Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Brooks B17 worth the weight?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Brooks B17 worth the weight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-11 | 11:44 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 2
Brooks B17 worth the weight?

The lbs had a Brooks B17 on sale for about $60. I've been looking at these for some time online and excitedly picked it off the rack. Yikes! This thing feels heavy! I'm not looking to be a total weight weenie with my gaspipe Grand Prix, but it felt noticeably heavier than my free Kashima vinyl saddle. Is there anything that looks remotely as cool and offers comparable quality/comfort to the Brooks with slightly less ballast? Or should I just suck it up and drop a half pound somewhere else? Maybe if I shaved my head...
Dav305z is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 12:03 AM
  #2  
blaise_f's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix

Bikes: Surly Trucker

It's only worth the weight in gold, but that's my opinion.
blaise_f is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 01:54 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 523
Likes: 19
From: Hub of the Universe, MA

Bikes: Centurions, Shoguns, and Stumpjumpers

if you're unwilling to pay the weight tax, go with another vinyl saddle. maybe a turbo, or the charge bucket.
smoothness is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 04:28 AM
  #4  
randyjawa's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 12,569
Likes: 2,740
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

If weight is the OP's concern, get ride of the bike and forget the Brooks. If enjoying the ride is the goal, keep the Raleigh and get the Brooks. Personally, I love almost every Brooks saddle I have ever tried, with a single exception, the Brooks B15 which was, for me, the saddle from Hades.

In fact, I have had a Brooks B17 honey kicking around for about three years. The saddle is almost brand new and looks just great on my recently built up Motobécane Grand Jubileé. No picutes of that yet and it looks as though I will be hanging onto my Motobé for a while. I love that bicycle!
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".

Last edited by randyjawa; 08-25-11 at 04:34 AM. Reason: forgot something
randyjawa is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 04:35 AM
  #5  
mkeller234's Avatar
Rustbelt Rider
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,105
Likes: 390
From: Canton, OH

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

The weight difference may be obvious in your hands but I really doubt you will notice that weight while you are on the bike. Some people like Brooks saddles and some don't, it's one of those things that you have to try for yourself. I do like the shape of a B17, they are nice and wide.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 04:39 AM
  #6  
Mercian Rider's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 740
Likes: 2
From: Ohio

Bikes: 1973 Mercian Pro, 1972-73 Peugeot Track, 1983 Lotus Competition, Early 1970s Bottecchia Pro/Giro, 2000 Bob Jackson Special Tourist, 2011 Rivendell A. Homer Hilsen; 1996 Franklin custom

A happy rear end will make you go faster, thereby making up for the extra weight.

Honestly, I've been riding B-17s since the early 70s, and have tried many others, but always come back to it.

Yes, it's worth the weight.
Mercian Rider is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 04:49 AM
  #7  
Chombi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Likes: 39

Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC

The Titanium railed Berthoud leather suspension saddle is supposed to weigh about the same as a typical Turbo saddle at around 300 grams. Maybe you should check that out.

Chombi
Chombi is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 04:51 AM
  #8  
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,266
Likes: 152
From: YEG

Bikes: See my sig...

If you ride in an aggressive position the B17 may not be the optimal saddle... the B17 Imperial is a much better saddle for this due to the ergonomic cut out which allows for a more forward position.

As always YMMV.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 05:22 AM
  #9  
rootboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,748
Likes: 138
From: Wherever
Hard to beat thick leather stretched over a steel frame in a good shape. But quality construction with steel and leather isn't light. Should become more comfortable than your vinyl saddle.
rootboy is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 05:26 AM
  #10  
devinfan's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 54
From: Toronto, Ontario
The only saddle I've ridden that's more comfortable than a B17 is a B66 - now THAT'S heavy. Comfort is far more important than a few grams. Also it's not like you're riding an ultra-light bike now anyways, so style and comfort are the way to go. Any Raleigh Grand Prix (I actually really like them) would look way better with a Brooks than any other saddle I can imagine. I can say honestly going from 16lb bikes to 30lb bikes, weight has very little to do with ride quality or speed so don't obsess over it.
devinfan is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 05:26 AM
  #11  
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

For me it is, but everyone is different. The B-17 is my favorite saddle, closely followed by the Professional. Sixty fiver is right on...it's not the best saddle for the drops.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 05:29 AM
  #12  
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,266
Likes: 152
From: YEG

Bikes: See my sig...

The stock saddle on a lot of older Grand Prix models was a Wrights W35 which is a little narrower and better suited for a road bike.

Brooks saddles come in so many configurations that there is pretty much one for every kind of bike... a B66 is a great saddle but on a road bike it may not feel as wonderful as it would on a roadster where the sitting position is more upright.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 05:32 AM
  #13  
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,266
Likes: 152
From: YEG

Bikes: See my sig...

Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
For me it is, but everyone is different. The B-17 is my favorite saddle, closely followed by the Professional. Sixty fiver is right on...it's not the best saddle for the drops.
The Professional is a pretty narrow saddle and I cannot ride on one, having much wider than normal sit bones for a guy.

My B17 Imperial is pure awesomeness and I have been pretty happy with my Ideale Professional which is a wider saddle than the Brooks... also ride on a Wright's W35N and an older wrights W3N which is not as narrow and very comfortable on my drop bar bikes with fairly level saddle to bar relationships.

If one has a more upright position on a road bike with a level saddle to bar drop a B17 can work well.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 05:40 AM
  #14  
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

I do have some drop to the bars and feel fine on a B-17...it's only when I'm on the drops that it becomes an issue. I don't really feel THAT much difference between the pro and B-17 in terms of width, most of the difference I feel is in the leather. I like Pros, but the B-17 is my favorite.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 05:54 AM
  #15  
rootboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,748
Likes: 138
From: Wherever
Originally Posted by Dav305z
Is there anything that looks remotely as cool and offers comparable quality/comfort to the Brooks with slightly less ballast?
You could look into a Brooks with Titanium rails ...if your pockets are deep.
rootboy is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 07:11 AM
  #16  
photogravity's Avatar
Hopelessly addicted...
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 13
From: Central Maryland

Bikes: 1949 Hercules Kestrel, 1950 Norman Rapide, 1970 Schwinn Collegiate, 1972 Peugeot UE-8, 1976 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Jack Taylor Tandem, 1984 Davidson Tandem, 2010 Bilenky "BQ" 650B Constructeur Tandem, 2011 Linus Mixte

"Brooks B17 worth the weight?"

Yes.
photogravity is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 07:21 AM
  #17  
Ecrevisse's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 308
Likes: 3
From: Rosanky, Texas

Bikes: Steel is real. All others need not apply.

Comfort is more important than weight. The Brooks B.17 is a very comfortable saddle. The titanium railed version will save you weight but will never be as light as the latest light weight saddle offerings.
Ecrevisse is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 07:30 AM
  #18  
timber_cruiser's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 112
Likes: 2
From: Utah

Bikes: Basso, No name 70's Columbus steel frame with Campy components, Fuji - The Finest, Raleigh Super Record, Giant Advanced TCR

The Brooks B17 is really worth the weight, both for the comfort, and more importantly, you can not get a better look than a Brooks on a classic Raleigh!

timber_cruiser is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 07:37 AM
  #19  
ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 8,343
Likes: 16
From: Louisville
How about spending $60 to find out for yourself?
ColonelJLloyd is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 07:43 AM
  #20  
rootboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,748
Likes: 138
From: Wherever
That's a pretty good deal on a B-17.
rootboy is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 07:46 AM
  #21  
storckm's Avatar
Cyclist
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 683
Likes: 49
A really good deal. When you're actually riding, you won't notice the weight, but you'll notice the comfort (unless you end up not liking the way it feels, which is, at least theoretically, possible).
storckm is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 07:59 AM
  #22  
lostarchitect's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,970
Likes: 59
From: Catskills/Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: See sig

Short answer: Yes.

Long answer: Yes, of course.
lostarchitect is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 08:46 AM
  #23  
-holiday76's Avatar
No one cares
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,288
Likes: 618
From: Bucks County, Pa
b17 imperial was my favorite saddle until it sagged really bad and is not ridable.

a regular b17 is really comfy for me out of the box

i have a swallow that is very comfortable out of the box

i have a pro that ranks last out of the box, however i'll still ride it over any non leather saddle and its getting better with age. I've done centuries on used pro's.

is it worth the weight? Depends. Are you so light and in shape and racing that it really matters? most people arent and if you were, you probably would know enough that you would be in c&v and asking about leather saddles.
__________________
I have some bikes.





Last edited by -holiday76; 08-25-11 at 09:04 AM.
-holiday76 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 08:54 AM
  #24  
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

Originally Posted by -holiday76
b17 imperial was my favorite saddle until it sagged really bad and it not unridable.

a regular b17 is really comfy for me out of the box

i have a swallow that is very comfortable out of the box

i have a pro that ranks last out of the box, however i'll still ride it over any non leather saddle and its getting better with age. I've done centuries on used pro's.

is it worth the weight? Depends. Are you so light and in shape and racing that it really matters? most people arent and if you were, you probably would know enough that you would be in c&v and asking about leather saddles.
That's my experience too Holiday...the Pros are (eventually) fine, but take some time to get there. The leather is just so dang thick it takes a while for them to break in. I like buying them used too...saves some pain.

My swallow is not good for longer rides, but I only have a few hundred on it...I'm hoping it breaks in. The B-17s are, for me, perfect from the moment they go on a post.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-11 | 09:03 AM
  #25  
Robofunc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, FL

Bikes: Schwinn, Bottecchia, Miyata, projects

I love my b17. I spend my time about 50/50 on the hoods/in the drops and notice no discomfort in either position.

That said, my second-favorite saddle was my nasty old black vinyl Kashima. For whatever reason, it just felt good. If it's comfortable, maybe don't be so quick to discard it (or sell it to me if you really hate it!)
Robofunc is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.