Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

are 44cm wide track bars too wide for you guys?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

are 44cm wide track bars too wide for you guys?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-11 | 10:46 PM
  #1  
J.Wolfe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Addicted Newb
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 172
Likes: 2
From: Philly

Bikes: 1974 Huffy Contestant: SOLD 1980 Fuji Royale: CURRENT

are 44cm wide track bars too wide for you guys?

i just bought soma 456 track drops in 44cm. compared to my nitto noodle 39cm its a good difference, more then i expected. i love the bars, but i guess from my previous bars it will have some getting used to of how wide they really are.

so my question is, is 44cm too wide to where it looks weird and goofy for you guys? its all personal preference i know, but i guess if i could do it again, i would have chosen a 42 instead. I probably will keep them, but i want the opinions of others who have maybe had 44cm wide bars of their own. pics are encouraged!

i know there are benefits to wider bars such as comfort, stability, steering, and breathing.



thanks
Justin

the bars, with a potential brake lever (still deciding)

Last edited by J.Wolfe; 09-15-11 at 10:52 PM.
J.Wolfe is offline  
Reply
Old 09-15-11 | 11:08 PM
  #2  
Puget Pounder's Avatar
Wookie Jesus inspires me.
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 4
From: Seattle, WA
Way too wide for me.

I usually ride drop bars that correspond to my shoulder width, which is about 40cm.
Puget Pounder is offline  
Reply
Old 09-15-11 | 11:19 PM
  #3  
J.Wolfe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Addicted Newb
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 172
Likes: 2
From: Philly

Bikes: 1974 Huffy Contestant: SOLD 1980 Fuji Royale: CURRENT

yea i was doing some research and they say pick bars that are the width of your shoulders/a little wider. i compared them to my shoulders just by physically fitting them up and to my surprise they seem to be just right. at first i was just worried about aesthetics but now with more research ive found that 44 is still not that wide in general terms, and that they are actually pretty spot on to my specs recommended to me.
J.Wolfe is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 12:09 AM
  #4  
Puget Pounder's Avatar
Wookie Jesus inspires me.
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 4
From: Seattle, WA
well aesthetics are important, but it shouldn't compromise fit. If it fits, then ride it. There is something about my anatomy that doesn't like my arms flaring out. I was taught to hold the bars straight out and there should be no angle (which is not an etched rule by any means) and it was always spot on for me. Or if you wanted to be precise, measure joint-to-joint and that's how wide the bar should be.
Puget Pounder is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 01:04 AM
  #5  
mazdaspeed's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 7
From: WA state
I can't ride bikes with handlebars smaller than 42cm anymore. 44's feel amazing to me. It really just depends on your size.
mazdaspeed is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 01:12 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 40
From: Victoria
44 or 46 (Noodles) for me please and thanks. I'm not big, but my shoulders are wide and fairly "open" so big bars work for me. I'd race on 44's for a better tuck, but I like the stability of the 46's for rough roads, downhills, fast corners, emergency maneuvers, and off-road. Real wide bars on the mountain bike, even better there.
tashi is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 02:34 AM
  #7  
Michael Angelo's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 36
From: Hurricane Alley , Florida

Bikes: Treks (USA), Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn letour,Raleigh Team Professional, Gazelle GoldLine Racing, 2 Super Mondias, Carlton Professional.

The bigger the rider the wider the bars.Sor instance, If you're 6'2" + then 44cm should be just fine. If you're a hobbit, then it's too darn wide.
Michael Angelo is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 05:36 AM
  #8  
Italuminium's Avatar
Cisalpinist
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,557
Likes: 18
From: Holland

Bikes: blue ones.

It seems to me hobbits need the wide bars because they are stocky themselves I'm not exactly hobbit length, (178 cm), but I prefer very narrow bars since I'm a lanky skinny sort of dude. Until I started rowing I was bit like a cat, if my head fit through somewhere the rest would be no problem
Italuminium is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 05:42 AM
  #9  
Gary Fountain's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,003
Likes: 303
From: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.

Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.

Traditionally the narrower your track bars the smaller the gap you could squeeze through on the velodrome.
Gary Fountain is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 06:37 AM
  #10  
Glennfordx4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 142
From: South Jersey

Bikes: Too many Bicycles to list

I think there fine but then again I ride 46's.
Glennfordx4 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 07:46 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Anything that's very different from what you're used to using/seeing will feel weird at first. Just like a different pair of shoes, or when you've been driving a rental car on vacation and come home to your usual car... feels weird, right? Ride them for a while.
AaronAnderson is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 08:34 AM
  #12  
jptwins's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Jamaica Plain, MA

Bikes: Boulder AllRoad67cm; 1990 Nobilette 65cm;Fuji S12-S LTD 63cm; xtracycle; panasonic gran tourer 68cm

ha, i must be a freak, since i have two bikes with 48cm nitto noodles. i'm a pretty big guy, so it's not that freaky, and these are on my 27" frame, so really only the wheels are proportionally small. I wanted to get a wide set originally, because i was going to pull my twins on a tandem trail-a-bike and needed as much leverage as possible. The other set I got on a great deal, so i couldn't pass it up.

that said, i recently decided to try a set of the Nitto B115 at 45cm, which i thought was going to be small, but they feel great. I believe 45 or 46 is my ideal.

here's my 48's on my very tall Raleigh Marathon:
jptwins is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 09:46 AM
  #13  
ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 8,343
Likes: 16
From: Louisville
Justin, I'm pretty sure those 456 bars are 46cm, not 44. They're very wide. I thought that wide bars made sense for me because I ride 63cm frames and am 6'. But apparently my shoulders aren't very wide. I've found ~42cm to be my sweet spot.
ColonelJLloyd is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 12:12 PM
  #14  
J.Wolfe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Addicted Newb
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 172
Likes: 2
From: Philly

Bikes: 1974 Huffy Contestant: SOLD 1980 Fuji Royale: CURRENT

i looked for stamping and the only numbers i found were "09L" "456" and "440" i assumed that read as 44.0. who knows lol. also im shipping your package out right now!
J.Wolfe is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 12:30 PM
  #15  
Stealthammer's Avatar
Still spinnin'.....
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 2
From: Whitestown, IN

Bikes: Fisher Opie freeride/urban assault MTB, Redline Monocog 29er MTB, Serrota T-Max Commuter, Klein Rascal SS, Salsa Campion Road bike, Pake Rum Runner FG/SS Road bike, Cannondale Synapse Road bike, Santana Arriva Road Tandem, and others....

I'm only 5'9" but I have wide shoulders and actually feel uncomfortable with anything narrower than 44cm, and prefer 46cm. They make climbing out of the saddle far more stable and controllable, and I don't believe that they appreciably increase the aerodynamic drag on downhills consider that I am the largest frontal impact. My mountain bikes using drop bars always start with 46cm and have the drops bent outward another 1.5" on each side, and I've been thinking about doing the same for my fixie bars.

39cm bars scare the crap out of me make me feel like I am riding one of those "college" fixies with 18" bars, and I won't even hand them down, they go straight into the dumpster....

Last edited by Stealthammer; 09-16-11 at 12:34 PM.
Stealthammer is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 01:58 PM
  #16  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Heh, my Bianchi came to me with 39cm bars, and I wondered why it took so long to feel comfortable steering it. (Not in a "pain" sense, but feeling really nervous taking one hand off.) I borrowed a friend's bike with 44cm bars for a while, and I'm thinking some 42cm randonneur bars are in my future.

- Scott
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 02:01 PM
  #17  
Puget Pounder's Avatar
Wookie Jesus inspires me.
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 4
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by Stealthammer
I'm only 5'9" but I have wide shoulders and actually feel uncomfortable with anything narrower than 44cm, and prefer 46cm. They make climbing out of the saddle far more stable and controllable, and I don't believe that they appreciably increase the aerodynamic drag on downhills consider that I am the largest frontal impact. My mountain bikes using drop bars always start with 46cm and have the drops bent outward another 1.5" on each side, and I've been thinking about doing the same for my fixie bars.

39cm bars scare the crap out of me make me feel like I am riding one of those "college" fixies with 18" bars, and I won't even hand them down, they go straight into the dumpster....
Seems like a waste of bars that some smaller people could use. My girlfriend uses 38s and they can be a pain to find.
Puget Pounder is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-11 | 02:03 PM
  #18  
blaise_f's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix

Bikes: Surly Trucker

Originally Posted by Puget Pounder
Seems like a waste of bars that some smaller people could use. My girlfriend uses 38s and they can be a pain to find.
Everything has a use. Not everyone is shaped or made the same way!
blaise_f is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigdo13
Road Cycling
53
03-31-16 04:09 PM
reesek
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
2
02-17-14 05:09 PM
jonwvara
Classic & Vintage
8
02-03-13 09:33 PM
McQz
Mountain Biking
16
08-06-11 09:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.