Single-speed commuting in San Francisco?
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Single-speed commuting in San Francisco?
My old bike got jacked a couple months ago so I've been taking the train to work, but I'm itching to get a new bike to commute again. My semi-hipster friend (cause you can only be so hipster as a corporate lawyer) is trying to convince me to get a single-speed bike to replace it, saying they're lighter, faster, and much more fun to ride. On that note, I've got a couple questions:
- Is it a good idea to buy a single-speed in a city as hilly as San Francisco? (My commute path is pretty flat, but I hope to ride around the city generally.)
- Can anyone recommend a good single-speed bike for <$500? I've heard great things about the Redline 925, but there are so many bike brands out there, it's hard to choose!
Much thanks in advance!
- Is it a good idea to buy a single-speed in a city as hilly as San Francisco? (My commute path is pretty flat, but I hope to ride around the city generally.)
- Can anyone recommend a good single-speed bike for <$500? I've heard great things about the Redline 925, but there are so many bike brands out there, it's hard to choose!
Much thanks in advance!
#2
My old bike got jacked a couple months ago so I've been taking the train to work, but I'm itching to get a new bike to commute again. My semi-hipster friend (cause you can only be so hipster as a corporate lawyer) is trying to convince me to get a single-speed bike to replace it, saying they're lighter, faster, and much more fun to ride. On that note, I've got a couple questions:
- Is it a good idea to buy a single-speed in a city as hilly as San Francisco? (My commute path is pretty flat, but I hope to ride around the city generally.)
- Can anyone recommend a good single-speed bike for <$500? I've heard great things about the Redline 925, but there are so many bike brands out there, it's hard to choose!
Much thanks in advance!
- Is it a good idea to buy a single-speed in a city as hilly as San Francisco? (My commute path is pretty flat, but I hope to ride around the city generally.)
- Can anyone recommend a good single-speed bike for <$500? I've heard great things about the Redline 925, but there are so many bike brands out there, it's hard to choose!
Much thanks in advance!
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 633
Likes: 1
From: Pittsfield, MA
Bikes: Motobecane Fantom Cross 2008 Schwinn Super Sport 1972 SS. Surly Pacer Rando bike
I love the 925, but I ended up with a 72 Schwinn Super Sport that I converted. Much more fun, and far cheaper. Just had to find the right one for me. Good luck!
#5
I commute every day on a singlespeed, and my office is on the exact opposite side of nob hill from me. Since its fairly easy to get around the hill (skirting it to the south past union square), I have no problems. If I lived at the top of a hill, it would be a different story.
That said, I'm building an IGH wheel b/c I want more access to parts of the city that are off-limits on a SS.
That said, I'm building an IGH wheel b/c I want more access to parts of the city that are off-limits on a SS.
#6
aka Tom Reingold




Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,231
Likes: 6,488
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
I'm a strong rider, so I don't have to shift often. I sometimes challenge myself to take a whole hilly ride in one gear. I can manage.
But I am not taking the gears off my bike. When I want them, they're there.
And I do not see the appeal of single-speed freewheeling bikes. I don't know if I ever will. They look nice, sure. They're lighter, but their light weight does not make climbing hills as easy as it is with a heavy bike with low gears, so forget that.
It's a fad.
San Francisco is insanely hilly. I am astonished that people thought it would be a good idea to build a city there.
If you ride San Francisco up those crazy hills without shifting gears, you'll get strong. Then one day, you'll be dead tired and will curse your decision which may have been based on machismo more than anything else.
But I am not taking the gears off my bike. When I want them, they're there.
And I do not see the appeal of single-speed freewheeling bikes. I don't know if I ever will. They look nice, sure. They're lighter, but their light weight does not make climbing hills as easy as it is with a heavy bike with low gears, so forget that.
It's a fad.
San Francisco is insanely hilly. I am astonished that people thought it would be a good idea to build a city there.
If you ride San Francisco up those crazy hills without shifting gears, you'll get strong. Then one day, you'll be dead tired and will curse your decision which may have been based on machismo more than anything else.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#7
I did messenger work in SF. And I use a singlespeed for interval training on hills. But I don't agree with your friend!
Riding the city without gears means either going miles out of your way to avoid the steeper hills - and accepting some addresses as being unobtainable - or messing up your knees. Option 1 is pure fakenger - opting for reduced functionality for "style". Option 2 is just stupid - although I suppose your friend at least has good medical benefits. (I suppose there is an option 3 as well, which is having a SS geared to climb hills and be useless on the flats.)
For $500 the best bike you could get for riding SF would be something like an early 90's rigid fork cromolly Kona or Specialized, fitted with 1.5 slicks. The longer top tubes of this generation of MTBs gives them excellent speed, they can winch themselves up mountains, the slicks laugh at tram tracks and combine with the high power brakes to give excellent stopping power, and the frames are as good or better than modern $2000 boutique hardtails. $250 would buy the bike with $250 in reserve for fixing up the bike. Buy on ebay with paypal and get condition stipulated in detail - ebay sides heavily with buyers in disputes these days. Or to be really funky, convert the bike to a 26'' crosser with drops.
Riding the city without gears means either going miles out of your way to avoid the steeper hills - and accepting some addresses as being unobtainable - or messing up your knees. Option 1 is pure fakenger - opting for reduced functionality for "style". Option 2 is just stupid - although I suppose your friend at least has good medical benefits. (I suppose there is an option 3 as well, which is having a SS geared to climb hills and be useless on the flats.)
For $500 the best bike you could get for riding SF would be something like an early 90's rigid fork cromolly Kona or Specialized, fitted with 1.5 slicks. The longer top tubes of this generation of MTBs gives them excellent speed, they can winch themselves up mountains, the slicks laugh at tram tracks and combine with the high power brakes to give excellent stopping power, and the frames are as good or better than modern $2000 boutique hardtails. $250 would buy the bike with $250 in reserve for fixing up the bike. Buy on ebay with paypal and get condition stipulated in detail - ebay sides heavily with buyers in disputes these days. Or to be really funky, convert the bike to a 26'' crosser with drops.
#8
Junior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
I commute every day on a singlespeed, and my office is on the exact opposite side of nob hill from me. Since its fairly easy to get around the hill (skirting it to the south past union square), I have no problems. If I lived at the top of a hill, it would be a different story.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Bikes: 2000 LeMond Buenos Aires / 1996 LeMond Alpe d'Huez / 2009 Scott Scale 60
I can't help you much on this one, i'm also trying to decide (gears or no gears). I don't have the hills you have (Madison WI) but it might be nice to have the option just in case.
Less then $500 you might want to keep an eye on craigslist (look for a bianchi)
heck buy something cheap geard and play around with it. Ride in one gear for a couple weeks and if you think that is your calling then buy a conversion kit to single speed.
Less then $500 you might want to keep an eye on craigslist (look for a bianchi)
heck buy something cheap geard and play around with it. Ride in one gear for a couple weeks and if you think that is your calling then buy a conversion kit to single speed.






