Frames the same size as an 87 Trek 520
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Ponca City Oklahoma
Frames the same size as an 87 Trek 520
I know there are better bikes but no bike I have tried fits me better than this bike. I have short legs and a long torso. My 87 520 has a 21" frame.
I don't use any of the other bikes I have, I use the Trek 520 for commuting, going to the post office, taking 100 mile trips to the nearest city and so on. I used it loaded down and naked.
I do need a backup bike and don't know if I will find another 21 inch 520. Trying to find another bike that fits me this well I think will involve trying too many different bikes and there is no LBS in my county to look at other bikes.
Since I have not been able to find another lugged 21 87 520 I wonder what other bikes used this same frame.
I don't use any of the other bikes I have, I use the Trek 520 for commuting, going to the post office, taking 100 mile trips to the nearest city and so on. I used it loaded down and naked.
I do need a backup bike and don't know if I will find another 21 inch 520. Trying to find another bike that fits me this well I think will involve trying too many different bikes and there is no LBS in my county to look at other bikes.
Since I have not been able to find another lugged 21 87 520 I wonder what other bikes used this same frame.
#2
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia
Bikes: 85 Peugeot Canyon Express, 73? Torpado, 85 Trek 400
Here's a link to the 87 brochure.
https://www.vintage-trek.com/TrekBrochure1987.htm
The last page has he measurement for your frame as well as other. Important numbers are set tube and top tube length and seat tube and head tube angle. Also, it looks like measurement D is incorrectly labeled. should be top tube length.
https://www.vintage-trek.com/TrekBrochure1987.htm
The last page has he measurement for your frame as well as other. Important numbers are set tube and top tube length and seat tube and head tube angle. Also, it looks like measurement D is incorrectly labeled. should be top tube length.
#4
Senior Member



Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 18,830
Likes: 11,707
See the frame geometry project.
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Ponca City Oklahoma
Here's a link to the 87 brochure.
https://www.vintage-trek.com/TrekBrochure1987.htm
The last page has he measurement for your frame as well as other. Important numbers are set tube and top tube length and seat tube and head tube angle. Also, it looks like measurement D is incorrectly labeled. should be top tube length.
https://www.vintage-trek.com/TrekBrochure1987.htm
The last page has he measurement for your frame as well as other. Important numbers are set tube and top tube length and seat tube and head tube angle. Also, it looks like measurement D is incorrectly labeled. should be top tube length.
Thanks, unless I am mistaken the 520 in 87 is unique and other bikes don't share an identical frame. I don't know how much the difference will affect fit so maybe I should hold out till I can get another Trek 520. I will start comparing years of 520s to see how much different they are.
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Ponca City Oklahoma
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Ponca City Oklahoma
See the frame geometry project.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
donrhummy
Road Cycling
5
11-27-12 08:51 AM





