![]() |
New fence for GWB sidewalk
I first heard it from a fellow commuter, Carmen. Just looked it up and sure enough, it seems to be happening:
After 86 years and countless deaths, suicide fence coming to GWB | NJ.com I didn't know about the 45 cases that were prevented earlier this year. :eek: Edit: Here's another link with a video: Suicide Prevention Fence Coming To George Washington Bridge Walkway « CBS New York |
Today was the first day that we used the north sidewalk. I heard that it will be about three months befroe they will open the south side up. Not a big deal. Just four stairs for the north sidewalk.
|
This is also amazing to this engineer:
A permanent fence will be installed on the north side of the bridge when its suspender cable ropes are replaced in 2018 |
I hate to come off like the cold hearted Bastrd that I am, but this is sort of ridiculous.
Of course if/when a fence is installed and folks can't jump off the bridge, the proponents will point to all the lives saved. But do we really believe that the suicidal are so dumb as to be stymied? Will they walk out onto the bridge, see the fence and say to themselves "Oh damn, It's not going to be this easy, I guess I'll go on living" Let's get real, someone may be suicidal, but that doesn't make them so dumb that they can't or won't find another high place, or another method entirely. All this does is move the problem. For all we know, if denied the opportunity to jump into the river, someone may opt to jump off a building, and might hit some poor fool walking on the sidewalk below. On a side note, this shutdown could be scheduled much better, by pushing it back into November when use of the walk drops naturally. |
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 19886546)
I hate to come off like the cold hearted Bastrd that I am, but this is sort of ridiculous.
Of course if/when a fence is installed and folks can't jump off the bridge, the proponents will point to all the lives saved. But do we really believe that the suicidal are so dumb as to be stymied? Will they walk out onto the bridge, see the fence and say to themselves "Oh damn, It's not going to be this easy, I guess I'll go on living" Let's get real, someone may be suicidal, but that doesn't make them so dumb that they can't or won't find another high place, or another method entirely. All this does is move the problem. For all we know, if denied the opportunity to jump into the river, someone may opt to jump off a building, and might hit some poor fool walking on the sidewalk below. On a side note, this shutdown could be scheduled much better, by pushing it back into November when use of the walk drops naturally. |
Originally Posted by acidfast7
(Post 19886574)
..... Not a fence, that's a cheap/lazy non-solution.
|
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 19886546)
Let's get real, someone may be suicidal, but that doesn't make them so dumb that they can't or won't find another high place, or another method entirely.
|
Suicide-prevention fences were installed last year on a high bridge in my city. Apparently, the fences have successfully reduced the number of suicide attempts on the bridge: Suicide attempts on High Level Bridge down since barriers installed, city says - Edmonton - CBC News, but, the implementation ticked off cyclists and pedestrians alike: Suicide barriers may restrict High Level Bridge paths to one-way traffic - Edmonton - CBC News.
|
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 19886546)
I hate to come off like the cold hearted Bastrd that I am, but this is sort of ridiculous.
Of course if/when a fence is installed and folks can't jump off the bridge, the proponents will point to all the lives saved. But do we really believe that the suicidal are so dumb as to be stymied? Will they walk out onto the bridge, see the fence and say to themselves "Oh damn, It's not going to be this easy, I guess I'll go on living" Let's get real, someone may be suicidal, but that doesn't make them so dumb that they can't or won't find another high place, or another method entirely. All this does is move the problem. For all we know, if denied the opportunity to jump into the river, someone may opt to jump off a building, and might hit some poor fool walking on the sidewalk below. On a side note, this shutdown could be scheduled much better, by pushing it back into November when use of the walk drops naturally. |
Originally Posted by groovestew
(Post 19895599)
Suicide-prevention fences were installed last year on a high bridge in my city. Apparently, the fences have successfully reduced the number of suicide attempts on the bridge: Suicide attempts on High Level Bridge down since barriers installed, city says - Edmonton - CBC News, but, the implementation ticked off cyclists and pedestrians alike: Suicide barriers may restrict High Level Bridge paths to one-way traffic - Edmonton - CBC News.
So far the plan seems to be to leave the sidewalk as-is. I hope it doesn't radically change but we may never know. Well, not until after the bigger north sidewalk project is completed. |
Originally Posted by acidfast7
(Post 19886574)
The best suicide prevention devices are signs, phones and actual people. Not a fence, that's a cheap/lazy solution.
|
Still riding on the north sidewalk without any issues. Looks like they actually cleaned it up before opening it. However, I don't see any changes on the south side so far. I hope they stay with their three month schedule. But I'm not holding my breath... :rolleyes:
|
It would cost more money, but they could build a barrier with bars, rather than chain link. It would be less ugly, and institutional, and you could still get a clear view if you stood close, and take a decent picture. It would even be harder to climb. Chain link makes you feel like you're in a pen.
|
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 19886546)
I hate to come off like the cold hearted Bastrd that I am, but this is sort of ridiculous.
Of course if/when a fence is installed and folks can't jump off the bridge, the proponents will point to all the lives saved. But do we really believe that the suicidal are so dumb as to be stymied? Will they walk out onto the bridge, see the fence and say to themselves "Oh damn, It's not going to be this easy, I guess I'll go on living" Let's get real, someone may be suicidal, but that doesn't make them so dumb that they can't or won't find another high place, or another method entirely. All this does is move the problem. For all we know, if denied the opportunity to jump into the river, someone may opt to jump off a building, and might hit some poor fool walking on the sidewalk below. On a side note, this shutdown could be scheduled much better, by pushing it back into November when use of the walk drops naturally. But the standard cliche is that suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. The point is that a lot of people commit suicide almost on a whim, and don't put a great deal of thought into it. The opportunity presents itself at the wrong moment and they go for it. Similarly: people who have a gun in the house are much more likely to commit suicide than those who do not. If they were really serious, they could figure it out; but in many cases they aren't that serious about it. So I believe you are right some of the time, and wrong some of the time. The fence will probably not help the people in the former category, but it will presumably save some of those in the latter. |
Forgot to mention that the south sidewalk is now open. It opened up a few weeks ago. Yeeay. The fence is not too bad. Yeah, not as visually nice as without it. But at least it didn't impede the sidewalk space at all. The humorous part is that there is still no fence on the Manhattan side leading up to the bridge. So they almost have it all covered... :rolleyes:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:19 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.