Chainsets
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Chainsets
Hey Guys
I'm currently going through the process of upgrading my chainrings / chain and cassette and was hoping for some advice.
I'm running 52/42 with an 8 speed cassette at the moment and happy to keep like that.
What chainset / chainrings do you recommend, I literally know f all about them.
Link to my bike here. https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vi...omec-time.html
Cheers!!!
I'm currently going through the process of upgrading my chainrings / chain and cassette and was hoping for some advice.
I'm running 52/42 with an 8 speed cassette at the moment and happy to keep like that.
What chainset / chainrings do you recommend, I literally know f all about them.
Link to my bike here. https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vi...omec-time.html
Cheers!!!
#2
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Those rings look fine to me, and you're not likely to get better performance with different ones. So you're in the awkward position of needing to futz with something else, I think.
#3
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,398
Likes: 1,865
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
There is nothing wrong with 52-42 if it serves you well. I run a 10% downsized version of it, 47-38, on my 1959 Capo.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#4
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
As much as would like new wheels the chainrings is the priority now
haha
#5
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 1,698
From: Berkeley CA
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 1975 Alex Singer, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International", 1985 Trek 720
What do you mean, "upgrading"? The only reasons there might be to change those parts would be: 1) you want to change gear ratios; 2) some parts are worn;or, 3) there is no 3.
First step would be to check the chain for wear. Measure from the center of a rivet on the taut chain using a good steel rule. 12" along should be at the center of another rivet. If that rivet is in fact at 12 1/16" + then you need to replace the chain before it grinds your cogs and chainrings into scrap. If the rivet is at 12 1/8" or greater you may have already damaged the chainrings and/or cogs and a new chain may cause skipping or chain suck. In any case, evaluate and change the chain first.
Edit: Oops, I didn't see your last reply. Sounds like you already measured the chain.
First step would be to check the chain for wear. Measure from the center of a rivet on the taut chain using a good steel rule. 12" along should be at the center of another rivet. If that rivet is in fact at 12 1/16" + then you need to replace the chain before it grinds your cogs and chainrings into scrap. If the rivet is at 12 1/8" or greater you may have already damaged the chainrings and/or cogs and a new chain may cause skipping or chain suck. In any case, evaluate and change the chain first.
Edit: Oops, I didn't see your last reply. Sounds like you already measured the chain.
#6
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
I like plain Sugino chainrings myself, but if you're on a budget, one thought is to see if there are any bike co-ops or swap meets going on in your area. I've gotten chainrings that were practically new for only a couple of bucks.
#7
Nigel
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 7
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
KMC X8.93 chain
Shimano 8 speed cassette to suit.
Chainrings - what is your budget? Often it is less expensive to replace the whole crankset, or just purchase a crankset for the chain rings, and sell the cranks without rings.
Shimano 8 speed cassette to suit.
Chainrings - what is your budget? Often it is less expensive to replace the whole crankset, or just purchase a crankset for the chain rings, and sell the cranks without rings.
#8
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Budget is around £50 I guess? Pretty flexible at the moment but don't want to be paying loads.
Sorry for noob question but do I need to check the bottom bracket fitting?
#9
Nigel
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 7
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
You definitely need chain, cassette and chain rings. Chain rings wear MUCH slower than cassette cogs.
#10
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Yes, which is a good reason to just replace the rings, either new rings or rings from a purchased crankset. From the pictures, do you have 110mm or 130mm BCD? Another option is to buy a used crank with good rings. Or a cheap 52/42 crank set with steel rings, and use just the rings until your money situation improves. For example: Silver Double Alloy Road Race Chainset 42/52: Amazon.co.uk: Sports & Outdoors
You definitely need chain, cassette and chain rings. Chain rings wear MUCH slower than cassette cogs.
You definitely need chain, cassette and chain rings. Chain rings wear MUCH slower than cassette cogs.
What's your thoughts?
Hilary Stone Shimano double chainsets
Cheers
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 507
Likes: 68
From: Chicago
Bikes: 1984 Trek 770
I have had a good experience with Stronglight chainrings on my 7800 group (7400 crankset). I had some issues getting the chain from the small ring up to the big ring. Previously I had been using the original 7400 chainrings, then a Vuelta big ring, then a 7800 inner ring, with not a whole lot of shifting improvement. Then I took a shot on the Stronglight rings and it was fantastic. I had been looking specifically for chainrings that would match the polished silver of the 7400 crank, so I was pretty happy to have both good shifts and looks.
#12
Nigel
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 7
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
Cool thanks for that, I've just found this site that sell a lot of NOS.
What's your thoughts?
Hilary Stone Shimano double chainsets
Cheers
What's your thoughts?
Hilary Stone Shimano double chainsets
Cheers
#13
Nigel
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 7
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
I have had a good experience with Stronglight chainrings on my 7800 group (7400 crankset). I had some issues getting the chain from the small ring up to the big ring. Previously I had been using the original 7400 chainrings, then a Vuelta big ring, then a 7800 inner ring, with not a whole lot of shifting improvement. Then I took a shot on the Stronglight rings and it was fantastic. I had been looking specifically for chainrings that would match the polished silver of the 7400 crank, so I was pretty happy to have both good shifts and looks.
#14
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
#15
Nigel
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 7
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 507
Likes: 68
From: Chicago
Bikes: 1984 Trek 770
At 8 speed, I'm not sure this would be as big a deal. 10s worked okay with my old 6s 7400 chainrings. It's just that when I was using a 10s chain, sometimes it would take another 1/4-1/2 revolution for the chain to catch on the bigger ring when shifting up. I imagine that a wider 8sp chain would be a little less problematic. You could always adjust your shifters/derailleur to give you the performance you're looking for.
#18
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
At 8 speed, I'm not sure this would be as big a deal. 10s worked okay with my old 6s 7400 chainrings. It's just that when I was using a 10s chain, sometimes it would take another 1/4-1/2 revolution for the chain to catch on the bigger ring when shifting up. I imagine that a wider 8sp chain would be a little less problematic. You could always adjust your shifters/derailleur to give you the performance you're looking for.
#19
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 507
Likes: 68
From: Chicago
Bikes: 1984 Trek 770
Sunrace 8s Cassette
KMC X8.99 or KMC X8.93
Stronglight Dural 8/9/10s (I use Stronglight Zicral; Dural seems to be more budget oriented)
Another reason why I liked the Stronglight chainrings was because they have a narrow profile where they join the crank arm spider, so it's less noticeable that it's not an original part. On my 7400 crank, the chainring profile is maybe 1mm wider on each side than a spider arm, so it isn't too bad. Obviously an original chainring would be perfect looking. Another chainring option is the Specialites TA Alize which is classic looking and comes in silver. I do not own one, however; so can't give any input on pricing or aesthetic fit with your particular crank.
KMC X8.99 or KMC X8.93
Stronglight Dural 8/9/10s (I use Stronglight Zicral; Dural seems to be more budget oriented)
Another reason why I liked the Stronglight chainrings was because they have a narrow profile where they join the crank arm spider, so it's less noticeable that it's not an original part. On my 7400 crank, the chainring profile is maybe 1mm wider on each side than a spider arm, so it isn't too bad. Obviously an original chainring would be perfect looking. Another chainring option is the Specialites TA Alize which is classic looking and comes in silver. I do not own one, however; so can't give any input on pricing or aesthetic fit with your particular crank.
#20
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Sunrace 8s Cassette
KMC X8.99 or KMC X8.93
Stronglight Dural 8/9/10s (I use Stronglight Zicral; Dural seems to be more budget oriented)
Another reason why I liked the Stronglight chainrings was because they have a narrow profile where they join the crank arm spider, so it's less noticeable that it's not an original part. On my 7400 crank, the chainring profile is maybe 1mm wider on each side than a spider arm, so it isn't too bad. Obviously an original chainring would be perfect looking. Another chainring option is the Specialites TA Alize which is classic looking and comes in silver. I do not own one, however; so can't give any input on pricing or aesthetic fit with your particular crank.
KMC X8.99 or KMC X8.93
Stronglight Dural 8/9/10s (I use Stronglight Zicral; Dural seems to be more budget oriented)
Another reason why I liked the Stronglight chainrings was because they have a narrow profile where they join the crank arm spider, so it's less noticeable that it's not an original part. On my 7400 crank, the chainring profile is maybe 1mm wider on each side than a spider arm, so it isn't too bad. Obviously an original chainring would be perfect looking. Another chainring option is the Specialites TA Alize which is classic looking and comes in silver. I do not own one, however; so can't give any input on pricing or aesthetic fit with your particular crank.
Going with those options should save me a lot of a cash too! Way under my budget haha
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bike4mike
Bicycle Mechanics
6
04-03-14 10:30 AM






