Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Thinking about changing wheel sizes.

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Thinking about changing wheel sizes.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-14 | 09:19 AM
  #26  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola FL

Bikes: 1984 Raleigh Kodiak , KHS Sierra Something

27x1-3/8 is the stock size for this bike. It is currently running 27x1-1/4. When I measure for tire width on the frame and forks should I drop down 2 to 4 mm to guesstimate where the wide point on a 700c would wind up? How much clearance minimum between tire sidewall and frame/fork?
Centaurious is offline  
Reply
Old 12-01-14 | 09:46 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,868
Likes: 3,753
Originally Posted by Centaurious
27x1-3/8 is the stock size for this bike. It is currently running 27x1-1/4. When I measure for tire width on the frame and forks should I drop down 2 to 4 mm to guesstimate where the wide point on a 700c would wind up? How much clearance minimum between tire sidewall and frame/fork?
4 mm would be reasonable. the concept is this, a 42 tire will in theory be a 42 mm circle in the cross section, this is an approximate as it does not take into account the added rubber for wear. Your original tires were 35 mm wide. There are some other factors too, a rim that is wider or narrower will modify the ultimate tire width.

As to the amount of side clearance, you can also possibly slide the rear wheel back a bit after to gain more capacity. 4 mm on each side I would be comfortable with. You might mark the widest tire region at the chain stays now, move back 4 mm and remove the wheel, measure the inside width, subtract 8 mm and you would have a reasonable guess as to the width of tire you could run with a 700c.
repechage is offline  
Reply
Old 12-01-14 | 10:17 AM
  #28  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Originally Posted by Centaurious
Was the 700c standard around before the 27" standard and we (americans) wanted an inch standard to match the rest of what we had? They are so close I wondered why have both?
No. These terms, 26", 27", 28", are nominal sizes and don't really have any bearing on anything. Note that the most common "28 inch" size is the same as 700c and is actually a smaller rim than a 27" rim. In the English speaking world they used to call tubular tires 27" or 28" wheels, or more generally "sprints." The original sales receipt for my 1954 Alvin Drysdale specified "27 x 1 1/4 sprinter tires" on "Vanzone rims" (sic). That is, Vianzone wooden rims with tubular tires.

What we know of as "27 inch" was a proprietary size introduced by Dunlop in the 30's in hopes of cornering the market for high end clincher tires.

I'm not sure when 622mm clincher rims and tires became available. By the late 40's for sure.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Reply
Old 12-01-14 | 11:34 AM
  #29  
browngw's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 720
From: Port Dover Ontario Canada

Bikes: 1965 Dilecta Le Blanc, 1956 Royal Nord, 1972 Raleigh Sports, 1972 CCM Turismo, 2014 Salsa Vaya, 2019 Giant Lafree and others

Two of my bikes are now running Schwalbe Silentos 700c. The Salsa Vaya touring bike came with 700c 40mm and I liked them so well I put a set on my Giant Hybrid. I replaced the kenda 700c38mm (measured 35mm) with Silento 35mm (measured 35mm). The Vaya soaks up lots of bad roads.
__________________
We are what we reflect. We are the changes that we bring to this world. Ride often. -Geo.-
browngw is offline  
Reply
Old 12-01-14 | 12:03 PM
  #30  
dddd's Avatar
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,834
Likes: 1,809
From: Northern California

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Originally Posted by mobilemail
You might also take a minute to consider how wide a tire the frame will accept, and if there is any real advantage to changing wheels. You always have to maintain enough clearance to avoid mud lockup, and in case your wheel comes out of true a bit. I don't know if they are still available, but Michelin used to make a 27x1-3/8 tire, roughly 35mm.

I think that you must be referring to the Michelin Hi-Lite Tour, a folding 1-3/8" tire that measured about 33mm wide. I have raced cyclocross on those!

That tire's tread pattern and actual sizing is accurately reflected in the much-heavier, current 27x1-1/4" World Tour tire, which is gum-walled with thick rubber and weighs the proverbial "ton".
dddd is online now  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian401
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
18
06-25-19 01:16 PM
pakeboi
Commuting
35
02-09-17 04:41 PM
nazcalines
Classic & Vintage
15
10-14-13 01:55 AM
corwin1968
Bicycle Mechanics
14
11-07-11 11:26 AM
RobE30
Classic & Vintage
7
11-16-10 07:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.