Fuji Touring Fit for Commuting
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Fuji Touring Fit for Commuting
Howdy all! I posted in the "Touring" area as well, but figured since some folks use touring bikes as commuters, it would be a good place to ask. I just bought a 54cm Fuji Touring bike and was curious how the fit looks. For reference, I am 5'7"/5'8". Any tips would be appreciated here. I know fitting topics are pretty "meh" around BF but I figured maybe a few kind souls could give a bit of advice (if any). Thanks a ton!

#2
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 263
Likes: 1
From: West Palm Beach, Florida
Bikes: 1984 Cannodale full touring bike, Giant full carbon dura ace, Belinsky frame Tandem
My 2 Cents! Overall looks very good! You need about an hour of continuous ridding to see if anything needs adjustment. The seat forward and aft appears good, the hight also good, the reach also looks good to me.
#3
Disco Infiltrator




Joined: May 2013
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 3,513
From: Folsom CA
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
There's a fit subforum if you really want to obsess over it.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
"Well, well!" said Holmes, impatiently. "A good cyclist does not need a high road. The moor is intersected with paths and the moon is at the full."
Genesis 49:16-17
"Well, well!" said Holmes, impatiently. "A good cyclist does not need a high road. The moor is intersected with paths and the moon is at the full."
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Fuji ACR 2.0, Roubaix & a Peugeot of mid 1980's vintage, orig 12 vitesse, now a single speed. Converted to fixie/single speed before I got it.
I have a 2011 Touring that I've been riding as a commuter and it now has over 15,000 miles on it.
Weaknesses:
1. Rear Wheel - Broke three spokes just riding as a commuter - i.e., not loaded with touring gear. New wheel solved that.
2. Brakes - Original Tektro calipers were awful. Now have Tektro "V" brakes. MUCH, MUCH BETTER!
3. Saddle - Original was good for about a 25-30 mile ride. Replaced with a Brooks B-17 Imperial. Oh, it is GREAT!
Other changes:
1. Replaced original Sora crank with a Sugino. Original gearing was 30-39-50. Sugino is 24-36-48.
2. Installed SKS plastic fenders. They were great while they lasted. Front fender is still good. Rear fender bit the dust. It cracked in several places clean across the width of the fender. My commute includes about 70 miles of bus travel per day with the bike out on front of the bus on an interstate highway at 65 mph. I think the wind buffeting the fenders flexed them in ways they weren't expected to flex day after day after day.
3. Replaced the hideous black and white bar tape that came on it after it got ugly dirty. Now just standard black.
4. Pedals are Shimano 324 combination pedals (platform on one side, clippy things on other.)
Still enjoying the bike.
Ray
Weaknesses:
1. Rear Wheel - Broke three spokes just riding as a commuter - i.e., not loaded with touring gear. New wheel solved that.
2. Brakes - Original Tektro calipers were awful. Now have Tektro "V" brakes. MUCH, MUCH BETTER!
3. Saddle - Original was good for about a 25-30 mile ride. Replaced with a Brooks B-17 Imperial. Oh, it is GREAT!
Other changes:
1. Replaced original Sora crank with a Sugino. Original gearing was 30-39-50. Sugino is 24-36-48.
2. Installed SKS plastic fenders. They were great while they lasted. Front fender is still good. Rear fender bit the dust. It cracked in several places clean across the width of the fender. My commute includes about 70 miles of bus travel per day with the bike out on front of the bus on an interstate highway at 65 mph. I think the wind buffeting the fenders flexed them in ways they weren't expected to flex day after day after day.
3. Replaced the hideous black and white bar tape that came on it after it got ugly dirty. Now just standard black.
4. Pedals are Shimano 324 combination pedals (platform on one side, clippy things on other.)
Still enjoying the bike.
Ray
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
For reference, inseam is about 31ish"
#8
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Just for the sake of discussion, I (also 5'7"-5'8") might have gone for the 56cm as well, but with an 80-100mm stem and 170mm cranks since that's how my bikes tend to be set up. I think it works out about the same.
As for you, it looks good to me -- leg is slightly bent at the bottom of the stroke, knee is over pedal pedal spindle, etc. How does it feel to ride?
As for you, it looks good to me -- leg is slightly bent at the bottom of the stroke, knee is over pedal pedal spindle, etc. How does it feel to ride?
#9
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Just for the sake of discussion, I (also 5'7"-5'8") might have gone for the 56cm as well, but with an 80-100mm stem and 170mm cranks since that's how my bikes tend to be set up. I think it works out about the same.
As for you, it looks good to me -- leg is slightly bent at the bottom of the stroke, knee is over pedal pedal spindle, etc. How does it feel to ride?
As for you, it looks good to me -- leg is slightly bent at the bottom of the stroke, knee is over pedal pedal spindle, etc. How does it feel to ride?

#10
Galveston County Texas
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 33,335
Likes: 1,285
From: In The Wind
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Keep us posted as how it goes.
Thanks
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: North Shore, MA
Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI
I'd like to get a closer look at the position of the brake hoods without your hands in the way. I'm thinking they could probably creep towards you 1/8 - 1/4".
#12
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Pay close attention to those twinges and don't ride too far with aching knees. Twinges in the front of your knee generally mean that the saddle is too low, behind the knee, that the saddle is too high. One of my legs is slightly longer than the other, so I deliberately set one cleat back further than the other to give that leg a little more extension. Hope this helps.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: North Shore, MA
Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI
Pay close attention to those twinges and don't ride too far with aching knees. Twinges in the front of your knee generally mean that the saddle is too low, behind the knee, that the saddle is too high. One of my legs is slightly longer than the other, so I deliberately set one cleat back further than the other to give that leg a little more extension. Hope this helps.
#14
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Thanks for the input! Definitely not mashing. In this picture, the saddle setback was pretty far back on the rails. The twinges did begin after moving it forward slightly and lowering my saddle as well so safe to say its one (or both) of those things.
#15
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 766
Likes: 1
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 7,391
Likes: 13
From: Memphis TN area
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Yep, I believe the instructions for Topeak racks actually call for them to be angled slightly forward. That's how I set mine up on both of my bikes that have racks.
#19
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
This bike. I've actually been commuting by bike for well over 5 years now. Planning to switch over to this bike and it's the first brand new bike I've ever purchased so figured I'd start with the fit. Unfortunately, despite getting it new, the place I bought it at still charges close to 100 for a fit.
#20
Full Member
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 227
Likes: 2
Looks pretty good. How is your stand over clearance? I am about the same height, but I barely clear on the same bike.
Howdy all! I posted in the "Touring" area as well, but figured since some folks use touring bikes as commuters, it would be a good place to ask. I just bought a 54cm Fuji Touring bike and was curious how the fit looks. For reference, I am 5'7"/5'8". Any tips would be appreciated here. I know fitting topics are pretty "meh" around BF but I figured maybe a few kind souls could give a bit of advice (if any). Thanks a ton!


#21
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
You have the same size bike? 54cm? Did you swap anything out for it or does it fit well overall?
#22
Full Member
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 227
Likes: 2
Standover is close. In shoes I barely clear (it's been completely fine so far). I've never really looked to clearance as I've ridden 58cm bikes with no issues in the past but yea, barely clears.
You have the same size bike? 54cm? Did you swap anything out for it or does it fit well overall?
You have the same size bike? 54cm? Did you swap anything out for it or does it fit well overall?
I rode the bike (54cm) for about 20 miles. It's a bit sluggish compared to Fuji Sportif. The bar end shifters are not precise or not quick. And when I put panniers on, my heels will touch the panniers (that's a rack issue I think).I feel it's a good bike for touring, but there are better choices for commuting.
#23
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Interesting. I get a solid few inches of heel clearance with my backrollers on the rack that came with the bike. I did take the bike to get worked over (wheels trued, etc) and they did work on the shifting for me so its wonderful now. They didnt like the Microshift and tried to push me to Dura Ace shifters due to "less plastic moving parts" but ill wait. Only issue I've had is slight toe overlap with the Planet Bike fenders I put on.
#24
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 263
Likes: 1
From: West Palm Beach, Florida
Bikes: 1984 Cannodale full touring bike, Giant full carbon dura ace, Belinsky frame Tandem
Interesting. I get a solid few inches of heel clearance with my backrollers on the rack that came with the bike. I did take the bike to get worked over (wheels trued, etc) and they did work on the shifting for me so its wonderful now. They didnt like the Microshift and tried to push me to Dura Ace shifters due to "less plastic moving parts" but ill wait. Only issue I've had is slight toe overlap with the Planet Bike fenders I put on.
Also, my last bike has the worst toe overlap of all the other bikes without fenders, not to say with the fenders it currently have. Although not the best situation, I have learned to ride with it and it hasn't been an issue. I think you compensate like when you have low clearance with the pedal, you learn how much you can lean before you have to quit pedaling and raise the pedal.
#25
Put some miles on it and see how it feels. I own the exact bike and it took me a while to find the sweet spot. Everyones different Id say if you can ride an hour and get off the bike and feel like you never rode that its a good fit.
PS I swapped out pretty much everything because i have a longer torso with shorter legs.
PS I swapped out pretty much everything because i have a longer torso with shorter legs.
Last edited by ALLSTOTT; 04-21-16 at 10:21 AM.



