Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

80s Schwinn Paramount fork sizes

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

80s Schwinn Paramount fork sizes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-13 | 07:35 PM
  #1  
DOS's Avatar
DOS
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 76
From: Arlington, VA USA
80s Schwinn Paramount fork sizes

Per the Waterford site, 80s Paramounts came with one of five different size forks depending on frame size, with fork size indicated in serial number by letters A through E from smallest to largest. My 61cm 87 Paramount originally had a size D fork, which the original owner damaged so I do not have it. I am looking to get a new fork for the bike and woulld like to match original size. I know based on geometry listings I have seen that rake was 40mm for evey size but have not been able to find info on different lengths. Hoping BF can hook me up.
DOS is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-13 | 08:52 PM
  #2  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

My '87 62cm Paramount has an "E" fork (620E WK 87077). I'm pretty sure everything below the crown race was identical (40mm rake, 355mm length), so the letter designation only referred to the steerer tube length (and is based on the length of the head tube).

This is the Paramount frameset page from the '87 Parts & Accessories Catalog.

EDIT - If you like, I can pull my fork, measure the head tube and steerer length, and you could then have a fork made with a steerer the same length relative to the head tube length as my 62 cm. I can also verify exactly how the 355mm dimension was measured.

__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.

Last edited by Scooper; 05-29-13 at 09:03 PM.
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-13 | 04:32 AM
  #3  
DOS's Avatar
DOS
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 76
From: Arlington, VA USA
Thanks scooper. Now that you point out steerer tube, the answerbtommy question seems obvious and I feel like an idiot for not realizing that. I inferred from the info I had seen about there being different "fork sizes" the difference was in blades and never even considered the obvious differences in steerer different frame sizes would entail. I would assume the 355mm length is crown to axel but if you could post a measurement from your fork, I would appreciate that. The steerer length on the fork I have now is right for me so I don't need that.
DOS is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-13 | 05:41 AM
  #4  
miamijim's Avatar
Senior Member
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Donating
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,973
Likes: 145
From: Tampa, Florida
Measure the head tube, a replacement fork should have a steerer tube about 45mm longer than that. Its always better to be a few mm longer than short.
miamijim is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-13 | 04:11 PM
  #5  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

The 355 mm "length" is a straight line dimension from the dropout centers to the center of the brake bolt hole in the crown. The length between the dropout centers and the crown race seat parallel to the steerer is 365 mm. I verified the fork rake is 40 mm.

I measured the steerer from the top to the crown race seat, and it was 235 mm. The head tube length is 195 mm. So, the steerer is 40 mm longer than the head tube.



Here's the measurement setup.



Dummy axle center.



Dummy axle center to brake hole center. 355 mm



Dummy axle center to crown race seat (parallel to steerer). 365 mm



Rake. 40 mm

__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.

Last edited by Scooper; 05-31-13 at 12:32 PM. Reason: added rake photo
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-13 | 09:04 PM
  #6  
DOS's Avatar
DOS
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 76
From: Arlington, VA USA
Thanks Scooper. I have not seen the first method of measuring forks before, only ever seen the axle to crown line parallel to the steerer. I sort of thought 355 seemed on the short side.
DOS is offline  
Reply
Old 05-31-13 | 03:01 PM
  #7  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Originally Posted by DOS
Thanks Scooper. I have not seen the first method of measuring forks before, only ever seen the axle to crown line parallel to the steerer. I sort of thought 355 seemed on the short side.
Yep; I'm not sure why Schwinn chose to measure the "fork height" that way. IMHO, it's not nearly as useful as either axle-to-crown race seat (straight line) or axle to crown race seat (parallel to the steerer) because it lacks the dimension between the brake hole in the crown and the crown race seat.

Nevertheless, it is used often enough for BikeCAD to include it in describing fork length. It is dimension "K" on the fork measurements page. "L" is the length from the axle to crown race seat (parallel to the steerer), and the cell labeled "L" can be alternately chosen "AC", which is axle to crown race seat (straight line).

These are the actual dimensions taken from the fork.

__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.

Last edited by Scooper; 05-31-13 at 11:03 PM. Reason: added BikeCAD Fork Dimensions Panel
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
biade
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
2
10-29-17 11:41 AM
jish1969
Classic & Vintage
6
07-22-13 06:38 PM
FlyerSC
Bicycle Mechanics
4
07-26-10 09:46 AM
dnlpnd
Bicycle Mechanics
4
06-04-10 07:15 PM
pcrover
Bicycle Mechanics
3
04-11-10 08:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.