![]() |
Its never been waxed? I think thats an obvious first step...
|
Originally Posted by bigbossman
(Post 13590599)
Sure it is.
Say I had a mid 70's paramount, and I got sick of looking at the yellow paint. If I hand it over to Ed Litton or send it to Waterford and have them paint it blue and then re-decal it, it will still be worth what it was before the repaint. It's not a one-off, historically significant, or even especially rare or valuable in the grand scheme of things. I agree - there are plenty of bikes that should be refinished only as a last resort, but this isn't one of them. I've seen enough Litton, Baylis, Bell, and Waterford refinished bike to satisfy myself.... they are masterfully done and will not hinder the sale of the frame they adorn. Maybe you wouldn't buy it - but I guarantee you there will be a market for them just the same, and with no loss of value. Having collected antique furniture for almost 50 years now, some of my early decisions to refinish have come back to haunt me. I spent serious $$ on the refinish work, and in return, lowered the value of every piece by 50 to 75%. Now the lower end stuff does not get hurt too much on value. But any of the better stuff, ouch. For me, if I got tired of a yellow Paramount, I would start shopping for a worthy replacement, and then sell my yellow bike. Done right, I would end up with a nice original bike, and only be out the cost of shipping and perhaps fleecebay fees. A quick look at the Waterford price list shows a basic repaint with masking of lugs is $750. Add to that price shipping both ways. Not sure whether the repaint pricing includes decals, or just the installation of them. All in, probably pushing $900 or more. Myself, I can't afford a $900 hit. |
Originally Posted by wrk101
(Post 13591111)
To me the loss of value is straight forward. At best, the bike will retain its pre-repaint value. The owner has just lost the cost of the repaint.
In the big picture, there aren't that many people who look at old bikes as money-makers, or who care one bit about what an alteration would do to its value. Most people like shiny, unblemished bikes better than faded, scratched, and chipped ones. That's a reality sometimes overlooked in this subforurm I think. And for the record, I don't have a problem with that. It's one reason I like this place. |
Originally Posted by wrk101
(Post 13591111)
To me the loss of value is straight forward. At best, the bike will retain its pre-repaint value. The owner has just lost the cost of the repaint.
Having collected antique furniture for almost 50 years now, some of my early decisions to refinish have come back to haunt me. I spent serious $$ on the refinish work, and in return, lowered the value of every piece by 50 to 75%. Now the lower end stuff does not get hurt too much on value. But any of the better stuff, ouch.
Originally Posted by well biked
(Post 13591145)
That's what I was thinking, too.
Of course you will likely not recoup the cost of the repaint. That is not the same as devaluing the bike. That frame just will not be degraded in value by 50-75%, it just won't. This is a production bike we're talking about, not a singularly special one-off. Again - I ask the question: How much is this particular frame/fork worth as it sits? Now..... how much is it worth with a Waterford refinish? Give me some numbers, please. Tell me just how much of the value is lost. |
Originally Posted by bigbossman
(Post 13591550)
. . . . Again - I ask the question:
How much is this particular frame/fork worth as it sits? Now..... how much is it worth with a Waterford refinish? Give me some numbers, please. Tell me just how much of the value is lost. Value before repaint = $517.18 Value after repaint = $511.81 Value lost = ($517.18 - $511.81) = $ 5.37 Jeez, do I have to explain everything to you? :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by bikingshearer
(Post 13591853)
$5.37.Jeez, do I have to explain everything to you? :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by bikingshearer
(Post 13591853)
$5.37.
Value before repaint = $517.18 Value after repaint = $511.81 Value lost = ($517.18 - $511.81) = $ 5.37 |
Originally Posted by bikingshearer
(Post 13591853)
$5.37.
Value before repaint = $517.18 Value after repaint = $511.81 Value lost = ($517.18 - $511.81) = $ 5.37 Jeez, do I have to explain everything to you? :rolleyes: -Kurt |
$900? I was thinking of charging her $100 plus parts for the whole thing.
I think I will recommend the clean and refurbish and she can look at new bikes. |
Does the Paramount fit you? Maybe you should convince her to trade up.:p
|
Originally Posted by ericbaker
(Post 13591025)
Its never been waxed? I think thats an obvious first step...
|
Originally Posted by bikingshearer
(Post 13594450)
Are you suggesting basic bikini-line, the Hitler moustache, or baby's butt bald?
|
Most of the older bikes are silk screened and lacquer paint both of become like water color and a tissue when hit with modern compounds .
Carefully with buffing. If you must repaint don't use vinyl. Use water transfers "decals" then clear coat. Just my 2 cents worth. But some good old knob polishing and wax can work magic first! |
Originally Posted by Spookeay Bird
(Post 13594726)
Most of the older bikes are silk screened and lacquer paint both of become like water color and a tissue when hit with modern compounds.
Cases in point:I've had a near-mint '72 Schwinn Speedster with silkscreened downtube lettering that virtually polished off completely with the slightest single wipe over the top. However, I recently acquired a 1969 Schwinn Racer in nearly identical shape with the same downtube silkscreened decal - and have successfully rubbed the decal multiple times with very little loss of the decal's vibrancy. There's no hard and fast rule to polishing silkscreened decals, other than to be careful. Try a small, inconspicuous spot and work from there as you see fit. -Kurt |
Originally Posted by Spookeay Bird
(Post 13594726)
But some good old knob polishing and wax can work magic first!
Sorry, couldn't resist. :D |
Originally Posted by realestvin7
(Post 13594767)
I'm here for the "knob polishing"...
Sorry, couldn't resist. :D |
My guess, strictly based on my experience with non-bike and non C&V bike people, is that she mentioned the word 'paint' only to show that she's serious about having the job done right. I'm sure you can convince her that less is more. I wouldn't even jump to the conclusion that the bike needs new cables and housings and whatever else you mentioned; maybe it does, maybe it doesn't, and there's no point in speculating.
|
If that lady ever sees this thread, between the waxing jokes and the knob
polishing ones, you will be out of a job and may have to sell your house.:D |
Originally Posted by bigbossman
(Post 13588516)
If she wants to paint it, it's her money. What's the big deal? Paint the damn thing, and make sure it gets done right.
|
Originally Posted by rhm
(Post 13596787)
My guess, strictly based on my experience with non-bike and non C&V bike people, is that she mentioned the word 'paint' only to show that she's serious about having the job done right.
One time, the final item on the list, #15 was . . . . "paint the car". |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.