Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Rolling hills are would these be considered hills

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Rolling hills are would these be considered hills

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-08 | 11:30 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Portland
Rolling hills are would these be considered hills

So I would like to know how my profile looks to other more experienced riders. Are these rolling hills or would some of these be considered actual hills that require some work for other riders.

I used to have to work really hard on a couple of them but now I only really get my heart rate up and my legs feel it on the larger one. I no longer have to use my easiest gears to pedal in and I am on my large ring for most of the ride except a couple of what I still consider to be my hills. My average speeds are around 14-15mph. Well in the morning it is 15.5mph since i get to go down them. I have a double 53/39 with a 11-25 on the back.
Attached Images
WickedShark is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-08 | 11:53 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,369
Likes: 0
From: Reston, VA

Bikes: 2003 Giant OCR2

I don't know, a couple of them look decent. Of course, you have one option - if it's too easy at 14mph, it won't be at 20mph.
Mr. Underbridge is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-08 | 12:05 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Portland
Originally Posted by Mr. Underbridge
I don't know, a couple of them look decent. Of course, you have one option - if it's too easy at 14mph, it won't be at 20mph.

The two large hills I am actualy only doing between 10-12mph. On some of the other parts I am averaging like 20+ which is why my average is around above 15mph sometimes. It takes me around 50 minutes on the way home and around 45 on the way to work to make this trip of actual riding time. I am also very new to riding and have only been riding for a little over a month or so.

Last edited by WickedShark; 08-06-08 at 12:14 PM.
WickedShark is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-08 | 12:43 PM
  #4  
Little Darwin's Avatar
The Improbable Bulk
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,379
Likes: 7
From: Wilkes-Barre, PA

Bikes: Many

Sometimes definitions vary depending on where you are riding.

Where I live, those are probably rollers.

In Florida, they are mountains.

In Portland, I don't know.

I live on what I consider a gentle slope, and when I realized my frontage is 300 feet, and rises a little over 30 feet, the math works out to over a 10% grade... What people here call flat, people in other parts of the country call rolling hills... so you probably have a couple of real hills there.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Little Darwin is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-08 | 01:25 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Morro Bay, CA
reminds me of the movie "The Englishman Who Went Up a Hill..." Why should it matter what other people call your hills? Sounds to me like you're getting a fine workout.
JMRobertson is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-08 | 01:30 PM
  #6  
maddyfish's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 0
From: Ky. and FL.

Bikes: KHS steel SS

The biggest is 110 feet of 3/4 mile or so, I'd call those rollers. But it doesn't matter what we call them. If you want to work on your hill climbing, maybe you can use a different route with more hills? Or just decide that you will hold X speed (faster than you do now) up the hills. Add 1 mph to X every week.
maddyfish is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-08 | 01:41 PM
  #7  
apricissimus's Avatar
L T X B O M P F A N S R
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 5
From: Malden, MA

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, Bianchi San Jose, Redline 925

I'm still unclear exactly what "rolling" hills are. I'm sure there's no precise definition, but I totally in the dark as to whether the hills I ride roll or not.

P.S. The title of this thread is like poetry.
apricissimus is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-08 | 01:46 PM
  #8  
leadchucker's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: foothills near Sacramento, CA

Bikes: trek fx

Originally Posted by apricissimus
.... whether the hills I ride roll or not.
The real question is - do they rock?

Sorry, couldn't help myself!
leadchucker is offline  
Reply
Old 08-07-08 | 09:29 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Portland
Originally Posted by leadchucker
The real question is - do they rock?

Sorry, couldn't help myself!
Yes we do not have to many rocking hills in Oregon.

The two larger hills are tough for me still. Although I am much stronger now as compared to when I started those two hills are still very tough for me. I do not use my easiest gears. I usually have two more gears I can switch to but all that seems to do is rasie my heart rate more. On the first hill I can average around 9mph and my heart rate will reach 175 or so at the top. The second hill my heart does not quite get that high but still around 170 and I average around 11mph. I need to go start climbing larger hills to build my strength and stamina for hill clmbing I guess.
WickedShark is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.