Trek 7.2 vs trek 4500
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Trek 7.2 vs trek 4500
I am looking for a bike to commute around campus in the $500 price range.
The rough will be somewhat rough, with gravel, grass, and bumps. What drew me to the 4500 was the front suspension, but it did seem heavy at the shop. WOuld the 7.2 have a better performance and be faster in these conditions? Are they of comparable quality?
Thanks, and suggestions are welcome.
The rough will be somewhat rough, with gravel, grass, and bumps. What drew me to the 4500 was the front suspension, but it did seem heavy at the shop. WOuld the 7.2 have a better performance and be faster in these conditions? Are they of comparable quality?
Thanks, and suggestions are welcome.
#3
Professional Genious
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis Mo Area
Bikes: 1999ish Giant Rincon, 2004 Trek 4900
I have a 2004 4900, similar, I think to the 4500 thats on the market now. I think it works great, and I take it on the dirt trails for fun on the weekends. I think its great, not really too heavy for me.
#4
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
There will be mainly pavement and asphalt, but I may have to cut accross grass and gravel daily on the way home. I was settled for the 4500 but I heard it is kind of slow, I would rather have something faster and slick. Quality wise, how do the two match up?
#5
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
If you're gonna stick on campus & ride on the street, sidewalks, & asphalt, I'd go with the 7.2. My wife has a 7.2 & it's quick, light, & a great ride.
You won't need shocks if you're gonna stick to pavement, which suprised me when I upgraded from my 820. They're really not necessary & only add weight.
If you're gonna hit a few dirt trails, I'd go for the shocks, but otherwise the 7.2 is a GREAT buy.
You won't need shocks if you're gonna stick to pavement, which suprised me when I upgraded from my 820. They're really not necessary & only add weight.
If you're gonna hit a few dirt trails, I'd go for the shocks, but otherwise the 7.2 is a GREAT buy.
#11
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
What are you talking about? They are asking for $499 on the 7.2 , $559 for the 4500, and $629 on the 7.3 fx (which is way out if my range). Are those reasonable prices?
I don't think they will be budging on the price any time soon. I was trying to negotiate on the 4500 the other day and the guy was like, "Noo, we are not really looking to dump these out." I asked for tax free, best price, free accessories and the only thing I got was 10% on fenders. Maybe I am a bad negotiator, but they are not giving any cuts as I see it.
I don't think they will be budging on the price any time soon. I was trying to negotiate on the 4500 the other day and the guy was like, "Noo, we are not really looking to dump these out." I asked for tax free, best price, free accessories and the only thing I got was 10% on fenders. Maybe I am a bad negotiator, but they are not giving any cuts as I see it.
#12
I have a 4500 and a 7.5fx. I ride the 7.5 to work on rough roads, gravel and grass with no problems. I use the 4500 when I mountain bike (not often) and really don’t care for it much. The components are crap. The derailleur hesitates when sifting, the brakes suck and the crank arms fallen off a few times. But if you inflate the tires you can get some speed on it. I loaned it to a friend who hasn’t biked for a while and he kept up on a 15mph average, but exerted a lot more energy doing so. I got a great deal on both bikes and had to take them. The 7.5 was 500$ and the 4500 was 350$.
#14
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, VA
Bikes: Jamis Aurora Elite (2011); Trek 520 (2006); Specialized Globe (2005); Lemond Zurich (2003)




