Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Simplex SX610 vs. SLJ 6600: Capacity differences

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Simplex SX610 vs. SLJ 6600: Capacity differences

Old 01-21-13, 11:29 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Simplex SX610 vs. SLJ 6600: Capacity differences

I've always thought the Simplex SX610 was the the econo version of the SLJ 6600 (T/SP versions). However, the SX610 has a max wrap and max cog size of 28 teeth, while the SLJ 6600 has a max wrap of 22 teeth and a max cog size of 24 teeth, according to Velobase catalog scans. Why the difference? Is the pulley cage a bit longer? The parallelogram travel a bit wider?
SlowRoller is offline  
Old 01-22-13, 06:18 AM
  #2  
"part timer"
 
SuperLJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tidewater VA
Posts: 622

Bikes: 1975 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1978 Bertin C35, 1982 Trek 614, 1983 Trek 620, 1984 Nishiki Seral, 1995 Mercian Ko’M, 1998 Fisher HKEK, 2000 Rivendell RS, 2001 Heron Touring, 2016 Nobilette Custom

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 160 Times in 61 Posts
At first I thought you must be mistaken, but since the '84 catalog scan on Velobase came from me, I dug it out and sure enough, there it is. In the photos they definitely look like they have the same cage length and geometry.

If you look at the "Gold Range Touring" derailleurs, there's no difference in capacity between the straight parallelogram 5500 GT/SP and the drop parallelogram 6600. Why wouldn't the same be true for the 5500 and 6600 T/SP?

I think the capacity shown for the 6600 T/SP is either a typo, or a bit of fiction designed to let the consumer know that this is their serious "racing" derailleur. I wouldn't be afraid to try one with a 28t cog.

Last edited by SuperLJ; 01-22-13 at 06:34 AM.
SuperLJ is offline  
Old 01-22-13, 06:36 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
zukahn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,512

Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Liked 1,739 Times in 630 Posts
I can not give much on gear capacity but of the half dozen or SX series I have come across 4 where in peices not in one functioning unit . As for the deference in capacity the SX DR's have signifcantly longer pulley arm almost a fulll inch longer than most Simplex stuff.

Last edited by zukahn1; 01-22-13 at 06:44 AM.
zukahn1 is offline  
Old 01-22-13, 07:07 AM
  #4  
"part timer"
 
SuperLJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tidewater VA
Posts: 622

Bikes: 1975 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1978 Bertin C35, 1982 Trek 614, 1983 Trek 620, 1984 Nishiki Seral, 1995 Mercian Ko’M, 1998 Fisher HKEK, 2000 Rivendell RS, 2001 Heron Touring, 2016 Nobilette Custom

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 160 Times in 61 Posts
Simplex derailleurs from this era came in three cage lengths:

CP - short, T - medium, and GT - long.

The /P or /SP designated whether the derailleur came with a mounting plate or not. So for instance, a GT/SP derailleur was a long cage derailleur without a mounting plate.
SuperLJ is offline  
Old 01-22-13, 03:03 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperLJ
Why wouldn't the same be true for the 5500 and 6600 T/SP?
That question crossed my mind, too!

Originally Posted by SuperLJ
I think the capacity shown for the 6600 T/SP is either a typo, or a bit of fiction designed to let the consumer know that this is their serious "racing" derailleur. I wouldn't be afraid to try one with a 28t cog.
That's interesting, given Simplex's late move to the dropped parallelogram. I do hope it actually has a little larger capacity than advertised. Thanks for your comments SuperLJ!
SlowRoller is offline  
Old 01-22-13, 03:08 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
My SLJ 6000 handles a 28t cog just fine.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 01-22-13, 05:06 PM
  #7  
"part timer"
 
SuperLJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tidewater VA
Posts: 622

Bikes: 1975 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1978 Bertin C35, 1982 Trek 614, 1983 Trek 620, 1984 Nishiki Seral, 1995 Mercian Ko’M, 1998 Fisher HKEK, 2000 Rivendell RS, 2001 Heron Touring, 2016 Nobilette Custom

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 160 Times in 61 Posts
Originally Posted by Grand Bois
My SLJ 6000 handles a 28t cog just fine.
There you go SlowRoller, the SLJ6000 is the same as the 6600, just a couple of years older.

My SLJ 5500T will handle the advertised 30t cog no problem (I had it set up as a half-step for a time), but I'm currently running it with 50/36 chainwheels and a 14-24 freewheel for a total of 28 (two below what's recommended) and it's probably a little more than maxed out capacity-wise.

Last edited by SuperLJ; 01-22-13 at 08:48 PM.
SuperLJ is offline  
Old 01-23-13, 10:28 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks, SLJ and Grand Bois. I may have to mount it and give it a shot.

Originally Posted by SuperLJ
There you go SlowRoller, the SLJ6000 is the same as the 6600, just a couple of years older.

My SLJ 5500T will handle the advertised 30t cog no problem (I had it set up as a half-step for a time), but I'm currently running it with 50/36 chainwheels and a 14-24 freewheel for a total of 28 (two below what's recommended) and it's probably a little more than maxed out capacity-wise.
SlowRoller is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jonwvara
Classic & Vintage
22
08-29-16 12:23 PM
jonwvara
Classic & Vintage
17
12-07-15 02:06 AM
ianstock
Bicycle Mechanics
3
03-11-14 09:48 AM
Jedwin
Bicycle Mechanics
11
06-13-12 07:45 AM
bluenote157
Bicycle Mechanics
4
07-11-10 04:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.