Crack in crankset spider
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,510
Likes: 4,929
From: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, 86 De Rosa Pro, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Crack in crankset spider
I just noticed a small crack in the spider of a ~84 Ofmega cranset that is original to my torpado supper strada
it is a crack, not a scratch and goes all the way through
I am going to replace it....wtb post in for sale coming soon
in interim....what do you think? ok to ride or don't take a chance?
thanks
crack

whole crank
it is a crack, not a scratch and goes all the way through
I am going to replace it....wtb post in for sale coming soon
in interim....what do you think? ok to ride or don't take a chance?
thanks
crack

whole crank
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
#2
I don't think failure would be catastrophic, more along the lines of losing a chainring bolt than the seriousness of having a crank arm break/losing a pedal; but it might prevent you from pedaling home, so why take the chance? And if it's failure started a chain reaction where you lost the entire spider at once, that could cause a crash.
Plus, if it breaks you won't be able to sell it on ebay
Plus, if it breaks you won't be able to sell it on ebay
#3
Senior Member


Joined: May 2008
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 2,762
From: Fredericksburg, Va
Bikes: ? Proteous, '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, 'Litespeed Catalyst'94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster
Hmmm... strange. I would not have expected a crack in that location with that orientation! Are your chain ring bolts uniformily tight?
There is a nick just inside (below) the radius on the edge where the failure is. Do you know where or how it was created? That may have been the location of the force that caused the crack.
There is a nick just inside (below) the radius on the edge where the failure is. Do you know where or how it was created? That may have been the location of the force that caused the crack.
#5
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,875
Likes: 3,757
Hmmm... strange. I would not have expected a crack in that location with that orientation! Are your chain ring bolts uniformily tight?
There is a nick just inside (below) the radius on the edge where the failure is. Do you know where or how it was created? That may have been the location of the force that caused the crack.
There is a nick just inside (below) the radius on the edge where the failure is. Do you know where or how it was created? That may have been the location of the force that caused the crack.
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,510
Likes: 4,929
From: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, 86 De Rosa Pro, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Hmmm... strange. I would not have expected a crack in that location with that orientation! Are your chain ring bolts uniformily tight?
There is a nick just inside (below) the radius on the edge where the failure is. Do you know where or how it was created? That may have been the location of the force that caused the crack.
There is a nick just inside (below) the radius on the edge where the failure is. Do you know where or how it was created? That may have been the location of the force that caused the crack.
I did have some loose chaing ring bolts, and lost one, but it wasn't the one on this locations....so hard to say
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
#7
Bianchi Goddess



Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 28,976
Likes: 4,245
From: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
I wouldn't hammer on it but I would likely ride it.
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#8
Senior Member


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,726
Likes: 4,191
From: Berkeley, CA
Bikes: 72 Cilo Pacer, 72 Gitane GT, 72 Peugeot PX10, 73 Speedwell Ti,l, 75 Peugeot PR-10L, 80 Colnago Super, 81 Zinn, 85 ALAN Cross, 85 De Rosa Pro, 86 Look 753, 86 Look KG86, 89 Parkpre Team, 90 Parkpre Team MTB, 90 Merlin
I would not ride it. If that spider does crack through and fail catastrophically, I could envision the chain ring folding and you toppling to the ground. If you must ride it--say, in the interim while you are waiting for the replacement to arrive--I would stay in the saddle.
#9
Thread Starter
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,510
Likes: 4,929
From: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, 86 De Rosa Pro, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
I would not ride it. If that spider does crack through and fail catastrophically, I could envision the chain ring folding and you toppling to the ground. If you must ride it--say, in the interim while you are waiting for the replacement to arrive--I would stay in the saddle.
repechage..... Massive maybe.... massive fast not so

It is now on hiatus until I find a replacement
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
#10
Senior Member


Joined: May 2008
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 2,762
From: Fredericksburg, Va
Bikes: ? Proteous, '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, 'Litespeed Catalyst'94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster
I think it is important to identify that one, it is a torsional load and two, it is distributed through all the spiders and through all the teeth engaged with the chain. There is no single point of the force vector from the crank or ring but a system of 5 force vectors distributed through the spiders which in turn impacting a distributed area of the ring and then through ring teeth. I would not be surprised if the variation of the force from the pedals was reasonably uniform at the ring bolts at any given time, if they are uniformly torqued. Then we get into the details of the tolerance of each of the holes and fastners relative to each spider and the resulting impact to the force distribution at the interface.
Nominally, the spiders see a cyclical load based on the force applied to the pedals in a given location, like a sine wave. Granted, the spider with the crack can only tolerate a load less than the others due to the failure on one of two spider sections, but the other four will pick up the difference while the remaining one will continue to work with the load until it fails. When it does the other four will have to pick up the difference. So initially the spiders distributed the load into 5 spider, with the complete failure of the 5th the load is distributed through 4. Note the resistance force vector is pointed counter-clockwise (your trying to get the ring to move clock-wise and the rear wheel and ground are resisting it), forcing a compressive force on the crack.
So squirtdad, experiencing the risk is your call. As little as we know of the design parameters of the crank and the load (s), what is the impact of the risk event of the second section of the failing spider? Are the remaining spiders up to the task of eduring your mashing? Is the failure of the second section truely catestrophic (one stroke) or will it propogate over time (n+1 strokes)? When it fails, what is the likelyhood of the ring folding with a distributed load around 180 degrees of teeth and being supported by the internal ring (would have to "fold" both rings)? Do you want to find out?
Nominally, the spiders see a cyclical load based on the force applied to the pedals in a given location, like a sine wave. Granted, the spider with the crack can only tolerate a load less than the others due to the failure on one of two spider sections, but the other four will pick up the difference while the remaining one will continue to work with the load until it fails. When it does the other four will have to pick up the difference. So initially the spiders distributed the load into 5 spider, with the complete failure of the 5th the load is distributed through 4. Note the resistance force vector is pointed counter-clockwise (your trying to get the ring to move clock-wise and the rear wheel and ground are resisting it), forcing a compressive force on the crack.
So squirtdad, experiencing the risk is your call. As little as we know of the design parameters of the crank and the load (s), what is the impact of the risk event of the second section of the failing spider? Are the remaining spiders up to the task of eduring your mashing? Is the failure of the second section truely catestrophic (one stroke) or will it propogate over time (n+1 strokes)? When it fails, what is the likelyhood of the ring folding with a distributed load around 180 degrees of teeth and being supported by the internal ring (would have to "fold" both rings)? Do you want to find out?
Last edited by SJX426; 07-01-14 at 01:32 PM.
#11
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,875
Likes: 3,757
If the bike was sporting the older "webbed" chainrings…one could just remove the one chainring bolt, back in the day we saw a number of bikes arrived in the shop with a missing bolt and no catastrophe.
Creaking, yes.
Creaking, yes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
neoviolence
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
30
06-13-11 06:43 PM






