Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Transforming centerpull cantis into direct pull, v-brakes

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Transforming centerpull cantis into direct pull, v-brakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-11, 05:07 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 637
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Transforming centerpull cantis into direct pull, v-brakes

Hi all.
Not sure i'm posting in the right forum...

I'm looking into transforming one of my cantis into this (per sheldon brown)

"The unit illustrated above is a World Class "V-Daptor." In this case, it has been installed on a conventional Shimano LX cantilever, thus converting a traditional center-pull cantilever into a direct-pull unit [...]"

The main purpose would be fun and, further « frankenbiking » my ride...

but I'm puzzled as to... which small parts I should buy.

Any ideas ?

These v-daptors seem to be missing the mounting bracket... https://www.sjscycles.co.uk/v-daptor-...r-pair-prod83/

Last edited by bloom87; 05-06-11 at 05:13 PM.
bloom87 is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 05:28 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
GrayJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: EagleRiver AK
Posts: 1,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 60 Times in 33 Posts
See these for more info;
https://problemsolversbike.com/products/travel_agents

(these are actually for adapting V-brakes to non-V brake levers but similar concept).

No cable housing stop bracket is needed (just as with with V brakes). Reports are that the adapter is somewhat prone to breaking cables and can get clogged with mud/dirt if riding dirty conditions offroad.
GrayJay is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 05:52 PM
  #3  
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Posts: 6,007
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
I would replace my brake levers with appropriate ones instead of using the travel agent. there are some levers which can be used with either type of brake
frantik is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 06:00 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 637
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think i'm looking for something different. I'm looking to mount the travel agent on a cantilever brake arm (not a v-brake).... it means I should be able to screw and mount the travel agent on the right arm of the cantis..

Edit : this is not a classic "wanna use v-brake with canti/road levers" problem. i'm looking to actually hack cantis into v-brakes....

Last edited by bloom87; 05-06-11 at 06:03 PM.
bloom87 is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 09:17 PM
  #5  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,474 Times in 1,437 Posts
What's the point here?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 11:28 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Captain Blight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,470

Bikes: -1973 Motobecane Mirage -197? Velosolex L'Etoile -'71 Raleigh Super Course

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
This is a stupid idea, and will only end badly.
Captain Blight is offline  
Old 05-07-11, 02:04 AM
  #7  
WNG
Spin Forest! Spin!
 
WNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arrid Zone-a
Posts: 5,956

Bikes: I used to have many. And I Will again.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
What's the point here?
+1, it might look interesting and 'fun', but the braking performance suffers.
WNG is offline  
Old 05-07-11, 10:33 AM
  #8  
Stop reading my posts!
 
unworthy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,584
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times in 788 Posts
The main thing you'd gain is you don't need cable hangers for the cantis.
The thing that causes brake performance problems is that the WC V-daptors are designed to pull more cable with less force using that eccentric pulley...that's because they are intended make "short pull" levers work with "long pull" V-brakes.
You put them on a canti and you will get super grabby (read: dangerous) brakes.
If you are determined to do this hack, you need to fit a center-drilled pulley to the V-daptor (and those other brands won't work since you can't bolt them to a canti arm) so the cable pull is not amplified.
Not worth the trouble, IMHO, but could be done if you are really handy.
unworthy1 is offline  
Old 05-07-11, 10:54 AM
  #9  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
My Counterpoint Opus II (semi-recumbent tandem) is from 1984, before the dawn of V-brakes. The front wheel is directly below the stoker's seat, so there's no room for a cable hanger; the cantilever was modified into a V-brake exactly the way OP means, and I'm pretty much 100% certain the bike was designed to have this brake configured this way; there's really no other way the brake could have been hooked up. It's very effective. But I don't remember the details.
rhm is offline  
Old 05-07-11, 12:38 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 637
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
+1, it might look interesting and 'fun', but the braking performance suffers.
Originally Posted by unworthy1
The main thing you'd gain is you don't need cable hangers for the cantis.
The thing that causes brake performance problems is that the WC V-daptors are designed to pull more cable with less force using that eccentric pulley...that's because they are intended make "short pull" levers work with "long pull" V-brakes.
You put them on a canti and you will get super grabby (read: dangerous) brakes.
If you are determined to do this hack, you need to fit a center-drilled pulley to the V-daptor (and those other brands won't work since you can't bolt them to a canti arm) so the cable pull is not amplified.
Not worth the trouble, IMHO, but could be done if you are really handy.
Ummm...with due respect guys and unless i'm missing something really fundamental here, I don't think that's true.

What you see pictured in the OP are basically v-brakes with extra-short arms. YES they were cantis in the first place, but hacked into linear pull, extra short-arms v-brakes. So I don't think there is any risk in it. I agree that v-brakes are inherently extra grabby... but this should be no more dangerous than a classic v-brake on the front (which I find kind of dangerous but manageable)

To those who say hacking cantis into v-brakes is stupid... and see no point.... I that's say it's cool and unique... I say it's sheldonbrown-y !!!!

Last edited by bloom87; 05-07-11 at 01:11 PM.
bloom87 is offline  
Old 05-07-11, 10:29 PM
  #11  
Surf Bum
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 2,184

Bikes: Lapierre Pulsium 500 FdJ, Ritchey breakaway cyclocross, vintage trek mtb.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Here's one reason to do it: to eliminate brake chatter. This may not have been a concern in the days of heavy steel forks, but is quite a problem these days with light carbon forks. I run mini-v brakes (with campy levers) to solve this problem, but running regular cantis set up like the opening picture would accomplish the same thing since the cable housing runs all the way to the brake instead of to a frame/stem mounted hanger (which keeps the housing fixed but as the fork flexes under braking, the cable is shortened/lengthened/shortened in a cycle that produces chatter feeling to the rider).
__________________
Thirst is stronger than the rules. - Stars and Watercarriers, 1974

Last edited by pacificaslim; 05-07-11 at 10:33 PM.
pacificaslim is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av1
Bicycle Mechanics
3
07-21-17 03:44 PM
erbfarm
Utility Cycling
6
12-18-12 08:26 PM
Mithrandir
Bicycle Mechanics
21
09-16-11 08:04 AM
breadbin
Bicycle Mechanics
14
04-11-11 09:59 AM
Bikedued
Classic & Vintage
4
01-22-10 12:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.