Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Need 3-speed conversion advice

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Need 3-speed conversion advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-13, 07:39 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
AZORCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Liberty, Missouri
Posts: 3,120

Bikes: 1966 Paramount | 1971 Raleigh International | ca. 1970 Bernard Carre | 1989 Waterford Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2019 Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 77 Times in 40 Posts
Need 3-speed conversion advice

This story begins with a broken spoke and a gift certificate, and ends with a wild hair.

The 1971 International that I built up over the winter snapped a rear spoke a few days ago. After looking the other spokes over I figured I'd just rebuild the wheel: nice Araya rims and super nice Omas hubs - seemed to me like a worthwhile thing to do. My wife is a big fan of Groupon and had bought one for an LBS that I occasionally visit. I don't really need anything at the moment and it's only valid for a limited time so I figured I'd use it and have them rebuild the wheel. So I stop in this morning to drop it off ... and they totally freak. NO WAY this wheel is worth the rebuild: Is that a 27" rim, for pete's sake? And oh my gosh, it's got a friggin' FREEWHEEL! Long story short, they tell me it's not possible and that the rim will just go completely haywire once the spokes are sprung; it's a lost cause. I smile, walk out fuming because I know better. Guess I'll have to do it myself and then drop by in a few days to show them the impossible wheel.

But on the way home I get to thinking (always a dangerous thing.) I remember that I've got a nearly new set of CR-18 700c wheels, with the rear laced to a Sturmey-Archer S-RF3 hub (this is the version with no coaster brake.) I've got big, cushy 38's on the wheels too. As I drive, I get to thinking about various 3-speed configurations I might try - which leads me to the wild hair: What if I leave the triple installed in the front? That effectively creates a nine speed - three in the rear x three in the front. (I haven't done the math to see how the gear spread actually looks, btw... I'm just cogitating at the moment.) Has anyone built this configuration? How did it work for you? I'd need to use a chain tensioner, which I haven't used before. Can anyone recommend one that would work with this configuration? Or is this just silly? School me, please.
AZORCH is offline  
Old 04-06-13, 08:20 PM
  #2  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
You could make it work, but you'd need a chain tensioner (or derailleur) in the back to take up the chain slack as you shift gears in the front.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 04-06-13, 08:22 PM
  #3  
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,846

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2297 Post(s)
Liked 2,054 Times in 1,254 Posts
I do think the big issue would be gear redundancy since a Sturmey AW has a normal 1:1 second gear with a 25% high and 25% low on each side. The 3 cog SA adapters for a rear derailleur typically had close ratios to help fill in the rather large jumps in the IGH. My instincts are telling me that's not how a front triple would roll out.

Too tired to do the math and I'll leave for the more adept geeks on the forum.

Edit I guess you could just use a claw derailleur set static in position under the rear cog without a cable?

Last edited by clubman; 04-06-13 at 08:34 PM.
clubman is offline  
Old 04-06-13, 09:20 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
AZORCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Liberty, Missouri
Posts: 3,120

Bikes: 1966 Paramount | 1971 Raleigh International | ca. 1970 Bernard Carre | 1989 Waterford Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2019 Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 77 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
You could make it work, but you'd need a chain tensioner (or derailleur) in the back to take up the chain slack as you shift gears in the front.
Yes, that was my question: if anyone had a specific chain tensioner to recommend. Would any model do the job?
AZORCH is offline  
Old 04-06-13, 09:36 PM
  #5  
Full Member
 
Tulok's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 418
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
I would just put on a big-ish front chainring. 42-46T, Easy chain adjustment, no springs or derailers. I think a triple on the fornt would require a rediculous amount of extra chain to accommodate the large step from 30t-52t thats 1 links(22 half links) that would need to be hanging there if you were in the granny.

Last edited by Tulok; 04-06-13 at 09:51 PM.
Tulok is offline  
Old 04-06-13, 09:45 PM
  #6  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
I think pretty much any rear derailleur would do the trick once you locked it in place via the limit screws -- the tooth difference for most triples is 20-23 teeth, well within the capacity of most "road" derailleurs.

EDIT: I would definitely crunch some numbers on Sheldon's gear calculator or www.gear-calculator.com before ordering any parts. Some sort of faux half-step would be nice for breaking up the gaps between AW ratios...
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498

Last edited by ThermionicScott; 04-06-13 at 09:52 PM.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 04-07-13, 02:24 PM
  #7  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Yeah, crunch some numbers!

Off the top of my head, when you put two cogs on an AW you want them 3 teeth apart, so something like 20 and 23 is good. That splits the hub gears nicely. If you did the same rat-io in front, so 40 and 46 for example, you would get the same effect. Do that jump again, so 40 46 52 and you would double two gears and add one more. Mostly you would just add confusion. The best chain tensioner for this purpose is a rear derailleur. But really, the best thing to do is to use two cogs on the hub. This is easy and indeed much simpler than what you propose. Either way you need a rear derailleur, so why bother with a front one?
rhm is offline  
Old 04-07-13, 02:31 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
AZORCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Liberty, Missouri
Posts: 3,120

Bikes: 1966 Paramount | 1971 Raleigh International | ca. 1970 Bernard Carre | 1989 Waterford Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2019 Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 77 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
Yeah, crunch some numbers!

Off the top of my head, when you put two cogs on an AW you want them 3 teeth apart, so something like 20 and 23 is good. That splits the hub gears nicely. If you did the same rat-io in front, so 40 and 46 for example, you would get the same effect. Do that jump again, so 40 46 52 and you would double two gears and add one more. Mostly you would just add confusion. The best chain tensioner for this purpose is a rear derailleur. But really, the best thing to do is to use two cogs on the hub. This is easy and indeed much simpler than what you propose. Either way you need a rear derailleur, so why bother with a front one?
These are good points, and thanks for the input, btw. I've been thinking about it today and reached pretty much the same conclusions myself. Very likely I'll wind up going with a 1x2 to yield six speeds (for the reasons you've already made) or even simpler still, just going with the single in back/single in front and going with the tried and true straight 3-speed. I'm sometimes really good at making a simple thing much more complicated than it absolutely needs to be!
AZORCH is offline  
Old 04-07-13, 07:59 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Salubrious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,597

Bikes: Too many 3-speeds, Jones Plus LWB

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 265 Times in 119 Posts
I built a 6-speed bike using an SA hub on a Schwinn Super Sport. I used the Huret rear derailer locked with the limit screws to manage chain tension.

High was ridiculous. I could only use it going down really steep hills and a couple of times got the bike going so fast I feared for my life- the frame had an oscillation ability in the front end at really high speed. OTOH low was really nice. The jumps between gears was more than I wanted. If I were to do it again it would likely be with a single chainwheel, maybe 42 teeth, and a couple of gears in the rear.

It was that bike though that got me sold on IGHs. I built up several bikes using the (then) Sachs 7-speed hub. With that hub I never worried about additional front sprockets and it did fit on the older frames that I used. The Alfines and the Rolhoff are a different matter.
Salubrious is offline  
Old 04-07-13, 08:31 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
AZORCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Liberty, Missouri
Posts: 3,120

Bikes: 1966 Paramount | 1971 Raleigh International | ca. 1970 Bernard Carre | 1989 Waterford Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2019 Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 77 Times in 40 Posts
I wound up going with a 42/19 configuration. With 700 x 38 tires that puts the "normal" (1.0) gear at 60.4 gear inches and the low (.75) at 45.3; the high (1.33) is 80.5 gear inches. My "normal" ride gear on the Boulder is 61.2 and I spend probably 98% of the time in that gear; occasionally I need a lower gear for a steep hill and the low gear I use on my big ring is 45.9 gear inches (I almost never use the small front ring.) The long and short of it is that those gears almost perfect match the two gears that get used on my main rider. I wish I'd done a little cypherin' up front!
AZORCH is offline  
Old 04-07-13, 09:52 PM
  #11  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
And with that, you're not far from the stock gearing on a lot of English 3-speeds! (Mine is 46/18, for 50/66/88 with the 26" wheels.)

I've gotta agree with rhm that if you were going to use an RD, you might as well do your shifting there, too. I'd call it a "1x2x3" to really mess with people.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 04-08-13, 10:21 AM
  #12  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
Off the top of my head, when you put two cogs on an AW you want them 3 teeth apart, so something like 20 and 23 is good. That splits the hub gears nicely. If you did the same rat-io in front, so 40 and 46 for example, you would get the same effect. Do that jump again, so 40 46 52 and you would double two gears and add one more. Mostly you would just add confusion. The best chain tensioner for this purpose is a rear derailleur. But really, the best thing to do is to use two cogs on the hub. This is easy and indeed much simpler than what you propose. Either way you need a rear derailleur, so why bother with a front one?
Indeed. Make sure you use the old-style dished cogs as you need only place them back to back to get clearance between the cogs. If you use the modern undished cogs, you'll need a spacer between them.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Seijun
Hybrid Bicycles
7
10-07-14 08:05 PM
ransom63
Bicycle Mechanics
6
06-07-12 04:48 PM
ijsbrand
Commuting
2
03-03-12 07:24 PM
cal_gundert05
Bicycle Mechanics
18
10-30-11 08:41 PM
RChickenMan
Bicycle Mechanics
6
08-08-10 11:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.