Slicks on MTB fast as Road bike?
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Not much really. Since narrower tires need to be pumped up a bit more to have the same rolling resistance as the wider tires, it comes out pretty much the same with each tire at it's optimal pressure. And the difference in width is not that much to begin with. For example if you vent from 1.9" width to 1.4" width you might feel some difference, but probably not for this example that you asked. Keep in mind, that also with tires narrower then 1.75", tire also shrinks considerably in it's volume, and as a result gives a much harsher ride, and needs much better roads - narrower tire can easily get stuck in things like rails, wrong side oriented manhole covers, sometimes even cracks in the road surface. Keeping all that in mind, I have opted not to run narrower tires then 1.75" on my commuter. Just something to have in mind if roads are not that good where you ride - mine sure aren't.
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times
in
38 Posts
lol, every time someone asks "what's the difference in tire speed between tire size a and tire size b", there are always inevitably two answers -
1. There's no noticeable difference
2. There's definitely a noticeable difference
I'm not kidding though. Every time. lol
There is some sort of difference in speed...no one can seem to agree whether it's truly miniscule or if it's a big deal. I know that I get passed by guys on the greenway with big fat tires on my skinny tire road bike - the fact that they bike every day means they can still kick my ass, lol.
1. There's no noticeable difference
2. There's definitely a noticeable difference
I'm not kidding though. Every time. lol
There is some sort of difference in speed...no one can seem to agree whether it's truly miniscule or if it's a big deal. I know that I get passed by guys on the greenway with big fat tires on my skinny tire road bike - the fact that they bike every day means they can still kick my ass, lol.
#78
Ridin' South Cackalacky
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
lol, every time someone asks "what's the difference in tire speed between tire size a and tire size b", there are always inevitably two answers -
1. There's no noticeable difference
2. There's definitely a noticeable difference
I'm not kidding though. Every time. lol
There is some sort of difference in speed...no one can seem to agree whether it's truly miniscule or if it's a big deal.
1. There's no noticeable difference
2. There's definitely a noticeable difference
I'm not kidding though. Every time. lol
There is some sort of difference in speed...no one can seem to agree whether it's truly miniscule or if it's a big deal.
At the extremes, the differences are bound to be noticable. Knobby softies vs. skinny 23's - that sort of thing.
The difference between a 1.5 and 1.75 slick is probably more between the ears than anything else.
At least it gives us something to prattle on about.
#79
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Roseville, mn
Posts: 31
Bikes: Trek 4300, 85 Schwinn LeTour, Schwinn Link
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I find it easier to maintain my preferred speed of 15MPH on my old Schwinn Le Tour then on my Trek MTB with slicks. when I get to work I find im less sweaty and have much more energy left.
#80
On a Mission from God
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 2,010
Bikes: '10 Surly LHT, Rat-rod Klunker, '82 Peugeot PH12 Centennial
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
I switched to 1.5's slicks my MTB, and it lets me keep up with the slower roadies on group rides (you know, the ones with hybrid bikes, knee surgeries, or weigh 100+ pounds more than me).
Plus they're blue. That has to make them better, right?
Plus they're blue. That has to make them better, right?
#81
Ridin' South Cackalacky
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
And sure, blue tires has to count for something. I mean how cool is that?
(I read somewhere that rubber is a washed out tan or grey color in its normal state. If I recall it was some asking about the light colored tires on a WWI reproduction aircraft. Carbon black is added to the blend to make tires the black we normally associate with rubber, and any other color will work as well.)
#82
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times
in
38 Posts
Aint it the truth.
At the extremes, the differences are bound to be noticable. Knobby softies vs. skinny 23's - that sort of thing.
The difference between a 1.5 and 1.75 slick is probably more between the ears than anything else.
At least it gives us something to prattle on about.
At the extremes, the differences are bound to be noticable. Knobby softies vs. skinny 23's - that sort of thing.
The difference between a 1.5 and 1.75 slick is probably more between the ears than anything else.
At least it gives us something to prattle on about.
This is all probably true - it's difficult to tell the difference between minor changes in tire size.
But put this person on a bike with 28c, then swap out the tires for 2" - they'll *definitely* be able to tell the difference.
I would personally say the line where tires on a mountain bike become to skinny to be comfortable is when you drop down below 1.5" to 1.25". But I only have a tiny bit of experience with that. On a side note, I don't have to ride really terrible roads, and I haven't had a problem with my skinny road bike tires getting caught in manhole covers, railroad tracks, or "cracks in the road surface" since I was like...8. I do keep an eye out for that stuff - you don't want to go over recessed railroad tracks and anything other than a 45 degree angle - but you know, I find since I also have to keep an eye out to make sure I just don't ride off the road, ride into a curb, or try to ride over fallen tree branches, I can somehow manage.
I wish I had some 1.5" to 1.75" tire experience, but I don't...I suspect it's a rather arbitrary decision, though again since I don't have experience I cannot say for sure.
#83
On a Mission from God
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 2,010
Bikes: '10 Surly LHT, Rat-rod Klunker, '82 Peugeot PH12 Centennial
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Glad to see you're on a bike, period. I've got no excuse, I'm not huge and I'm mostly healthy. I'm I'm not proud of always being the rear sweeper on group rides, but hey, somebody's got to do it, right?
True, rubber is naturally light brown, they add black coloring to it. And yes, blue tires on a blue bike gets lots of comments from the carbon fairies.
And sure, blue tires has to count for something. I mean how cool is that?
(I read somewhere that rubber is a washed out tan or grey color in its normal state. If I recall it was some asking about the light colored tires on a WWI reproduction aircraft. Carbon black is added to the blend to make tires the black we normally associate with rubber, and any other color will work as well.)
(I read somewhere that rubber is a washed out tan or grey color in its normal state. If I recall it was some asking about the light colored tires on a WWI reproduction aircraft. Carbon black is added to the blend to make tires the black we normally associate with rubber, and any other color will work as well.)
True, rubber is naturally light brown, they add black coloring to it. And yes, blue tires on a blue bike gets lots of comments from the carbon fairies.
#84
Ridin' South Cackalacky
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yeah, but saying the difference is "probably more between the ears than anything else" is to strong. Someone says they can't tell the difference between 28c and 32c. Then they say they can't tell the difference between 32c and 35c. They say they can't tell the difference between 1.25" and 1.5". They say they can't tell the difference between 1.5" and 1.75". They say they can't tell the difference between 1.75" and 2".
This is all probably true - it's difficult to tell the difference between minor changes in tire size.
But put this person on a bike with 28c, then swap out the tires for 2" - they'll *definitely* be able to tell the difference.
I would personally say the line where tires on a mountain bike become to skinny to be comfortable is when you drop down below 1.5" to 1.25". But I only have a tiny bit of experience with that. On a side note, I don't have to ride really terrible roads, and I haven't had a problem with my skinny road bike tires getting caught in manhole covers, railroad tracks, or "cracks in the road surface" since I was like...8. I do keep an eye out for that stuff - you don't want to go over recessed railroad tracks and anything other than a 45 degree angle - but you know, I find since I also have to keep an eye out to make sure I just don't ride off the road, ride into a curb, or try to ride over fallen tree branches, I can somehow manage.
I wish I had some 1.5" to 1.75" tire experience, but I don't...I suspect it's a rather arbitrary decision, though again since I don't have experience I cannot say for sure.
This is all probably true - it's difficult to tell the difference between minor changes in tire size.
But put this person on a bike with 28c, then swap out the tires for 2" - they'll *definitely* be able to tell the difference.
I would personally say the line where tires on a mountain bike become to skinny to be comfortable is when you drop down below 1.5" to 1.25". But I only have a tiny bit of experience with that. On a side note, I don't have to ride really terrible roads, and I haven't had a problem with my skinny road bike tires getting caught in manhole covers, railroad tracks, or "cracks in the road surface" since I was like...8. I do keep an eye out for that stuff - you don't want to go over recessed railroad tracks and anything other than a 45 degree angle - but you know, I find since I also have to keep an eye out to make sure I just don't ride off the road, ride into a curb, or try to ride over fallen tree branches, I can somehow manage.
I wish I had some 1.5" to 1.75" tire experience, but I don't...I suspect it's a rather arbitrary decision, though again since I don't have experience I cannot say for sure.
#85
On a Mission from God
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 2,010
Bikes: '10 Surly LHT, Rat-rod Klunker, '82 Peugeot PH12 Centennial
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Funny thing about blue tires, when you ride them for a while, you can easily see where the contact patch is. Even at 100PSI, my Kendas have a much bigger contact patch than I imagined. I'll have to post a pic to show you what I mean.
#86
Senior Member
I commute on several kinds of bikes, mtb, touring and an older steel road bike set up for commuting. On my commute the mtb is almost as fast as the road bike, +- 3 min for 19 miles. I find myself not slowing down on the mtb for road hazards. My ride involves dirt paths and roads, potholes, curbs, gravel and bumpy MUPs. The road bike is faster on good pavement and slower on the rough stuff.
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,599
Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 157 Times
in
75 Posts
I think there are many factors that can influence the average speed on a variety of bikes.
In my own experience and context ("race prep" training on very good quality rigid MTB with slicks vs. excellent quality road racing bike on the same loop with similar conditioning, 20-40 mile training ride distance) yields a difference of no more than 2-3 mph (20-21 mph average pace on the mountain bike, 22-24 mph average pace on the road bike). So, overall pace was about 10% faster on a racing bike from my experience.
This is in a high intensity, race training environment, with relatively steady riding (no traffic signals, etc).
So, I find that this small delta in pace becomes insignificant to nonexisistant in the commuting environment. Stop signs, traffic signals and other real world commuting realities essentially negate the small pace advantage that the road bike might have given me.
In my own experience and context ("race prep" training on very good quality rigid MTB with slicks vs. excellent quality road racing bike on the same loop with similar conditioning, 20-40 mile training ride distance) yields a difference of no more than 2-3 mph (20-21 mph average pace on the mountain bike, 22-24 mph average pace on the road bike). So, overall pace was about 10% faster on a racing bike from my experience.
This is in a high intensity, race training environment, with relatively steady riding (no traffic signals, etc).
So, I find that this small delta in pace becomes insignificant to nonexisistant in the commuting environment. Stop signs, traffic signals and other real world commuting realities essentially negate the small pace advantage that the road bike might have given me.
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Air resistance would be higher but, opposite to what most people think, rolling resistance would be lower if pressure was the same.
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,350
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4310 Post(s)
Liked 1,387 Times
in
967 Posts
FWIW runners debate the effects of aerodynamics too. Or, more specifically, the value of drafting.
Most competitive runners agree that drafting during a headwind is beneficial. There's some controversy over whether or not it's worth it when it's calm. Some feel that the cooling effect of having the air move by you is more beneficial than any small difference in air resistance. One guy who's actually quoted some studies settled on speed of 11 mph.
In other words, if you're running at 11 mph or faster in calm weather, then you're better off drafting. If you're going slower than 11 mph, the benefits are negligible.
Most competitive runners agree that drafting during a headwind is beneficial. There's some controversy over whether or not it's worth it when it's calm. Some feel that the cooling effect of having the air move by you is more beneficial than any small difference in air resistance. One guy who's actually quoted some studies settled on speed of 11 mph.
In other words, if you're running at 11 mph or faster in calm weather, then you're better off drafting. If you're going slower than 11 mph, the benefits are negligible.
This following indicates that the effort of riding at 16 mph in a less aerodynamic position would yield 18 mph on the drops (approximately).
https://www.noping.net/english/
#94
Ridin' South Cackalacky
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
And getting a new one, soon.
Carbon fairies - I love it! Im gonna use that one, if I may.
True, rubber is naturally light brown, they add black coloring to it. And yes, blue tires on a blue bike gets lots of comments from the carbon fairies.
#95
Pedal faster not harder.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 576
Bikes: Ummmm...Cannondale F4000..Ummmmm...Yeti ARC-X Cyclocross..Ummmm...Rocky Mountain Vertex TO with a BionX PL350 Electric Conversion...Ummmmm..Rocky Mountain Cardiac..Ummmm..thats it for now I think. I'd have to go look in the basement to be sure.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Last summer in August, when I had my best fitness of the season. I tested this. I have a top end hardtail mountain bike that had a MSRP of over 5 grand in 2006. Top notch world cup worthy race bike. I put on 1.5 inch slicks and went for a personal best for my commute. I did a personal best time for my commute. 2 days later I used my mid-range cyclocross bike with 35mm cross tires and did a new personal best by over 1min.
I would say wheel diameter plays a big part. The 700c wheels seem to maintain momentum better. Gearing plays a part too. The mountain bike cassette has huge gaps in gearing which works off road but sucks on road. The gear you're in is too hard and the next easier one is way too easy. I could have been faster on my mountain that day if I had a more road oriented cluster.
Yes you can still go fast on a mountain bike. I have a 44*11 top gear. A good spin and good legs, you can see 29mph plus. 16:40 to 17:40 in the first video is at 27-29mph.
Recorded for your viewing pleasure.
The mountain bike with slicks.
Cross bike with cross tires two days later.
Case closed.
I would say wheel diameter plays a big part. The 700c wheels seem to maintain momentum better. Gearing plays a part too. The mountain bike cassette has huge gaps in gearing which works off road but sucks on road. The gear you're in is too hard and the next easier one is way too easy. I could have been faster on my mountain that day if I had a more road oriented cluster.
Yes you can still go fast on a mountain bike. I have a 44*11 top gear. A good spin and good legs, you can see 29mph plus. 16:40 to 17:40 in the first video is at 27-29mph.
Recorded for your viewing pleasure.
The mountain bike with slicks.
Cross bike with cross tires two days later.
Case closed.
Last edited by LesMcLuffAlot; 07-19-10 at 09:07 PM.
#96
Ridin' South Cackalacky
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Last summer in August, when I had my best fitness of the season. I tested this. I have a top end hardtail mountain bike that had a MSRP of over 5 grand in 2006. Top notch world cup worthy race bike. I put on 1.5 inch slicks and went for a personal best for my commute. I did a personal best time for my commute. 2 days later I used my mid-range cyclocross bike with 35mm cross tires and did a new personal best by over 1min.
I would say wheel diameter plays a big part. The 700c wheels seem to maintain momentum better. Gearing plays a part too. The mountain bike cassette has huge gaps in gearing which works off road but sucks on road. The gear you're in is too hard and the next easier one is way too easy. I could have been faster on my mountain that day if I had a more road oriented cluster.
Yes you can still go fast on a mountain bike. I have a 44*11 top gear. A good spin and good legs, you can see 29mph plus. 16:40 to 17:40 in the first video is at 27-29mph.
Recorded for your viewing pleasure.
The mountain bike with slicks.
Cross bike with cross tires two days later.
Case closed.
I would say wheel diameter plays a big part. The 700c wheels seem to maintain momentum better. Gearing plays a part too. The mountain bike cassette has huge gaps in gearing which works off road but sucks on road. The gear you're in is too hard and the next easier one is way too easy. I could have been faster on my mountain that day if I had a more road oriented cluster.
Yes you can still go fast on a mountain bike. I have a 44*11 top gear. A good spin and good legs, you can see 29mph plus. 16:40 to 17:40 in the first video is at 27-29mph.
Recorded for your viewing pleasure.
The mountain bike with slicks.
Cross bike with cross tires two days later.
Case closed.
But you need to trim the weeds around your driveway. You can do that when you get back.
Thanks!
#97
master of bottom licks
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lou-evil, Canned-Yucky USA
Posts: 2,210
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
My Huffy MTB now has a 52T chainring because a 48T was limiting... granted that was while drafting or with a tail-wind but nevertheless those sprints for a speed rush are now more exhilarating. Also my MTB bars are level with my saddle height so I can tuck pretty well when I need to by holding the bars closer towards the stem and letting my elbows drop as though I were doing chin-ups.
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Has anyone mentioned this?
https://pfunwithpflug.blogspot.com/20...unon-road.html
A flat bar 29er came in third in a serious amateur road race with the help of the gravel roads that made a third of the route.
https://pfunwithpflug.blogspot.com/20...unon-road.html
A flat bar 29er came in third in a serious amateur road race with the help of the gravel roads that made a third of the route.
#99
South Denver Commuter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 319
Bikes: 2003 Spec. Epic, 200ish Bianchi Milano
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nope. Frontal area of the Mt. Bike with rider is simply higher than the roadie and rider.