Bike Lane Danger?
#26
Banned
Like I'm listening to some guy from the sticks. Call them stupid all you want.
The 16M+ ppl in the London commuter zone will disagree and continue to use them.
The 16M+ ppl in the London commuter zone will disagree and continue to use them.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The Big City
Posts: 619
Bikes: Brompton M3L, Tern Verge P20, Citi Bike
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
7 Posts
In theory you're not allowed to use the street unless if a bike lane exists. Sometimes, this is not enforced is the rider is on a rennrad (sport/race bike) and leaving the city. A general commuter (no spandex, etc...) would be stopped/shouted at by the police in Frankfurt for example.
Most of the time the infrastructure is clean and maintained.
There are a lot of split cycle/ped paths, however peds are extremely good about not being in the bike portion as they'll be responsible for any collision (damage to bike / injury issues). Same with the autos actually, in general it's quite collegial.
The further east one goes across the continent until the Urals, the nicer the people are but resources (time, space, infrastructure) are more scarce, which seems to cause issues (parking, petty theft, etc...)
Most of the time the infrastructure is clean and maintained.
There are a lot of split cycle/ped paths, however peds are extremely good about not being in the bike portion as they'll be responsible for any collision (damage to bike / injury issues). Same with the autos actually, in general it's quite collegial.
The further east one goes across the continent until the Urals, the nicer the people are but resources (time, space, infrastructure) are more scarce, which seems to cause issues (parking, petty theft, etc...)
So, according to the traffic law, bike racers in training have the right to choose between using bike infrastructure or the traffic lane, as long the bike is a racing bike in accordance with legal guidelines. This seems very precise, in that Teutonic sort of way.
There's a lot of push back in the comments, essentially, the cyclists was doing nothing dangerous, nothing illegal, and the driver was making things dangerous by not understanding the law.
Last edited by wilfried; 01-03-18 at 04:22 PM.
#28
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times
in
1,679 Posts
I almost clicked through just to see what argument could possibly be made against bike lanes, then I thought better of it. There are some cyclists here in the Portland area who are against bike lanes. They're usually the same people who are against helmets (not just against requiring helmets but actually against helmets). I find that I'm much happier if I don't try to engage their arguments.
I do think there are in many situations better infrastructure choices than bike lanes, but I also think that bike lanes are much better than just throwing people into busy lanes that must be shared with cars and trucks. Bike lanes seem to work better in the suburbs than they do in the city. In the city more planning is required for proper bike lane deployment.
I do think there are in many situations better infrastructure choices than bike lanes, but I also think that bike lanes are much better than just throwing people into busy lanes that must be shared with cars and trucks. Bike lanes seem to work better in the suburbs than they do in the city. In the city more planning is required for proper bike lane deployment.
#29
Banned
According to commentary in Youtube: "Rennradfahrer nehmen in der StVO eine Sonderstellung ein. So besteht bei Trainingsausfahrten ein Wahlrecht zwischen der Benutzung von Radfahranlagen und der für den Verkehr bestimmten Fahrbahn. Voraussetzung dafür ist, dass das Fahrrad ein Rennrad entsprechend den gesetzlichen Vorschriften ist."
So, according to the traffic law, bike racers in training have the right to choose between using bike infrastructure or the traffic lane, as long the bike is a racing bike in accordance with legal guidelines. This seems very precise, in that Teutonic sort of way.
There's a lot of push back in the comments, essentially, the cyclists was doing nothing dangerous, nothing illegal, and the driver was making things dangerous by not understanding the law.
So, according to the traffic law, bike racers in training have the right to choose between using bike infrastructure or the traffic lane, as long the bike is a racing bike in accordance with legal guidelines. This seems very precise, in that Teutonic sort of way.
There's a lot of push back in the comments, essentially, the cyclists was doing nothing dangerous, nothing illegal, and the driver was making things dangerous by not understanding the law.
It's not about push back, it's about the regs (gesetz.)
#30
Banned
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The Big City
Posts: 619
Bikes: Brompton M3L, Tern Verge P20, Citi Bike
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
7 Posts
And, yes, the comment do push back against the headline and OP's comment, that the bike racer is using the street despite being right next to the bike path, and that he's thereby endangering himself and others, by saying that the cyclist didn't do anything wrong, and the OP doesn't understand the law.
Last edited by wilfried; 01-03-18 at 05:24 PM.
#32
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,535
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4358 Post(s)
Liked 3,998 Times
in
2,668 Posts
while i dont wear a helmet i am not anti helmet. those who are rabid about it are probably also anti seatbelt and pro smoking. the reason i dont wear a helmet is because my neck feels much better when i dont. i think i am healthier riding without a helmet than not riding.
#33
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
while i dont wear a helmet i am not anti helmet. those who are rabid about it are probably also anti seatbelt and pro smoking. the reason i dont wear a helmet is because my neck feels much better when i dont. i think i am healthier riding without a helmet than not riding.
#34
Fillet-Brazed Member
while i dont wear a helmet i am not anti helmet. those who are rabid about it are probably also anti seatbelt and pro smoking. the reason i dont wear a helmet is because my neck feels much better when i dont. i think i am healthier riding without a helmet than not riding.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
There are some oddly placed left turn boxes. Still, I'd rather be either to the side of the road, or in a lane.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
We don't have them, but I take up the same position anyway when it's possible. I assume it's so we don't get right-hooked, and it's sometimes a good idea to be in the lane until we're through. The bike box, starting out in front, makes that the de facto situation
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
I like to line up to the side of the road, but vary my position somewhat.
If I expect several right on red turns, then I'll hang back a bit to allow cars to get around me. There is one intersection that is substantially a T, where I'll line up on the left side of the right turn lane, allowing cars to do right on red to my right side. I'm technically in the straight through lane, but nobody goes straight, and it drops me into the bike lane going left.
If traffic is mostly going straight, then I will sometimes line up as far forward as I possibly can, while still on the right side of the road. I.E. on the forward side of the crosswalk, assuming not a lot of walkers. That way, I hope I'm visible to right turn traffic, but not standing directly in front of them.
I suppose I could imagine a street with lots of bikes, as well as right turning vehicles would benefit from moving the bikes forward so the bikes would proceed in a pulse, allowing cars to turn after that pulse, rather than having a steady stream of bikes passing to the right. I just never see that many bikes. I suppose I should hang out around the university campus a bit more in the spring.
#38
Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
5 Posts
He's an oil industry shill and just writes fear mongering articles against cycling of any kind for transportation. I've read his articles and they seem to be aimed that the newbie cyclist considering bike commuting to work. I guess the thought process is that if you can prevent people from trying bike commuting, they won't get hooked on it and continue driving cars. Not sure if this guy is also part of the oil/auto industry lobbying for bike helmet laws (as they reduce cycling as well).
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
They usually hang back even more than necessary IME. When you're right in front of them, stopped at a light, it's impossible to not know that you're there. Angle towards the far right side, they can swoop around if they really want to.
I do all of that too. As long as you're in front of them, directly or over to the right, a driver knows that you are there and he knows that you're going through the intersection. That's probably the main justification of the bike box. Being directly in front stifles the close pass during the intersection, which is sometimes safer if you don't have that nice wide bike lane at the other side. It all depends.
I like to line up to the side of the road, but vary my position somewhat.
If I expect several right on red turns, then I'll hang back a bit to allow cars to get around me. There is one intersection that is substantially a T, where I'll line up on the left side of the right turn lane, allowing cars to do right on red to my right side. I'm technically in the straight through lane, but nobody goes straight, and it drops me into the bike lane going left.
If traffic is mostly going straight, then I will sometimes line up as far forward as I possibly can, while still on the right side of the road. I.E. on the forward side of the crosswalk, assuming not a lot of walkers. That way, I hope I'm visible to right turn traffic, but not standing directly in front of them ...
If I expect several right on red turns, then I'll hang back a bit to allow cars to get around me. There is one intersection that is substantially a T, where I'll line up on the left side of the right turn lane, allowing cars to do right on red to my right side. I'm technically in the straight through lane, but nobody goes straight, and it drops me into the bike lane going left.
If traffic is mostly going straight, then I will sometimes line up as far forward as I possibly can, while still on the right side of the road. I.E. on the forward side of the crosswalk, assuming not a lot of walkers. That way, I hope I'm visible to right turn traffic, but not standing directly in front of them ...
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
A major hassle. Cars will park just behind the red light trigger. And my bike just doesn't quite trigger it unless I'm pulling the trailer. So we end up waiting, car and bike with a dead red.
I often have to motion for the cars to pull forward to activate the trigger.
Perhaps that would be a benefit of bike boxes. Reminding engineers to put bike sensitive triggers into the boxes, and car sensitive triggers where the cars stop.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
I go by the mantra "First Come, First Served". If the car(s) is/are there first, why should I (cyclists) be allowed to go around them, and then force them to have to move slowly past the intersection until such time as they can get around me, especially if they have already passed me previously? If I'm there first, well then the cars have to wait because I was obviously there before they were.
And yeah it's stupid when a car passes immediately before an intersection or stop sign. But generally I'd rather have them in front of me so that they can go on ahead since they can accelerate faster, than have them on my ass behind me as we're going through the intersection.
And yeah it's stupid when a car passes immediately before an intersection or stop sign. But generally I'd rather have them in front of me so that they can go on ahead since they can accelerate faster, than have them on my ass behind me as we're going through the intersection.
#42
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times
in
1,679 Posts
How long did you give the helmet? It can take a while for your neck to build up the muscles to support the extra weight of a helmet, it took around 2 months for me to get used to a Nutcase helmet (which are heavy), there are lighter helmets out there which should minimize the discomfort or time to get used to.
#43
Banned
Nah, guys. The bike boxes make sense in southern England as the traffic density is huge (larger than anywhere I've been except expect Asia/India.)
Have the bikes at front and filtering through the stopped traffic is the safest and they're aren't any hidden cyclists.
Maybe in a rural area they don't make sense, but everywhere I've seen them they're heavily used. Even at a midnight on a weekday there'll be multiple bikes in them.
I like segregated stuff better (like CPH) but that's not available is ultra dense 1000-year old cities always.
Have the bikes at front and filtering through the stopped traffic is the safest and they're aren't any hidden cyclists.
Maybe in a rural area they don't make sense, but everywhere I've seen them they're heavily used. Even at a midnight on a weekday there'll be multiple bikes in them.
I like segregated stuff better (like CPH) but that's not available is ultra dense 1000-year old cities always.
#44
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Back-of-beyond, Kootenays, BC
Posts: 750
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Exp ert Road and Specialized Stump Jumper FS Mountain; De Vinci Caribou touring, Intense Tracer T275c, Cramerotti, Specialized Allez, Condor
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times
in
57 Posts
Me too. That’s why I was interested to hear the counter arguments. I am surprised by the hostility of some respondents but I guess that’s why there is so much bad feeling between drivers and riders. Too much heat, not enough light!
#45
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
I've been hit from behind in a (not very small) CAR, standing stopped at a traffic light. Never underestimate the power of stupidity.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Queens, NY for now...
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: 82 Lotus Unique, 86 Lotus Legend, 88 Basso Loto, 88 Basso PR, 89 Basso PR, 96 Bianchi CDI, 2013 Deda Aegis, 2019 Basso Diamante SV
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
113 Posts
which is why I hate bike boxes. Forcing motorists to negotiate passing the same cyclists again and again and again is really dumb. Oh there's a cycle lane you say? Well all those people in that bike box will NOT move immediately into the cycle lane, nor would they all fit. I know what London cycle lanes and bike boxes look like. And they're ridiculous.
#47
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
As for bicycles, I often filter all the way to the first car when there's a traffic jam. Filtering to the front is more "traumatic" for the drivers, but starting behind the first car - they get into the intersection first (if anyone's running a "late green", the car gets hit), I use the windshield of the car in front to accelerate easier, the first car controls the pace so I get no horns from the drivers behind - and the cars can easily go past one bicycle since I leave enough room when filtering.
Having said this, local bike associations are trying to enforce a minimum 1m passing distance when overtaking bikes - along with lane changing when overtaking bikes on out of urban areas. I believe this, if enforced, would make filtering with a bicycle a lot less fair towards drivers - making them do just what you said: bothering to take you over later on. It would also cause more jams and tension - especially on twisty, one lane per direction, out of city roads, climbs even more so.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Queens, NY for now...
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: 82 Lotus Unique, 86 Lotus Legend, 88 Basso Loto, 88 Basso PR, 89 Basso PR, 96 Bianchi CDI, 2013 Deda Aegis, 2019 Basso Diamante SV
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
113 Posts
Makes perfect sense for motorcycles - they're usually faster accelerating than cars, not sure about bicycles. Maybe Acidfast can explain it better.
As for bicycles, I often filter all the way to the first car when there's a traffic jam. Filtering to the front is more "traumatic" for the drivers, but starting behind the first car - they get into the intersection first (if anyone's running a "late green", the car gets hit), I use the windshield of the car in front to accelerate easier, the first car controls the pace so I get no horns from the drivers behind - and the cars can easily go past one bicycle since I leave enough room when filtering.
As for bicycles, I often filter all the way to the first car when there's a traffic jam. Filtering to the front is more "traumatic" for the drivers, but starting behind the first car - they get into the intersection first (if anyone's running a "late green", the car gets hit), I use the windshield of the car in front to accelerate easier, the first car controls the pace so I get no horns from the drivers behind - and the cars can easily go past one bicycle since I leave enough room when filtering.
When I used to ride a motorcycle, I filtered to the front all the time. This was perfectly normal and acceptable in Italy, but in the US it caused many a driver to freak out and/or get mad. They just don't get it. You are using a fraction of the gas and the road space, so your compensation should be going to the front if there is space to do so. But I even had a cop start screaming in my face and give me a ticket for it (which I later beat).
I see no reason why you shouldn't do it on a push bike, and if anyone gets mad that's their problem, as long as you leave room or don't purposely obstruct them if they want to pass you back.
#49
Full Member
I am not a fan of the bike box.
It's fine when the cyclist passes stopped motorists on their curb side while they are stopped and gets in front of them before the light turns green.
But, the cyclist who is moving forward to the bike box when the light turns green is vulnerable to being hit by a driver who turns right or left (whichever side curb is on) when the light turns green. In the U.S. drivers aren't trained to look for a cyclist passing next to the curb before turning right on green.
There isn't a countdown timer on traffic lights for me to know when a red is about to change to green.
It's fine when the cyclist passes stopped motorists on their curb side while they are stopped and gets in front of them before the light turns green.
But, the cyclist who is moving forward to the bike box when the light turns green is vulnerable to being hit by a driver who turns right or left (whichever side curb is on) when the light turns green. In the U.S. drivers aren't trained to look for a cyclist passing next to the curb before turning right on green.
There isn't a countdown timer on traffic lights for me to know when a red is about to change to green.
#50
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
North Italy is a (motor)cycling heaven IMO. Love the way those people ride and drive. All starting almost at once at green lights, drivers watching out for (motor)cyclists, allowing each other to filter and move on whenever there's room.