Clipless Pedals
#1
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Clipless Pedals
Hi
I'm new to commuting and wondering what the benefits/disadvantages of Clipless pedals are?
I'm quite fit and do around a 14 mile round trip in London down the Old Kent Road each day. I currently have a Canondale Bad Boy fatty. Can any one recommend any pedals and what the advantages are of expensive compared to cheap clipless pedals.
Thanks in advance.
I'm new to commuting and wondering what the benefits/disadvantages of Clipless pedals are?
I'm quite fit and do around a 14 mile round trip in London down the Old Kent Road each day. I currently have a Canondale Bad Boy fatty. Can any one recommend any pedals and what the advantages are of expensive compared to cheap clipless pedals.
Thanks in advance.
#3
You gonna eat that?
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14,917
Likes: 543
From: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
#5
#6
born again cyclist
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 88
From: Chicago
Bikes: I have five of brikes
according to the many know it all geniuses of this forum, clipless pedals will either:
A. automatically transform you into the next tour de france champion.
or
B. do absolutely nothing at all, and you're monumentally stupid if you use them.
A. automatically transform you into the next tour de france champion.
or
B. do absolutely nothing at all, and you're monumentally stupid if you use them.
#7
Conservative Hippie
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 0
From: Wakulla Co. FL
Try different things and see what you like. What you like is all that matters.
I went from toe clips, to clipless, to clipless on one bike, toe clips on another, platforms on a third. Then I tried PowerGrips. Now all my bikes have PowerGrips.
I went from toe clips, to clipless, to clipless on one bike, toe clips on another, platforms on a third. Then I tried PowerGrips. Now all my bikes have PowerGrips.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 0
From: Los Alamos, NM
Bikes: Fuji Cross Comp, BMC SR02, Surly Krampas
All to your preference. I have been using them for a while, and honestly don't feel comfortable riding any other way now. My preference is clipless. But no reason yours has to be unless it is.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
Bikes: 2007 Giant Cypress DX, Windsor Tourist 2011
The two main advantages that I've noticed with clipless pedals is that obviously they will not slip off in rainy weather or right after walking over wet lawn, and number 2, they make it slightly easier to climb because your feet are 'welded' to the pedals so there is less wasted motion.
Downsides are that you will probably hit the deck while adjusting to them (everyone does), and in 'stop and go' city traffic it is harder to put a foot down than with platform pedals. Another downside is that going clipless is a fairly expensive route compared to buying a set of platform pedals.
I made the move to clipless a few years ago, and honestly my opinion is that for commuting they should be considered more of a luxury thing. Not a lot of 'bang for the buck' there, honestly. If you are racing or riding competitively, in that case you will be on the road for hours at a time and any small gain in efficiency is going to be worthwhile, but for commuting distances, not so much.
Downsides are that you will probably hit the deck while adjusting to them (everyone does), and in 'stop and go' city traffic it is harder to put a foot down than with platform pedals. Another downside is that going clipless is a fairly expensive route compared to buying a set of platform pedals.
I made the move to clipless a few years ago, and honestly my opinion is that for commuting they should be considered more of a luxury thing. Not a lot of 'bang for the buck' there, honestly. If you are racing or riding competitively, in that case you will be on the road for hours at a time and any small gain in efficiency is going to be worthwhile, but for commuting distances, not so much.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,571
Likes: 16
From: Oxnard, CA
Bikes: 2009 Fuji Roubaix RC; 2011 Fuji Cross 2.0; '92 Diamond Back Ascent EX
Shimano M520s (SPD) work well for commuting, are reasonably priced and easy to get used to. There are many types of shoes that work with SPD so you can go MTB style (easier to walk in) or road style (tend to be a bit stiffer and lighter but not as easy to walk).
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Palmer, Alaska
I'm riding A520s because I often can't (or don't want to) wear bike shoes. I like having clipless pedals on very long rides, as it makes me a more efficient rider. Around town, I like being able to wear normal shoes.
Often, the difference between very expensive and "cheap" clipless pedals is weight. Look at the Crank Brothers line-up and you will see 2, 3, sometimes 5 different pedals that are all essentially the same, but go up in cost and down in weight. Unless you are racing competitively, you can get by with clipless pedals that weigh a bit more. But still expect to spend $50-100. It's difficult to find anything under that price range that is worth owning.
Often, the difference between very expensive and "cheap" clipless pedals is weight. Look at the Crank Brothers line-up and you will see 2, 3, sometimes 5 different pedals that are all essentially the same, but go up in cost and down in weight. Unless you are racing competitively, you can get by with clipless pedals that weigh a bit more. But still expect to spend $50-100. It's difficult to find anything under that price range that is worth owning.
#13
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 960
Likes: 80
For road riding/commuting, I prefer SPD clipless pedals. For MTB I prefer Crank Bros. egg-beaters. I hate toe clips. Platform pedals are OK, but you give up the pull stroke if you want/need it.
There are two major muscle groups in your thigh: quadriceps and hamstring. When pushing on the pedals, one typically mostly engages the quadriceps. Equally powerful, however, are the hamstrings. If you have platform pedals, you cannot use your hamstring muscles. Using your hamstrings would give your quadriceps a break and you'd be able to pedal faster/farther/longer. I personally prefer this option.
The downside to clips are: 1- there's a learning curve 2- you have to have clipless specific shoes, and 3- (from my experience, though I haven't ever seen others write about it), the upward pull by the hamstrings tends to put additional weight on the saddle. This can cause backside-saddle interaction issues (ie, greater chance for saddle sore, numbness, soreness, etc, unless you have a properly fitting/adjusted saddle).
There are two major muscle groups in your thigh: quadriceps and hamstring. When pushing on the pedals, one typically mostly engages the quadriceps. Equally powerful, however, are the hamstrings. If you have platform pedals, you cannot use your hamstring muscles. Using your hamstrings would give your quadriceps a break and you'd be able to pedal faster/farther/longer. I personally prefer this option.
The downside to clips are: 1- there's a learning curve 2- you have to have clipless specific shoes, and 3- (from my experience, though I haven't ever seen others write about it), the upward pull by the hamstrings tends to put additional weight on the saddle. This can cause backside-saddle interaction issues (ie, greater chance for saddle sore, numbness, soreness, etc, unless you have a properly fitting/adjusted saddle).
#14
^^^ +1 to what hopperja says.
I'm happy with my 520 pedals. They came with my road bike so I had to learn how to use them. I had never used STI/brifters before so learning how to shift and use clipless pedals was a bit of a challenge. I have NO regrets and no plans to change to road pedals. 520s are cheap and you can walk around in shoes. You can get inexpensive canvas-like shoes or spend mucho $$$ getting light carbony shoes. If you have multiple bikes, replacing pedals on all bikes can cost an arm and a leg.
I did a test ride on a couple of bikes last weekend and I didn't bring my pedals. I realized how much I like my clipless pedals. I went over a bump in the road and my foot came off the pedal. Weirded me out.
I you do lots of stopping and starting, you might find toe clips to be an acceptable compromise. I'm fine commuting with clipless pedals.
YMMV
I'm happy with my 520 pedals. They came with my road bike so I had to learn how to use them. I had never used STI/brifters before so learning how to shift and use clipless pedals was a bit of a challenge. I have NO regrets and no plans to change to road pedals. 520s are cheap and you can walk around in shoes. You can get inexpensive canvas-like shoes or spend mucho $$$ getting light carbony shoes. If you have multiple bikes, replacing pedals on all bikes can cost an arm and a leg.
I did a test ride on a couple of bikes last weekend and I didn't bring my pedals. I realized how much I like my clipless pedals. I went over a bump in the road and my foot came off the pedal. Weirded me out.
I you do lots of stopping and starting, you might find toe clips to be an acceptable compromise. I'm fine commuting with clipless pedals.
YMMV
#16
Ride On.
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Bikes: 2010 Trek 1.5, 2010 Specialized Langster, 2010 Specialized Hardrock Sport 29er, 2011 Gary Fisher HiFi Plus 29er
I run three different options. I have road pedals on the 1.5, SPD's on the HiFi, and platforms on the Hardrock. My fixie had powergrips before I sold it (still kept the pedals). I am debating on using powergrips or plain platforms on the Transport. I'll decide after riding it some when it comes in.
I like a commuter to be flexible enough to wear normal shoes. Typically I run PowerGrips or platforms on it. As for the road and MTB, I like maximum power transfer, so I go with clipless on those.
At least with the SPD's, you can wear a good touring shoe and be able to walk normally without a bunch of "clicking", all while still maintaining a more normal shoe look.
I like a commuter to be flexible enough to wear normal shoes. Typically I run PowerGrips or platforms on it. As for the road and MTB, I like maximum power transfer, so I go with clipless on those.
At least with the SPD's, you can wear a good touring shoe and be able to walk normally without a bunch of "clicking", all while still maintaining a more normal shoe look.
#18
Like the use of helmets, this can be a polarizing subject here at bike forums.
The bottom line is take it all in and figure out what works for YOU.
I have three primary bikes - mountain, road & commuting. On my road & commuting I use SPD pedals and they share the same pair of shoes. M520 on my road bike and PD a530 dual sided pedals on my commuter.
Works for me.
The bottom line is take it all in and figure out what works for YOU.
I have three primary bikes - mountain, road & commuting. On my road & commuting I use SPD pedals and they share the same pair of shoes. M520 on my road bike and PD a530 dual sided pedals on my commuter.
Works for me.
#19
Support JDRF
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 925
Likes: 3
From: Arkansas
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus, Specialized Roubaix Elite
I use them on my road bike and commuter. The main reason is with platforms I don't hold my foot straight and my knee ends up hurting. With clipless it locks my foot in position and eliminates the knee problems. Other than that, some days I still swap over to platforms just so I don't have to have an extra pair of shoes.
#20
Slowpoke
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Near Boulder Colorado
Bikes: old Stumpjumper, Riv Simple One, Riv Cheviot
MKS Touring pedals with no retention, or the MKS Lambda (Rivendell Grip King). I wear running shoes mostly (that have retired from running duty) (I also run) or Tevas. I'm happy. A lot of people love clipless retention also. Lots of things work fine.
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore, MD
Bikes: 2010 GT Tachyon 3.0
I made the move to clipless a few years ago, and honestly my opinion is that for commuting they should be considered more of a luxury thing. Not a lot of 'bang for the buck' there, honestly. If you are racing or riding competitively, in that case you will be on the road for hours at a time and any small gain in efficiency is going to be worthwhile, but for commuting distances, not so much.
I won't go over 10mph on platforms. In stop-and-go traffic it's hard to 'go' when you're not clipped in; the sudden connection gives all you need to throw down every watt of power you can find without worry.
#22
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore, MD
Bikes: 2010 GT Tachyon 3.0
You'll hear this argument a lot. Magically, less load on one pedal, but your legs aren't doing any lifting. It doesn't work that way; energy comes from somewhere. Pedal power meters aren't made to measure lifting force; power meters belong in the rear wheel.
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
Bikes: 2007 Giant Cypress DX, Windsor Tourist 2011
Here's a quick article on the subject: https://www.roadcycling.com/training/...echnique.shtml
#24
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,267
Likes: 7
From: NA
Bikes: NA
The main reason is with platforms I don't hold my foot straight and my knee ends up hurting. With clipless it locks my foot in position and eliminates the knee problems
My knee pain disappeared when I switched to clipless.




