Is Cyclo-Commute your fastest option?
#1
Is Cyclo-Commute your fastest option?
For me, my fastest option is probably by the subway. Can't argue with travelling at 80kph on a dedicated rail. After that, it's a toss up b/t car and bike. The road traffic here can be snarly. In that case, commuting by car is not much faster and sometimes I think it may be slower.
So for me the fastest is
1) Subway
2) Tie b/t Car and Bike.
3) Bus
How about you?
So for me the fastest is
1) Subway
2) Tie b/t Car and Bike.
3) Bus
How about you?
#3
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 356
Likes: 1
drive car , but by only a few minutes
th en bike
bus, but with all the waiting for the bus to come a ridiculous option
personally i prefer the bike routine as i feel safer going at my own speed, and having the peace of mind that if i break down with the bike i can fix it in short order usually.
th en bike
bus, but with all the waiting for the bus to come a ridiculous option
personally i prefer the bike routine as i feel safer going at my own speed, and having the peace of mind that if i break down with the bike i can fix it in short order usually.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Searcher GS, 2007 Dahon Curve D3
Well, for me, there are a lot of factors.
1) If I leave at 5:30 AM, the car is probably the fastest, I can make it in probably 50 minutes. But I can't seem to regularly get up that early.
(tie) 1) If I get a ride to the train station from my wife, I can make it in 50 minutes
2) If I leave at 8 AM, the car is usually fastest, but sometimes I'm late due to traffic, construction, etc. So I don't do this often.
3) If I ride to the train station, it takes about an hour, but this doesn't vary with traffic or rush hour. Also, the time on the train is "free" I can sleep, read, talk to people, whatever. So this is preferable to a shorter commute by car. No risk of wear & tear on the car or car accidents.
4) If I drive during rush hour, it takes 90 minutes and I'm cranky when I get to work. This is the absolute last resort. (if I've missed my last train that will get me in on time)
To add to that, there are express trains and regular trains. So for me, it is more about how I prefer to travel than the duration of the commute.
1) If I leave at 5:30 AM, the car is probably the fastest, I can make it in probably 50 minutes. But I can't seem to regularly get up that early.
(tie) 1) If I get a ride to the train station from my wife, I can make it in 50 minutes
2) If I leave at 8 AM, the car is usually fastest, but sometimes I'm late due to traffic, construction, etc. So I don't do this often.
3) If I ride to the train station, it takes about an hour, but this doesn't vary with traffic or rush hour. Also, the time on the train is "free" I can sleep, read, talk to people, whatever. So this is preferable to a shorter commute by car. No risk of wear & tear on the car or car accidents.
4) If I drive during rush hour, it takes 90 minutes and I'm cranky when I get to work. This is the absolute last resort. (if I've missed my last train that will get me in on time)
To add to that, there are express trains and regular trains. So for me, it is more about how I prefer to travel than the duration of the commute.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 1
From: Boise, ID.
1) Driving. 15ish minutes.
2) Cycling. 35-55 minutes depending on the weather, my route, and how hungover I am.
3) Bus. Haven't actually tried this one. I just know to get to my job I'd have to do two transfers, which according to the schedule would take around 2 hours.
2) Cycling. 35-55 minutes depending on the weather, my route, and how hungover I am.
3) Bus. Haven't actually tried this one. I just know to get to my job I'd have to do two transfers, which according to the schedule would take around 2 hours.
#7
Primate
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 5
From: gone
Bikes: Concorde Columbus SL, Rocky Mountain Edge, Sparta stadfiets
I can ride the same speed as the trams here, but with no waiting, and the ride is door-to-door. Both are faster than cars, which get low priority in urban areas.
#8
Bike: 40 minutes average
Subway + bus: 40 minutes minimum, usually more like 1h, often longer due to problems.
Driving: out of question! I'm not driving to Manhattan during rush hours, period. You've got to be nuts to do that. Caged? No, thanks.
Subway + bus: 40 minutes minimum, usually more like 1h, often longer due to problems.
Driving: out of question! I'm not driving to Manhattan during rush hours, period. You've got to be nuts to do that. Caged? No, thanks.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
1: car
2) bike
3- walk
[4] bus
1.5 miles with 4 lights. One crosses a major road, and usually is red, two more never change, and the last one is where I make a left and am about 100m from my office. By only stopping twice on a 40mph road, the car is pretty quick.
Public transit basically doesn't exist. It runs in the opposite direction from work
2) bike
3- walk
[4] bus
1.5 miles with 4 lights. One crosses a major road, and usually is red, two more never change, and the last one is where I make a left and am about 100m from my office. By only stopping twice on a 40mph road, the car is pretty quick.
Public transit basically doesn't exist. It runs in the opposite direction from work
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
I live in New York.
I am definitely fastest on my bike, but only by a small margin vs. the bus. The margin widens outside of normal rush hour though; the bus I take runs far less often off peak. Of course, the bus can be less stressful than riding on NYC streets sometimes...
The subway would be much faster, were it not for the fact that I need a transfer (and an inconvenient one at that). If they ever finished the 2nd Ave line the subway would take the lead.
I am definitely fastest on my bike, but only by a small margin vs. the bus. The margin widens outside of normal rush hour though; the bus I take runs far less often off peak. Of course, the bus can be less stressful than riding on NYC streets sometimes...
The subway would be much faster, were it not for the fact that I need a transfer (and an inconvenient one at that). If they ever finished the 2nd Ave line the subway would take the lead.
#12
Señior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Drive: 18 minutes
Bike: 35 to 50 minutes depending on season
Walk: 3 hours
Those are the choices here. 90% rural with no traffic or reason to slow down at all, I get in my car, get up to 50 MPH and stay there most of the way until I get to work. Bike is only faster if there are a lot of reasons that a car would have to stop.
Bike: 35 to 50 minutes depending on season
Walk: 3 hours
Those are the choices here. 90% rural with no traffic or reason to slow down at all, I get in my car, get up to 50 MPH and stay there most of the way until I get to work. Bike is only faster if there are a lot of reasons that a car would have to stop.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Canada
In summer, biking is the fastest option at 10 minutes. Well, actual road time is the same as a car (I sometimes get caught by all the same lights as coworkers driving a similar route). But in order to match the bike time to the car time, I'd have to pay $200 to park in the same parkade where I have a free bike rack. Additionally, most of the car stalls are on lower levels, so I get a time advantage in getting to my bike and getting it up to the surface.
The bus isn't terrible. In winter, the bus is pretty similar to the bike (15-20 minutes), except that it's unpredictable when it'll come. Leaving at exactly the same time can give me anything from "walk straight onto the bus" to "wait 15 minutes and be late for work."
I can also walk in 30-35 minutes.
I'm about 2 blocks from a proposed light rail route, to be built at some point in the next 6 years, which might be faster. However, I intend to move in 3-4 years (once my wife is finished law school), so I may never get a chance to compare those options for speed.
The bus isn't terrible. In winter, the bus is pretty similar to the bike (15-20 minutes), except that it's unpredictable when it'll come. Leaving at exactly the same time can give me anything from "walk straight onto the bus" to "wait 15 minutes and be late for work."
I can also walk in 30-35 minutes.
I'm about 2 blocks from a proposed light rail route, to be built at some point in the next 6 years, which might be faster. However, I intend to move in 3-4 years (once my wife is finished law school), so I may never get a chance to compare those options for speed.
Last edited by neil; 05-11-10 at 04:27 PM.
#14
Full Member

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
#16
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
My commute is about 10 min on bike. I can do it around 6 or 7 min if I blow some lights and get there sweaty. It takes at least 12 min by car. Or 45 min walking. Bus would probably take an hour because I don't know the schedule.
#17
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,484
Likes: 4,891
From: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, 86 De Rosa Pro, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Now (5 mile commute one way) local streets, no...car is faster but only about 10 minutes depending on catching lights.
a number of year back withh an 8 mile one way commute, the bike was faster. by 5 to 10 minutes.as the traffic was horrrible (first street/ Tasman ave for San Jose types)
a number of year back withh an 8 mile one way commute, the bike was faster. by 5 to 10 minutes.as the traffic was horrrible (first street/ Tasman ave for San Jose types)
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
#18
Junior Mint
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge, MA
Bikes: Trek 830
For me, driving is like 15 minutes, bike 20. Subway 30-35, bus 40. Public transit loses because of the time to walk to and from stations. Car is fastest, but most stressful, so most days it's bike.
#19
Morning
1) Car 20 minutes ($16 to park)
2) Car/subway 40 minutes ($4.50 to park)
3) Bike 1 hour: includes shower & change ($30/month gym membership)
Evening
1) Car 30-45 minutes
2) Subway/Car 40 minutes
3) Bike 1 hour: includes walk to gym to change
1) Car 20 minutes ($16 to park)
2) Car/subway 40 minutes ($4.50 to park)
3) Bike 1 hour: includes shower & change ($30/month gym membership)
Evening
1) Car 30-45 minutes
2) Subway/Car 40 minutes
3) Bike 1 hour: includes walk to gym to change
#20
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Wayne, PA
Bikes: Diamondback Insight 1
1) Train (I'm pretty sure at least)
2) Car
3) Bike
Bike, for me, has only been 2-3 minutes slower than car, so I just need to get faster! It's only 3.5 miles, so it's pretty quick no matter how I go.
2) Car
3) Bike
Bike, for me, has only been 2-3 minutes slower than car, so I just need to get faster! It's only 3.5 miles, so it's pretty quick no matter how I go.
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
I have a 2 mile commute to school.
1. Bike. Between 6 and 10 minutes, depending on traffic and the wind.
2. Car. Probably 10 minutes on average. I haven't driven it in a long time. Often 8 minutes and often 15 minutes. Traffic can be especially capricious in sprawling cities.
3. Bus. I have never ridden the bus, although I'd guess I could make it in 20 minutes on a good day.
Of course, my time by bike is a sprint. If I'm in a hurry, I'll blow through the 4-way stops with no traffic. However, if any drivers can see me, I stop.
1. Bike. Between 6 and 10 minutes, depending on traffic and the wind.
2. Car. Probably 10 minutes on average. I haven't driven it in a long time. Often 8 minutes and often 15 minutes. Traffic can be especially capricious in sprawling cities.
3. Bus. I have never ridden the bus, although I'd guess I could make it in 20 minutes on a good day.
Of course, my time by bike is a sprint. If I'm in a hurry, I'll blow through the 4-way stops with no traffic. However, if any drivers can see me, I stop.
#24
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 0
From: Westwood MA (just south of Boston)
Bikes: 2009 Trek Soho
at first it wasn't, but now biking is my fastest option.
driving across the freeway (5m) + biking 12-13m (55m) = 1 hour. used to take 1:20 but a better bike and some exercise has helped :-)
driving to the train station (10) + riding the train (25m) +taking the subway = 1 hour, though there are often delays on the subway so it's usually longer.
driving in rush hour = 90m. at 6am it's only 30m, but I don't get up that early.
driving across the freeway (5m) + biking 12-13m (55m) = 1 hour. used to take 1:20 but a better bike and some exercise has helped :-)
driving to the train station (10) + riding the train (25m) +taking the subway = 1 hour, though there are often delays on the subway so it's usually longer.
driving in rush hour = 90m. at 6am it's only 30m, but I don't get up that early.
#25
You gonna eat that?
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14,917
Likes: 543
From: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS




