Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Rear rack for bike

Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Rear rack for bike

Old 05-03-08 | 10:25 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Rear rack for bike

Okay, so i went on my first long bike ride (about 50 miles) and i was wearing a backpack the whole way. Man the sweat mark i had was quite emberassing. So I was wondering, whats the best, preferably cheapest rack i can mount on the back of my bike, just so strap my backpack to with a bungee net.

I know at the target by my house, they have this but it seems like it might be kind of bad because its mounted to the seat post.

One of my LBS's has this but thats farther away.

So, are seat mounted on bike racks a bad idea?
jacob. is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 10:36 AM
  #2  
n00b-sauce
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Guymon, OK

Bikes: Cannondale Synapse SL 2, Trek 1000

I tried one for about a week before I threw it away. I found it near impossible to secure tightly enough. It was always swaying to one side or another.
YULitle is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 10:39 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
So should I probably go with just a normal rack than?
jacob. is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 10:42 AM
  #4  
n00b-sauce
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Guymon, OK

Bikes: Cannondale Synapse SL 2, Trek 1000

That's what I did, but you're the one buying it. Make sure your bike can handle a regular rear rack in the first place.
YULitle is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 10:43 AM
  #5  
cooker's Avatar
Prefers Cicero
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,860
Likes: 146
From: Toronto

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

A normal rack is better. The load is lower and less likely to sway. Also if you have a level top tube, the seat post rack rides too high under the seat making less room for your stuff on top. If you have a sloping top tube it's a little better since the seat post is longer and the rack rides a little lower. People say to avoid seat post racks if you have a carbon seat post.

You'll need to check if your bike has rack eyelets on the dropouts. Otherwise you'll need "P-clips" to attach to the seat stays.
cooker is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 10:46 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cooker
A normal rack is better. The load is lower and less likely to sway. Also if you have a level top tube, the seat post rack rides too high under the seat making less room for your stuff on top. If you have a sloping top tube it's a little better since the seat post is longer and the rack rides a little lower. People say to avoid seat post racks if you have a carbon seat post.

You'll need to check if your bike has rack eyelets on the dropouts. Otherwise you'll need "P-clips" to attach to the seat stays.
I'm pretty sure I remember it having the eyelets for a rack.
jacob. is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 10:46 AM
  #7  
Andy_K's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,095
Likes: 4,721
From: Beaverton, OR

Bikes: Yes

If you have the holes to mount it, and maybe even if you don't, a normal rack is definitely the way to go. Performance bike has theirs on sale for $20 if you can wait for it to be shipped to you.

https://www.performancebike.com/shop/...tegory_ID=2325

I've got to say, if you can ride 50 miles, even without a backpack, and not have a big old sweat mark, then you're in much better shape than I am. When I ride 50 miles, I don't worry about the sweat. Still, I wouldn't want to do it with a backpack.
Andy_K is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 11:11 AM
  #8  
no motor?'s Avatar
Unlisted member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,192
Likes: 435
From: Chicagoland

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock

Originally Posted by cooker
A normal rack is better. The load is lower and less likely to sway. Also if you have a level top tube, the seat post rack rides too high under the seat making less room for your stuff on top. If you have a sloping top tube it's a little better since the seat post is longer and the rack rides a little lower. People say to avoid seat post racks if you have a carbon seat post.

You'll need to check if your bike has rack eyelets on the dropouts. Otherwise you'll need "P-clips" to attach to the seat stays.
I learned all this the hard way, he's right. The lower height of the rear rack makes it easier to get at the in the bag and makes the bicycle more stable. And it's easier to get on and off when the bag is lower.
no motor? is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 11:42 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Andy_K
If you have the holes to mount it, and maybe even if you don't, a normal rack is definitely the way to go. Performance bike has theirs on sale for $20 if you can wait for it to be shipped to you.

https://www.performancebike.com/shop/...tegory_ID=2325

I've got to say, if you can ride 50 miles, even without a backpack, and not have a big old sweat mark, then you're in much better shape than I am. When I ride 50 miles, I don't worry about the sweat. Still, I wouldn't want to do it with a backpack.
Yeah, I was surprised, that the only places i was sweating was where the backpack contacted my body. I usually sweat an unbelievable amount. And my shoulders started gettin real soar from the backpack as well. Which is why i want a rack.
jacob. is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 01:54 PM
  #10  
n4zou's Avatar
Scott
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,393
Likes: 1

Bikes: Too Many

nashbar.com has one on sale for $16
n4zou is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 08:17 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Rack
Trunk

Thats what I'm gettin. Thats absolutely perfect for me.
jacob. is offline  
Reply
Old 05-03-08 | 09:05 PM
  #12  
cooker's Avatar
Prefers Cicero
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,860
Likes: 146
From: Toronto

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Looks good.
cooker is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.