Larger Frame or Longer Stem?
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 35
Likes: 2
Larger Frame or Longer Stem?
Hi there.
It's time to replace my old hybrid mountain bike that I use for mostly city commuting.
Today when I was test riding a couple of bikes - I couldn't decide which format I liked better.
The models I was test riding were Cannondale Quick CX.
The bike I am currently going to be replacing is a Cannondale F800 with a Lefty Jake. Its frame size is a large with a longer stem to give me a bit of extension when I ride.
I took out a bike with a large frame and stock stem - which rode nicely - but I felt I was too upright. This of course could be corrected with a longer stem.
The second bike I took out was an XL frame with stock stem. The extension felt about right.
Is there a benefit to going with an extra large frame? Or should I stick to a large frame and get a longer stem?
I'm 5' 11" ...
Thanks
SparkyCanada
It's time to replace my old hybrid mountain bike that I use for mostly city commuting.
Today when I was test riding a couple of bikes - I couldn't decide which format I liked better.
The models I was test riding were Cannondale Quick CX.
The bike I am currently going to be replacing is a Cannondale F800 with a Lefty Jake. Its frame size is a large with a longer stem to give me a bit of extension when I ride.
I took out a bike with a large frame and stock stem - which rode nicely - but I felt I was too upright. This of course could be corrected with a longer stem.
The second bike I took out was an XL frame with stock stem. The extension felt about right.
Is there a benefit to going with an extra large frame? Or should I stick to a large frame and get a longer stem?
I'm 5' 11" ...
Thanks
SparkyCanada
#2
Senior Member

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 575
From: Southern California
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter,, Ritchey Ultra, Salsa La Cruz, Neuhaus Hummingbird
Can you easily stand over the XL? I'd go with the bike that fits right stock.
I'm between sizes in a lot of brands and usually lean toward the larger size. However, I'm 6'2' with a long torso so reach is the main factor.
I'm between sizes in a lot of brands and usually lean toward the larger size. However, I'm 6'2' with a long torso so reach is the main factor.
#4
multimodal commuter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
I suspect you'll have better luck, in the long run, with the smaller one.
#6
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 35
Likes: 2
#7
Callipygian Connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 351
I recommend going with the frame size which allows the use of a "normal" size stem. Normal is in quotes because, what's "normal?" I can't really define normal, but I know when it's not. Have you ever spent time riding a road bike with a 50mm stem? How about a 140mm stem? The point is, at either end of the spectrum, handling starts to get a bit weird. There are benefits to go bigger frame, and benefits to go smaller frame. There are also drawbacks either way. If your frame size choice puts you at either extreme for a stem, then you're probably not gonna be happy in the long run. Personally, I'm ok with 90 - 110 stems on drop bar bikes. I feel comfortable going a bit shorter with flat bar setups. It's all a matter of personal choice but I wouldn't put myself at one extreme or the other.
-Kedosto
-Kedosto
#8
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 35
Likes: 2
Last edited by SparkyCanada; 03-30-19 at 01:31 PM.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 2,015
From: San Diego, California
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
And forward pressure on bars with a long stem tends to straighten the wheel more so than with a short stem.
And a longer stem requires more handlebar movement to turn the wheel.

https://cyclingtips.com/2015/03/how-...-and-handling/
#10
multimodal commuter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
I meant the frame. I'll give you two reasons.
First, because I think this is important: In my experience, when I'm caught between two frame sizes, I'll find even if the smaller frame size may give me a bit of a pain in the neck, it's actually more fun to ride than the bigger one. I've experienced this with two pairs of bikes, where I've done a lot of riding on both the 58 and a 60 cm versions of basically the same bike. Long story. I am guessing if you bought both bikes, you'd find you would ride the smaller one more.
Second, this is obvious but worth mentioning anyway. Your question about the stem demonstrates how it's pretty easy to modify a small bike to fit a taller rider. Change the stem, the handlebar, the seat post, even the crank arms, and you can dial in the fit pretty perfectly. A bigger frame will necessarily limit the adjustments you can make. If it turns out that the fit is not ideal right out of the box, your options for adjustments are limited.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
#11
Bigger frame = More stable, more comfort. Good for straight-line riding.
Smaller frame = More "flick-able", meaning the frame is easier to throw around while climbing or sprinting. Good for racing and climbing.
I would decide which is more important to you, and then choose accordingly.
Smaller frame = More "flick-able", meaning the frame is easier to throw around while climbing or sprinting. Good for racing and climbing.
I would decide which is more important to you, and then choose accordingly.
#12
Disco Infiltrator




Joined: May 2013
Posts: 15,328
Likes: 3,518
From: Folsom CA
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
I'm not looking up charts right now but I suspect the hybrid is supposed to sit easier than your old MTB.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
"Well, well!" said Holmes, impatiently. "A good cyclist does not need a high road. The moor is intersected with paths and the moon is at the full."
Genesis 49:16-17
"Well, well!" said Holmes, impatiently. "A good cyclist does not need a high road. The moor is intersected with paths and the moon is at the full."
#13
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 35
Likes: 2
Longer stem increases the rotational inertia of the steering assembly (wheel/fork/bars).
And forward pressure on bars with a long stem tends to straighten the wheel more so than with a short stem.
And a longer stem requires more handlebar movement to turn the wheel.

https://cyclingtips.com/2015/03/how-...-and-handling/
And forward pressure on bars with a long stem tends to straighten the wheel more so than with a short stem.
And a longer stem requires more handlebar movement to turn the wheel.

https://cyclingtips.com/2015/03/how-...-and-handling/
SparkyCanada
#14
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 35
Likes: 2
Bigger frame = More stable, more comfort. Good for straight-line riding.
Smaller frame = More "flick-able", meaning the frame is easier to throw around while climbing or sprinting. Good for racing and climbing.
I would decide which is more important to you, and then choose accordingly.
Smaller frame = More "flick-able", meaning the frame is easier to throw around while climbing or sprinting. Good for racing and climbing.
I would decide which is more important to you, and then choose accordingly.
SparkyCanada
#15
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 35
Likes: 2
Thanks,
SparkyCanada
#16
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 514
Likes: 24
From: the danger zone!
Bikes: steel is real. and so is Ti...
Hi there.
It's time to replace my old hybrid mountain bike that I use for mostly city commuting.
Today when I was test riding a couple of bikes - I couldn't decide which format I liked better.
The models I was test riding were Cannondale Quick CX.
The bike I am currently going to be replacing is a Cannondale F800 with a Lefty Jake. Its frame size is a large with a longer stem to give me a bit of extension when I ride.
I took out a bike with a large frame and stock stem - which rode nicely - but I felt I was too upright. This of course could be corrected with a longer stem.
The second bike I took out was an XL frame with stock stem. The extension felt about right.
Is there a benefit to going with an extra large frame? Or should I stick to a large frame and get a longer stem?
I'm 5' 11" ...
Thanks
SparkyCanada
It's time to replace my old hybrid mountain bike that I use for mostly city commuting.
Today when I was test riding a couple of bikes - I couldn't decide which format I liked better.
The models I was test riding were Cannondale Quick CX.
The bike I am currently going to be replacing is a Cannondale F800 with a Lefty Jake. Its frame size is a large with a longer stem to give me a bit of extension when I ride.
I took out a bike with a large frame and stock stem - which rode nicely - but I felt I was too upright. This of course could be corrected with a longer stem.
The second bike I took out was an XL frame with stock stem. The extension felt about right.
Is there a benefit to going with an extra large frame? Or should I stick to a large frame and get a longer stem?
I'm 5' 11" ...
Thanks
SparkyCanada
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jcll2002
Road Cycling
17
09-07-12 11:28 AM
roburrito
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
7
07-18-11 08:56 PM
therearegoats
Road Cycling
25
04-11-11 02:54 PM






