Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Giant OCR 2 for commuting

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Giant OCR 2 for commuting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-08 | 12:00 AM
  #26  
tjspiel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 8,101
Likes: 17
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by harrison
so after reading the comments in this thread it is apparent there I should focus on a few things

how the OCR will ride of rough/pothole filled streets
the clearance for fullfenders
clearance for assorted types of tires
carbon fork + seatpost = good for commuting? avaible?

I went to another bike shop than my usuall today, the sell Treks/specialized/and Kona
the Trek 1.2/1.5 is the direct competor to the OCR series, while cheaper the parts are lacking

I talked to the shop owner about commuting with a rodie/ we talked cyolocross for a little. While not ideal for long road touring, it is a matter of switching out tire combanations. and the major plus was the amazing amount of clearance for real Full fenders + assorted types of tires, not to mention racks.
The one bike I was looking at was the Kona Jake

basically I have a ton of more options to think about

I will be test driving the Giant OCR 2, Kona Jake, and the Trek 1.2. And perhaps others depending on how much search keeps unfolding. It just sucks that I have to wait, the weather up there (northeast) is pretty ugly this time of year.

thoughts>?
I'm in favor of test rides. Get the one that feels the best.

I know speed was one reason you were leaning toward the OCR and it's probably going to be a tad faster than a cross bike, but I like the versatility that a cross bike offers.

If your commute is on good roads with some hills, the OCR or a Trek might be the one to go with. If you're thinking about commuting in the winter, a cross bike will accept studded tires.
tjspiel is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 06:52 AM
  #27  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Yea your totally right about the test rides, I am going to take my time and really get a feal for each

speed is what I want, plus touring capable is a major plus. I have my converted mountian bike commuter for winter time which is still a serious possibility for keeping a road bike on the road for close to 7 months of the year, which is excellent for around here.

Our weather is just like bostons, changing every 2 min, wet/cold in the winter, roads are awful 80% of the time, esp this time of the year. Yet with a rodie commuter 7 or 8 months of the year is a very real possibility.
harrison is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 09:18 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,369
Likes: 0
From: Reston, VA

Bikes: 2003 Giant OCR2

Originally Posted by vaticdart
haven't tried this yet, but it looks like it can work. I'm still just using Planet Bike SpeedEZ fenders which are much better than the blade things.
I'd be really interested to see how much clearance there is between the tire and fender once it's mounted. Mine's a 2003 model, so maybe things have changed, but it doesn't look to me like something I'd want to try, especially on the front wheel.

Originally Posted by vaticdart
Again, not correct. I attached one of these, to my OCR1 fine. I wanted the non-disc brake version, but that's what my LBS had at the time.
How'd you attach it at the top? Does the OCR1 come with eyelets on the upper part of the seatstay (which the OCR2 doesn't), or did you attach it to the seatpost as I mentioned the first time? I realize it has eyelets on the dropout, but that alone isn't sufficiently to mount a rack to a bike.
Mr. Underbridge is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 10:06 AM
  #29  
GBR
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
I have had an OCR2 for two years. It's been great for me. I have had a rack on it and that works fine. I do not have fenders, but there is wheel clearance if you are running 25mm tires and I bet you could jury rig fenders. There little holes at the top and bottom for the rack, but they put little rubber things in them when they sell it. Maybe this has changed in the last couple years.

Mine also came with pedals. This is 50-100 bucks right there.

The only things I did not like that I would changed:
Mine had an adjustable stem, this creaked and obviously once you find where you like the bars you don't adjust it. So I got a new stem.
Also, I hated the stock seat.

Also, if you want a road bike to commute, you can safely ignore the MTB advocates. I have ridden road bikes over gravel roads, potholed streets, up and down curbs. Just get 28mm tires and inflate them to 80-90psi.
timdoug is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 10:13 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 54
Likes: 1
From: Danvers, Massachusetts USA

Bikes: Fuji Royale 1984, Specialized Crossroads 2004, Giant Halfway 2005, Giant OCR 2 2006

I have a 2006 Ocr 2 it has eyelets for fenders and a rack. There are places on seat stays to connect a rack. I just put a trek interchange rack on my Ocr. Fenders may fit with very close tolerance. I use my OCR for commuting 1-2 days per week 42 miles round trip. It works well for this purpose. Though if I had known I would only use this bike for commuting then I may have bought a bike that could fit wider tires and fenders more easily. I find the OCR to be a very comfortable fairly fast ride. I lke the compact frame geometry it makes it easier to mount and dismount than my traditional steel framed road bike.
Northshore Man is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 11:40 AM
  #31  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
hmmm thanks for the comments guys

I am going to go into my giant dealer to talk specifics about fender clearance, which seems to grow in importance for me. Not to mention my options with tires/sizes
harrison is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 11:50 AM
  #32  
greenstork's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by harrison
hmmm thanks for the comments guys

I am going to go into my giant dealer to talk specifics about fender clearance, which seems to grow in importance for me. Not to mention my options with tires/sizes
If you're worried about these issues, why not get a cyclocross bike? It's not like you're racing and worried about every last ounce of weight. In fact, many CX bikes are fairly light and the benefits for a commuter rig are easily apparent: more fender clearance, sturdier build (frame & wheels), and often come with rack mounts.

Last edited by greenstork; 03-06-08 at 12:41 PM.
greenstork is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 12:04 PM
  #33  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
that was discussed earlier in the thread

I noted I was going to test out the Kona Jake. Which is still very much an option. the only thing I have against a cx is that I was to do some small level touring, so if I could find a bike that has that possibility then im set
harrison is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 12:22 PM
  #34  
greenstork's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by harrison
that was discussed earlier in the thread

I noted I was going to test out the Kona Jake. Which is still very much an option. the only thing I have against a cx is that I was to do some small level touring, so if I could find a bike that has that possibility then im set
If that's the case and you want to tour, then a traditional road bike is ill-suited for the task. Commuting is one thing, traveling under a heavy load is entirely another. The tubing of a road racing bike like an OCR2 (to say nothing of the chain stay length, fork rake & trail) is designed to be light (although the OC2 is an admittedly stable bike) -- that thing will turn into a slinky if you put weight on it. A CX bike is designed with sturdier tubing and therefore is better suited to carrying a load. Neither are ideal for touring but a CX bike is far better than a road racing bike.

Don't take my word for, go post over in the Touring forum about the possibility of touring on an OCR2 and see what they say. Most people will tell you that you'd be better off with another bike or a trailer, don't expect to carry anything more than 20 lbs. or so. In other words, good for small tours, far less than ideal:

https://www.bikeforums.net/touring/298328-buy-new-touring-bike-use-my-ocr2-road-bike.html

Last edited by greenstork; 03-06-08 at 12:42 PM.
greenstork is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 12:46 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA

Bikes: Giant OCR1

Originally Posted by greenstork
If you're worried about these issues, why not get a cyclocross bike? It's not like you're racing and worried about every last ounce of weight. In fact, many CX bikes are fairly light and the benefits for a commuter rig are easily apparent: more fender clearance, sturdier build (frame & wheels), and often come with rack mounts.
While I haven't test ridden a cyclocross bike yet, if I had was going to spend $1000 - $1500 again on a commuter/get-around/have-fun bicycle, I very well might go with a cyclocross or touring bicycle for the reasons you state. At the time I had just gotten tired of my old clunker, had a new job that paid considerably more than my previous line of work (Kinko's!), and basically decided one morning "it's time to spend $1000 on a new bicycle."

If I had been more careful in my considerations I might have ended up with something else, or maybe not. I pretty much fell in love with the way the OCR feels in the drop position almost immediately. Well, immediately after I convinced myself it was possible to steer with drop bars without killing myself.
vaticdart is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 01:14 PM
  #36  
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
I've been riding an OCR2 for about 4 years now and use it primarily for commuting. Depending on the route I take, my commute is 28-37 miles round trip (25% MUT, 75% neighborhood streets). I probably have 5-6k miles on it so far. It has its positive and negatives but over all I've been pretty happy with it. However, knowing what I know now (i.e. i don't really like road biking all that much) I probably would have gotten something different, probably a cyclocross bike.

The positives: At the time it was a pretty good value. Similarly spec'd bikes from other companies were $50-100 more. It's been pretty durable. The only things that have needed to be replaced were tires, brake pads, and the chain. Normal wear and tear stuff. It's a fairly stiff frame. When you mash on the pedals it goes. It has eyelets for fenders and/or racks (mine only has them on the rear but I think the current models have fork eyelets too). I use a rear rack and have used panniers in the past without any heel clearance issues. Handling is pretty stable. It rides like a bike.

The negatives: fender and tire clearance can be an issue. I'm running 28mm Pasela TGs with full fenders and there's just barely enough clearance. In fact, I probably shouldn't run anything bigger than 25mm tires, but i like the way the 28's ride. Ride quality with the stock tires was a bit rough but different tires and playing around with tire pressures made a big difference in comfort.

Overall it has been a good commuter for me. I'm not sure if the current model has more frame and fork clearance than mine, but if you don't plan on running anything bigger than a 25mm tire with fenders or 28mm tire without, you should be fine.
Planter is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 03:27 PM
  #37  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by greenstork
If that's the case and you want to tour, then a traditional road bike is ill-suited for the task. Commuting is one thing, traveling under a heavy load is entirely another. The tubing of a road racing bike like an OCR2 (to say nothing of the chain stay length, fork rake & trail) is designed to be light (although the OC2 is an admittedly stable bike) -- that thing will turn into a slinky if you put weight on it. A CX bike is designed with sturdier tubing and therefore is better suited to carrying a load. Neither are ideal for touring but a CX bike is far better than a road racing bike.

Don't take my word for, go post over in the Touring forum about the possibility of touring on an OCR2 and see what they say. Most people will tell you that you'd be better off with another bike or a trailer, don't expect to carry anything more than 20 lbs. or so. In other words, good for small tours, far less than ideal:

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=298328
hmmmm thanks for the heads up
harrison is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-08 | 03:30 PM
  #38  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Planter
I've been riding an OCR2 for about 4 years now and use it primarily for commuting. Depending on the route I take, my commute is 28-37 miles round trip (25% MUT, 75% neighborhood streets). I probably have 5-6k miles on it so far. It has its positive and negatives but over all I've been pretty happy with it. However, knowing what I know now (i.e. i don't really like road biking all that much) I probably would have gotten something different, probably a cyclocross bike.

The positives: At the time it was a pretty good value. Similarly spec'd bikes from other companies were $50-100 more. It's been pretty durable. The only things that have needed to be replaced were tires, brake pads, and the chain. Normal wear and tear stuff. It's a fairly stiff frame. When you mash on the pedals it goes. It has eyelets for fenders and/or racks (mine only has them on the rear but I think the current models have fork eyelets too). I use a rear rack and have used panniers in the past without any heel clearance issues. Handling is pretty stable. It rides like a bike.

The negatives: fender and tire clearance can be an issue. I'm running 28mm Pasela TGs with full fenders and there's just barely enough clearance. In fact, I probably shouldn't run anything bigger than 25mm tires, but i like the way the 28's ride. Ride quality with the stock tires was a bit rough but different tires and playing around with tire pressures made a big difference in comfort.

Overall it has been a good commuter for me. I'm not sure if the current model has more frame and fork clearance than mine, but if you don't plan on running anything bigger than a 25mm tire with fenders or 28mm tire without, you should be fine.
thanks a ton mate
harrison is offline  
Reply
Old 03-09-08 | 10:43 AM
  #39  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Lakefield, ON
I have a high mileage OCR that has turned out to be great. You get really good tire choices for a road bike due to the long reach brakes and the rear rack capabilities rock!
Rear fender installation is easy on this bike however the front is problematic with no eyelets. I clip a Zefal fender to the down tube when it's rainy which only works well if I'm going in a straight line. This bike makes a great commuter or credit card tourer though I agree that 20 or so pounds on the rack is the reasonable limit. As far as 'speed', if you can get low on the OCR then you'll find it's a very fast bike!
Tommy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-09-08 | 07:00 PM
  #40  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
thanks man!
harrison is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-08 | 11:03 AM
  #41  
X-LinkedRider's Avatar
Flying Under the Radar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
From: Northeast PA

Bikes: 10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc

Originally Posted by harrison
I have looked at the FCR series, I really really like what they have to offer, but what turned me onto the OCR is the fact that I will want to do some long distance rides/touring in the future. but those are awesome bikes, I think they are perfect for the price
Yeah, I mean they are all nice bikes. Especially if you love to ride. I actually plan on going cross country with mine. Leaving in just a month or so. Westbound. Should be a fun trip. Can learn more about the trip on my website/forums. Link is in my sig.
X-LinkedRider is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.