Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

What's so bad about stem shifters?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

What's so bad about stem shifters?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-13 | 07:15 PM
  #1  
fettsvenska's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 440
Likes: 98
From: Eastern Washington

Bikes: 1978 Raleigh Competition-1974 Raleigh Folder-1983 Austro Daimler-198? Fuji Monterey-Surly LHT-Surly Karate Monkey-Surly Cross Check

What's so bad about stem shifters?

I'm sort of new to the C&V scene and was hoping that you guys might be able to provide some insight. I was just wondering what the big disadvantages of stem shifters are. For me, being a little on the tall side at 6'2", stem shifters are almost a little better than downtube shifters because I don't have to reach as far. I'm not trying to evangelize for everyone to start using stem shifters but if they shift well, what's the problem?
fettsvenska is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 07:17 PM
  #2  
hairnet's Avatar
Fresh Garbage
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,190
Likes: 30
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: N+1

There is no problem. If you ride in a fairly upright position then go for it.
hairnet is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 07:24 PM
  #3  
fettsvenska's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 440
Likes: 98
From: Eastern Washington

Bikes: 1978 Raleigh Competition-1974 Raleigh Folder-1983 Austro Daimler-198? Fuji Monterey-Surly LHT-Surly Karate Monkey-Surly Cross Check

Originally Posted by hairnet
There is no problem. If you ride in a fairly upright position then go for it.
That's sort of the way I feel about it. As long as the shifters do a decent job and I'm comfortable with them, why not? Right?
fettsvenska is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 07:26 PM
  #4  
Whit51's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 607
Likes: 116
From: Charlotte, NC
Some 80's frames built for stem shifters had braised on down tube cable guides, making it easy to convert these frames to my personal favorites, bar-end shifters.
Whit51 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 07:27 PM
  #5  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Originally Posted by fettsvenska
As long as the shifters do a decent job and I'm comfortable with them, why not? Right?
Right!
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 07:30 PM
  #6  
RubberLegs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 6
From: Tampa Bay, Florida

Bikes: 87 Bridgestone 550 (Shocking Electric Metallic Pink)

Had them on my Schwinn LeTour IV, it was kind of nice to just slide the hand over, and shift with the thumb without the hand leaving the bars. They WERE friction shifters, so constandly tweaking them. But after N+1 struck, and I got a FELT with STI, I LIKE to be able to keep hands on the brakes AND shift at the same time....not so smooth, being a Sora, bottom of the barrel. Then came my Bridgestone with DT shifters. Alternating between the 3 was driving me a little nuts. The Schwinn moved on. It still takes me a bit to reset the brain as to WHERE to shift, seems especially bad going from the DT to the STI....keep reaching for the DT. I don't think I have tried to shift with my brake levers on the Bridgestone....
RubberLegs is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 07:30 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 13
From: Kansai
Back in the day, they were on mid range and lower bikes that were scorned by "serious" cyclists (like myselfs) and become hopelessly associated with hopeless Fred-dom. In this they are similar to turkey wings.

There are arguments for and against their ergonomics depending on one's riding style, but, in my opinion, it is ultimately guilt by association for them.
robatsu is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 07:31 PM
  #8  
fettsvenska's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 440
Likes: 98
From: Eastern Washington

Bikes: 1978 Raleigh Competition-1974 Raleigh Folder-1983 Austro Daimler-198? Fuji Monterey-Surly LHT-Surly Karate Monkey-Surly Cross Check

The reason I'm asking is that I just purchased an 81 Miyata 610 and it has Suntour stem shifters. This is my first bike with stem shifters. I've disassembled it and have begun the cleaning process. I thought that before I put this thing back together I would see if there are any arguments for replacing the stem shifters with down tube shifters.
fettsvenska is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 08:25 PM
  #9  
hairnet's Avatar
Fresh Garbage
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,190
Likes: 30
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: N+1

If you have the ratcheting kind, even better.
hairnet is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 08:27 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,879
Likes: 6
From: Northern California
I remember back when those were popular (or at least common). Some manufacturers would put the stem shifters on their cheapest bikes and downtube shifters on their better bikes. The problem with stem shifters is that they are hard to reach except when you hold the handlebars from the tops, which gives you an unstable, unaerodynamic, and and inefficient riding position. If you do ride like that and hit a pothole (or car or dog or curb), it is pretty easy to get thrown over the handlebars, then the shifters sticking upwards will impale your chest. Some stem shifters have rubber ends to reduce the impaling problem a little, though flying over the handlebars is still not fun.
johnny99 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 08:30 PM
  #11  
Velognome's Avatar
Get off my lawn!
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,035
Likes: 119
From: The Garden State

Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman

I had a UO-8 with stem shifters.....I loved that bike! Put the shifters where you like them .
Velognome is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 08:42 PM
  #12  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Schwinn offered stem shifters on the Paramount road models (P13-9, P10-9, and P15-9) in the seventies. Those weren't exactly low- or mid-range bikes.

I had "twin-stik" stem shifters on my Super Sport in the early seventies, and loved them. For friction shifters back in the day they worked just as well as downtube or bar-end shifters and were at my thumbtips when I was on the tops.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 08:50 PM
  #13  
Yo Spiff's Avatar
Carpe Velo
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Worth, Texas

Bikes: 2000 Bianchi Veloce, '88 Schwinn Prologue, '90 Bianchi Volpe,'94 Yokota Grizzly Peak, Yokota Enterprise, '16 Diamondback Haanjo, '91 Bianchi Boardwalk, Ellsworth cruiser

Originally Posted by RubberLegs
Alternating between the 3 was driving me a little nuts. The Schwinn moved on. It still takes me a bit to reset the brain as to WHERE to shift, seems especially bad going from the DT to the STI....keep reaching for the DT. I don't think I have tried to shift with my brake levers on the Bridgestone....
Glad to know I am not the only one who has that happen. I have multiple bikes with drop bars. They have Campy Ergo, downtube and bar end shifters. I frequently reach for the wrong location.

I think the main issue with stem shifters is just the past association with low end bikes. I guess we can sometimes be a bunch of bike snobs here. A lesser issue may be a hand postion with less control. If you like them and they work well for you, there is no problem.
Yo Spiff is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 09:15 PM
  #14  
wearyourtruth's Avatar
Ride for Life
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 2
From: Houston
Originally Posted by robatsu
Back in the day, they were on mid range and lower bikes that were scorned by "serious" cyclists (like myselfs) and become hopelessly associated with hopeless Fred-dom. In this they are similar to turkey wings.

There are arguments for and against their ergonomics depending on one's riding style, but, in my opinion, it is ultimately guilt by association for them.
i agree with this. i scorned them for a long time because they just didn't come on nice bikes. i currently run them on my 1985 touring rig because my knees kept hitting my bar-end shifters when i was out of the saddle. they work great for me on the stem.
wearyourtruth is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 10:03 PM
  #15  
Savagewolf's Avatar
KingoftheMountain wannabe
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 1
From: Independence, Oregon

Bikes: V.O. Pass Hunter & Specialized Hardrock

I hate the look, but I agree that they are easier to use over downtube sifting if you are tall.
Savagewolf is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 11:04 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN

Bikes: '86 Trek Elance 400; '83 Trek 520; 90s Specialized Crossroads, '84 Trek 610 (wife's), 90s Trek Multitrack (wife's), Cargo Trailers, Burley for the Kids, WeeHoo Trailer

I am just over 6' and prefer stem over downtube shifters. I once had a commuter Schwinn LeTour where I replaced the downtube shifters with stem shifters. No problem. I currently run stem shifters on my winter bike, which is a hybrid that originally had grip shifters I didn't like. The old school friction stem shifters are reliable. Plus, if you want to pick some up, they are dirt cheap at any place that has used bike parts. They are associated with cheap bikes, though. For fun, you could put some of the carbon fiber looking tape on them and tell people they are the latest thing, referencing that they encourage body weight to stay on the center-line, resulting in more power transfer...or something like that.
vins0010 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-13 | 11:50 PM
  #17  
zandoval's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,626
Likes: 2,497
From: Bastrop Texas

Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites

Originally Posted by fettsvenska
...it has Suntour stem shifters...
As far as stem shifters go Suntours are pretty good...
zandoval is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-13 | 01:21 AM
  #18  
acoffin's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 537
Likes: 15
From: St Louis

Bikes: 72 Lygie (SS conv), 87 Ironman Expert, 94 Allez Sport, 16 Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross

Maybe they are better for tall people, but they are definitely not for me. I am 5'11" and ride size 57-59. The stem is the most awkward position of all available options. When using stem shifters your body has a tendency to lift up when reaching for the shifter, and it simply isn't positioned for ergonomics of the hand a wrist. To be honest when i had stem shifters I loathed the thought of reaching for them. I think it just kind of made med feel unstable, or maybe it was the fear of hitting a bump while one hand was at the rear of the stem. For me integrated shifters are great, dt shifters are a blast, and bar end is my go to favorite.
acoffin is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-13 | 07:37 AM
  #19  
fettsvenska's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 440
Likes: 98
From: Eastern Washington

Bikes: 1978 Raleigh Competition-1974 Raleigh Folder-1983 Austro Daimler-198? Fuji Monterey-Surly LHT-Surly Karate Monkey-Surly Cross Check

Originally Posted by johnny99
I remember back when those were popular (or at least common). Some manufacturers would put the stem shifters on their cheapest bikes and downtube shifters on their better bikes. The problem with stem shifters is that they are hard to reach except when you hold the handlebars from the tops, which gives you an unstable, unaerodynamic, and and inefficient riding position. If you do ride like that and hit a pothole (or car or dog or curb), it is pretty easy to get thrown over the handlebars, then the shifters sticking upwards will impale your chest. Some stem shifters have rubber ends to reduce the impaling problem a little, though flying over the handlebars is still not fun.
Except for the impaling part, couldn't you make this same argument about down tube shifters?
fettsvenska is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-13 | 07:41 AM
  #20  
fettsvenska's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 440
Likes: 98
From: Eastern Washington

Bikes: 1978 Raleigh Competition-1974 Raleigh Folder-1983 Austro Daimler-198? Fuji Monterey-Surly LHT-Surly Karate Monkey-Surly Cross Check

Originally Posted by vins0010
I am just over 6' and prefer stem over downtube shifters. I once had a commuter Schwinn LeTour where I replaced the downtube shifters with stem shifters. No problem. I currently run stem shifters on my winter bike, which is a hybrid that originally had grip shifters I didn't like. The old school friction stem shifters are reliable. Plus, if you want to pick some up, they are dirt cheap at any place that has used bike parts. They are associated with cheap bikes, though. For fun, you could put some of the carbon fiber looking tape on them and tell people they are the latest thing, referencing that they encourage body weight to stay on the center-line, resulting in more power transfer...or something like that.
Dude, I love this...we might be twins separated at birth.
fettsvenska is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-13 | 07:46 AM
  #21  
wrk101's Avatar
Thrifty Bill
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,645
Likes: 1,109
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

A lot of recreational buyers/riders like stem shifters. I have a mid level Takara from the early 1980s with stem shifters. I may rebuild it that way, not sure. Certainly on mixtes, most of the time, I will rebuild them with stem shifters. I've got a stash of stem shifters right now, so they have to go on some bikes in the queue.

DT shifters can be intimidating to new or inexperienced riders. Barcons? Even worse.

The challenge with stem shifters is that some buyers assume its a cheap bike, so it can depress the value. Really depends on the style of the bike, and the potential buyer pool.
wrk101 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-13 | 07:58 AM
  #22  
fettsvenska's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 440
Likes: 98
From: Eastern Washington

Bikes: 1978 Raleigh Competition-1974 Raleigh Folder-1983 Austro Daimler-198? Fuji Monterey-Surly LHT-Surly Karate Monkey-Surly Cross Check

After considering the comments/opinions so far, it seems like there are 3 things to consider when deciding whether or not to use stem shifters:

1. Personal preference: If you like them, use them. If not, don't use them.

2. How tall the rider is: Tall riders may benefit more by not having to reach way down for down tube shifters. Although this almost seems to imply that bar end shifters might be superior to both stem and down tube shifters (which happens to be my opinion but bar ends are also the most expensive and hardest to find used).

3. Bike geometry or riding orientation: Down tube shifters might be the superior choice for bikes with a more aggressive geometry designed for faster riding when the rider is not on the tops of the bars as much. For bikes with a more relaxed geometry where the rider would be on the tops of the bars most of the time, stem shifters might work just fine.

Given my height (6'2") and that this Miyata 610 was certainly not built for speed, I think that for right now I'm going to stick with the stem shifters. If a decent set of used Suntour barcons comes in front of me, maybe I'll give those a try.
fettsvenska is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-13 | 08:01 AM
  #23  
Italuminium's Avatar
Cisalpinist
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,557
Likes: 18
From: Holland

Bikes: blue ones.

I'm not tapping in the myth that stem shifters are vicious man traps in a crash. Gory pics first. Until then, I believe it's just some snobby prejudice, like others said above -no nice bike rocks stem shifters. That said, I'm a poser at heart and I'll never be caught with stem shifters. Give me loosening, hard to reach, imprecise Camapgnolo DT shifters any day.
Italuminium is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-13 | 08:09 AM
  #24  
rootboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,748
Likes: 138
From: Wherever
Originally Posted by Italuminium
I'm a poser at heart and I'll never be caught with stem shifters. Give me loosening, hard to reach, imprecise Camapgnolo DT shifters any day.
Snoboser......

I like 'em too.
rootboy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-13 | 08:27 AM
  #25  
cehowardGS's Avatar
Motorcycle RoadRacer
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,826
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by fettsvenska
I'm sort of new to the C&V scene and was hoping that you guys might be able to provide some insight. I was just wondering what the big disadvantages of stem shifters are. For me, being a little on the tall side at 6'2", stem shifters are almost a little better than downtube shifters because I don't have to reach as far. I'm not trying to evangelize for everyone to start using stem shifters but if they shift well, what's the problem?
Just speaking for myself, and what I have learned about stem shifters. Most of the time, stem shifters are a gauge of the quality of the bike. Mind you, I said most of the time, and only speaking for myself. When I am scanning for bikes on Craigslist, anything with stem shifters, and safety levers, I don't even give a second look.. IMO, stem shifters are mostly on department and low quality bikes.
cehowardGS is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.