Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-12 | 12:35 PM
  #1  
TheTreauth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Michigan

Bikes: 2011 Giant Rapid 3, 2001 Schwinn Mesa GSX

Thoughts?

I'm looking for a vintage bike to do a light first resto job on. My area rarely has anything worthwhile come on on Craigslist but today I found this.

https://saginaw.craigslist.org/bik/2939077715.html

I would want to find original drop handlebars and saddle (or at least some respectable looking alternatives). They put the drop brakes on some ugly looking flat bars, from what I can tell. The seller does not have the original saddle or handlebars, unfortunately.

Thoughts from you pros?

Last edited by TheTreauth; 04-04-12 at 12:37 PM. Reason: added detail
TheTreauth is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-12 | 12:54 PM
  #2  
bibliobob's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,226
Likes: 734
From: Sacramento, CA

Bikes: '64 Bianchi CDM, '62ish Altenburger Cinelli Mod B, '63-64 Cinelli SC, 69 Rene Herse Competition, '71 Gitane SC, '73 Cinelli SC, '73-74 Colnago Super,, '73-74 Cinelli SC, '78ish counterfeit Confente, '82 Medici Gran Turismo, '67ish Mondia Speciale

Looks like a good choice to me. Some caveats:

1) Make sure that it's your size. No point in spending any money on something that won't fit you.

2) Make sure that the seat post and stem aren't seized.

Good luck!
bibliobob is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-12 | 01:08 PM
  #3  
cycleheimer's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,918
Likes: 319
From: New York Metro Area
What the one in the CL ad you're looking at looks like...




What is should look like...



It's probably late '80s. The components it might have come with:

Cromoly Frame and Fork
Suntour VX Accushift derailleurs
Suntour VX Acushift shifters
Diacompe VX brakeset
Suntour VX crankset
Champion handlebar and stem
Quick release
Weinmman rims
Alloy seatpost

Off the tip of the bat...tires, tubes, seat, alloy drop bars, correct brake levers and hoods. Is there a seat post under that saddle? What type? Alloy micro-adjust (would be surprised)? Check to make sure it hasn't been downgraded with inexpensive components. That crank set doesn't seem to look correct, IMHO. The frame needs to be the correct size for you. That is most important if you plan on riding it. IMHO, try to pitch, in a real nice and friendly firm way, $60 to $75 cash if you want it. That's my take on it.

I like this one on your CL...
80;s TREK 420 Road Bike - $140 (Bay City)

https://saginaw.craigslist.org/bik/2934131219.html
Date: 2012-04-01, 11:25AM EDT
Reply to: q3fc6-2934131219@sale.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


Mid 80's Trek touring road bike. Broken spoke in the back. Dirty bar tape. CLASSY. Just a beautiful bike. But alas, too large for me, 33 inch stand over height. Come check it out.



  • Location: Bay City
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2934131219


Last edited by cycleheimer; 04-04-12 at 01:31 PM.
cycleheimer is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-12 | 02:59 PM
  #4  
auchencrow's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,303
Likes: 60
From: Detroit
Unless the seller can miraculously produce all the original parts, I would not even make an offer on the Lotus. (You'd be in too deep with that just getting it close to factory spec).

The 420 is a far better deal even at the higher asking price.
__________________
- Auchen
auchencrow is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-12 | 03:17 PM
  #5  
Forum Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 22,903
Likes: 10,327
From: Kalamazoo
That Trek is a much bigger bike than that Lotus.

Which one, if either, is the OP's correct size?
__________________


Carbon: Fuji SL2.1 Di2.......Aluminum: Cannondale Synapse 105........Steel: Vintage Specialized Sirrus
...
cb400bill is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-12 | 03:19 PM
  #6  
TheTreauth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Michigan

Bikes: 2011 Giant Rapid 3, 2001 Schwinn Mesa GSX

Thank you for the feedback guys, I appreciate it. I was looking at the 420 as well, I need to actually go and look at both bikes to see how they fit me though. I'm skeptical of the 420 because I'm only 5'10" but I won't really know unless I check it out.
TheTreauth is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-12 | 03:44 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 16
Originally Posted by TheTreauth
I'm looking for a vintage bike to do a light first resto job on. My area rarely has anything worthwhile come on on Craigslist but today I found this.

https://saginaw.craigslist.org/bik/2939077715.html

I would want to find original drop handlebars and saddle (or at least some respectable looking alternatives). They put the drop brakes on some ugly looking flat bars, from what I can tell. The seller does not have the original saddle or handlebars, unfortunately.

Thoughts from you pros?
A tiny bike that was too big for the previous owner. If you go see the bike, be careful not to step on your host.
Roll-Monroe-Co is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-12 | 04:14 PM
  #8  
bibliobob's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,226
Likes: 734
From: Sacramento, CA

Bikes: '64 Bianchi CDM, '62ish Altenburger Cinelli Mod B, '63-64 Cinelli SC, 69 Rene Herse Competition, '71 Gitane SC, '73 Cinelli SC, '73-74 Colnago Super,, '73-74 Cinelli SC, '78ish counterfeit Confente, '82 Medici Gran Turismo, '67ish Mondia Speciale

If you're 5'10", neither bike is going to fit you. The Trek is likely too big, and the Lotus is definitely too small...

You should be looking for bikes in the 56-58 cm range, in all likelihood. Fit is very subjective, but most people would probably recommend against either of those.

Search the threads here; plenty of information about proper fit.

Good luck!
bibliobob is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-12 | 08:12 AM
  #9  
cycleheimer's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,918
Likes: 319
From: New York Metro Area
The Trek looks like a 58cm (23") frame. It may very well fit you properly, but you need to do the "stand over" test. Make sure you can lift the wheels about an inch off the ground when straddling the top bar. Make sure you feel comfortable on it. The back wheel is going to be out of alignment, due to that broken spoke. Test riding might not be that easy...have a spare 27" rear wheel handy? The 21" frame might just be too small. Worth checking out both, if you can get a chance to. Make sure the Trek is in original condition as much as possible. Plenty of info and specs on Treks here .... including copies of original sales brochures ....

https://vintage-trek.com/

The Trek seat tube decal looks older than '84/85, so he may have indicated the wrong model number. The 420 was towards the starting point of Treks line-up, although it would have been higher up in the hierarchy for other manufacturers. You might have something there. Old Treks, in nice condition, aren't too shabby a ride. Could be quite impressive, depending on condition.
cycleheimer is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-12 | 11:17 AM
  #10  
TheTreauth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Michigan

Bikes: 2011 Giant Rapid 3, 2001 Schwinn Mesa GSX

Thank you for the help, folks. Much appreciated!
TheTreauth is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-12 | 05:33 PM
  #11  
cycleheimer's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,918
Likes: 319
From: New York Metro Area
Originally Posted by TheTreauth
Thank you for the help, folks. Much appreciated!
Any time. That's what we're here for
cycleheimer is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-12 | 05:36 PM
  #12  
wrk101's Avatar
Thrifty Bill
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,639
Likes: 1,106
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

+1 The Lotus is in rough shape. For $50, I would pick it up, as I have a hefty stash of parts in hand. But $100? No way.

+1 The Trek is a DEAL.
wrk101 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-12 | 06:03 PM
  #13  
cycleheimer's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,918
Likes: 319
From: New York Metro Area
Originally Posted by wrk101
+1 The Lotus is in rough shape. For $50, I would pick it up, as I have a hefty stash of parts in hand. But $100? No way.

+1 The Trek is a DEAL.
$50 actually sounds like the magic number. Already having on hand the parts you need is a very big plus in this case.
cycleheimer is offline  
Reply
Old 04-06-12 | 04:36 AM
  #14  
Snydermann's Avatar
Lotus Monomaniac
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 4
From: Pennsylvania
I'm a Lotus fan and even I'd pass on that one. Unless it was dirt cheap.

The 2000R was even sold through Sears at a time (89-91) when we think Lotus had begun to license the Lotus name to other companies rather than design, import and distribute the bikes themselves. The 2000R and 3000R are some of the most common Lotus models you'll find for sale.
Snydermann is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roypercy
Classic & Vintage
9
10-29-15 07:03 PM
cb400bill
Classic & Vintage
7
08-22-14 10:33 PM
AlabamaCommuter
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
3
10-05-12 06:32 AM
bpraz02
Road Cycling
8
08-29-12 10:18 AM
scozim
Classic & Vintage
9
10-23-10 04:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.