![]() |
Originally Posted by baron von trail
(Post 17851803)
A phone, for no other reason than calling 911 if and when needed, is an essential tool, much like a pump and spare tube. You can choose to ignore making use of modern technology and decide to crawl out of the woods on your belly in an effort to find help, should you break a leg or develop a significant head injury, but many of us have had such emergencies and were quite glad we had our phones with us.
I’m not crash-prone and neither am I like you when it comes to such devices. I have no desire to “perceive” myself safer merely by carrying such a device. In the remoteness of the mountains where I ride, reception is poor to non-existent as proven via my friend’s wireless device. So carrying such a device has proven itself rather pointless. Question for you: What do you think solo bicyclists did before the days of no wireless communication devices? Answer: They rode cautiously, they enjoyed themselves, and they were prepared to accept whatever consequences. I’m of that same making, from the same generation of people that grew up without such devices and you know what; I liked those days much better than these current times of being hounded to death by cell phone calls, e-mails, texts, pager alerts, telemarketers, surveyors, etc… For me, silence is golden. Besides, being that the majority of people carry a cell phone, someone would eventually call 911 if such was necessary, that is, if they could acquire reception in those virtual dead zones. I don’t ride in fear of the unknown rather, I ride for the thrill of the unknown. |
Originally Posted by hyhuu
(Post 17856154)
I normally commute with my bike. The other day, inspired by this thread I tried commuting with my cell phone but I didn't get anywhere so I went back to the bike again.
THE END
Originally Posted by hyhuu
(Post 17856154)
I normally commute with my bike. The other day, inspired by this thread I tried commuting with my cell phone but I didn't get anywhere so I went back to the bike again.
|
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
Then you should carry such a device, as it makes you “feel” safer.
I’m not crash-prone and neither am I like you when it comes to such devices. I have no desire to “perceive” myself safer merely by carrying such a device. In the remoteness of the mountains where I ride, reception is poor to non-existent as proven via my friend’s wireless device. So carrying such a device has proven itself rather pointless. Question for you: What do you think solo bicyclists did before the days of no wireless communication devices? Answer: They rode cautiously, they enjoyed themselves, and they were prepared to accept whatever consequences. I’m of that same making, from the same generation of people that grew up without such devices and you know what; I liked those days much better than these current times of being hounded to death by cell phone calls, e-mails, texts, pager alerts, telemarketers, surveyors, etc… For me, silence is golden. Besides, being that the majority of people carry a cell phone, someone would eventually call 911 if such was necessary, that is, if they could acquire reception in those virtual dead zones. I don’t ride in fear of the unknown rather, I ride for the thrill of the unknown. I see the cell phone as helping to eliminate one more reason why people might be reluctant to commute. Knowing that you can have a mechanical issue or a breakdown and that you can call for help is reassurance you can avail yourself of or not. Modern technology has helped me eliminate phone calls from a surveyors or telemarketers. More likely than not, if it's a number I don't recognize or not in my contacts, it goes to voicemail. Besides, the on-off switch is something that can help eliminate most of your complaints. ;) |
No reason to allow the cell phone to control you; just turn it off...
|
Originally Posted by ItsJustMe
(Post 17848908)
...I commute without a bag of pistachios...
|
Originally Posted by jimmie65
(Post 17848184)
Yeah, it's horrible having help a call away, being able to look up directions anytime, communicating with family and friends wherever and whenever....
Why would anyone want a cell phone? |
Well, I don't own a cell phone so I certainly commute without one. But I'm actually thinking of getting one, not for commuting, but primarily to have on hand when I do long solo rides. I don't particularly want a smart phone, but being able to call for help or notify people that I'm going to be late in the advent of a flat is pretty appealing, particularly since pay phones are now rarer than hen's teeth.
|
winston63 - check into prepaid, the various MVNOs are perfect for what you're looking to do. I'm not closely familiar with the providers, but check in-store at places like Target or Walmart for the ones serving your area. Turn the phone off except when you need to make a call and you'll likely only need to charge it once every week or two (or as needed).
We actually ported our home phone landline to Walmart's Straight Talk Wireless Home Phone. Instead of $53/mo we now pay $16.01 including taxes & fees. $70 box (maybe $80?) paid for itself in under two months, plugs into the house phone wiring and also our cordless phone base is plugged into it. It's going over Verizon's cell network. |
Originally Posted by gpburdell
(Post 17857133)
winston63 - check into prepaid, the various MVNOs are perfect for what you're looking to do. I'm not closely familiar with the providers, but check in-store at places like Target or Walmart for the ones serving your area. Turn the phone off except when you need to make a call and you'll likely only need to charge it once every week or two (or as needed).
|
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
Then you should carry such a device, as it makes you “feel” safer.
I’m not crash-prone and neither am I like you when it comes to such devices. I have no desire to “perceive” myself safer merely by carrying such a device. In the remoteness of the mountains where I ride, reception is poor to non-existent as proven via my friend’s wireless device. So carrying such a device has proven itself rather pointless. Question for you: What do you think solo bicyclists did before the days of no wireless communication devices? Answer: They rode cautiously, they enjoyed themselves, and they were prepared to accept whatever consequences. I’m of that same making, from the same generation of people that grew up without such devices and you know what; I liked those days much better than these current times of being hounded to death by cell phone calls, e-mails, texts, pager alerts, telemarketers, surveyors, etc… For me, silence is golden. Besides, being that the majority of people carry a cell phone, someone would eventually call 911 if such was necessary, that is, if they could acquire reception in those virtual dead zones. I don’t ride in fear of the unknown rather, I ride for the thrill of the unknown. |
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
Then you should carry such a device, as it makes you “feel” safer.
I’m not crash-prone and neither am I like you when it comes to such devices. I have no desire to “perceive” myself safer merely by carrying such a device. In the remoteness of the mountains where I ride, reception is poor to non-existent as proven via my friend’s wireless device. So carrying such a device has proven itself rather pointless. Question for you: What do you think solo bicyclists did before the days of no wireless communication devices? Answer: They rode cautiously, they enjoyed themselves, and they were prepared to accept whatever consequences. I’m of that same making, from the same generation of people that grew up without such devices and you know what; I liked those days much better than these current times of being hounded to death by cell phone calls, e-mails, texts, pager alerts, telemarketers, surveyors, etc… For me, silence is golden. Besides, being that the majority of people carry a cell phone, someone would eventually call 911 if such was necessary, that is, if they could acquire reception in those virtual dead zones. I don’t ride in fear of the unknown rather, I ride for the thrill of the unknown. |
Originally Posted by ItsJustMe ...I commute without a bag of pistachios...
Originally Posted by scroca
(Post 17856703)
That sounds crazy to me. You are probably the only one and I'd keep quiet about it, if I were you.
Commuting without a bag of pistachios marks that person as one of those wild and crazy guys who impress everyone, especially the ladies at work. |
Riding without a cellphone fine . . . been doing it for the past 40+ years . . .
|
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
(Post 17857491)
Originally Posted by ItsJustMe ...I commute without a bag of pistachios...Commuting without a bag of pistachios marks that person as one of those wild and crazy guys who impress everyone, especially the ladies at work.
|
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17851662)
Jimmie65, you apparently enjoy communicating with others and using the Internet while riding, but some of us have absolutely no need whatsoever for a wireless communication device. That’s likely hard for someone like you to comprehend, but some of us are from the old school when such devices didn’t even exist and you know what; we still totally enjoyed riding without such devices bacn then (and some of us still do)!
In my case, a wireless communication device is useless ballast, as the satisfaction that I derive from my rides, even my 250-mile mountain rides, are via no means of Internet communication, no communication with virtually useless family members, and my friends are located too many states away to be of any assistance. My satisfaction is derived from being entirely self-reliant and still managing to accomplish the intended distances. Not being able to look things up due to unforeseen circumstances has added greater adventure by providing unusual discoveries to my rides. For instance, when a bridge was out of commission nearly 38 miles into my 200-mile ride, by looking around the general area I discovered two relatively nearby tunnels that saved the day! That was a wonderfully exciting discovery and I’ve since used those two tunnels several times on additional rides. It didn’t require the Internet, family members, or friends. 2) Sucks for you when you need to call 911 on a ride (hope it never happens, mind you) and are without a useless ballast which could potentially save your life or another's. I've happened upon 3 nasty car wrecks for which I was the first responder, all of which I called 911 for while assessing the occupants of the wrecked vehicles. One of those accidents was an overturned SUV in the median of a 70mph highway with children in the back seats. Oh, but since it's never happened to you, and since you're too good for a cell phone, then of course you have no reason to prepare for the worst. |
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
Then you should carry such a device, as it makes you “feel” safer.
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
I’m not crash-prone and neither am I like you when it comes to such devices. I have no desire to “perceive” myself safer merely by carrying such a device.
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
Question for you: What do you think solo bicyclists did before the days of no wireless communication devices?
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
Besides, being that the majority of people carry a cell phone, someone would eventually call 911 if such was necessary, that is, if they could acquire reception in those virtual dead zones.
1) That those with a cell phone would make the call. It's nice that you live in this happy little fantasy world where strangers around you care enough to stop and give you the benefit of their help. It doesn't always work that way, you may be the only stranger who cares enough to lend a hand. How do you not know this? Stabbed hero dies as more than 20 people stroll past him | New York Post 2) That those with a cell phone would be around to witness whatever it is that requires a call. As I mention in a previous post, I've happened upon 3 auto wrecks for which I've called 911 as the first responder. One of those was in the dead of night at an empty intersection and no one was around but me. During the time that I stuck around for EMS to arrive, still no one came by.
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
I don’t ride in fear of the unknown rather, I ride for the thrill of the unknown.
Again, you are a tool. |
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
In the remoteness of the mountains where I ride, reception is poor to non-existent as proven via my friend’s wireless device.
|
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
Then you should carry such a device, as it makes you “feel” safer.
I’m not crash-prone and neither am I like you when it comes to such devices. I have no desire to “perceive” myself safer merely by carrying such a device. In the remoteness of the mountains where I ride, reception is poor to non-existent as proven via my friend’s wireless device. So carrying such a device has proven itself rather pointless. Question for you: What do you think solo bicyclists did before the days of no wireless communication devices? Answer: They rode cautiously, they enjoyed themselves, and they were prepared to accept whatever consequences. I’m of that same making, from the same generation of people that grew up without such devices and you know what; I liked those days much better than these current times of being hounded to death by cell phone calls, e-mails, texts, pager alerts, telemarketers, surveyors, etc… For me, silence is golden. Besides, being that the majority of people carry a cell phone, someone would eventually call 911 if such was necessary, that is, if they could acquire reception in those virtual dead zones. I don’t ride in fear of the unknown rather, I ride for the thrill of the unknown. |
Originally Posted by Gnosis
(Post 17856473)
In the remoteness of the mountains where I ride, reception is poor to non-existent as proven via my friend’s wireless device. So carrying such a device has proven itself rather pointless.
I don’t ride in fear of the unknown rather, I ride for the thrill of the unknown. |
I LOVE reading all the comments here. I asked if any of you are like me in the "no cell phone" regard. I didn't say there was anything wrong with carrying one.
Nonetheless, many of you have made assumptions about me and the intentions of my original post. Many of you expressed distaste for this thread and yet, you posted here anyhow, perpetuating the thread. Some of you attacked me, some mocked me, some of you gave me your personal opinion of my screen name. I see no reason to defend myself. Still, the comments are interesting. |
Originally Posted by YouthInAsia
(Post 17859284)
I LOVE reading all the comments here. I asked if any of you are like me in the "no cell phone" regard. I didn't say there was anything wrong with carrying one.
Nonetheless, many of you have made assumptions about me and the intentions of my original post. Your first two posts included these comments:
Originally Posted by YouthInAsia
(Post 17847944)
Anyone else commute without a cell phone? I hate those things.
Originally Posted by YouthInAsia
(Post 17848242)
Seems that virtually everyone who has a smart phone becomes controlled by their smart phone.
|
Originally Posted by gregf83
(Post 17857188)
You sound like a bit of a Luddite, nttawwt, but I'm curious why you are using a computer to communicate on a public forum.
|
Phone is hardwired, so is this thing.
|
This thread is amusing to me, I'm a bit of a Luddite, I didn't have a computer or cell phone until 2004. I now have both and recognize they are useful tools that don't control me or need to be feared.
The cavemen may resume their chest thumping. :) |
Originally Posted by gpburdell
(Post 17859480)
Back to stir the pot a little?
Your first two posts included these comments: If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck... |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.