980, '93? Merckx MX-Leader

Relaxed Riding Position?

Posting here because not only are the bikes vintage, but also some of the riders. I'm 54 and the bike is a '68 U08 Peugeot.

After riding with the hot shots, I've recently dropped the handle bars about three to four inches below my seat height. I don't think I like it much. Not only do I bend down farther, but I also feel constricted at the hips.

My question: Is the geometry on these older bikes such that lower bar height does not work well, no matter how young or supple you are? I'm 6' 195 lbs. The frame is the HUGE size made in those days. Others have commented that the bikes of that era placed the rider behind the pedals and modern racing bikes center the rider more directly over the pedals. If this is so, the lower bars on an old style geometry bike would REQUIRE that the hips have a sharper angle to the pedals than todays bikes.

Any thoughts?

If this is too stupid, maybe someone could explain on a 6th grade level, what is meant by "relaxed" geometry. The hot shoes often comment on my bike after a test ride: "It's so comfortable, but a little flexible." I notice a different feel when I take a turn on their new tech bikes, but am not sure how to describe it.

Tyson
TysonB is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-04 | 12:23 AM
  #2  
Glutton for Punishment
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 9
From: San Leandro, CA
This is a good question; I bought a '68 Motobecane Grand Touring this summer and I'm going through the same process as you, trying to arrive at a more relaxed position that's still reasonably efficient. When I got the bike, the drops had already been replaced with 24" BMX bars. I had no interest in drops, but the BMX bars were practically without sweep and had 4" of rise. Mounted in the original SR 85mm stemn it looked odd and handled odd. I found a set of 'North Country-style' bars similar to those on old Raleigh tourers, and they've gotten me closer -- my hand positions are about 4 or 5 inches directly above where they'd be in the drops. I can still pedal pretty efficiently, but a lot more experimentation is needed. To that end, I'm going to install an adjustable quill-type stem. That ought to give me a large enough selection to find the right (or at least right enough) selection.
mswantak is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-04 | 08:30 AM
  #3  
ex frame builder
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 523
Likes: 5
In the 1950s and to some extent through the 1960s aluminum handlebar stems a seat posts were not as good as they are today and were prone to breakage. So back then people rode bigger frames with less seat post showing and they used a shorter handlebar stem so a longer top tube was called for.

By the 1970s handlebar stems were available in much stronger drop forged aluminum; seat posts too were better. The result was frames got smaller; (More seat post showing.) top tubes got shorter so with a longer stem the rider’s weight was more over the front wheel making for much better handling.

These old frames generally had shallow head angles, long fork rake, and a long top tube. This in turn made the seat angle very shallow around 70 or 71 degrees. This is what people usually mean by a relaxed geometry; or more ‘laid back’ for want of a better phrase.

You are right in your assumption that with your bars low and sitting so far back your hips are restricted and my advice is to raise your bars a little at a time until you can find a position you can live with. And you will have to accept the fact that with a frame this old you are never going to achieve the same riding position as others on their newer bikes.
__________________
History, photos and tech articles on "Dave's Bike Blog." 'dave moulton' Registry including a Picture Gallery https://www.davemoultonregistry.com/
Dave Moulton is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-04 | 10:22 AM
  #4  
John E's Avatar
feros ferio
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,397
Likes: 1,864
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Compare the length of your top tube with that of a comparably sized modern frame. I believe UO-8 top tubes are considered longish; mine certainly is, which is also why I can ride a small 54cm frame comfortably.

A handlebar 3-4"/8-10cm below the seat is probably too low, unless you are into serious time trialing. I keep the top of the drops 1.5-2"/4-5cm below the top of my saddle on my road bikes, and that is already a very aggressive stance, particularly if I bend my elbows. I, too, am 54 years old.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-04 | 07:06 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Cushing, Oklahoma

Bikes: 1969 Peugeot U08, unknown MTB circa 1980, '93? Merckx MX-Leader

Guys,

Thanks for the informative replies. The bars are going to be raised a couple of inches tonight! I liked them where they were originally well enough. Should probably have left well enough alone. The "new tech" guys often do whatever is "in" without really wondering "why?".

My thought is that being comfortable in some measure, helps one be efficient and faster in the long run.

Tyson
TysonB is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.