Most bike friendly US Cities?
09-20-05 | 01:26 PM
#3
dangerous with tools
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 0
From: minneapolis
Bikes: fat, long, single & fast
09-20-05 | 02:44 PM
#4
Arizona Dessert
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 2,170
From: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Originally Posted by Keith99
Nope. But I do know that you need to be careful trusting any such list. Some rank based mainly on number of bikelanes/paths. Sometimes useful for commuters sometimes an indication you are not welcome on the streets.
Also note that some cities may have lots of places/times that are fanstatic to ride, but also lots places/times that are hell.
Al
09-20-05 | 02:53 PM
#5
proud okie
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Bikes: Schwinn Sierra Hybrid, old schwinn MTB, Graziella folding bicycle (one speed Italian), miscellaneous other bike parts
I know Austin somtimes makes it on to the lists because of its many bike paths, but I have to say that I enjoy commuting in Oklahoma City much more. OKC has some hills but not nearly so many as Austin. More importantly drivers are pretty friendly. If you ride assertively (take your lane), then seem to respect you for the most part.
09-20-05 | 08:33 PM
#6
52-week commuter
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 1
From: Washington, DC
Bikes: Redline Conquest, Cannonday, Specialized, RANS
The League of American Bicyclists has a program called "Bike Friendly Cities." Here is a scathing critique of it: https://www.labreform.org/BFC.html
09-21-05 | 04:33 AM
#9
commuter extraordinaire
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Tx
Bikes: Trek 4100, 3700
Originally Posted by gear
I'm pretty sure Boston won't be on the list.
09-21-05 | 06:48 AM
#10
I live near Boston and ride in that city more than any of the other cities I've ridden in (DC,Phili,Toronto,Montreal,Quebec city,Amsterdam,Brussels, Ghent, Phoenix) it seems the drivers are much less friendly towards bikers, somewhat unfriendly actually.
09-21-05 | 08:17 AM
#11
Retrogrouch in Training
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,484
Likes: 1
From: Knee-deep in the day-to-day
Boston is a great town to ride in, but it's not a particularly cyclist-friendly city.
The city adiministration has a long tradition of wishing cyclists away. In fact, they laid off their bicycle coordinator several years ago and haven't bother refilling it since, despite substantial public demand.
There is a dearth of on-street bike parking downtown (though a good amount of it in garages if you know where to go).
The cops don't even know the rules regarding cycling on the streets. There are some bike cops, though. You'll know them because they're the ones riding on the wrong side of the street or on the sidewalk.
Enforcement is completely arbitrary. If you're a messenger, you'll get cited for not wearing a helmet...if the officer doesn't like you. On the other hand, that same officer won't even give you a second glance for running a light.
Motorists here often don't understand how to behave around cyclists.
The transit authority makes up excuses for not installing bike racks on buses. In fact, of the three routes that did have racks, at least one has mysteriously lost them. Though I've heard that the new GM is interested in working with advocates.
The traffic department has historically refused to even consider share the road signs because they were "too expensive". (Also a lie.)
In 2000, the city won the dubious double distinction of being awarded the title of America's least bike friendly city as well as having the Cycle Messenger World Championships relocated to Philadelphia following the railroading of a messenger who ran into a jaywalking pedestrian. Additional arbitrary courier regulations were enacted and the police force would harrass anyone they suspected might be a messenger.
The list could go on.
However, having said all that, it's a small, dense, and congested city. While the latter half of the 20th century damaged us as like any American city, it was less severe. Most of the city is well-connected by streets with traffic signals, on-street parking, retail destinations, and substantial foot traffic. This makes for a naturally traffic-calmed environment. The congestion tends to make the speed differential between cyclists and motorists less pronounced.
It's also true that the city seems to be changing its mind. The obvious support for reinstating the bike coordinator position as demonstrated at a public hearing last year seems to have lit a fire. They're solidly behind the upcoming Hub on Wheels festival and we've got someone on the inside at the BTD trying to work out a pilot signage project.
The city adiministration has a long tradition of wishing cyclists away. In fact, they laid off their bicycle coordinator several years ago and haven't bother refilling it since, despite substantial public demand.
There is a dearth of on-street bike parking downtown (though a good amount of it in garages if you know where to go).
The cops don't even know the rules regarding cycling on the streets. There are some bike cops, though. You'll know them because they're the ones riding on the wrong side of the street or on the sidewalk.
Enforcement is completely arbitrary. If you're a messenger, you'll get cited for not wearing a helmet...if the officer doesn't like you. On the other hand, that same officer won't even give you a second glance for running a light.
Motorists here often don't understand how to behave around cyclists.
The transit authority makes up excuses for not installing bike racks on buses. In fact, of the three routes that did have racks, at least one has mysteriously lost them. Though I've heard that the new GM is interested in working with advocates.
The traffic department has historically refused to even consider share the road signs because they were "too expensive". (Also a lie.)
In 2000, the city won the dubious double distinction of being awarded the title of America's least bike friendly city as well as having the Cycle Messenger World Championships relocated to Philadelphia following the railroading of a messenger who ran into a jaywalking pedestrian. Additional arbitrary courier regulations were enacted and the police force would harrass anyone they suspected might be a messenger.
The list could go on.
However, having said all that, it's a small, dense, and congested city. While the latter half of the 20th century damaged us as like any American city, it was less severe. Most of the city is well-connected by streets with traffic signals, on-street parking, retail destinations, and substantial foot traffic. This makes for a naturally traffic-calmed environment. The congestion tends to make the speed differential between cyclists and motorists less pronounced.
It's also true that the city seems to be changing its mind. The obvious support for reinstating the bike coordinator position as demonstrated at a public hearing last year seems to have lit a fire. They're solidly behind the upcoming Hub on Wheels festival and we've got someone on the inside at the BTD trying to work out a pilot signage project.
Last edited by bostontrevor; 09-22-05 at 03:36 PM.
09-21-05 | 09:00 AM
#12
52-week commuter
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 1
From: Washington, DC
Bikes: Redline Conquest, Cannonday, Specialized, RANS
Originally Posted by bostontrevor
In fact, they laid their bicycle coordinator several years ago and haven't bother refilling it since, despite substantial public demand.
09-22-05 | 03:37 PM
#14
Retrogrouch in Training
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,484
Likes: 1
From: Knee-deep in the day-to-day
So yeah, I heard that Mr. Grabauskus was interested in working with us.
https://www.massbike.org/news/bikerac..._release05.htm
https://www.massbike.org/news/bikerac..._release05.htm
