Why have a winter bike?
#76
Banned
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,804
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Bikes: Raleigh Grand Prix, Giant Innova, Nishiki Sebring, Trek 7.5FX
I should probably clarify my position since it's been a long thread. I have no trouble with the idea of somebody getting a 2nd bike for winter especially since that's what in fact I have done myself.
I do question the idea that a dedicated bike commuter needs to keep a spare bike around "just in case". I think most of us could manage without a bike the one or two days each year that their bike might out of commission for whatever reason.
To take it a step further, I personally would prefer owning single a bike that was equally well suited for the things I use two bikes for now. I have a monthly "bike budget" and since I put a fair amount of miles on both bikes, I have two bikes worth of upkeep rather than one. I have two sets of fenders, I have two sets of lights, two sets of tools, two pumps, two sets of spare tubes, two patch kits, etc. If I only had one bike, I'd go through consumables for that bike quicker, but it would be much easier keeping spare parts and I'd have more money for the things I'd rather spend money on.
The two bikes I have are intended for very different purposes and I doubt there is a single bike that could do what both of these do equally as well.
So I have two bikes.
I do question the idea that a dedicated bike commuter needs to keep a spare bike around "just in case". I think most of us could manage without a bike the one or two days each year that their bike might out of commission for whatever reason.
To take it a step further, I personally would prefer owning single a bike that was equally well suited for the things I use two bikes for now. I have a monthly "bike budget" and since I put a fair amount of miles on both bikes, I have two bikes worth of upkeep rather than one. I have two sets of fenders, I have two sets of lights, two sets of tools, two pumps, two sets of spare tubes, two patch kits, etc. If I only had one bike, I'd go through consumables for that bike quicker, but it would be much easier keeping spare parts and I'd have more money for the things I'd rather spend money on.
The two bikes I have are intended for very different purposes and I doubt there is a single bike that could do what both of these do equally as well.
So I have two bikes.
Just because a guy's Surly LHT is outfitted for touring doesn't mean he can't substitute his broken down Diamondback Insight Commuter with it, when the time deems it necessary.
OMG guys, I think we're splitting hairs here. There's not one bloody one of us who would not want an extra bike of value, if we had the storage space for it. Most us here, reverently observe the N+1 rule, without question.
So, let's just stop it!
Especially you, TJ!
Last edited by SlimRider; 05-23-12 at 03:06 PM.
#77
Sure, but he has a point regarding new or prospective bike commuters. Fenders, panniers, lights, special clothes, all kinds of tools, spare bikes, none of that is necessary to start commuting. Just get a patch kit and air, jump on the bike and go.
#78
Banned
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,804
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Bikes: Raleigh Grand Prix, Giant Innova, Nishiki Sebring, Trek 7.5FX
Newbie commuters need to expect to acquire these things, sometime down the road. Hopefully, more sooner than later! Now admittedly, some folks will never need rack and panniers, so those commuters will kindly omit those things from the list. Some folks work in factories and mills. It won't matter to them that much, if they've splashed through a few puddles while cycling to work. For them, fenders are a futile concern.
However, practically everything else is a commuter requirement, if the commuter is being truly efficient...
Last edited by SlimRider; 05-23-12 at 01:56 PM.
#79
Might want to bring along a set of tire levers if you plan to fix a flat.
#80
No. Those things aren't really necessary to get started. However, once they do start, they had better begin to acquire the necessary tools to keep rolling, or else they're going to be in trouble. That statement becomes increasingly important with commute distance. They are going to need patch kits, tire levers, pumps, Park tools, etc..If getting to work neat and clean is important, fenders will also play a significant role in their commute. If they are carring a laptop, books, lunch, and such, a rack with panniers might come in handy, too!
It's also important as newbie commuters, for them to expect to acquire these things, sometime down the road. Hopefully, more sooner than later! Now admittedly, some folks will never need rack and panniers, so those commuters will kindly omit those things from the list. Some folks work in factories and mills. It won't matter to them that much, if they've splashed through a few puddles while cycling to work. For them, fenders are a futile concern.
However, practically everything else is a commuter requirement, if the commuter is being truly efficient...
It's also important as newbie commuters, for them to expect to acquire these things, sometime down the road. Hopefully, more sooner than later! Now admittedly, some folks will never need rack and panniers, so those commuters will kindly omit those things from the list. Some folks work in factories and mills. It won't matter to them that much, if they've splashed through a few puddles while cycling to work. For them, fenders are a futile concern.
However, practically everything else is a commuter requirement, if the commuter is being truly efficient...
That being said, my guess is that maybe 50% of the people who commute to my office would bother to change a flat if they got one on the way to work. Their backup is a cell phone. And you know what? That's OK.
As many times as I show my wife how to change a flat, she wouldn't do it unless she had no other option. She goes to work early and she'd have no problem waking me from a nice to slumber to go rescue her. Or if she was close enough to work or home, she'd just walk.
Same with my 12 year old son. He bikes to school. Theoretically at least he could change a flat, but if he got one, he'd call me or my wife. That does remind me though. I should have him change one again just to prove to me, and more importantly to him, that he can do it.
Oh, and I think it's a good idea to carry a spare tube even if you wouldn't change it yourself. Maybe a good samaritan would come along and change it for you.
Last edited by tjspiel; 05-23-12 at 02:05 PM.
#81
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Bikes: Gunnar Crosshairs, Giant Trance, Felt Breed, Marin SS MTB, Felt Pyre BMX bike, oldschool GT trials bike
Your still not out of a ride though, just use the limit screws to set the derailer in a suitable gear and the bike is still very ride-able until the new part shows. You even have a 2 or 3 speed if you have a double or triple up front.
#82
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Henderson/Las Vegas NV
Bikes: Giant Defy 2
most of the people i know who are car free have a backup bike as should one bike be put out of commission, they won't be put out by having to use alternate transportation.
I could crash one bike a day for several weeks and still be okay to ride if i was not a broken and bloody mess.
I could crash one bike a day for several weeks and still be okay to ride if i was not a broken and bloody mess.
#83
Mostly harmless ™
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 243
From: Novi Sad
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
#84
Giftless Amateur

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,317
Likes: 843
From: MD / metro DC
Bikes: Cross-Check/Nexus commuter. Several others for various forms of play.
I just spent two painful hours in a work meeting trying hard to distinguish between requirements and desirements in a fiscally constrained effort. And then I made the mistake of popping open this thread. 
We seemed to have drifted from the winter bike to the backup bike. I think it's reasonable to the point of essential to have a Plan B. For one person, Plan B might be to be a few minutes late. For another, perhaps that means having a Trek Madone on strip alert to mitigate the few minutes of delay incurred switching to Plan B when A became untenable. Players' choice.
Maybe there's a strong argument to made that you don't just want a winter bike, you absolutely need not one, but TWO winter bikes. Just in case. On an icy day.

We seemed to have drifted from the winter bike to the backup bike. I think it's reasonable to the point of essential to have a Plan B. For one person, Plan B might be to be a few minutes late. For another, perhaps that means having a Trek Madone on strip alert to mitigate the few minutes of delay incurred switching to Plan B when A became untenable. Players' choice.
Maybe there's a strong argument to made that you don't just want a winter bike, you absolutely need not one, but TWO winter bikes. Just in case. On an icy day.
#85
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Bikes: Gunnar Crosshairs, Giant Trance, Felt Breed, Marin SS MTB, Felt Pyre BMX bike, oldschool GT trials bike
That is true in that PARTICULAR case. There are breakdowns that make bike not rideable and if you can't find parts quickly, or at least not at a decent price, a backup bike comes in very handy. You can SURVIVE without a backup bike, but it is a very, very, very useful thing to have and doesn't cost much. Just like a second pair of jeans. 

Even a crash that would bend the hell out of a wheel can usually be beat on the ground enough to clear the frame and bikeshops will always have wheels around, freehub fails you can use zip ties to tie the cassette to the spokes and make a fixie (just remember not to try and coast), bend a fork and you can usually force it back enough to limp home, etc. There really is very little that will hurt a bike so bad you can not limp it along. Those things are so rare that they are in no way enough to call them justification to tell other cyclist the NEED a second bike, second bikes are NICE but in no way a NEED. I do not mean to rant but one of my big pet peeves is people confusing the words need and want.
#86
Banned
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,804
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Bikes: Raleigh Grand Prix, Giant Innova, Nishiki Sebring, Trek 7.5FX
[QUOTE=tjspiel;14262827]
A daily cycling commuter will eventually have the need to know how to use Park tools, as well. After many years of commuting, hundreds of dollars could be saved. Possessing a set of Park tools at home can only improve one's efficiency and wealth.
If your back up plan is a cell phone, then I'd say you are at a distinct disadvantage. As such, you will be held at the mercy of your LBS, forever...
You must constantly prove your endless love and devotion! 
He was sent to you as both a gift and a test from God! 
Now that's a stellar idea! I couldn't agree more!
There's no point in carrying a chain breaker or even a multi-tool if you don't know how to use one. I personally think that being able to change a tire is a really-really good to have skill if you're going to be a commuter.
That being said, my guess is that maybe 50% of the people who commute to my office would bother to change a flat if they got one on the way to work. Their backup is a cell phone. And you know what? That's OK.
As many times as I show my wife how to change a flat, she wouldn't do it unless she had no other option. She goes to work early and she'd have no problem waking me from a nice to slumber to go rescue her. Or if she was close enough to work or home, she'd just walk.

Same with my 12 year old son. He bikes to school. Theoretically at least he could change a flat, but if he got one, he'd call me or my wife. That does remind me though. I should have him change one again just to prove to me, and more importantly to him, that he can do it.

Oh, and I think it's a good idea to carry a spare tube even if you wouldn't change it yourself. Maybe a good samaritan would come along and change it for you.
#88
I classify my rides a bit differently. I have an "A" bike for perfect weather conditions during the non winter months. I have a "B" bike for good winter weather conditions as by that time the "A" bike is in the trainer in the basement. Then there is the "C" bike which is used for foul weather days, usually during the winter, which in my neck of the woods are not as common as you would think. As for the really, really lousy days I take the Passat!!
#90
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes: 2014 Specialized Dolce Triple, 1987 Schwinn Tempo, 2012 Windsor Kensington 8
Oh man, I want a Pugsley/Moonlander so bad. I live in the middle of the sand dunes that inspired Frank Herbert, it's a crime that the LBS doesn't carry fatbikes.
#91
Would not limit it's use to winter as they are a great trail bike and the extra cush in those tyres is good for my back and they roll out much faster than one would think as the rolling resistance on those fatties is extremely low.
If I told you the price I will paying for the bike I am looking at and will most likely buy, you might want to hurt me.
#92
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes: 2014 Specialized Dolce Triple, 1987 Schwinn Tempo, 2012 Windsor Kensington 8
Some of the videos people have posted of them on youtube are amazing - one of them the Pugsley was keeping pace with a horse in a collected canter on some tide flats.
#93
I have a winter bike that is sort of working out as planned. It is a mountain bike like the main commuter, and the plan is that in November I install studded tires and begin riding it when it snows. Then, in April, I put back the regular tires and use it as a backup. That use pattern is handy in Minnesota because in recent years the snow has not been reliable. Sometimes the roads are bare, sometimes covered with packed snow. I can switch bikes as needed. My "backup" for mechanical failure is that my six-mile route to work passes a bike shop, on a bus route, at about mile 2.5. I am officially able to fix a flat, but I struggle with it, and am pleased to spend money at the bike shop because a bike repair is so much cheaper than a car repair.
#94
Mostly harmless ™
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 243
From: Novi Sad
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
#95
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 871
Likes: 115
From: Minnesota
Bikes: Cannondale '92 T600 '95 H600 '01 RT1000
Good grief. This discussion is STILL going on? The OP probably has his winter bike built up and is working on a spare one. :-) Meanwhile, the rest of us probably have a couple hundred miles added to our stats. In the words of Freddie Mercury, "Get on your bikes and ride!" Oh wait... Did he mean "bikes" as in summer and winter....?
#96
Banned
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,804
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Bikes: Raleigh Grand Prix, Giant Innova, Nishiki Sebring, Trek 7.5FX
The point I am trying to make is that those things are extremely rare and chances are if you have some decent mechanical skills you can get by till parts show up. Those cases are so rare that it is in no way common enough to tell people they MUST have a back up bike if they want to commute, that is a very quick way to turn people off from commuting.
Even a crash that would bend the hell out of a wheel can usually be beat on the ground enough to clear the frame and bikeshops will always have wheels around, freehub fails you can use zip ties to tie the cassette to the spokes and make a fixie (just remember not to try and coast), bend a fork and you can usually force it back enough to limp home, etc. There really is very little that will hurt a bike so bad you can not limp it along. Those things are so rare that they are in no way enough to call them justification to tell other cyclist the NEED a second bike, second bikes are NICE but in no way a NEED. I do not mean to rant but one of my big pet peeves is people confusing the words need and want.
Even a crash that would bend the hell out of a wheel can usually be beat on the ground enough to clear the frame and bikeshops will always have wheels around, freehub fails you can use zip ties to tie the cassette to the spokes and make a fixie (just remember not to try and coast), bend a fork and you can usually force it back enough to limp home, etc. There really is very little that will hurt a bike so bad you can not limp it along. Those things are so rare that they are in no way enough to call them justification to tell other cyclist the NEED a second bike, second bikes are NICE but in no way a NEED. I do not mean to rant but one of my big pet peeves is people confusing the words need and want.
There's one problem with your argument here, Nubcake. Eventually, that limp-a-long bike, is gonna have to get fixed. It can't just limp along forever. According the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, with increase in time the universe experiences greater entropy. That's why everything deteriorates, given time. The more time, the more chaos!
Ya gotta take the time to apply the energy, and work to get your mechanical system, called the bike, to operate according to expectations.
That's why you NEED a spare bike...Just in such a case!
PS.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics demands that the N+1 Rule be obeyed without question!
Last edited by SlimRider; 05-25-12 at 08:24 AM.
#97
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Bikes: Gunnar Crosshairs, Giant Trance, Felt Breed, Marin SS MTB, Felt Pyre BMX bike, oldschool GT trials bike
There's one problem with your argument here, Nubcake. Eventually, that limp-a-long bike, is gonna have to get fixed. It can't just limp along forever. According the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, with increase in time the universe experiences greater entropy. That's why everything deteriorates, given time. The more time, the more chaos!
Ya gotta take the time to apply the energy, and work to get your mechanical system, called the bike, to operate according to expectations.
That's why you NEED a spare bike...Just in such a case!
PS.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics demands that the N+1 Rule be obeyed without question!
Ya gotta take the time to apply the energy, and work to get your mechanical system, called the bike, to operate according to expectations.
That's why you NEED a spare bike...Just in such a case!
PS.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics demands that the N+1 Rule be obeyed without question!

Even if you do completely trash a wheel or a part that is un-available right away to where you can not keep the bike going you can try scavenging or just walk/take public transit, a cab for a couple days, etc.
You can justify your 2nd (3rd, 4th, 5th, however many you want) bikes however you would like to yourself but telling new commuters the NEED a second bike is only going to discourage many would be commuters. I promise you if I tried telling a customer who came into the shop they need 2 bikes if they want to commute they would either go to another shop or give up the idea of commuting entirely. Hell this isn't even the car free section so take your car for a day or two if you trash the bike beyond repair (again, extremely rare if you keep up with repairs) Although I am liking the creativity in your way of justifying multiple bikes SlimRider
#98
Banned
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,804
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Bikes: Raleigh Grand Prix, Giant Innova, Nishiki Sebring, Trek 7.5FX
The idea is to limp it along until parts show up, not use band-aid fixes for permanent repairs 
Even if you do completely trash a wheel or a part that is un-available right away to where you can not keep the bike going you can try scavenging or just walk/take public transit, a cab for a couple days, etc.
You can justify your 2nd (3rd, 4th, 5th, however many you want) bikes however you would like to yourself but telling new commuters the NEED a second bike is only going to discourage many would be commuters. I promise you if I tried telling a customer who came into the shop they need 2 bikes if they want to commute they would either go to another shop or give up the idea of commuting entirely. Hell this isn't even the car free section so take your car for a day or two if you trash the bike beyond repair (again, extremely rare if you keep up with repairs) Although I am liking the creativity in your way of justifying multiple bikes SlimRider
Even if you do completely trash a wheel or a part that is un-available right away to where you can not keep the bike going you can try scavenging or just walk/take public transit, a cab for a couple days, etc.
You can justify your 2nd (3rd, 4th, 5th, however many you want) bikes however you would like to yourself but telling new commuters the NEED a second bike is only going to discourage many would be commuters. I promise you if I tried telling a customer who came into the shop they need 2 bikes if they want to commute they would either go to another shop or give up the idea of commuting entirely. Hell this isn't even the car free section so take your car for a day or two if you trash the bike beyond repair (again, extremely rare if you keep up with repairs) Although I am liking the creativity in your way of justifying multiple bikes SlimRider
Quite frankly, I think it's a good idea for newbies to approach commuting with the idea that they're gonna need their main commuter steed and a possible beater for a spare. They don't have to focus on the beater, spare, or N+1 project, immediately. However, it's quite a healthy idea, just to keep that extra bike, on the back burner of their minds.
Even two beaters are better than just one!
PS.
'Tis better to have and not need, than to need and not have...
Last edited by SlimRider; 05-25-12 at 08:55 AM.
#99
My winter bike:
Fixed gear to avoid problems with frozen pawls/derailleurs.
Flat bars to accommodate poggies for hand warmth in bitter cold.
Studded tires.
Fenders.
Toe cages to accommodate boots for foot warmth in bitter cold.
Rack with large panniers to hold extra winter stuff.
It's not a beater, but it is a dedicated winter bike. Works for me.



