![]() |
Originally Posted by FarHorizon
(Post 17373035)
I don't much disagree with any of youse guys so far. But based on age alone, it's only a matter of time before a Wal-Mart BSO becomes a "classic." As to aesthetic form, some would argue that their Electra Townies already qualify as "classics."
It's good to have a laissez faire attitude toward definitions, but I predict that your elasticity will eventually be challenged (not necessarily a bad thing). I might define somewhat differently: A classic bicycle is "a bicycle work of industrial art that was intended to have worth beyond that of an otherwise mass-produced appliance." It's a slippery definition, I admit, and it casts a broad net. But under my definition, the Wal-Mart BSO would NEVER inherit "classic" status. I'm not trying to troll, nor am I trying to change anything in this forum. I was just curious. Defining classic is by nature subjective - we're a big tent regarding our opinions. |
Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
(Post 17373237)
Your qualification of industrial art is as slippery as any other definition. Like art, some will have more generalized appreciation and consensus as to status. I really don't think most guys like Ugo, Cino and Eisentraut were creating industrial art - they were making bicycles designed to be ridden and successfully marketed.
Defining classic is by nature subjective - we're a big tent regarding our opinions. Thanks for the post. |
Originally Posted by FarHorizon
(Post 17373035)
I don't much disagree with any of youse guys so far. But based on age alone, it's only a matter of time before a Wal-Mart BSO becomes a "classic." As to aesthetic form, some would argue that their Electra Townies already qualify as "classics."
It's good to have a laissez faire attitude toward definitions, but I predict that your elasticity will eventually be challenged (not necessarily a bad thing). I might define somewhat differently: A classic bicycle is "a bicycle work of industrial art that was intended to have worth beyond that of an otherwise mass-produced appliance." It's a slippery definition, I admit, and it casts a broad net. But under my definition, the Wal-Mart BSO would NEVER inherit "classic" status. I'm not trying to troll, nor am I trying to change anything in this forum. I was just curious. If you already knew the answers, and had your own definitions, why did you ask? Were you only seeking a target at which to level volleys? A man walks into a bar, he sees a classic bike and a vintage bike. Which one does he steal? The one that fits......his definition. |
I got what I asked for - information. I posted my interpretation of that information. Offended? Don't read it.
|
Originally Posted by FarHorizon
(Post 17372327)
I see ads on Craigslist now for "Vintage" bikes with carbon frames. How old, exactly, does a bike need to be to be considered "classic;" to be considered "vintage?"
Is it just age or are there aesthetic considerations? Is any bike with a "compact frame geometry" and a sloping top-tube not considered "classic" or "vintage?" Is any bike with a threadless headset automatically not in the group? Just curious... FH Plenty of sloping top tube bikes ARE vintage from near the turn of the 20th century. It went away then returned. Threadless headsets are old too, my tricycle even had one. You are going to have to do better and do more research. This has by the way been discussed a number of times in this forum, every time with a bit of a twist. |
Thanks - I wasn't privy to the history. Thanks again for the information. I'm done.
|
Classic is fixed gear. Derailleurs are nothing but trendy crap that will never stick.
Vintage is old crap not cool enough to be classic. |
Originally Posted by FarHorizon
(Post 17373426)
I got what I asked for - information. I posted my interpretation of that information. Offended? Don't read it.
Appears more presumptive than anything. Reaching and grasping are two different things. Welcome to the forum. Just curious. |
Originally Posted by lostarchitect
(Post 17372845)
|
Originally Posted by nlerner
(Post 17373230)
PS: if you've ever met sykerocker, he dresses like that, casually impeccable, and makes it look 100% normal in this day and age. Women were all over him at NAHBS Richmond. |
I wish someone would invent a way to quickly release my hubs from the dropouts to make wheel removal far easier and faster.
|
Originally Posted by nlerner
(Post 17373230)
|
Originally Posted by CliffordK
(Post 17373110)
I've seen Schwinn Varsities listed as "classic"... or perhaps an old Huffy. No doubt new bikes will eventually reach that definition once the paint starts wearing off.
I'm not sure carbon frames with brifters will achieve the same classic appeal as steel tubing and DT shifters as long as they remain the dominant market model. It's hard to be old school without some significant distinctions from the modern. |
Originally Posted by FarHorizon
(Post 17373463)
Thanks - I wasn't privy to the history. Thanks again for the information. I'm done.
huh ?….. |
Classic: A work of enduring excellence. (Age is irrelevant.)
Vintage: Referring to a specific year/time period (no mention of quality). F'rinstance, my 2004 Merckx Team SC is a classic despite only being 10 years old. Definitely not "vintage" in the common parlance. SP OC, OR |
Classic is "lugged" and Vintage is "steel". Your welcome.
|
Originally Posted by RaleighSport
(Post 17372418)
C&V is like art.. it's not going to be C&V to everyone.. but if it is C&V to you, you'll know it.
Originally Posted by mechanicmatt
(Post 17373829)
Classic is "lugged" and Vintage is "steel". Your welcome.
Per the above I now know it's both classic and vintage :). 2012 DeRosa Neo Primato. (Okay - vintage may be a stretch) |
3 Attachment(s)
This is classic:
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=421940 This is is vintage: http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=421941 This is classic and vintage: http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=421942 |
To quote my favorite gearhead author, Peter Egan, a Classic is "Something that never gets old, even when it is."
|
I just made perfect, hard boiled egg.
|
Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
(Post 17373974)
This is classic:
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=421940 This is is vintage: http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=421941 This is classic and vintage: http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=421942 |
Originally Posted by jon c.
(Post 17373692)
I'm not sure carbon frames with brifters will achieve the same classic appeal as steel tubing and DT shifters as long as they remain the dominant market model. It's hard to be old school without some significant distinctions from the modern.
So, the brifters with aluminum levers are already headed to classic status, or being used in classic restorations. 8 Speed is also heading to Vintage/Classic, and perhaps 9 speed will be soon to follow as the 10/11 speed configurations now dominate at least the high-end markets. |
Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
(Post 17373974)
This is classic:
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=421940 This is is vintage: http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=421941 This is classic and vintage: http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=421942 I should post some pics of my finished Kvale. :) |
Originally Posted by rootboy
(Post 17373715)
When you ask a question that is essentially un-answerable, you're gonna get all kinds of answers. huh ?…..
Because it wasn't in a sticky, I should have assumed that I was opening a can of worms (that others had opened previously). And since it is an obvious question, I should have searched the forum before posting it again; mea culpa. I do apologize for my errors, but I really and truly didn't want to create any controversy or to troll the forum. If the moderator would be so kind as to post a sticky about the elastic criteria for the terms, this (probably) wouldn't happen again. By asking the unanswerable question (yet again), I've been accused of being "trollish," "grasping," and "presumptive" when I was merely curious (and somewhat foolish). So I apologize. I darned sure won't ask again. Cordially - FH |
Originally Posted by mechanicmatt
(Post 17373829)
Classic is "lugged" and Vintage is "steel". Your welcome.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.