Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Helmets cause more danger

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Helmets cause more danger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-07 | 04:04 PM
  #176  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: clipped in & pedaling

Bikes: jamis dakar xlt 1.9, weyless sp

Originally Posted by Daily Commute
I agree that mandatory helmet laws don't make sense, but I still think it's wise to voluntarily wear a helmet. A helmet will protect you from pain, and that's good enough for me. Wear a helmet, ride prudently, and focus on your own riding instead of whether someone else is wearing a helmet.


HAIL TO THE CHIEF!
bigpedaler is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-07 | 04:07 PM
  #177  
Banned.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,761
Likes: 3
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana

Bikes: 84 Trek 660 Suntour Superbe; 87 Giant Rincon Shimano XT; 07 Mercian Vincitore Campy Veloce

Originally Posted by bigpedaler

HAIL TO THE CHIEF!
And that my folks is the final word on this subject!
froze is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-07 | 07:33 PM
  #178  
closetbiker's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,630
Likes: 18
From: Vancouver, BC
as long as there are paranoid schizophrenicks, the thread may die, but the topic will live on
closetbiker is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-07 | 07:56 PM
  #179  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
From: Aurora, CO

Bikes: CAAD9-1, Windsor Cliff 29er

One thing to keep in mind, John Stossel is a libertarian. I tend to lean that way myself politically too, but he's probably trying to make a backdoor case for making the government stop regulating something that only affects ME directly. In other words, if my actions can only harm myself then it's not the governments job to keep me from doing stupid things. There's an argument either way, I just think it clarifies the issue.
cooleric1234 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-04-07 | 11:06 PM
  #180  
Banned.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,761
Likes: 3
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana

Bikes: 84 Trek 660 Suntour Superbe; 87 Giant Rincon Shimano XT; 07 Mercian Vincitore Campy Veloce

Originally Posted by cooleric1234
One thing to keep in mind, John Stossel is a libertarian. I tend to lean that way myself politically too, but he's probably trying to make a backdoor case for making the government stop regulating something that only affects ME directly. In other words, if my actions can only harm myself then it's not the governments job to keep me from doing stupid things. There's an argument either way, I just think it clarifies the issue.
What the heck this post is alive yet.

I agree with you, I think that we should have the choice as to whether or not to wear seatbelts or helmets-I choose to do both whether the law was there or not. It's the same with smoking, I choose not to smoke but I don't agree with San Diego and outlawing smoking anywhere including your home! Or Ohio saying truckers can't smoke in their trucks because that's a place of business?! But the government has this warped sense of reality that they think it's their job to babyset us, while they get away with not practicing what they preach. I understand that smoking, drinking, not wearing helmets or seatbelts cause insurance companies a huge financial burden so why not just tax the crap out of that stuff? It's funny that the government wants to regulate that kind of thing yet they don't seem to care that 98% of the poor people on welfare and other government assistance play lotteries all over America, wasting billions of dollars for the hope of a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow while their families starve because their money got spent on Lottery tics. Lottery playing has cost the poor more money then drinking, smoking, seatbelts and helmets have cost insurance companies! I see poor people at grocery stores all the time paying for food with food stamps then buy $20 or more in lotto tics and they do this every week. One poor person in this town wallpapered their bedroom inside of their subsidized apartment with their used lotto tics!! Then this lotto money is suppose to go to schools but little makes it there, so our city has to come up with hundreds of millions of dollars in bonds to pay for new school buildings, but thats another story that involves more then that.
froze is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.