Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Early 90s Diamondback Outlook

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Early 90s Diamondback Outlook

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-12 | 08:58 AM
  #1  
Narhay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,699
Likes: 581
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Early 90s Diamondback Outlook

What do you guys think about this bike? I can get one for a song but I'm not sure if it is worth it or if I should go for a modern mtb.
Narhay is offline  
Reply
Old 10-03-12 | 09:09 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,773
Likes: 105
From: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
The DB Outlook has always been at the bottom of the Diamondback range, It's a lot better than a BSO, but it was never a great MTB.

What are you looking at in terms of riding, even a MTB from as recent as the mid 2000's will not ride as well as a 2012 or 2013 bike, IF taking off road; if however you are just looking to ride on road / non technical trails (MUP), it really won't matter and the Outlook will be great for this.
jimc101 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-03-12 | 11:32 AM
  #3  
Banned.
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Likes: 1,463
I just finished an Outlook, and it had surprisingly nice components for it's price range. The canti's were not bottom-end, and worked great. The rims were Mavic 519's, and the shifting was SIS 3x6 that worked pretty well. I put on a riser bar and decided the Avenir saddle was fine. I cleaned it up and it's a great little bike. If the owner wants road tires, I think it'd be an excellent path/city bike. Definitely not a stump jumper. I think I paid $75

I also picked up a GT Saddleback with Deore LX and wheels for $125. I'm sure the front shock needs rebuilding, but with road tires, it's a nice bike.

I agree with jimc101. For off-road use, even that Force or Forge from Target.com, for around $300, is a pretty good bike compared to the older ones.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Reply
Old 10-08-12 | 03:39 AM
  #4  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
I'd say no to the DB Outlook and no to a new MTB if you are on a budget. For $100-$200 you can buy an XT equipped 90's MTB with a nice frame in surprisingly good condition. If you have some patience and know what you are looking for you can pick up a bike that you could part out immediately and make a profit. You can ride it for a year or two and sell it for what you bought it for, or possibly still break it down and make a profit.

You can't do that with a $300 modern bike. You buy it and it's value immediately goes down. You ride it a few times and it's worth $100. In a couple years it's worthless and starts to cost you money in maintenance.

The appealing thing to me about the mid 90's bikes ('92-'96 being the 'sweet spot' since by '98 most of the bikes were no longer handmade in the USA) is there were a bunch of aftermarket parts that are still sought after today. The cold war was over and there was an abundance of metal and machine shops looking for things to make after defense contracts were terminated. Bike parts filled a chunk of that gap. Some of those parts sneak thru on eBay and go cheap at times. If you are into biking and can devote time to cleaning up the bike and buying/reselling parts you can 'trade up' and keep parts you like for your newest bike/frame purchase.

BikePro is a great site for IDing some of these older parts. Click over on the left for 'Hubs and Skewers' to see makers of the items with photos, descriptions and prices back in '95.

https://www.bikepro.com/

If you decide on an older MTB solicit opinions with a 'help me find a bike' thread and post your cities Craigslist link for others to peruse and maybe help you find a hidden gem. I'd look for GT, Specialized, Bridgestone, Ritchey, Gary Fisher, ParkPre, Marin, Kona, Klein and several others that are all still coveted by some. Cannondale are sort of parts specific with CODA brand parts, 1 1/4" headsets and weird Headshock or Lefty suspension. Great bikes with a following still and with iconic riders like Ned and Tinker the brand brings back good memories. DiamondBack just never had that 'must have' bike and doesn't seem to have the 'old school swagger' of some of the other brands.

BikePedia has a great list of bikes since '93:

https://www.bikepedia.com/QuickBike/D...x#.UHKfp64ZYUQ

Older bikes aren't for everybody though. These bikes weren't intended to be ridden 15 years and a hard ridden bike is probably beyond it's useful lifespan. Metal fatigues. People don't do proper maintenance. Even lightly ridden bikes are often in need of repair. Any old bike should be stripped down, inspected and rebuilt. Wheels should be checked by a pro. Older MTB's should be ridden with a mindset that you are on an old bike. Riding style should emphasize finesse over force and be XC/fire road/singletrack rather than DH or jumping.

Last edited by Groundoggy; 10-08-12 at 03:44 AM. Reason: Added disclaimer about Cannondale
Groundoggy is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bikebakman
Classic & Vintage
4
11-02-15 05:03 AM
prs1
Mountain Biking
1
04-30-15 07:32 AM
AK404
Mountain Biking
24
11-19-12 12:22 AM
worldtraveller
General Cycling Discussion
22
08-08-11 08:51 AM
Mudu93
Classic & Vintage
3
02-15-10 09:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.