Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

What's your fastest option?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.
View Poll Results: What's the fastest way for you to commute?
My own two feet.
1
0.50%
My own two wheels! Ride on!
71
35.68%
Rails or buses.
4
2.01%
Four wheels.
117
58.79%
Other (please describe)
6
3.02%
Voters: 199. You may not vote on this poll

What's your fastest option?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-06 | 12:44 PM
  #26  
rocks in head's Avatar
...addicted...
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 58
From: East of the River, Washington DC

Bikes: 1985 Alpine, 2007 IRO Rob Roy, 1985 Ross Mt. Whitney, 1991 Diamondback Master TG

Shuttle bus (free!) is fastest, at 12-15 minutes. Car would be next fastest, as I could take the same route the bus does, but I'd have to pay $10 to park for the day, and I'd have to buy a car. I ride a more indirect route ~ 5 mi to work, and it takes 20 in the morning and 30-35 in the afternoon... you can guess which way has the gruelling hills. Train - the nearest metro stop is AT work, which is why my apartment runs the shuttle bus. doesn't help me any, unless I want to go into (or back from) DC.

I ride every day, except yesterday, when it rained something like 3" in thirty-something minutes, and was generally pouring all afternoon. My fiancee picked me up and I rode the shuttle in, leaving my bike at work.
rocks in head is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 12:50 PM
  #27  
moxfyre's Avatar
cyclist/gearhead/cycli...
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,166
Likes: 1
From: DC / Maryland suburbs

Bikes: Homebuilt tourer/commuter, modified-beyond-recognition 1990 Trek 1100, reasonably stock 2002-ish Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo

Originally Posted by rajman
Just wondering how many people out there have cycling as the fastest commuting option. If you've done the head to head comparison of the modalities post away.

Disclaimer - I'm on leave this year, so I'm going on the data with my permanent job - a very short commute.
It takes me 14-18 minutes each way for my commute by bike, depending on how energetic I am. It would take me about 20 minutes by bus, plus I'd have to walk about 1/2 mile total at the ends. My roommates drive and it takes them about 12 minutes when there's no traffic, but there are often traffic jams on Route 1 and it can take 25 minutes or so in traffic.

So, driving would be (barely) faster, but cycling is more reliable definitely!
moxfyre is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 12:54 PM
  #28  
mihlbach's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,656
Likes: 145
From: Long Island, NY
My commute time by bike and car are very close. I'd be hard pressed to say which is faster..it would probably just depend on the traffic that day.
mihlbach is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 01:29 PM
  #29  
aMull's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: Toronto

Bikes: Leader 735TR 09 58cm 46/17

Using a car is the fastest, however i don't have one so it's biking. Takes me an hour with the bike, an hour and a half with the bus.
aMull is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 01:36 PM
  #30  
genec's Avatar
genec
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 27,072
Likes: 4,533
From: West Coast

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Well in the past the fastest commute was by bike... it would take me about 45 minutes by bike and about an hour by car. The time difference was due to traffic congestion that I could bypass on bike.

My current situation is that I can drive TO work faster... but going home is a different story.... where one road tends to be quite backed up in the evenings with up to a 40 minute wait... I can cover that congested couple of miles in about 10-12 minutes or so on bike...
genec is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 01:38 PM
  #31  
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Kitchener, Ontario

Bikes: ~1990 Bianchi Forte, 2006 Kona Jake

I've never tried driving, but given that I would have to park ~5minute walk from the building (on a university campus) when I lock my bike up right outside the door, I have to guess that riding is faster. It takes me about 15 minutes for my 4km ride (with 6 traffic lights, with 4 of 6 red on most rides, plus time to lock/unlock). It's been a long time since I've walked it, but I think that would be in the 30-40 minute range. There's a new express bus that would be 5 minutes walking plus 12 minutes on the bus (according to the schedule), plus any wait time at the busstop.
amward is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 01:57 PM
  #32  
Enjoy
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,165
Likes: 0
From: Seattle metro

Bikes: Trek 5200

Car is usually fastest. Unless the weather changes or there's an accident. Then Bike and car transit time is about equal. That's OK. If I were to compare bike time to car + workout on treadmill, the bike commute would be shorter and I'd have my workout in for the day. So in that respect, it saves time.
vrkelley is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 01:58 PM
  #33  
Enjoy
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,165
Likes: 0
From: Seattle metro

Bikes: Trek 5200

Originally Posted by rajman
Just wondering how many people out there have cycling as the fastest commuting option. If you've done the head to head comparison of the modalities post away.

Disclaimer - I'm on leave this year, so I'm going on the data with my permanent job - a very short commute.
Cool Poll. Thanks for cook'n this one up!
vrkelley is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 02:49 PM
  #34  
crtreedude's Avatar
Third World Layabout
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,136
Likes: 34
From: Costa Rica

Bikes: Cannondale F900 and Tandem

Downhill (to work) - bike beats car.
Uphill (to home) - car beats my legs and lungs

But, if I factor in excercise - bike wins hands down.
crtreedude is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 03:07 PM
  #35  
Mad scientist w/a wrench
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Chucktown

Bikes: none working atm

My fiance and I have almost equal straight-line distances from home to work, and our workplaces are both located along the same arterial. If she doesn't take the freeway I beat her home during rush hour.

I second the argument of bike time < drive time + exercise time.
krazygluon is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 03:54 PM
  #36  
KnhoJ's Avatar
Mister Goody Two Shoes
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Someone had to vote for feet! I live across the street from work. It's so close that getting out a bike would take almost as long as walking there.
KnhoJ is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 04:47 PM
  #37  
azesty's Avatar
Hot in China
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
From: China

Bikes: Giant Lava

I commute 12 km each way. It takes 15 minutes by car, 25 - 38 minutes by bike (it is hilly and also depends on wind, load and fitness). I have not caught the bus, but believe it would take 3 different busses, and take more than an hour.

a
azesty is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 04:47 PM
  #38  
Chris L's Avatar
Every lane is a bike lane
Titanium Club Membership
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 9,666
Likes: 16
From: Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia - passionfruit capital of the universe!
Usually the bike. Most mornings the arterial which represents the shortest distance to work is gridlocked for kilometres on end. I usually pass hundreds (sometimes thousands) of cars in that stretch. Strangely, it's usually a little quieter during school holidays*, so on those times a car might be faster, but I've never driven one, so I can't say that for sure. The bus? Forget it. The nearest bus connection is several kilometres away. I tried to bus it one day last year and ended up walking 7km anyway. And that assumes the bus shows up at all (which is not a guarantee by any means in this part of the world).

*yes, it is a major surprise that any road around here would be quieter in school holiday time, considering the number of tourists who visit. I can only assume they haven't discovered the one major non-coastal arterial road in the entire city.
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.

That is all.
Chris L is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 05:01 PM
  #39  
kemmer's Avatar
*****es love tarck
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 1
From: Sandy, UT

Bikes: so many

Originally Posted by tuolumne
I voted other. The quickest way to get to work is to throw my car in the trunk, drive to a park-n-ride lot, and bike the last 4 miles to work. Saves 5 minutes in the morning and closer to 10 coming home.

That's a nice compromise, I think that would work well for anyone who works in a congested area. I've thought about doing that with the train too, but it's kind of a waste of time to sit there waiting for it when I could be on my way under my own power.
kemmer is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 05:10 PM
  #40  
al-wagner's Avatar
Happy old man
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: West coast of New England

Bikes: Trek 4500 mountain bike, Trek 7500fx disk, and Trek 2200 Road bike

I put 4 wheels because it takes 5-10 minutes less to ride my car to work then my bike.
al-wagner is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 06:25 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
In LA, with no traffic, cars win, about 2x faster. I do 15 min bar car, 35-40 by bike.

With traffic, though, bikes/cars equal. 30 vs 30 mins for me.

With a downhill section, bikes win hands down. In fact, I think bikes would win more if it weren't for really heavy traffic zones in which people are in such a rush that it's probably unsafe to "take the lane."
agarose2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 06:45 PM
  #42  
sukram's Avatar
Bubba Ho-Tep's BFF
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Escaped NYC

Bikes: Brompton & a Bianchi Volpe do-it-all-bike

Originally Posted by oboeguy
In NYC, I can generally get somewhere faster by bike riding than by taking the subway.
For my commute, definitely faster by bike. If I were to take mass transit from Astoria to where I work on the UES I could either take 1 subway ride and walk about 4/5 of a mile, make 1 subway transfer to go 1 stop and walk a 1/2 mile, or skip that last 1/2 mile and take the bus instead.
sukram is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 07:13 PM
  #43  
Bklyn's Avatar
Ex-Lion Tamer
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, N.Y.

Bikes: 1982 Lotus Legend (steel-frame touring bike); 1982 Fuji S10S (converted to a singlespeed: 46x16); Specialized Crossroads hybrid (the child taxi).

Originally Posted by oboeguy
In NYC, I can generally get somewhere faster by bike riding than by taking the subway.
+1

I've whittled my ride from Park Slope to Times Square down to about 31 minutes in the mornings. (This does require a bit of seat-of-the-pants spinning up First Avenue.) The way home, though, I tend to play it safer. (New Yorkers will recognize the problem immediately: First Ave. is one way northbound; there's no really bike-friendly southbound route at rush hour. So I take the MUP on the Hudson River.) This adds maybe 10 minutes, but either way, it's definitely faster than the Q train. Plus I don't have to share the breathing space of thousands of irritated New Yorkers. Of course, I may never read a novel again, but that's a different thread.
Bklyn is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 07:58 PM
  #44  
TCNJCyclist's Avatar
Olé Olé Olé Olé T-C...N-J
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: The Dark Forest of Ewing (New Jersey)

Bikes: 1985 Trek 620, 2005 Cannondale R700

Where's the option for 4 hooves? In all seriousness, its probably a toss up between bike and car for my specific commute (about 3 miles by bike, maybe 4 or so by car). The bike route is on all roads with a 25 mph speed limit and one light that is almost always green. The car route is along two roads, both with speed limits around 40-45mph and about 4-5 lights (depending the campus entrance that's used).

Last week, I left no more than 2 minutes before my sister and got to the student center about two minutes before her. Factors like parking probably played a part in my win, but then again, it probably should.
__________________
1985 Trek 620 (picture pending)
2005 Cannondale R700 (picture pending)

Bike & Build
NJ Bike Map
TCNJCyclist is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 08:04 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
I also do a 45 minute run home 2/5 days per week, a 1hr 30 min run home 1 day, and bike the other 2 days.

All options slower than the car except bike on rush hour.

Great workout, though - definitely saves lots of time compared to driving if you include workout time!
agarose2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-06 | 09:06 PM
  #46  
jimmythefly's Avatar
bike rider
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Seattle

Bikes: 83 Trek 500, 2x 90s Novara Randonee, Zion 737, Specialized Rockhopper, Nishiki Colorado, Univega Specialissima

from home (crown hill) to school (downtown) 7.5 miles.
Bus is about 40 minutes from when I step onto it, but the wait at the stop can be as long as 20 minutes.
Express bus is 25 minutes.
Car is 20+parking+walking=35 (not to mention the cost)
Bike is 35 min

On the way there (which has a decent downhill down 15th street) I have made it in 20 minutes, leaving my house and getting to class on time. Fastest I've ever ridden and I hit all the lights green.

Unless I have a flat tire or need to carry something large that absolutely can't be exposed to the weather or need to dress up for a presentation I bike, far more enjoyable and just as fast, all things considered.
jimmythefly is offline  
Reply
Old 09-30-06 | 06:05 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0

Bikes: Two Fishers and one Cannondale

I'll take a stressless 1hour bike over being cut off, honked at, and red light runners to save 15 - 20 mins anytime.

This may not be popular but: Who else out there feels safer on a bike than in a car? It is only a small
% drivers who are beligerent towards bikes, at least that's my experience

Lets hear some replys


Winnipeg
Canada
G. Bucci is offline  
Reply
Old 09-30-06 | 06:19 AM
  #48  
DoB
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
I can drive the 12.5 miles in 25 minutes. I can bike it in 50 minutes (improving though....I'm down to 45 minutes on windless days).

I could take the bus in theory....just two transfers and a 2 hour trip.

There are of course, no trains in Detroit.
DoB is offline  
Reply
Old 09-30-06 | 08:30 AM
  #49  
specq's Avatar
King of the Ramsey Hills
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Saint Paul
Originally Posted by tuolumne
The quickest way to get to work is to throw my car in the trunk
you must have one of them xtra-xtracycles?

Last edited by specq; 09-30-06 at 08:40 AM.
specq is offline  
Reply
Old 09-30-06 | 08:45 AM
  #50  
Giant XTC SE 2006
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Scotland, Alloa

Bikes: Giant XTC SE

Not really old enough to have a job to commute to although I have done the route my mum does to work countless times. The car is the quickest at around 10 minutes. I've proved to many friends that taking the bike is quicker than the bus. On average by bike it takes around 25 mins. Bus around 30 mins aswell. Ive done the journey once at best just over 15 mins. I'd take the bike over anything though, more enjoyable.
Dougie is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.