"Good" Components
#1
Thread Starter
Extraordinary Magnitude


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14,080
Likes: 2,133
From: Waukesha WI
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
"Good" Components
A lot of what makes a component "good" is how it's used, however there is a very definite issue of quality to how a component is made- whether it's the materials, the design, the manufacturing process...
As you read about Suntour- Maeda charged what THEY thought their product was worth, instead of letting the market decide. As a result, Suntour didn't charge a lot and their stuff ended up going on department store bikes- but because of their slant parallelogram rear derailleur- it shifted and fucntioned better than anything else- regardless of price. While most people now generally recognize that superiority of that function (though not necessarily the "pretty" of the pieces), I can imagine it would have been hard to admit that entry level stuff actually was the best stuff.
A few weeks ago there was a thread about the quality of the Takagi Tourney XT crankset. My 1984 Stumpjumper came with one- so I kind of figured it was good stuff and replied as such in the thread. It looks graceful, yet sufficiently robust to look like it means business. The previous owner of my Stumpjumper rode it all over for (probably) thousands of miles for 20+ years. When I was putting together my Voyageur, I specifically sought out a Takagi Tourney XT crankset. It's a brand that was bought out by Shimano- and it was never really a piece that was on a LOT of stuff- so it's kind of unknown- but in my mind it had cache and was quality.
When I bought my Trek 620- it had some replacement wheels on there- I was kind of happy since I didn't HAVE to replace the Helicomatic that came on there originally. However, I found some wheels with Atom high flange hubs laced to some Mavic rims. While the high flange hubs are shiny and the Mavic labels are pretty, I don't think they're really way up there on the food chain for robust wheels. As a result, I've wanted to upgrade to something a little different. I have a set of wheels with Belgian made Weinmann rims- although these came on a low end Trek- the more I looked at those wheels- Double walled, eyeletted... I think those are good, guality rims. But when I think of Weinmann, I don't think of a prized, coveted piece.
Speaking of Weinmann... in the Show Your Vintage Touring Bike thread, Lascauxcaveman posted his Peugot with Weinmann cantilever brakes- and I found that Charlie Kelly used those when he was building his own personal Mountain Bike in the very formative years of downhill Mountain Biking. IMO- those brakes, regardless of function, have cache because of that.
So what is the porpoise of this thread?
First, and quite selfishly- are those Belgian made Weinmann 27" rims "good stuff?"
Secondly- what are some of those "sleeper" components that people pass by looking for Campagnolo or XT or...
As you read about Suntour- Maeda charged what THEY thought their product was worth, instead of letting the market decide. As a result, Suntour didn't charge a lot and their stuff ended up going on department store bikes- but because of their slant parallelogram rear derailleur- it shifted and fucntioned better than anything else- regardless of price. While most people now generally recognize that superiority of that function (though not necessarily the "pretty" of the pieces), I can imagine it would have been hard to admit that entry level stuff actually was the best stuff.
A few weeks ago there was a thread about the quality of the Takagi Tourney XT crankset. My 1984 Stumpjumper came with one- so I kind of figured it was good stuff and replied as such in the thread. It looks graceful, yet sufficiently robust to look like it means business. The previous owner of my Stumpjumper rode it all over for (probably) thousands of miles for 20+ years. When I was putting together my Voyageur, I specifically sought out a Takagi Tourney XT crankset. It's a brand that was bought out by Shimano- and it was never really a piece that was on a LOT of stuff- so it's kind of unknown- but in my mind it had cache and was quality.
When I bought my Trek 620- it had some replacement wheels on there- I was kind of happy since I didn't HAVE to replace the Helicomatic that came on there originally. However, I found some wheels with Atom high flange hubs laced to some Mavic rims. While the high flange hubs are shiny and the Mavic labels are pretty, I don't think they're really way up there on the food chain for robust wheels. As a result, I've wanted to upgrade to something a little different. I have a set of wheels with Belgian made Weinmann rims- although these came on a low end Trek- the more I looked at those wheels- Double walled, eyeletted... I think those are good, guality rims. But when I think of Weinmann, I don't think of a prized, coveted piece.
Speaking of Weinmann... in the Show Your Vintage Touring Bike thread, Lascauxcaveman posted his Peugot with Weinmann cantilever brakes- and I found that Charlie Kelly used those when he was building his own personal Mountain Bike in the very formative years of downhill Mountain Biking. IMO- those brakes, regardless of function, have cache because of that.
So what is the porpoise of this thread?
First, and quite selfishly- are those Belgian made Weinmann 27" rims "good stuff?"
Secondly- what are some of those "sleeper" components that people pass by looking for Campagnolo or XT or...
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#2
Senior Member


Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 36
From: Hurricane Alley , Florida
Bikes: Treks (USA), Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn letour,Raleigh Team Professional, Gazelle GoldLine Racing, 2 Super Mondias, Carlton Professional.
A lot of what makes a component "good" is how it's used, however there is a very definite issue of quality to how a component is made- whether it's the materials, the design, the manufacturing process...
As you read about Suntour- Maeda charged what THEY thought their product was worth, instead of letting the market decide. As a result, Suntour didn't charge a lot and their stuff ended up going on department store bikes- but because of their slant parallelogram rear derailleur- it shifted and fucntioned better than anything else- regardless of price. While most people now generally recognize that superiority of that function (though not necessarily the "pretty" of the pieces), I can imagine it would have been hard to admit that entry level stuff actually was the best stuff.
A few weeks ago there was a thread about the quality of the Takagi Tourney XT crankset. My 1984 Stumpjumper came with one- so I kind of figured it was good stuff and replied as such in the thread. It looks graceful, yet sufficiently robust to look like it means business. The previous owner of my Stumpjumper rode it all over for (probably) thousands of miles for 20+ years. When I was putting together my Voyageur, I specifically sought out a Takagi Tourney XT crankset. It's a brand that was bought out by Shimano- and it was never really a piece that was on a LOT of stuff- so it's kind of unknown- but in my mind it had cache and was quality.
When I bought my Trek 620- it had some replacement wheels on there- I was kind of happy since I didn't HAVE to replace the Helicomatic that came on there originally. However, I found some wheels with Atom high flange hubs laced to some Mavic rims. While the high flange hubs are shiny and the Mavic labels are pretty, I don't think they're really way up there on the food chain for robust wheels. As a result, I've wanted to upgrade to something a little different. I have a set of wheels with Belgian made Weinmann rims- although these came on a low end Trek- the more I looked at those wheels- Double walled, eyeletted... I think those are good, guality rims. But when I think of Weinmann, I don't think of a prized, coveted piece.
Speaking of Weinmann... in the Show Your Vintage Touring Bike thread, Lascauxcaveman posted his Peugot with Weinmann cantilever brakes- and I found that Charlie Kelly used those when he was building his own personal Mountain Bike in the very formative years of downhill Mountain Biking. IMO- those brakes, regardless of function, have cache because of that.
So what is the porpoise of this thread?
First, and quite selfishly- are those Belgian made Weinmann 27" rims "good stuff?"
Secondly- what are some of those "sleeper" components that people pass by looking for Campagnolo or XT or...
As you read about Suntour- Maeda charged what THEY thought their product was worth, instead of letting the market decide. As a result, Suntour didn't charge a lot and their stuff ended up going on department store bikes- but because of their slant parallelogram rear derailleur- it shifted and fucntioned better than anything else- regardless of price. While most people now generally recognize that superiority of that function (though not necessarily the "pretty" of the pieces), I can imagine it would have been hard to admit that entry level stuff actually was the best stuff.
A few weeks ago there was a thread about the quality of the Takagi Tourney XT crankset. My 1984 Stumpjumper came with one- so I kind of figured it was good stuff and replied as such in the thread. It looks graceful, yet sufficiently robust to look like it means business. The previous owner of my Stumpjumper rode it all over for (probably) thousands of miles for 20+ years. When I was putting together my Voyageur, I specifically sought out a Takagi Tourney XT crankset. It's a brand that was bought out by Shimano- and it was never really a piece that was on a LOT of stuff- so it's kind of unknown- but in my mind it had cache and was quality.
When I bought my Trek 620- it had some replacement wheels on there- I was kind of happy since I didn't HAVE to replace the Helicomatic that came on there originally. However, I found some wheels with Atom high flange hubs laced to some Mavic rims. While the high flange hubs are shiny and the Mavic labels are pretty, I don't think they're really way up there on the food chain for robust wheels. As a result, I've wanted to upgrade to something a little different. I have a set of wheels with Belgian made Weinmann rims- although these came on a low end Trek- the more I looked at those wheels- Double walled, eyeletted... I think those are good, guality rims. But when I think of Weinmann, I don't think of a prized, coveted piece.
Speaking of Weinmann... in the Show Your Vintage Touring Bike thread, Lascauxcaveman posted his Peugot with Weinmann cantilever brakes- and I found that Charlie Kelly used those when he was building his own personal Mountain Bike in the very formative years of downhill Mountain Biking. IMO- those brakes, regardless of function, have cache because of that.
So what is the porpoise of this thread?
First, and quite selfishly- are those Belgian made Weinmann 27" rims "good stuff?"
Secondly- what are some of those "sleeper" components that people pass by looking for Campagnolo or XT or...
Weinmann 27" rims are ok. Most of them are not Hook bead, meaning you need to use a wire beaded Tire. My Favorite Sleeper Component are Suntour "sealed" or "WTB" hubs. They spin great, good quality an you can find NOS sets Relatively cheap. I just bought a set of these for a Fuji I'm rehabing. I just need to respace the rear hub to 126, no big deal. They even have grease ports !!
https://www.ebay.com/itm/221298714807...ht_1329wt_1362
Suntour Bar ends are another one of my Favorites, So are MKS pedals.
I tend to stick to Campagnolo group sets, but I do make exceptions....
#3
Senior Member




Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 21,770
Likes: 5,675
From: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
The weinmann concave rims were pretty decent. My favorite vintage rims were the Super Champion 58s for touring and heavy duty use and the Mavic Mod Es. Agree that the sealed suntour or wtb hubs were fantastic. I have several sets (sealed superbe, sealed cyclone, sealed xc pro) and they all spin as nicely today as when I first bought them after lots and lots of miles. I'm pretty the sealed specialized were just a rebranded suntour and they are also excellent. MKS still makes great pedals. I just bought a pair of the MKS lambda pedals that look funky but they are a really fine set of platform pedals if you want to ride with regular shoes.
My favorite vintage component is the stronglight A9 headset. They were fairly inexpensive and lasted and lasted and lasted. I grew up in a city that had (and still has) really rough roads (New Orleans is built on mud and it is impossible to keep the roads there in decent shape). It was a great city to test out headsets though. I've seen more than a few campy headsets come back to the shop pitted. This never happened to the A9s. You can still get a needle bearing one inch headset if you look around like this, https://www.rivbike.com/product-p/hsrd.htm.
My favorite vintage component is the stronglight A9 headset. They were fairly inexpensive and lasted and lasted and lasted. I grew up in a city that had (and still has) really rough roads (New Orleans is built on mud and it is impossible to keep the roads there in decent shape). It was a great city to test out headsets though. I've seen more than a few campy headsets come back to the shop pitted. This never happened to the A9s. You can still get a needle bearing one inch headset if you look around like this, https://www.rivbike.com/product-p/hsrd.htm.
#4
Senior Member


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,429
Likes: 257
From: Ashland, VA
Bikes: The keepers: 1969 Magneet Sprint, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1973 Raleigh Twenty, 3 - 1986 Rossins.
Personal experience on my Magneet tourer has me close to 5100 miles on my set of Weinmann rims with no problems whatsoever. They're still holding true and have had no flat spot problems despite the number of potholes I've failed to miss over the years. I have no plans whatsoever to upgrade. If it's not broke, don't fix it.
I've always considered Weinmann components to be greatly underrated, mainly because Schwinn used the brand for so many years. And of course, any classic buff knows that if it appeared on a Schwinn, it's got to be mediocre
.
I've always considered Weinmann components to be greatly underrated, mainly because Schwinn used the brand for so many years. And of course, any classic buff knows that if it appeared on a Schwinn, it's got to be mediocre
.
__________________
Syke
“No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”
H.L. Mencken, (1926)
Syke
“No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”
H.L. Mencken, (1926)
#5
A few of my favorite (relatively) economical "sleeper" components:
Weinmann's concave rims.
Huret's Challenger rear derailleur
Avocet's Touring saddles
Suntour's "Power" shifters
Universal 68 brakes
Weinmann's concave rims.
Huret's Challenger rear derailleur
Avocet's Touring saddles
Suntour's "Power" shifters
Universal 68 brakes
__________________
- Auchen
- Auchen
#6
“part-timer”

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 659
Likes: 232
From: Tidewater VA
Bikes: 1975 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1978 Bertin C35, 1982 Trek 614, 1983 Trek 620, 1984 Nishiki Seral, 1995 Mercian Ko’M, 1998 Fisher HKEK, 2000 Rivendell RS, 2001 Heron Touring, 2016 Nobilette Custom
Sachs stuff from the 90's.
Quality and finish-wise as nice as anything out there. Look for top-end New Success and Quarz. Indestructible derailleurs and the smoothest hub bearings you've ever spun. I've used the same New Success group on two different bikes (both my "main" riders) since 1995.
Quality and finish-wise as nice as anything out there. Look for top-end New Success and Quarz. Indestructible derailleurs and the smoothest hub bearings you've ever spun. I've used the same New Success group on two different bikes (both my "main" riders) since 1995.
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,579
Likes: 6
From: Pearland, Texas
Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana
TGB, For the selfish question I have had good luck with the older Weinmann rims.
On to the second question. There are a ton of lower level road bike components whose only sin are that they weigh more than their upper level component cousins. I built my son's Olmo with a Suntour Blaze drivetrain that with a little polishing looks rather good, IMHO. A set of RSX DP calipers greatly improve stopping. My current project is using RX100 parts mixed with a 105 crankset and brake levers.
My touring bike is using an Alivio FD and hubs and a STX RD along with a CODA branded Sugino crankset. This was a bike I felt I'd really be upgrading, but after almost three years, I don't have a good reason to do so.
My mountain bike is a true mutt of Shimano components, from brand new, with the low end parts as durable as the upper end parts. It ranges from STX to XT level.
Brad
PS Auchen, I really liked my Avocet Touring II, but my older daughter liked it also and it's on her CX bike.
On to the second question. There are a ton of lower level road bike components whose only sin are that they weigh more than their upper level component cousins. I built my son's Olmo with a Suntour Blaze drivetrain that with a little polishing looks rather good, IMHO. A set of RSX DP calipers greatly improve stopping. My current project is using RX100 parts mixed with a 105 crankset and brake levers.
My touring bike is using an Alivio FD and hubs and a STX RD along with a CODA branded Sugino crankset. This was a bike I felt I'd really be upgrading, but after almost three years, I don't have a good reason to do so.
My mountain bike is a true mutt of Shimano components, from brand new, with the low end parts as durable as the upper end parts. It ranges from STX to XT level.
Brad
PS Auchen, I really liked my Avocet Touring II, but my older daughter liked it also and it's on her CX bike.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 806
Likes: 35
I liked the Berthet pedals. Simple to service, real easy to get into and good with bare feet. Suntour VX derailler I put on my Lambert in 1972 is now on my wifes Mercian. (sorry, Ive gone Campy everything)
I am still using some Phil Wood hubs that I got in 78. I updated from a 120 to 126 axel in 85.
I am still using some Phil Wood hubs that I got in 78. I updated from a 120 to 126 axel in 85.
#9
spondylitis.org


Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 128
From: Fleetwood, PA, USA
Bikes: '84 Colnago Super; '90 Bridgestone MB-1; '81 Trek 930; '01 Cinelli Supercorsa; '62 Ideor Asso; '87 Tommasini Super Prestige; '13 Lynskey R2300; '84 Serotta Nova Special; '94 Litespeed Catalyst; etc.
The best testament to how "good" something is would be its combination of function, durability and aesthetics (in that order).
Campagnolo Record/Nuovo Record etc. has been all three, throughout the ages. Unfortunately it's always been expensive, too. Same goes for boutique manufacturers (Paul Components, Chris King, early Ringle, American Classic, Cook Brothers, etc.).
From the late 60s to the early 80s there were very few manufacturers that could touch Maeda Industries for F/D/A. Their metallurgy was always outstanding. The Superbe Pro group they eventually came out with (too late, as it turned out) was better than anything before or since (IMO). Unfortunately, Maeda/SunTour decided to embrace complicated pivot design (vs. building on what they had that worked so well in the slant parallelogram), and Shimano came in and ate them alive with SIS.
Shimano was in SunTour's shadow for a hell of a long time (not many people remember it), but then determined to up the ante on its competitors, and as a result it came out with the 1-2 punch that settled it for everyone (e.g. Dura Ace 7400-series and Deore XT 7-speed SIS). I still use both groups, and they are still going strong on bikes in the current stable. Despite all the flack they used to take for Rapid Fire and for their brifters (justified), they still offered up bar-end shifters for retro-grouches like me.
Too bad they decided to make their parts proprietary and ass-fugly after about 1995. It's why Sugino is still with us, in fact.
SRAM took Sachs/Sedis/Huret technology, stole a little from Shimano and eventually became a player, but it doesn't really belong on vintage bikes.
And then there were the French. The good ones (TA Specialities; Mavic; Stronglight) are still with us. The ones that self-destructed or tried to kill us (AVA; Simplex; Maillard) are not.
Sleepers -
Takagi cranksets
Sugino cranksets and seatposts
Sachs/Sedis chains, cranks, hubs, freewheels
Miche hubs, derailleurs, etc.
Weinmann brakes (60s-late 70s)
Dia Compe / Grand Compe brakes, levers
SR/Sakae Ringyo anything from the late 70s through the mid 90s
Sun Rims
Matrix rims
Araya rims (double-wall; tubular)
Suzue hubs (particularly the sealed-bearing cartridge ones)
Sunshine hubs (particularly the track hubs)
Simplex alloy friction shifters
Simplex Super LJ derailleurs
Campagnolo Record/Nuovo Record etc. has been all three, throughout the ages. Unfortunately it's always been expensive, too. Same goes for boutique manufacturers (Paul Components, Chris King, early Ringle, American Classic, Cook Brothers, etc.).
From the late 60s to the early 80s there were very few manufacturers that could touch Maeda Industries for F/D/A. Their metallurgy was always outstanding. The Superbe Pro group they eventually came out with (too late, as it turned out) was better than anything before or since (IMO). Unfortunately, Maeda/SunTour decided to embrace complicated pivot design (vs. building on what they had that worked so well in the slant parallelogram), and Shimano came in and ate them alive with SIS.
Shimano was in SunTour's shadow for a hell of a long time (not many people remember it), but then determined to up the ante on its competitors, and as a result it came out with the 1-2 punch that settled it for everyone (e.g. Dura Ace 7400-series and Deore XT 7-speed SIS). I still use both groups, and they are still going strong on bikes in the current stable. Despite all the flack they used to take for Rapid Fire and for their brifters (justified), they still offered up bar-end shifters for retro-grouches like me.
Too bad they decided to make their parts proprietary and ass-fugly after about 1995. It's why Sugino is still with us, in fact.
SRAM took Sachs/Sedis/Huret technology, stole a little from Shimano and eventually became a player, but it doesn't really belong on vintage bikes.
And then there were the French. The good ones (TA Specialities; Mavic; Stronglight) are still with us. The ones that self-destructed or tried to kill us (AVA; Simplex; Maillard) are not.
Sleepers -
Takagi cranksets
Sugino cranksets and seatposts
Sachs/Sedis chains, cranks, hubs, freewheels
Miche hubs, derailleurs, etc.
Weinmann brakes (60s-late 70s)
Dia Compe / Grand Compe brakes, levers
SR/Sakae Ringyo anything from the late 70s through the mid 90s
Sun Rims
Matrix rims
Araya rims (double-wall; tubular)
Suzue hubs (particularly the sealed-bearing cartridge ones)
Sunshine hubs (particularly the track hubs)
Simplex alloy friction shifters
Simplex Super LJ derailleurs
Last edited by kunsunoke; 12-14-13 at 01:00 PM.
#10
1, 2, 3 and to the 4X


Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 425
Likes: 34
From: Ashland, OR
#11
spondylitis.org


Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 128
From: Fleetwood, PA, USA
Bikes: '84 Colnago Super; '90 Bridgestone MB-1; '81 Trek 930; '01 Cinelli Supercorsa; '62 Ideor Asso; '87 Tommasini Super Prestige; '13 Lynskey R2300; '84 Serotta Nova Special; '94 Litespeed Catalyst; etc.
Sorry, I should have taken that nap before I posted.
#12
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 799
From: Ridgewood, Queens
Bikes: Zunow, 3Rensho, Look KG196
Here's my list of sleeper parts - as defined by reliability, relative rarity, and obscurity resulting in a low price.
Lambert / Viscount cranks - just like TA or Stronglight cranks but with English threading and typically 1/3 of the price
Nervar cranks - same as the Lamberts
Simplex retro friction shifters, and the various Spidel and Mavic versions
SunTour V-GT Luxe rear derailleurs, Vx-GT derailleurs - best touring derailleurs ever
MAFAC cantilever brakes, MAFAC brake levers, MAFAC centerpulls - high resale value if they are complete and nicely restored, but easy to find
Shimano 500 centerpulls - surprisingly well made!
Shimano Light Action / Z series - an entry level group with a very nice, understated silver look and excellent mechanicals. Their light action ratchet shifters are second only to simplex retro frictions as the best friction shifters out there
Shimano oval chain - 1/8" chain originally made for cruiser bikes but looks awesome on a track bike, very sturdy and reliable
some modern bits that are great for restorations:
sunrace thumb shifters - a grant Peterson favorite, $10 a set and just as good as any vintage bits
Alex DA or Weinmann LP18 rims laced to Quando hubs - sub-$100 wheel set that looks right on a vintage build
Action Bicycles cork bar wrap - cheapest out there but look great. A little bit of lacquer over natural cork tape and you have the same look and feel as leather for sixth of the price
bonus - cant afford a Campagnolo Pista crankset? Get an old Strada set that's 144bcd and then grind off the inner chainring tabs. Once mounted on a bike, no one will know the difference.
Lambert / Viscount cranks - just like TA or Stronglight cranks but with English threading and typically 1/3 of the price
Nervar cranks - same as the Lamberts
Simplex retro friction shifters, and the various Spidel and Mavic versions
SunTour V-GT Luxe rear derailleurs, Vx-GT derailleurs - best touring derailleurs ever
MAFAC cantilever brakes, MAFAC brake levers, MAFAC centerpulls - high resale value if they are complete and nicely restored, but easy to find
Shimano 500 centerpulls - surprisingly well made!
Shimano Light Action / Z series - an entry level group with a very nice, understated silver look and excellent mechanicals. Their light action ratchet shifters are second only to simplex retro frictions as the best friction shifters out there
Shimano oval chain - 1/8" chain originally made for cruiser bikes but looks awesome on a track bike, very sturdy and reliable
some modern bits that are great for restorations:
sunrace thumb shifters - a grant Peterson favorite, $10 a set and just as good as any vintage bits
Alex DA or Weinmann LP18 rims laced to Quando hubs - sub-$100 wheel set that looks right on a vintage build
Action Bicycles cork bar wrap - cheapest out there but look great. A little bit of lacquer over natural cork tape and you have the same look and feel as leather for sixth of the price
bonus - cant afford a Campagnolo Pista crankset? Get an old Strada set that's 144bcd and then grind off the inner chainring tabs. Once mounted on a bike, no one will know the difference.
__________________
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
#13
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,953
Likes: 387
From: NE Indiana
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
A lot of Suntour stuff did not just go on department store bikes, a lot of low end Suntour stuff did as did a lot of low end Shimano stuff. Once you got past the Seven line of derailleurs the rest could only be found on bikes sold in LBS's. But like you said even the low to mid end Suntour stuff shifted better than the top of the line stuff sold by Shimano or Campy after the slant parallelogram derailleur was introduced. The higher end Suntour used the same slant parallelogram design but they went further with using lighter parts and better mechanicals. Once you got into ARX, Cyclone, Sprint, Superbe, and the Vx series those were mostly LBS's offerings. There were some exclusions to that, when Nishiki and Centurion started to piss of LBS's and selling their bikes to retail stores some of those came with the higher end Suntour but I don't recall if any of those ever had Superbe or Sprint. For the most part Suntour mid level on up was mostly sold in LBS's.
Miche was not that great either, they lacked in quality until sometime in the 80's and 90's they rebadged Suntour derailleurs with the Miche name. Mavic wasn't all that great either, they were made by Simplex! So to say Mavic was better then Simplex is pure ignorance of the two models.
I think the best French made derailleur was the Huret, the Jubilee and Duopar was virtually indestructible and it shifted better than the Campy and Shimano of the day, and the shift levers were the best levers ever made by anyone. And you also have to keep in mind that until the slant parell. design by Suntour came out all, and I mean ALL derailleurs were crappy in function, but that's all there was so you went with what you had, after that companies strived to make the derailleurs better and shifting quality eventually went up in all brands but it took quite a few years probably not until Shimano SIS came out was there any measurable improvement. Sach/Huret came out in the early 80's, to say early 80's bikes are not vintage is just not right unless in your mind anything newer than 1979 is not vintage. But it was in that age of Sach/Huret that a truly classic Duopar derailleur came out, the finest French derailleur ever made.
As a side note, I have two bikes with the newest STI (2013 105) and Ergo (2006 Athena) shifting systems, and I test rode Dura Ace and Ultegra, and none of those shift faster than the SIS did! SIS is just faster for some reason, I push or pull the lever to the next click and bang it's in gear, with STI or Ergo there is a slight delay and a slightly softer engagement, plus with SIS I could shift from first to 7th and bang it's there right now, not so with either of the other newer stuff. In fact my friction Suntour Superbe non indexed shifter shifts as fast as my newer stuff! I'm just saying what i've experienced which I'm sure most of you will disagree, after all how dare the newer stuff be rated below older stuff, it's sacrilege.
Miche was not that great either, they lacked in quality until sometime in the 80's and 90's they rebadged Suntour derailleurs with the Miche name. Mavic wasn't all that great either, they were made by Simplex! So to say Mavic was better then Simplex is pure ignorance of the two models.
I think the best French made derailleur was the Huret, the Jubilee and Duopar was virtually indestructible and it shifted better than the Campy and Shimano of the day, and the shift levers were the best levers ever made by anyone. And you also have to keep in mind that until the slant parell. design by Suntour came out all, and I mean ALL derailleurs were crappy in function, but that's all there was so you went with what you had, after that companies strived to make the derailleurs better and shifting quality eventually went up in all brands but it took quite a few years probably not until Shimano SIS came out was there any measurable improvement. Sach/Huret came out in the early 80's, to say early 80's bikes are not vintage is just not right unless in your mind anything newer than 1979 is not vintage. But it was in that age of Sach/Huret that a truly classic Duopar derailleur came out, the finest French derailleur ever made.
As a side note, I have two bikes with the newest STI (2013 105) and Ergo (2006 Athena) shifting systems, and I test rode Dura Ace and Ultegra, and none of those shift faster than the SIS did! SIS is just faster for some reason, I push or pull the lever to the next click and bang it's in gear, with STI or Ergo there is a slight delay and a slightly softer engagement, plus with SIS I could shift from first to 7th and bang it's there right now, not so with either of the other newer stuff. In fact my friction Suntour Superbe non indexed shifter shifts as fast as my newer stuff! I'm just saying what i've experienced which I'm sure most of you will disagree, after all how dare the newer stuff be rated below older stuff, it's sacrilege.
#14
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
As a side note, I have two bikes with the newest STI (2013 105) and Ergo (2006 Athena) shifting systems, and I test rode Dura Ace and Ultegra, and none of those shift faster than the SIS did! SIS is just faster for some reason, I push or pull the lever to the next click and bang it's in gear, with STI or Ergo there is a slight delay and a slightly softer engagement, plus with SIS I could shift from first to 7th and bang it's there right now, not so with either of the other newer stuff. In fact my friction Suntour Superbe non indexed shifter shifts as fast as my newer stuff! I'm just saying what i've experienced which I'm sure most of you will disagree, after all how dare the newer stuff be rated below older stuff, it's sacrilege.
#16
What??? Only 2 wheels?


Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13,496
Likes: 938
From: Boston-ish, MA
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
A friend who knows or at least used to know bikes, the guy who gave me my Masi frame, was always a big Campy fan for the aesthetics. He never liked the Suntour V-series stuff because it didn't have the nice finish of Campy. I never noticed back when that stuff was new because I was too busy riding and loving the shifting, and never could see the derailleurs when I was riding anyway. Truth be told, back then I never had any Campy for comparison.
I can see the difference now, of course. But I still have no worries about putting Vx derailleurs on a good bike. They just work too well.
The point is, my criteria would always place aesthetics last. Functionality and low weight with out. They usually go together in the nicer components.
I can see the difference now, of course. But I still have no worries about putting Vx derailleurs on a good bike. They just work too well.The point is, my criteria would always place aesthetics last. Functionality and low weight with out. They usually go together in the nicer components.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#17
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,953
Likes: 387
From: NE Indiana
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
I've noticed the same as well. The Dura Ace 7400 system with SIS on my 80's Allez shifts faster than all of the modern groups (DA7900, Ultegra 6700, Sram Force/Red, Tiagra) that I've tried so far. I'm not sure if 7400 actually shifts faster but at the very least the shifts feel more direct. A pull or push on the lever and it's in the next gear without any fuss. I've been thinking of modernizing the group on my Allez to something with integrated shift/brake levers but the direct feel of the 7400 group is giving me pause about the "upgrade".
#18
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,953
Likes: 387
From: NE Indiana
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
A friend who knows or at least used to know bikes, the guy who gave me my Masi frame, was always a big Campy fan for the aesthetics. He never liked the Suntour V-series stuff because it didn't have the nice finish of Campy. I never noticed back when that stuff was new because I was too busy riding and loving the shifting, and never could see the derailleurs when I was riding anyway. Truth be told, back then I never had any Campy for comparison.
I can see the difference now, of course. But I still have no worries about putting Vx derailleurs on a good bike. They just work too well.
The point is, my criteria would always place aesthetics last. Functionality and low weight with out. They usually go together in the nicer components.
I can see the difference now, of course. But I still have no worries about putting Vx derailleurs on a good bike. They just work too well.The point is, my criteria would always place aesthetics last. Functionality and low weight with out. They usually go together in the nicer components.
I also have the Suntour Mountech II derailleur which is mountain/touring derailleur version of the Tech but looks different, anyways it too supposedly had the same issues as the Superbe Tech. I can't speak about the durability of this derailleur yet because I only have about 2200 miles on it, but, like the Superbe Tech it's the fastest shifting friction derailleur I've ever used for wide gear ranges. This one came stock on my 85 Schwinn Le Tour Luxe I bought used with just 250 miles on it and was in showroom condition when I got it about 3 or 4 years ago.
#19
The best testament to how "good" something is would be its combination of function, durability and aesthetics (in that order).
Campagnolo Record/Nuovo Record etc. has been all three, throughout the ages. Unfortunately it's always been expensive, too. Same goes for boutique manufacturers (Paul Components, Chris King, early Ringle, American Classic, Cook Brothers, etc.). ...
Campagnolo Record/Nuovo Record etc. has been all three, throughout the ages. Unfortunately it's always been expensive, too. Same goes for boutique manufacturers (Paul Components, Chris King, early Ringle, American Classic, Cook Brothers, etc.). ...
Yes, I bought ... one.
#20
Spin Forest! Spin!
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,956
Likes: 18
From: Arrid Zone-a
Bikes: I used to have many. And I Will again.
Campy Super Record FD's didn't shifted all that good compared to the top end competition in its day.
Nashbar had a habit of such great closeouts....Superbe Pro parts went pretty cheap in early 90s.
And Campy 2006 spec parts too. I picked up some Record and Centaur 10 speed hubs for cheap.
Fast forward a few years and Silver Record hubs were going for $500 a set!
Nashbar had a habit of such great closeouts....Superbe Pro parts went pretty cheap in early 90s.
And Campy 2006 spec parts too. I picked up some Record and Centaur 10 speed hubs for cheap.
Fast forward a few years and Silver Record hubs were going for $500 a set!
#21
Thread Starter
Extraordinary Magnitude


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14,080
Likes: 2,133
From: Waukesha WI
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Here's my list of sleeper parts - as defined by reliability, relative rarity, and obscurity resulting in a low price.
Shimano Light Action / Z series - an entry level group with a very nice, understated silver look and excellent mechanicals. Their light action ratchet shifters are second only to simplex retro frictions as the best friction shifters out there
Shimano Light Action / Z series - an entry level group with a very nice, understated silver look and excellent mechanicals. Their light action ratchet shifters are second only to simplex retro frictions as the best friction shifters out there
Is there some place that has an exploded diagram of how these go together?
I have a clamp on boss that I have some SIS shifters on- I could twistie tie those together- but the L422s... they have to be screwed on to something to hold them together apparently.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#22
Thread Starter
Extraordinary Magnitude


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14,080
Likes: 2,133
From: Waukesha WI
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
So in looking at people's "sleepers" here- it's interesting that a lot of people stumble over the same things- not talked about, not prized possessions, not feverish acquisitions... Just stuff that you've discovered that works/looks great.
My favorite saddle is the San Marco Touring- it came on a few touring bikes in 86- and that's it. I don't think I've seen it specced on anything other than Voyageurs, Passages and Trek 620. Although I like the Avocet Touring IIs that I have, the one drawback to the San Marco is that it doesn't have loops for hanging a bag- which the Avocets have.
As I mentioned before- the Sachs/Huret ratcheting shifters. I'm really excited to try the Simplex retrofrictions and compare them to the Sachs/Huret shifters- I find the action... "silky" compared to the Suntour ratcheting stuff (I've never used the Suntour Sprint friction shifters, which I've heard has a more fine ratcheting action than the Power Shifters).

It's interesting that stuff that would have been ubiquitous even on low end bikes makes it onto here. Stuff like Araya rims, Sanshin hubs, SR stems and bars, DiaCompe brakes/levers... Stuff that was specced on lower end bikes- but still trucking along 30 years later- sometimes with zero maintenance. So far from being "crappy" components- they suffer from being inexpensive, being on everything, and not having that "quality" cache.
My favorite saddle is the San Marco Touring- it came on a few touring bikes in 86- and that's it. I don't think I've seen it specced on anything other than Voyageurs, Passages and Trek 620. Although I like the Avocet Touring IIs that I have, the one drawback to the San Marco is that it doesn't have loops for hanging a bag- which the Avocets have.
As I mentioned before- the Sachs/Huret ratcheting shifters. I'm really excited to try the Simplex retrofrictions and compare them to the Sachs/Huret shifters- I find the action... "silky" compared to the Suntour ratcheting stuff (I've never used the Suntour Sprint friction shifters, which I've heard has a more fine ratcheting action than the Power Shifters).

It's interesting that stuff that would have been ubiquitous even on low end bikes makes it onto here. Stuff like Araya rims, Sanshin hubs, SR stems and bars, DiaCompe brakes/levers... Stuff that was specced on lower end bikes- but still trucking along 30 years later- sometimes with zero maintenance. So far from being "crappy" components- they suffer from being inexpensive, being on everything, and not having that "quality" cache.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#23
Death fork? Naaaah!!

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,529
Likes: 945
From: The other Maine, north of RT 2
Bikes: Seriously downsizing.
Shimano 'Z' series brakes and Light Action derailers have been mentioned, but I also like the upper-tier Exage comps. EX 400/500 is pretty much the same as 105 with different cosmetics and finish; ditto for CX/LX 500 and Deore LX.
I also like the SunTour 'backwards' FDs,plain 'ol Normandy high-flange hubs, and Viscount/Lambert cranksets. The set on my Super Sport consists of Nevar BB and crank arms, Lambert small and middle ring, and Viscount outer ring.
Top
Top
I also like the SunTour 'backwards' FDs,plain 'ol Normandy high-flange hubs, and Viscount/Lambert cranksets. The set on my Super Sport consists of Nevar BB and crank arms, Lambert small and middle ring, and Viscount outer ring.
Top
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
#24
Thread Starter
Extraordinary Magnitude


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14,080
Likes: 2,133
From: Waukesha WI
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
That Z series stuff... I think it's an interesting time in Shimano's lineup. I think that group was supposed to be a cross between a MTB and Touring set. I've seen it introduced on the Trek line on the sport bikes. It seems the Z206 FD was on tons of bikes. It worked welll as a double and it worked well as a triple AND half-step gearing. I have a set of the Z series drop bar brake levers. They're the second coolest looking brake levers evAr. Velobase has them listed as a part of the Golden Arrow 105 group. IMO the slotted Superbe levers are the coolest- but the Z306 levers are really cool. I also have a set of the 6207 600 series slotted levers- they're the same besides the 600 and Shimano logos.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#25
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 799
From: Ridgewood, Queens
Bikes: Zunow, 3Rensho, Look KG196
I have a set of the L422 shifters- I found them too stiff and FAR preferred the Sachs/Huret shifters. But I thought- I should probably get those out and give them a second chance- so I just went down to the basement, found the box and the bag... and bam... they're exploded all over the bag.
Is there some place that has an exploded diagram of how these go together?
I have a clamp on boss that I have some SIS shifters on- I could twistie tie those together- but the L422s... they have to be screwed on to something to hold them together apparently.
Is there some place that has an exploded diagram of how these go together?
I have a clamp on boss that I have some SIS shifters on- I could twistie tie those together- but the L422s... they have to be screwed on to something to hold them together apparently.
i don't have any resources to share, but if you post a pic of the parts maybe we can suggest how they go back together.
__________________
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.





