![]() |
Help With a Brooks Saddle
OK, this is the undisputed sub forum for all things Brooks. I have B67 and need to know if there's a classy way to mount a saddle bag on it. I saw a pic in a post with what looked like a decaleur mounted to the bottom of the spring. I checked Velo Orange and they had nothing. Any help would be appreciated.
|
Well, it does have bag loops so that is a nice place to start.
http://www.brooksengland.com/en/Resa...om&halign=left Are you talking about a support for a large bag? If so, I found a support that loops around the seat stays and provides a base for the bottom of the bag. Not exceptionally classy, but a practical way to get the job done. I found mine at a Yard Sale and it took me over a year to figure out how to use the thing. Unfortunately the only pictures I have are of it under the bag. The portion which contacts the frame has a plastic coating on the chrome frame. http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...SaddlenBag.jpg http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...3/P7270045.jpg |
The Carradice Bagman or the Viva saddle bag support are good products that will support the weight of a large saddlebag.
|
+1 to what Pastorbob suggested. That bag support thing was made by Park (iIrc) and came in two sizes. It's a great design, very strong, and when used correctly very stable. But you have to get lucky with the fit. I custom made a bag (basically a copy of the one Pastorbob has) to fit my frame and saddle height. If you know what you're looking for, you'll see the same bag support in this photo:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5110/...c442d5ca_b.jpg |
Rivendell sells an approximation of the Park rack.
|
Originally Posted by ColonelJLloyd
(Post 13224221)
Rivendell sells an approximation of the Park rack.
|
Looks like it should fit on most C&V bikes.
|
Originally Posted by ColonelJLloyd
(Post 13224300)
Looks like it should fit on most C&V bikes.
|
Right, but if anyone is expecting a perfect fit from any non-custom rack they're foolish or naive. Ain't gonna happen, as you say, Herr Verarbeiter.
|
Whats the point of a gigantic saddle bag flopping around?
. Why not just a bag on a rear rack instead? . |
Originally Posted by dgodave
(Post 13224483)
Whats the point of a gigantic saddle bag flopping around?
. Why not just a bag on a rear rack instead? . A rear rack does not serve well as a saddle bag support. I've tried it. |
Originally Posted by rhm
(Post 13224632)
For utilitarian purposes, a decent rack trunk secured to a good rack is an excellent solution. But since OP explicitly stated that he's looking for a classy way to attach a saddle bag to a Brooks B72 (which is, if done properly, also an excellent utilitarian solution) I don't think that's what he's looking for.
A rear rack does not serve well as a saddle bag support. I've tried it. |
|
HOLY COW that is huge seat bag! I used to have something like that years ago and the support bracket, but I am not sure where it ever went.
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...SaddlenBag.jpg I am too much of a minimalist to haul such huge carpet bag around these days though |
Originally Posted by rhm
(Post 13224632)
For utilitarian purposes, a decent rack trunk secured to a good rack is an excellent solution. But since OP explicitly stated that he's looking for a classy way to attach a saddle bag to a Brooks B72 (which is, if done properly, also an excellent utilitarian solution) I don't think that's what he's looking for.
A rear rack does not serve well as a saddle bag support. I've tried it. . But I have to wonder why? The big saddle bag seems inherently floppy, high up, possibly awkward. I just wonder whats the attraction. . |
Originally Posted by Bianchigirll
(Post 13230355)
HOLY COW that is huge seat bag! I used to have something like that years ago and the support bracket, but I am not sure where it ever went.
I am too much of a minimalist to haul such huge carpet bag around these days though
Originally Posted by dgodave
(Post 13230365)
I respect that the OP has considered what he wants.
. But I have to wonder why? The big saddle bag seems inherently floppy, high up, possibly awkward. I just wonder whats the attraction. . The bag is very stable. The backs of my thighs do come in contact with the front side, but it is not an annoyance. With the Park Rack underneath, the bag really stays put. |
This thread has me thinking about eliminating the ugly rear rack on my Mercier in favor of a saddle bag and the small removable park-type rack. That way I could switch it between bikes easily. I would need to find a classy bag that I could use for both work and play, though.
|
OK, I finally found the thread. It's post #23 and the mount I want is pictured. I PM'd the owner but haven't heard back yet. Maybe someone hear knows what it is. I'm looking for that bag mount. It positions the bag away from the springs.
http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...our?highlight= http://i553.photobucket.com/albums/j...1sales/bag.jpg |
That is rather clever! To my eye it looks custom fabricated. Other than the elongated "C" clamps to the outside of the leather straps, it looks as if you could find all the hardware at ACE and the LBS (or your spare parts bin). FTWelder could whip that out in in hour or less. Wonder what the other piece of square stock is doing down near the seatpost clamp?
|
Looks like a potential mounting point for a rear rack.
Mark |
Originally Posted by dgodave
(Post 13230365)
I respect that the OP has considered what he wants.
. But I have to wonder why? The big saddle bag seems inherently floppy, high up, possibly awkward. I just wonder whats the attraction. . The attraction for me starts with the premise that with a "vintage" bike, I like to find the best compromise between the original style of the bike and whatever utilitarian purpose I will put it to. So while a touring bike from the 70's or 80's looks best with a Jim Blackburn rack over the back wheel, an English lightweight from the 40's looks best with a saddle bag. The saddle bag on my Fothergill, as shown, has the right look. The way it attaches, and rests on the Park bag support, is not period correct by any means; but that's not the point. The top of the bag is reenforced with two pieces of 1/2" x 1/8" aluminum bar stock. A cable clamp (a U-shaped steel rod, threaded at each end) goes around each saddle rail and through the two aluminum bars. So the bag is very securely mounted to the saddle rails; it does not flop around at all. |
Originally Posted by rhm
(Post 13224188)
+1 to what Pastorbob suggested. That bag support thing was made by Park (iIrc) and came in two sizes. It's a great design, very strong, and when used correctly very stable. But you have to get lucky with the fit. I custom made a bag (basically a copy of the one Pastorbob has) to fit my frame and saddle height. If you know what you're looking for, you'll see the same bag support in this photo:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5110/...c442d5ca_b.jpg |
Originally Posted by pastorbobnlnh
(Post 13234215)
That is rather clever! To my eye it looks custom fabricated. Other than the elongated "C" clamps to the outside of the leather straps, it looks as if you could find all the hardware at ACE and the LBS (or your spare parts bin). FTWelder could whip that out in in hour or less. Wonder what the other piece of square stock is doing down near the seatpost clamp?
|
Originally Posted by cs1
(Post 13236271)
I was thinking the same thing. I really like the QR to take the bag off.
|
Originally Posted by brockd15
(Post 13236681)
I don't know where, but I'm pretty sure I've seen that for sale somewhere before. I don't think it's a custom fab job.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.