Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

LHT or crosscheck?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.
View Poll Results: lht or cc?
long haul trucker
44
61.97%
cross check
27
38.03%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

LHT or crosscheck?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-08, 09:34 AM
  #26  
jpdesjar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I love my steamroller for my commute. I like to keep a pretty clutter free bike but might consider putting a rack on the front for the summer rides so I can avoid the dreaded sweaty pack back.

Surly makes some really nice frames. It is really forgiving on bumps which there are many on my route in to work.
I am getting all steamy just thinking about riding it again.

I saw a lot of Surly bikes in Burlinton, VT this past weekend. I think I saw one of every bike they make. I know I spotted a few cross checks and at least one steamer.
Go ride some!
 
Old 05-06-08, 10:15 AM
  #27  
Bike Nerd
 
Mr. Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mid- Michigan
Posts: 579

Bikes: mid 80's Fuji Supreme (commuter), LeRun unicycle thingy Raleigh Centrurion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by climbhoser
Mr. Jim,

I think the Xcheck is a good do all bike. I think what you're seeing is that everyone's happy with what they decided to get.

I am VERY happy to have the Xcheck. I ride over 30 miles a day on my commute, do kiddie hauling, change it from geared to single speed for winter riding, and even doing some light tours. I have average feet, size 9, and I never have heel strike nor do I have toe overlap unless I use fenders.

The ONE thing I wish the Xcheck had, and it's still in no way a deal breaker, is lowrider braze ons on the fork for a little bit more "involved" touring. As it is I can still put a solid front rack on there and do a front rack bag, but I can't do panniers (that I've found, but I'm open to ideas) on the front. So, I do a front rack bafg, a handlebar bag, rear panniers and I stack the rear rack, and then do a frame bag and I'm set!

Good for at least a few nights, depending on how smelly I'm ok with getting and how much money I can accept spending on food instead of cooking it.

I like it because it's so zippy feeling, and because I like to race 'cross in the fall, and because I like making it a single speed for the winter as I abhor dérailleur duty on a daily basis. The LHT is great, but it's more like a cruise ship where the Crosscheck is a cabin cruiser. The cruise ship is great, but it's a bit more slow feeling to me and not as nice if you want to do just pure road riding a lot with it. Light touring is my last priority, whereas commuting is #1 for me, and going on fun rides is #2.

I could go on forever, but you get the idea...try them both and decide which one feels better to ride and go from there. However, if loaded touring is #1 for you, then don't even question it and get the LHT.
Thanks I think that helps me out, Your riding style and bike use is much like mine and for that the Cross check is probably the better choice, this was my first instinct, but all the LHT had clouded the issue for me. Now if George would get me my stimulus check we might have a new bike to get set up
Mr. Jim is offline  
Old 05-06-08, 12:54 PM
  #28  
Back after a long absence
 
joelpalmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 603

Bikes: 1974 Schwinn Speedster 3-speed, Raleigh Super Course

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Cyclaholic
There's the LHT, then there's everything else trying to be as good.
+1

(see sig)
joelpalmer is offline  
Old 05-06-08, 01:23 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 72
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I chose the LHT for the following reasons:
- Better complete bike spec for my needs with triple crank, wider range cassette, wider rims, and 36H spoked wheels.
- It will never be a ss/fixed-gear, so I'd rather have the vertical dropouts.
- The longer chainstays, since I have size 14 feet, to prevent heel strike with panniers.

Other little pluses:
- Pump peg
- 3rd water bottle mount
- fork rack mounts

I am also toying with the idea of doing some touring, but others have said the cross-check is quite capable of touring as well.
habcup is offline  
Old 05-06-08, 01:40 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: CO
Posts: 505

Bikes: Gunnar Hyper XF, Jamis Dragon Race, Surly LHT

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 9 Posts
Will you use panniers? If so, the LHT is probably longer and more likely will leave you with the panniers positioned back far enough to avoid heel strike.

I use my LHT for everything from quick trips down the street to a 44 mile RT commute. I have it set up with a flat bar and bar ends, plus a rack an REI Transit panniers. It's fast, comfortable, and incredibly utilitarian.
KeatonR is offline  
Old 05-06-08, 02:09 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CliftonGK1
If you don't mind carrying your stuff in a backpack or courier bag, since there's no rack brazes on the Pacer.
The Cross Check is only 0.5 pounds heavier for the frame and fork, has rack and fender brazes (in back; fender only up front), and clears much wider tires. (The Pacer can only take 32mm without and 28mm tires w/ fenders, so no studs in the winter.)
Since I have a Pacer. Yes, you can put a rack on the back using P-clips. Any better hardware store will have them, or can order them for you. These fit around the seat stays, up around where they are brazed to the seat tube. The Pacer has a single, threaded, braze-on at the dropouts, for fender attachment. On mine, I using it for both fender and rack attachment. Alternately, you can use a seatpost, clamp-on type rack, so that is really a non-issue.

Don't see the original poster needing studded tires in Hawaii. Spring for the big bucks and put some Michelin ProRace2 25-700c on there. Like clouds they are, yet in no way sluggish. Cheaper now that they have come out with the ProRace3.
Staggerwing is offline  
Old 05-06-08, 02:24 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
CliftonGK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375

Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Staggerwing
Since I have a Pacer. Yes, you can put a rack on the back using P-clips. Any better hardware store will have them, or can order them for you. These fit around the seat stays, up around where they are brazed to the seat tube. The Pacer has a single, threaded, braze-on at the dropouts, for fender attachment. On mine, I using it for both fender and rack attachment. Alternately, you can use a seatpost, clamp-on type rack, so that is really a non-issue.
Sure, you can use P-clips or other rack adapter kits to put almost any rack on nearly any bike. There's the seatpost rack option (which can't handle as much weight as a regular rack setup). There's workarounds for just about any situation.

I think the question is why, in a poll where the choices are "A" or "B", did someone answer "C"?
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
CliftonGK1 is offline  
Old 05-06-08, 02:25 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
climbhoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 1,654

Bikes: SS Surly Crosscheck; '91 Cannondale 3.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KeatonR
Will you use panniers? If so, the LHT is probably longer and more likely will leave you with the panniers positioned back far enough to avoid heel strike.
I use panniers on my Crosscheck and it's a non-issue.
climbhoser is offline  
Old 05-06-08, 03:28 PM
  #34  
Bike Nerd
 
Mr. Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mid- Michigan
Posts: 579

Bikes: mid 80's Fuji Supreme (commuter), LeRun unicycle thingy Raleigh Centrurion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by climbhoser
I use panniers on my Crosscheck and it's a non-issue.
I buy shoes in the children's dept, not really worried about heel strike much Hard part is finding bike shoes in a 7.5 EE
Mr. Jim is offline  
Old 05-06-08, 03:36 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
climbhoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 1,654

Bikes: SS Surly Crosscheck; '91 Cannondale 3.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Jim
I buy shoes in the children's dept, not really worried about heel strike much Hard part is finding bike shoes in a 7.5 EE

Is it as hard as finding shoes in 9 EEEE? Wearing some Allen Edmonds EEEs right now, and just got done ordering some Lake MX165s in their wide. I hope it's wide enough

BTW, Lake shoes are awesome for paddlefoots. I feel your pain.
climbhoser is offline  
Old 05-06-08, 07:35 PM
  #36  
or tarckeemoon, depending
 
marqueemoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the pesto of cities
Posts: 7,017

Bikes: Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The Long Haul Trucker rides like it's on rails. If we're talking complete bikes it's a nicer spec.

That said, I own a Cross Check. I don't need touring bike handling for my application.

If I were building up a geared commuting bike today it would be a Kona ***** Tonk. No question.
marqueemoon is offline  
Old 05-08-08, 09:30 AM
  #37  
CRIKEY!!!!!!!
 
Cyclaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: all the way down under
Posts: 4,276

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1589 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times in 365 Posts
Wow, so much Surly love out there. The sad thing is that in my many thousands of miles on the LHT I've never ever seen another one on the road .... and not for lack of looking either, I'm the type that sees a hot lady on a nice bike and think "mmmm, nice bike"

Honestly, I think you'll be happy as a pig in poo with either one. I think getting the right frame size and setting it up for a good fit is a bazillion times more critical than the differences in frame geometries between the two models.
__________________
"Surely one can love his own country without becoming hopelessly lost in an all-consuming flame of narrow-minded nationalism" - Fred Birchmore
Cyclaholic is offline  
Old 05-08-08, 09:49 AM
  #38  
Reeks of aged cotton duck
 
Hydrated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Middle Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,176

Bikes: 2008 Kogswell PR mkII, 1976 Raleigh Professional, 1996 Serotta Atlanta, 1984 Trek 520, 1979 Raleigh Comp GS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Get both.

I'm serious... I'm getting ready to take the plunge on some new wheels, and I can see myself ending up with both a LHT and a Crosscheck before it's all said and done.

My problem is deciding which one to get first...
Hydrated is offline  
Old 07-22-08, 09:27 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Time to fish this thread from the depths. =)

I bought a used LHT frame that I custom powder coated (light blue). I am also building it up as strictly a commuter for the toughness it has. I debated heavily between an LHT and a Xcheck but I thought the LHT frame was so much more versatile plus I LOVED the feel of the ride of the stock bike at the LBS. It really does feel like a cadillac. I'm wondering how this type of build will feel. I supposed it will be the perfect Randoneer (sp?) It's kind of an experiment you could say.

It will have Easton EA70's and a Double chaing ring, STI shifter, 35mm Schwalbe Marathon XR's, etc. IE an "LHT Commuter". I will post pics up here when it's done. I would imagine there are others as curious to see it as much as I am. =)
BoiseShwin is offline  
Old 07-23-08, 09:24 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 434
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Anyone try putting a LHT fork on a X-Check? Are the forks different enough in rake to net a handling change?
availpunk9 is offline  
Old 07-23-08, 10:23 AM
  #41  
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
I would buy a Soma. A better frame using better tubing from a better factory. Soma makes both a Touring and a Cyclocross frame.

Michael
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 07-23-08, 10:45 AM
  #42  
Nerd
 
girljen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wheat Ridge, CO
Posts: 450

Bikes: K2 T-9 Crosswind

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by climbhoser
Mr. Jim,

I think the Xcheck is a good do all bike. I think what you're seeing is that everyone's happy with what they decided to get.

I am VERY happy to have the Xcheck. I ride over 30 miles a day on my commute, do kiddie hauling, change it from geared to single speed for winter riding, and even doing some light tours. I have average feet, size 9, and I never have heel strike nor do I have toe overlap unless I use fenders.
You don't know it, but you just answered the one question I had about LHT vs. CC! I've wanted a CC for a long time, but was thinking that maybe I should go with a LHT so I could haul my kid (and diaper bag, and groceries...) in the trailer. But if the CC works well for that, I'm down. Thanks!
girljen is offline  
Old 07-23-08, 11:08 AM
  #43  
An Army of Fred
 
harleyfrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lost South of Nowhere East of Edan On the Waterfront Far from the Madding Crowd (Biloxi, MS)
Posts: 1,003

Bikes: 1992 Specialized Crossroads Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Following the classic Bike Ownership Equation (n+1), I'm thinking a lot of what my next commuter bike will be. I've been debating between a cyclo-cross and a touring bike. Given what I've researched so far and knowing what future events are planned (i.e., a new campus, five miles further ride one way), I'm leaning more towards the LHT over the X-Check or even the Tricross. Main reason being distance. The roads I ride are pretty light, traffic-wise, as well as straight, but currently not all of them (hell, none) are smooth. In fact, one stretch has been torn up for construction and is basically a rutted, pot-holed, hardpack and crushed limestone. Granted the X-Check would do well, I'd like a little more relaxed geometry and longer chainstays for panniers (plus the option of front racks, if I decide to tour or do brevets).
harleyfrog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.